Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How to weigh in on proposal to start testing them
    A blue sensor on the front of an autonomous truck
    Cameras and sensors are pictured on Scanias self-driving truck in Sweden.

    Topline:

    California regulators have released a new proposal to allow companies to test self-driving heavy duty trucks on public roads. The regulations are subject to a public comment period that ends in June.

    Why now?: The California Department of Motor Vehicles announced proposed regulations last week that would allow companies, for the first time, to apply for permits to test autonomous vehicles over 10,000 pounds. Until now, the state has welcomed fleets of smaller vehicles like Waymo robo-taxis, which weigh about half that much.

    Read on ... about the pros and cons of driverless trucks. And how you can weigh in on the proposal.

    California regulators have released a new proposal to allow companies to test self-driving heavy duty trucks on public roads.

    The California Department of Motor Vehicles announced proposed regulations last week that would allow autonomous vehicles over 10,000 pounds to be tested, including semi-trucks.

    Regulators say self-driving heavy duty trucks are already being tested in other states including Texas and Arizona.

    California is the only state with regulations that explicitly ban them.

    The DMV’s new proposed regulations for autonomous commercial trucks are subject to a public comment period that ends in June.

    Pushback is likely from labor unions representing hundreds of thousands of truck drivers across the state.

    The DMV’s update is welcome news for the autonomous vehicle industry, from industry giants like Google-owned Waymo to trucking-focused tech companies like Aurora Innovation and Kodiak Robotics.

    The proposed regulations will also enhance data-reporting requirements for manufacturers, such as reporting instances when cars stop in the middle of an active road.

    Where California regulations stand

    Twenty-five states, representing more than half the U.S. population, already have autonomous vehicle regulations on the books.

    While California has allowed the testing of light duty autonomous vehicles since 2019, until now, the state has not allowed autonomous cars above 10,000 pounds on the roads. That said, it has welcomed fleets of smaller vehicles like Waymo robo-taxis, which weigh about half that much.

    The state’s driverless vehicle regulations use a multi-phase permitting process for testing and operating autonomous vehicles:

    • First, manufacturers must get a permit for testing with a safety driver. 
    • Next, a driverless testing permit. 
    • Then, a deployment permit, to send its trucks onto the freeway. 

    According to the state’s motor vehicle department, there are more than 30 manufacturers testing light duty autonomous vehicles with drivers, six companies testing without a driver and three already authorized to operate.

    Soon, heavier autonomous trucks will have access to that same three-step permitting process and, eventually, busy L.A. County freeways.

    Global management consulting firm McKinsey projects autonomous heavy-duty trucks will account for 13% of all trucks on U.S. roads in 2035.

    Union pushback in motion

    The Teamsters Union is currently preparing formal comments on the DMV’s autonomous vehicle rulemaking.

    In the meantime, union officials are calling on California to pass a law requiring a trained human operator inside any autonomous vehicle used to deliver commercial goods to residences or businesses.

    The California Assembly bill passed out of the transportation committee last week.

    “Californians are sick and tired of Big Tech’s complete disregard for the impact of AI on safety, jobs, and our communities,” said Teamsters official Peter Finn, in a statement supporting AB33.

    In 2023, California lawmakers passed a Teamsters-supported bill requiring human drivers aboard all self-driving trucks, but Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed it.

    Safety concerns 

    For trucking companies, autonomous vehicles offer potential cost savings and safety benefits, according to independent research scientist Noah Goodall. "If you can get the safety improved by any amount, that's huge,” said Goodall, speaking to LAist’s AirTalk. “Truck crashes are very severe.”

    Jeff Farrah, CEO of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, argues that autonomous vehicles are inherently safer than human-driven ones.

    "They have a 360 degree view of the world around them,” he said. “They never drive impaired. They never drive distracted. They never drive tired."

