The Brief

The Los Angeles Department of Transportation has a new general manager.

Laura Rubio-Cornejo, who previously served as Pasadena's transportation director, will oversee 52 transportation services and projects, including the Vision Zero initiative that aims to reduce traffic related deaths.

Susanne Whatley, who hosts LAist 89.3's a.m. news show Morning Edition, spoke with Rubio-Cornejo about what's ahead for transportation in Los Angeles. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Top priorities

LAist: Talk about your top priorities as L.A.'s new transportation general manager.

Rubio-Cornejo: My top priority would be ensuring that our streets are safe for all Angelenos, but particularly for the most vulnerable amongst us. Ensuring that whether you're a child, you're an elderly person, that you can walk out your front door and that is safe, and that is inviting.

LAist: And that's quite a challenge for a city that was pretty much constructed, at least in modern times, on the automobile. Back in 2015 is when the city approved Vision Zero, and it was called a commitment to eliminate traffic deaths by the year 2025. And yet we're seeing the numbers actually increased since then. It's up, my understanding is, nearly 70% percent in this past year compared to when Vision Zero was adopted. Talk about what's behind this increase and how you plan to make L.A. streets safer.

RC: The trend is one that we're seeing not just in Los Angeles, not just statewide, but nationwide. And it's a very disturbing trend that despite efforts to make our streets safer, despite ongoing infrastructure that LADOT and the City of Los Angeles has been implementing, we continue to see an increase in fatalities, particularly amongst pedestrians. But what we know is that where there is safe street infrastructure — it is effective. And so this isn't a time to scale back. This isn't a time to throw our hands up and say this isn't working. We know it is working. And so we need to continue to address safe streets.

We need to continue to implement safe street infrastructure and we need to do that one street at a time, one community at a time.

What it will take to make streets safer

LAist: What specific steps do make a difference in making the streets safer?

RC: When we have streets that acknowledge that they're intended to be for all modes. We have a very good example with Avalon Boulevard, where we were able to reallocate road space and make that a multimodal street. We saw a reduction in speeds there. We saw pedestrian amenities be more inviting for that mode. And so that's just one example. Bicycle infrastructure isn't just about allocating road space for the bicyclist. It's about also traffic calming. It's about providing some additional protections for the pedestrian. And really, when we plan our streets, when we design them, in consideration that the streets really are intended to be shared. By all modes, that really makes the greatest impact.

Where does Vision Zero stand?

Map of L.A.'s High-Injury Network (HIN). Just 6% of city streets account for 70% of deaths and severe injuries for people walking.

(

Courtesy City of L.A.

)

LAist: On the city's Vision Zero website, the most recent progress report was from about six years ago in 2017, just a couple years into the program. When do you anticipate another update for the public on where things are with the Vision Zero goal?

RC: We just provided an update to our city council this last summer. We do anticipate a more comprehensive update report coming out of the city's CAO office in a couple of months, if not sooner. And so that will really be a full view of the program, its effectiveness, and some recommendations on how to proceed.

How to get involved

LAist: If people in L.A. want to get involved in supporting Vision Zero, how can they do that?

RC: They can participate, be active participants when we do have meetings. They can coordinate with our community engagement team here with LADOT. They can work directly with their council offices. I would say the best way is when we do have a project and we have a community meeting, attend speak out, share with us what your concerns are, your preferences. That's what we're there to gather. Making sure that whatever infrastructure we move forward with, really reflects the priorities of that community.

What's next for transportation is L.A.?

LAist: Moving ahead, what have been the biggest changes involving transportation in Los Angeles in recent years, and are there any major projects that you'd like to highlight for our listeners?

RC: You know, we've had the ability to implement over 20 miles of bus only lanes. We're really excited about our Safe Routes to School programs where we're advancing safety at the nearby schools. Those are just two of the ways that we're really working on advancing safety at a more local level.

LAist: Governor Newsom just signed hundreds of bills into law over the past month or so after the end of the legislative session. And I'm wondering if there are any new laws Angeleno's in particular should keep in mind when it comes to driving or street safety or just transportation in general.

RC: One in particular that the City of Los Angeles really participated in advancing to the governor's desk is AB645 sponsored by Assemblymember Friedman that allows for us to be able to detect speeding and enforcement of speeding. And so that's one that we'll be working really closely over the next several years with our fellow departments on implementing and reporting back out to the state on its effectiveness.

