Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How an unlikely crew took on the tee time system
    Two Asian men, on in a ball cap, embrace side-by-side and smile for a photo.
    Golf influencer, Dave Fink, and leader of Asian golf club SoCal Dream Golf Club, Joseph Lee, teamed up to advocate to stop brokers from snatching up prime tee times at public golf courses in L.A.

    Topline:

    For years, many players within the Los Angeles golfing community found it increasingly difficult to book tee times at the city’s public golf courses. Then, an unlikely crew of golf enthusiasts united to expose a shadow system of brokers who were snatching up coveted tee times and reselling them at higher rates. Now, their fight to keep golf in L.A. accessible and affordable is paying off.

    Why it matters: The city of L.A. operates a busy and sprawling public golf course system. According to L.A.’s golf division, the city’s public courses hosted more than 1 million rounds of golf last year.

    And these public courses offer lower tee time rates than most private courses. L.A.'s Trump National Golf Course during prime time on a weekend costs upward of $1,000. Meanwhile, the most coveted time slot at Wilson and Harding, the public course in Griffith Park, costs $55 dollars. So these affordable tee times are highly sought after, and many L.A. golfers were furious when they learned about the tee time brokers.

    Why now: The Los Angeles golf community was rocked on March 4 when Dave Fink, a golf influencer, posted a viral video on Instagram detailing how brokers were snatching up prime tee times at Los Angeles’ public golf courses and reselling them. News and outrage spread quickly, and the story broke in the Los Angeles Times.

    What's next: Now, when someone books a tee time for a public golf course, they have to pay a $10 deposit on their greens fee, discouraging people from snatching up tee times they won’t use.

    Read on... to learn more about the controversy and hear it the latest episode of "Imperfect Paradise."

    For years, many players within the Los Angeles golfing community found it increasingly difficult to book tee times at the city’s public golf courses. Then, an unlikely crew of golf enthusiasts united to expose a shadow system of brokers who were snatching up coveted tee times and reselling them at higher rates.

    Now, their fight to keep golf in L.A. accessible and affordable is paying off. Here's how it happened.

    Shadow broker system 

    The Los Angeles golf community was rocked on March 4 when Dave Fink, a golf influencer, posted a viral video on Instagram detailing how brokers were snatching up prime tee times at Los Angeles’ public golf courses and reselling them. News and outrage spread quickly, and the story broke in the Los Angeles Times.

    According to L.A. Times reporter Ashley Ahn, who interviewed multiple brokers, they communicate with their clients through a Korean app called Kakao Talk, "so that inherently selects [a] predominantly Korean client base of golfers.”

    It is still unknown how the brokers are able to secure tee times before other golfers can book them directly online. Ahn says a broker she spoke to said “he uses three to five devices with a group of friends, and that's how he secures the times at 6 a.m.”

    The broker told Ahn that he started out during the COVID-19 pandemic to help his grandparents, who struggled with technology. “So it started out as a way to help Korean seniors who didn't know how to book a tee time online,” she said.

    High demand for public golf in L.A.

    The city of L.A. operates a busy and sprawling public golf course system. According to L.A.’s golf division, the city’s public courses hosted more than 1 million rounds of golf last year.

    And these public courses offer lower tee time rates than most private courses. L.A.'s Trump National Golf Course during prime time on a weekend costs upward of $1,000. Meanwhile, the most coveted time slot at Wilson and Harding, the public course in Griffith Park, costs $55 dollars. So these affordable tee times are highly sought after, and many L.A. golfers were furious when they learned about the tee time brokers.

    Golfers unite against the brokers

    Nearly half a year before Fink posted his viral video, in October 2023, members of SoCal Dream Golf Club, a club for Asian and Korean golfers, wrote to L.A. city’s golf supervisor, Rick Reinschmidt, to alert him of the brokers. “We felt very awkward because...we reported about the tee time brokers many times. But he didn't do anything,” said Joseph Lee, a leader of SoCal Dream Golf Club.

    However, Reinschmidt stated in an email that the golf division did take immediate action. “The city canceled all tee times and suspended all player accounts,” he said, adding that public accounts they suspected of being associated with the shadow booking system were also canceled.

    Still, Lee felt the city was not doing enough to clamp down on the brokers, and when Fink’s video took off, Lee reached out to the influencer right away. “He has influence and….I have proof, and I have resources,” he said. “If we cooperate with each other, then we can…[track] all those rats and take them down.”

    Tee time tipping point

    The tipping point came during the city’s Golf Advisory Committee meeting on March 18. The committee is an independent body of unpaid volunteers that works closely with L.A.’s golf division, submitting reports and recommendations to city leaders for consideration.

    Fink put a call out on his Instagram, urging golfers who were angry about the broker situation to show up at the upcoming committee meeting. Both Fink and Lee were among the dozens who attended. The overwhelming sentiment was that the players wanted golf to be more affordable and accessible for Angelenos. They offered potential solutions and pleaded with L.A. golf officials to change the booking procedures to fight the shadow broker system.