    Listen to the AirTalk conversation

    Listen 20:01
    California to give robo-trucks the greenlight, new crash reporting standards, and more
    Guests: CNBC reporter Lora Kolodny, senior policy analyst of transportation and safety at Consumer Reports Cooper Lohr and independent transportation researcher Noah Goodall.

    But driverless vehicles have had their own safety issues.

    The California DMV suspended driverless car company Cruise's permit in 2023 after one of their self-driving cars struck and injured a pedestrian in San Francisco.

    For some, heavier and faster-moving driverless trucks on California roads causes more concern.

    Research has shown that vehicles with higher front ends, like heavy-duty pickup trucks, are more likely to cause fatalities in collisions with pedestrians. Plus, heavier vehicles like commercial trucks take more time to come to full stop, whether automated or not.

    Farrah’s association describes a “driver shortage” in the long-haul trucking industry, a characterization debated by economists.

    “Collectively, we need to figure out how to move more freight with less people to do it,” said Farrah. “And we believe that autonomous trucks are part of the suite of solutions.”

    How you can weigh in 

    The 45-day public comment period for these regulations began on April 25, 2025 and runs through June 9, 2025.

    Written comments may be submitted to LADRegulations@dmv.ca.gov during the 45-day period. After the comment period, the DMV will host a public hearing to gather additional public input.

    Location: California Public Utility Commission’s Auditorium
    Address: 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco
    Date: June 10
    Time: 9 a.m.

    Proposed regulations are available on the DMV's website.

  • Focus on wife's health benefits
    A light-skinned Black man with glasses, a short-cropped salt-and-pepper beard, and short-cropped salt-and-pepper hair, smiles at the camera.
    A preliminary hearing on corruptions charges facing Curren Price began Tuesday.

    Topline:

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    Backstory: In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    The details: Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial. If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    What's next: Ex-employees of both Price and his wife are expected to testify.

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial.

    If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    On Tuesday, prosecutors called an analyst with the city’s Personnel Department to testify and presented him with documents that showed Price placed his current wife Del Richardson on his city-issued healthcare plan from 2013 to 2017, before they were legally married.

    Deputy District Attorney Casey Higgins then showed the analyst a 1981 marriage certificate showing Price’s marriage to Suzette Price. The analyst said his office never saw the certificate.

    “We most likely would have asked questions,” said Paul Makowski, chief benefits analyst with the city’s Personnel Department.

    Prosecutors say Price bilked the city out of tens of thousands of dollars in health benefits for Richardson.

    Price has said he thought he was divorced from his wife when he signed Richardson up for the benefit. He and Suzette Price had been separated since 2002. His attorney Michael Schafler noted Price never sought benefits for both women at the same time.

    Prosecutors say the conflict of interest and perjury charges relate to Price failing to recuse himself from votes on projects that benefited his wife’s business, which provides relocation services and community engagement on big projects.

    For example, the Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles paid Richardson & Associates more than $600,000 over two years from 2019 to 2020. During that same time, Price voted to support a $35 million federal grant and a state grant application for $252 million for the agency, according to prosecutors.

    In addition, LA Metro paid Richardson & Associates about $219,000 over two years from 2020 to 2021. Prosecutors say during that time, Price introduced and voted for a motion to award $30 million to Metro.

    Price’s staff allegedly alerted Price about both transactions as potential conflicts of interest, according to prosecutors.

    The preliminary hearing is expected to last six days.

  • Sponsored message
  • County leaders launch newest department
     Workers at office cubicles are looking at computer screens, responding to calls for homeless services at the L.A. County Emergency Centralized Response Center.
    Workers respond to calls for homeless services at the L.A. County Emergency Centralized Response Center.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles officials gathered Tuesday for a media event to launch the county’s newest department. The new entity faces a daunting mandate: solve the region’s deeply entrenched homelessness crisis.

    The transition: The new L.A. County Homeless Services and Housing department takes the mantle from the embattled L.A. Homeless Services Authority, which until now has overseen the funding and administration of homeless services across a county where more than 72,000 people experience homelessness on any given night.