LAist: Is that the speed camera law?

RC: It is. And I think what's really important about that law is it allows us to enforce speeds in a way that's consistent, in a way that is accountable. So really looking forward to having that implemented.

LAist: And that encompasses city of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Glendale, where Laura Friedman is from, in addition to three cities up north. How long is this going to be a pilot program and what method is going to be used to evaluate whether that works or not?

RC: I believe we have to report back a couple of years into the program being in effect. Five years or so is my understanding. There are a couple of metrics we have to report back on to the state, and so we'll be making sure that we're tracking that in house and reporting out to the state as well as to our fellow cities, working with our other cities that are part of that legislation to ensure that the application is consistent across the board.

LAist: Anything else that you'd like to add?

RC: I would just like to reinforce the department's commitment to safe streets. It is really important that individuals at Angelenos, whether you're a resident, you're visiting, that you feel safe walking down our streets, that you be mindful as you're driving that we are sharing the same road space. There's a strong commitment here to make sure that the streets really do reflect that they are intended to be for people.

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

HP Communications, Inc., whose subcontractor struck a 16-inch underground petroleum pipeline in East L.A. last month, said the pipeline operator failed to properly mark the line’s location before the excavation work began.

The May 22 rupture sent an estimated 2,400 gallons of crude oil onto nearby streets and into storm drains, and drew a large-scale response and cleanup. 

In a June 1 statement, the HP Communications said its internal review found that “no markings identifying the pipeline were observed within the delineated work area” where construction was allowed. 

The pipeline is operated by Pacific Pipeline System, which since 2006 has been owned by Plains All American Pipeline.

A Pacific Pipeline System spokesperson released a statement to Boyle Heights Beat noting that the company does not comment on ongoing investigations.

“The cause of the incident remains under investigation by appropriate regulators and governmental authorities,” the statement read. “Pacific Pipeline System continues to focus on response and remediation efforts while cooperating fully with investigators as they work to complete their review.”

HP Communications, in its statement, alleged the pipeline operator incorrectly indicated through the DigAlert system, a notification center that discloses underground facility locations for planned excavation, that the pipeline had been “marked completely and accurately.”

“The purpose of California’s USA/DigAlert system is to help prevent precisely these types of incidents by ensuring that underground facility operators identify and mark the locations of their facilities before excavation or construction activities begin,” the statement read. 

“Construction activities associated with the project by our subcontractor were planned and conducted based on the utility locating information provided through the USA/DigAlert process,” the statement continued.

Under California’s DigAlert system, companies are required to notify the center before digging into a specified area. 

HP Communications said a subcontractor damaged the underground pipeline during construction for a “fiber-optic installation project” but did not identify the subcontractor. 

The work at the site was immediately halted after that, the company said.

“Protecting the safety of workers, first responders, nearby residents, and the surrounding community was the immediate focus of HP’s response efforts,” the statement read, adding that HP Communications is cooperating with agencies involved in the response, cleanup, and investigation efforts. 

The cause of the rupture remains under investigation, and no one has been held responsible. 

It remains unclear whether the excavation work was connected to the Broadband for All initiative, a $6 billion state and federal investment to close the digital divide. 

The plan involves building a network of high-capacity fiber lines that carry large amounts of data at high speeds over long distances, according to LAist. About 10,000 miles of fiber optic cable is being installed throughout California, including more than 500 miles in Los Angeles County. The state owns and manages the system.

HP Communications is one of the companies awarded a contract for the Broadband for All initiative. However, neither the company nor Pacific Pipeline System has publicly identified the project involved in the East L.A. excavation.

Last January, when federal immigration agents started an immigration crackdown in Portland, Maine, pediatric occupational therapist Xenia Pantos was driving using their spouse's car to work when they saw masked federal agents and vehicles with tinted windows parked in the road. Worried about immigrant community members, Pantos stopped for a few minutes to observe.

Pantos told NPR they stayed at least 10 feet away from the agents and did not interact with them, but noticed an agent taking photos of another observer's license plate.

Hours later, Pantos' spouse, Carly Williams, a nonprofit consultant, said she received a call from a blocked number. A deep male voice on the other end of the line asked for her by name and identified himself as calling from the Department of Homeland Security.

Williams said the caller asked if anyone else drives her vehicle. When Williams mentioned her spouse sometimes did, the caller asked Williams if she knew her spouse had stopped at an incident that morning.