    The accountability: County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said transferring responsibilities from LAHSA — a joint powers authority created in 1993 by the city and county of L.A. — to one centralized agency will reduce finger-pointing.

    “For a long time, it is LAHSA blames the county, the county blames the city, the city blames LAHSA — we all blame each other,” Barger said. “Accountability now ends with the [Board of Supervisors]. ... The buck is going to stop with us.”

    Read on … to learn why sales taxes are up but revenue for the new department is down.

    Los Angeles officials gathered Tuesday for a media event to launch the county’s newest department. The new entity faces a daunting mandate: solve the region’s deeply entrenched homelessness crisis.

    The new L.A. County Homeless Services and Housing department takes the mantle from the embattled regional L.A. Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA, which until now has overseen the funding and administration of homeless services across a county where more than 72,000 people experience homelessness on any given night.

    County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said transferring responsibilities from LAHSA — a joint powers authority created in 1993 by the city and county of L.A. — to one centralized agency will reduce finger-pointing.

    “For a long time, it is LAHSA blames the county, the county blames the city, the city blames LAHSA — we all blame each other,” Barger said. “Accountability now ends with the [Board of Supervisors]. ... The buck is going to stop with us.”

    Department launches as volunteers count LA’s unhoused 

    The launch coincided with the first day of the region’s homeless count, which is still being overseen by LAHSA. Last year, the county decided to pull hundreds of millions of dollars from LAHSA and entrust that annual funding to the new county department.

    The decision came shortly after a series of audits uncovered spending and oversight problems at the agency. Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said she hoped reducing LAHSA’s responsibilities would help the agency better execute its core duties, such as the annual homeless count.

    “Now that the focus and scope of what they're doing has been narrowed, hopefully that's where they've been focusing their time, effort and energy,” Horvath said.

    Sarah Mahin (center), a woman with light skin tone, speaks at a podium about the launch of the new county homelessness department she will direct. Standing behind her are L.A. County Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath, two women with light skin tone.
    Sarah Mahin (center) speaks about the launch of the new county homelessness department she will direct. Standing behind her are L.A. County Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath.
    (
    David Wagner/LAist
    )

    Revenue for the new department comes from Measure A, the half-cent sales tax voters opted to double from the previous quarter-cent tax in November 2024.

    Why sales taxes are up, but overall revenue is down

    Despite the increased sales tax revenue, officials say overall funding is down because of federal and state funding losses, plus allocations of sales tax revenue to a separate entity, the L.A. County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency.

    The county’s new homelessness department has a $635 million draft spending plan. It comes with proposed cuts of more than 25% to homeless services.

    “Cuts are painful for everyone, but we are making thoughtful and responsible decisions,” said Sarah Mahin, the new county department’s director. “We are prioritizing the most vulnerable people and the programs that we know work. And we're actively working with our partners to secure other funding and solutions to fill gaps.”

    One program that will see cuts is Pathway Home, which clears encampments and offers residents spots in interim housing. Mahin said spending on the motels that serve as that interim housing will go down, dropping the number of annual encampment clearances involving motels from 30 to 10.

  • LA County's oldest restaurant reopens its doors
    The interior of a diner, with blue chairs in front of a counter, with metal shelves filled with supplies behind and three chalkboards outlining the menu above
    The Original Saugus Cafe is open once again

    Topline:

    The Original Saugus Cafe, L.A. County's oldest restaurant, closed at the beginning of the year, causing unhappiness among its devoted customers. But this week, it's reopened under new management amid a legal battle over the business.

    Why it matters: The 139-year-old business is a fixture in Santa Clarita, once visited by presidents and movie starts. But a dispute between previous management and the landlord forced the historic business to shutter its doors. Disappointed customers were able to eat once again at the restaurant Monday, albeit under a new operator, Eduardo Reyna, owner of nearby Dario’s Mexican Restaurant.