"What he basically said was, 'You should let her know to not do that anymore because people who are doing that type of thing are getting added to a domestic terrorist watch list,'" Williams recalled in an interview with NPR. (While the caller referred to Pantos as "she" and "her," Pantos uses they/them pronouns).

"That was a pretty terrifying phone call to receive, as you can imagine," Williams said.

DHS declined to comment on the couple's account when asked by NPR.

For months, Department of Homeland Security officials have repeatedly denied having a database tracking U.S. citizen protesters or a database of "domestic terrorists", even as anecdotes like what happened to Pantos and Williams suggest federal agents are collecting observers' information in some capacity.

In a previously unpublicized letter sent to members of Congress in April, recently departed acting ICE director Todd Lyons acknowledged the agency gives itself wide latitude to collect information on individuals suspected of potential violations of law, including interference with ICE operations or officer safety matters, and maintains records on people who were never arrested.

In the letter, Lyons denied that ICE maintains a database of protesters or that DHS maintains a "separate, standalone database" of individuals who were encountered but not arrested or detained. But he said at protests that involved alleged criminal conduct, ICE has collected "information to identify individuals reasonably believed to be involved in, or directly supporting, potential violations of federal law and to address officer safety and facility security concerns." The letter said ICE collects "essential biographic and biometric information and situational details."

Lyons wrote: "If individuals who interact with ICE officers are not arrested or detained, any information collected during those encounters is maintained consistent with applicable law and DHS and ICE policies and is treated as an official government record."

NPR is the first news organization to review the letter, which is dated April 21.

It was sent in response to Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and 11 other Democratic members of Congress who wrote to DHS in February asking questions about what data the department collects on protesters.

Civil liberties experts told NPR Lyons' letter appears to be the clearest official acknowledgement yet by federal immigration officials that they may be routinely collecting and preserving information on protesters and observers who are not arrested.

"This letter is evidence of the fact that ICE is knowingly collecting and maintaining official government records on any protestor or lawful observer that its agents claim is potentially interfering with them or threatening agent safety," said JoAnna Suriani, a lawyer at the nonprofit legal and advocacy organization, Protect Democracy.

Suriani is representing Pantos, Williams and other observers in Maine in a federal lawsuit that alleges their First Amendment rights were violated by federal agents who tried to intimidate them by recording their faces and license plates and threatening to add them to a domestic terrorism database.

"Anyone who has seen the videos of our clients' interactions with ICE agents can see they aren't impeding anything and pose no threat to anyone, so why was their information collected?" Suriani said.

Protesters photographed, filmed and threatened with charges

Since the Trump administration's immigration crackdown began last year, peaceful protesters and observers recording federal immigration operations on their cell phones have been threatened with criminal charges for impeding or interfering with law enforcement operations. However, many cases where charges were brought against activists have been dismissed or resulted in acquittals. DHS officials have also previously asserted that recording federal agents and posting the videos amounts to "doxxing" and is a threat to their safety.

Observers in several states, including Minnesota and Tennessee, complained that agents photographed their faces and license plates and later determined their identities and where they lived. Federal agents have access to a suite of surveillance tools, including facial recognition technology, and can access vehicle registration records using a car's license plate.

An activist stands outside across from what appears to be an U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement SUV in Portland, Maine on January 23, 2026.

(

Joseph Prezioso

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

A number of observers have also said their Global Entry status was revoked after interacting with federal immigration officials. The program is run by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, another DHS agency, and allows expedited processing for pre-approved, low-risk travelers.

In January, a DHS official sent a memo to some federal immigration agents temporarily assigned to Minneapolis instructing them to collect personal information about protesters and agitators, including license plates, identifications and images, according to CNN reporting.

Frost told NPR he has been concerned about law enforcement tracking protesters since he was part of the Black Lives Matter movement and learned police were collecting information on him and other protesters.

He said while it may be typical for law enforcement to conduct investigations and determine if someone broke the law and then move on, it is concerning if information on people who are exercising their rights is kept by a large federal department.

"That's the concern, is that we have an agency that's been tasked with immigration enforcement having a database … relating to Americans exercising the First Amendment, which is wrong," Frost told NPR.

ICE letter provides nuance after blanket denial

At a February congressional hearing, Lyons denied his agency was surveilling U.S. citizens and said: "There is no database for protesters."

DHS has repeatedly provided a statement to the media that says, "There is NO database of 'domestic terrorists' run by DHS. We do of course monitor and investigate and refer all threats, assaults and obstruction of our officers to the appropriate law enforcement. Obstructing and assaulting law enforcement is a felony and a federal crime. Our law enforcement methods follow the U.S. constitution."

A mobile billboard that reads "ICE agents aren't above Maine Law. Illegal conduct can be prosecuted" is seen on Jan. 30, 2026, in Portland, Maine.

(

Scott Eisen

/

Getty Images North America

)

A department spokesperson provided that statement in response to NPR's inquiry asking if the Lyons' letter still reflected current policy, and again in response to a request for comment about Pantos and Williams' account.

At a congressional hearing last week, Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin said his department had used facial recognition technology on people gathered outside of Delaney Hall, an immigration detention center in New Jersey that has been the site of recent protests that have led to intense clashes between some individuals and federal agents. Dozens of people have been arrested in connection with the demonstrations, including some who are accused of assaulting federal officers.

"I have zero tolerance," Mullin said in the hearing. "If you verbally assault our officers, you go after our vehicles, you assault our property, you assault one of our officers, we will find you, we will arrest you."

Lyons' April letter began by saying, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does not maintain any kind of database of U.S. citizens protesting ICE activities." It also asserted that "DHS policies and practices are designed to respect lawful protests and constitutionally protected activities."

The letter continued, "Where individuals decide to go beyond protected speech and commit crimes against federal personnel and property or threaten, or forcibly impede, assault, or interfere with lawful operations, ICE remains steadfast in exercising its authority to investigate and prosecute violators."

While the letter suggested personal information is only collected if there is potential unlawful activity, Scarlet Kim, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the Trump administration has set a precedent of characterizing lawful First Amendment activities as possible crimes.

"We know that very high level officials within DHS and Lyons himself have explicitly equated First Amendment-protected activities like video recording, gathering information about federal agents, and sharing that information publicly as essentially potential criminal acts that threaten officer safety," said Kim, who is representing observers in Memphis and Minneapolis in federal lawsuits against agencies involved in immigration enforcement.

"So their own definition of what potentially violates the law and could trigger surveillance against an individual includes activities that are squarely protected by the First Amendment," Kim said.

While Lyons writes, "DHS is not creating or maintaining a separate, standalone database for individuals encountered that haven't been arrested or detained," Kim said the letter "strongly suggests" that even if DHS does not have a standalone database of U.S. citizens engaged in First Amendment-protected activities, federal agents are likely collecting and maintaining that information in existing data systems.

"He did not deny that, essentially, that information would not be placed in other existing databases," Kim said.

The letter from Frost and his fellow Democrats was addressed to the Secretary of Homeland Security and asked about policies at DHS, but the response came just from ICE, which is just one agency within the department, raising questions about what may be happening in other parts of the department.

The Democrats' letter questioned whether DHS maintains or accesses information from lists or programs called "Bluekey, Grapevine, Hummingbird, Reaper, Sandcastle, Sienna, Slipstream, and Sparta" among others. A January article by independent journalist Ken Klippenstein reported DHS and FBI have secret watchlists with those code names to track anti-ICE and pro-Palestinian protesters, as well as "Antifa."

The letter from Lyons said in response: "ICE does not maintain, add, or access information from the programs mentioned in your letter."

Frost told NPR he plans to continue pressing the department as he has many more questions about how the information ICE is collecting is used and how it is shared with other parts of DHS.

Last month, the organization FIRE, which advocates for freedom of expression, announced that it is suing DHS and ICE for access to records on whether it is maintaining a database of protesters.

Maine couple left with unanswered questions

Pantos told NPR they had no idea their information might be collected by federal agents when they made the decision to pull over and peacefully observe that morning in January, and that what they had done was protected by the First Amendment.

But after the unexpected phone call threatening that Pantos could be added to a domestic terrorist database, Pantos said they felt too scared to observe ICE activity again. They worried about their family's safety.

"We are a queer couple, which brings additional risks," Pantos said. "There has been an ICE surge in Portland and I've felt really overwhelmed and powerless."

In March, two months after the incident, the couple drove to Quebec City in Pantos' car to celebrate their anniversary. When they tried to re-enter the U.S., a Customs and Border Protection officer pulled them aside for additional questioning and took their phones and keys for about an hour, they said.