    Why now: The reopening comes amid an ongoing legal dispute between the property's landlords, the Arklin family, and the family of Alfredo Mercado, who operated the cafe for almost 30 years. The two parties are fighting over rights to the name "Original Saugus Cafe," which Mercado established as an LLC in 1998. The Mercados filed a million-dollar lawsuit last week and are now adding Reyna to the suit for interfering with their business.

    The backstory: Mercado and the original landlord, Hank Arklin, had a handshake deal with no written lease. After Arklin died last August, the relationship between the two families soured. According to the Mercado family’s attorney, Steffanie Stelnick, the landlords locked the family out and withheld their equipment and inventory. She says the liquor license remains in dispute and has not been transferred to the new operator.

    What's next: The defendants were served Monday and have a set time to respond to the complaint before the case proceeds.

  • City not pursuing misdemeanor charge
    A police officer in a black uniform and sunglasses stands to the left of a cop car. The police officer is holding the arm of a man in front of him wearing a reflective vest. The man is in haandcuffs.
    Jonathan Hale was arrested in December at the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues in Westwood.
    Jonathan Hale said the city isn’t pursuing misdemeanor vandalism charges lodged against him after Los Angeles police arrested him in December for painting unauthorized crosswalks in Westwood.

    The hearing: At the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues, Hale told reporters that his hearing Tuesday lasted just about 10 minutes. According to Hale, the statute of limitations for his charges remains open until Dec. 7, a year after the street safety activist was arrested. “So they can change their mind, and I do risk arrest if I do this again,” Hale said. The hearing had been rescheduled from its original date of Jan. 5.

    The crosswalks: Police arrested Hale as he and a group of volunteers, known as Peoples’ Vision Zero, were painting the third of four crosswalk legs at the Westwood intersection. As of Tuesday, the city has not repainted, eliminated or finished the crosswalks at the intersection.

    Large rectangles are painted in white on black asphalt. There are bright orange safety bollards and signs laying against a stop sign in the background.
    One of the four crosswalks at the Westwood intersection where Hale was arrested remains unfinished. Two legs of the crosswalk were completed by Hale and his group before the L.A. police arrested the street safety activist.
    (
    Jonathan Hale
    )

    What’s next: Hale said People’s Vision Zero would continue painting crosswalks if the city does not take concrete steps toward its goal of ending traffic deaths. One way Hale said the city could make progress is by creating a community-led initiative to paint code-compliant crosswalks.

    Dig deeper into the background on Hale’s arrest.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    Jonathan Hale said the city isn’t pursuing misdemeanor vandalism charges lodged against him after Los Angeles police arrested him in December for painting unauthorized crosswalks in Westwood.

    The hearing: At the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues, Hale told reporters that his hearing Tuesday lasted just about 10 minutes. According to Hale, the statute of limitations for his charges remains open until Dec. 7, a year after the street safety activist was arrested. “So they can change their mind, and I do risk arrest if I do this again,” Hale said. The hearing had been rescheduled from its original date of Jan. 5.

    The crosswalks: Police arrested Hale as he and a group of volunteers, known as People's Vision Zero, were painting the third of four crosswalk legs at the Westwood intersection. As of Tuesday, the city has not repainted, eliminated or finished the crosswalks at the intersection.

    Large rectangles are painted in white on black asphalt. There are bright orange safety bollards and signs laying against a stop sign in the background.
    One of the four crosswalks at the Westwood intersection where Hale was arrested remains unfinished. Two legs of the crosswalk were completed by Hale and his group before the L.A. police arrested the street safety activist.
    (
    Jonathan Hale
    )

    What’s next: Hale said People’s Vision Zero would continue painting crosswalks if the city does not take concrete steps toward its goal of ending traffic deaths. One way Hale said the city could make progress is by working with his group to create a community-led initiative to paint code-compliant crosswalks.

    Dig deeper into the background on Hale’s arrest.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.