To their surprise, one of the officer's first questions was to ask Williams if she had her car registration with her, despite the fact that they were traveling in Pantos' car. After Williams said she didn't have it with her, the officer asked her to describe her car and to recite her license plate number if she remembered it, according to the couple's account.

"He was clearly looking at a computer screen," Williams said, adding that the officer "seemed to be verifying what I was saying."

The couple told NPR that was the moment they realized their data must have been retained in some kind of federal system after Pantos stopped to observe federal agents in January.

"I have to think, because he asked about Carly's vehicle when we were in my vehicle, that there is some sort of an alert when you run our passports that brings attention to us in a way that it didn't used to before all of this happened," Pantos told NPR.

"I feel really concerned about what has happened with my data and the data of so many other people," Pantos said.
Copyright 2026 NPR

It's a sunny, warm Wednesday on deck so make sure you stay hydrated and apply that SPF.

Daytime highs at the beaches are going to stay in the low to mid 70s, and reach 85 to 95 degrees in the valleys. Similar conditions are expected for the Inland Empire.

For communities in the Santa Monica Mountains, temperatures will stay in the mid 80s.

And in Coachella Valley, temperatures will once again be in the triple digits, with highs of up to 108 degrees.

The Phillips 66 oil refinery in the South Bay is shutting down, and nearby communities want a say in what comes next. But some residents worry they’re already being left out.  

Carson officials had called for creating a task force that would include community members to provide recommendations during the redevelopment process, but the effort has stalled.

City officials say they’re in direct conversation with Phillips 66 and are hosting community town halls for residents.

The background

Phillips 66 announced its intention to close its L.A. refinery in 2024, citing an aging facility and increasingly strict state regulations. The refinery spans more than 650 acres and has two main complexes, one in the L.A. neighborhood of Wilmington and one in Carson. They’re connected via a 5-mile pipeline. The company processed its final barrel of crude oil late last year.

Soon after Phillips 66 announced its intent to close, the Carson City Council passed a yearlong moratorium on proposals to develop the site and amended the general plan to give the council authority to approve the final plans for redeveloping the portion of the property within city limits.

What Carson leaders said 

When the moratorium expired last year, and in anticipation of the company submitting a project proposal, Carson Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes directed staff to put together a task force — including residents, City Council members and other stakeholders — to help inform the cleanup and redevelopment of some 223 acres of the company’s land within Carson city limits.

“ I know that my residents are real concerned about what they would like to see on that site versus them being told after the fact,” Mayor Pro Tem Cedric L. Hicks Sr. said at a council meeting last September, when he also expressed support for establishing a task force.

Task force effort stalls

Nearly nine months later, a task force has not been created.

In a statement to LAist, Carson spokesperson Margie Revilla-Garcia said the task force hasn’t yet been established “as staff is still discussing its structure internally.”

“At this time, no timeline has been established for the creation of the task force,” Revilla-Garcia wrote in an email.

Councilwoman Arleen Rojas, whose district includes the refinery, said a task force is premature — cleanup should be the priority.

“We have the community that’s been giving us ideas on what they want there, but we really need to clean it up,” she said.

Rojas said the council established an ad hoc committee that regularly meets with Phillips 66 about the cleanup. Meanwhile, she said the city has hosted and will hold more town hall meetings to educate residents about the cleanup process, which is likely to take years.

In April, Phillips 66 submitted its initial plan to turn the site into warehouses and industrial buildings. (The company submitted a proposal for its Wilmington site in August 2025 to the city of L.A.)

What’s next

Some Carson residents worry that without a designated task force, their concerns could go unheard as Phillips 66 carries out a largely unprecedented cleanup and redevelopment effort.

Jonathan, a Carson resident who grew up with a window view of the nearby Valero oil refinery, said most of his neighbors know little about the Phillips 66 closure. (LAist is not publishing his surname because he fears for family members who are in the U.S. without documentation.) He learned about the creation of a task force via the environmental justice advocacy group Asian Pacific Environmental Network, or APEN.

That group had pushed for a task force that would be included in cleanup conversations, not only redevelopment efforts.

He added that a task force could allow residents to have some say in rectifying longstanding health and pollution concerns from the area’s refineries.

“We get pollution stains on our walls inside because the air is just that dirty,” he said. “In some ways it's a lot like living next to a giant bomb that you don't really know the timer.”

He hopes a task force could help influence the current proposal, which is fully industrial.

“ Living in the shadow of a refinery makes you yearn for way more green spaces,” he said.