    Changes to the booking system 

    Since the Golf Advisory Committee meeting in March, the city of L.A. has responded by implementing a pilot program. Now, when someone books a tee time for a public golf course, they have to pay a $10 deposit on their greens fee, discouraging people from snatching up tee times they won’t use.

    “Tee times are not filling up as quickly as they were prior to the implementation of the deposit, helping to increase access to available tee time,” Reinshmidt said in his email.

    Fink said he’s also seen the situation improve. “I get messages every day from people that say, ‘Hey, I live down the street from Rancho Park. I have not been able to get a tee time for 10 years. And for the last two weeks, I've gotten tee times on Saturday.’”

    Learn more: Listen to Imperfect Paradise: Tee Time Takedown.

    Imperfect Paradise Main Tile
    Listen 47:54
    Many players within the Los Angeles golfing community found it increasingly difficult to book tee times at the city’s public golf courses for years. An unlikely crew of golf enthusiasts united to expose a shadow system of brokers who were snatching up coveted tee times and reselling them at higher rates. Their fight to keep golf in L.A. accessible and affordable is paying off. Host Antonia Cereijido reports.
    ‘Free the Tee’: Fighting Back Against LA Golf Course Scalpers
    Many players within the Los Angeles golfing community found it increasingly difficult to book tee times at the city’s public golf courses for years. An unlikely crew of golf enthusiasts united to expose a shadow system of brokers who were snatching up coveted tee times and reselling them at higher rates. Their fight to keep golf in L.A. accessible and affordable is paying off. Host Antonia Cereijido reports.

  • Apple, Google told H-1B workers to stay put

    Topline:

    Apple and Google are warning some U.S-based employees on visas against traveling outside of the country to avoid the risk of getting stuck coming back, as the Trump administration toughens vetting of visa applicants, according to recent internal memos from the tech companies that were reviewed by NPR.

    Why it matters: For Apple and Google, which together employ more than 300,000 employees and rely heavily on highly-skilled foreign workers, the increased vetting and reports of extended delays were enough for the companies to tell some of their staff to stay in the U.S. if they are able to avoid foreign travel.

    Apple and Google are warning some U.S-based employees on visas against traveling outside of the country to avoid the risk of getting stuck coming back, as the Trump administration toughens vetting of visa applicants, according to recent internal memos from the tech companies that were reviewed by NPR.

    U.S. consulates and embassies have been reporting lengthy, sometimes months-long delays, for visa appointments following new rules from the Department of Homeland Security requiring travelers to undergo a screening of up to five years' of their social media history — a move criticized by free speech advocates as a privacy invasion.

    For Apple and Google, which together employ more than 300,000 employees and rely heavily on highly-skilled foreign workers, the increased vetting and reports of extended delays were enough for the companies to tell some of their staff to stay in the U.S. if they are able to avoid foreign travel.

    "We recommend avoiding international travel at this time as you risk an extended stay outside of the U.S.," Berry Appleman & Leiden, a law firm that works with Google, wrote to employees.

    The law firm Fragomen, which works with Apple, wrote a similar message: "Given the recent updates and the possibility of unpredictable, extended delays when returning to the U.S., we strongly recommend that employees without a valid H-1B visa stamp avoid international travel for now," the memo read. "If travel cannot be postponed, employees should connect with Apple Immigration and Fragomen in advance to discuss the risks."

    Apple and Google declined to comment on the advisories, which were first reported by Business Insider.

    It's the latest sign of how the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policies are affecting the foreign-born workforce in the U.S.

    Earlier this year, the White House announced that companies will be subjected to a $100,000 fee for all new H-1B visas, a type of visa popular among tech companies eager to hire highly skilled workers from abroad.

    H-1Bs typically last three years, and applicants have to return to an embassy or consulate in their home country for a renewal, but reports suggest such a routine trip could lead to people being stranded for months as a result of the Trump administration's new policies.

    On Friday, The Washington Post reported that hundreds of visa holders who traveled to India to renew their H-1Bs had their appointments postponed with the State Department explaining that officials needed more time to ensure that no applicants "pose a threat to U.S. national security or public safety."

    At Google, the Alphabet Workers' Union has been campaigning for additional protections for workers on H-1B visas. Those workers would be particularly vulnerable in the event Google carried out layoffs, since losing employer sponsorship could jeopardize their legal status, said Google software engineer Parul Koul, who leads the union.

    The need to support H-1B holders at Google, she said, has "only become more urgent with all the scrutiny and heightened vetting by the Trump administration around the H1B program, and how the administration is coming for all other types of immigrant workers."

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Mountain lion captured near animal crossing
    A close up of a mountain lion with its mouth open
    A mountain lion was recently captured near the upcoming site of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing.

    Topline:

    A mountain lion, tagged P-129, was recently captured near the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing construction site.

    Why it matters: She is the third mountain lion to be captured through the crossing site, and the first since construction started.

    Its capture at that very location substantiates the goal of the crossing itself — to create a bridge to connect the Santa Monica mountains bifurcated by the 101 for animals to roam.

    Read on ... to find details about P-129 and the state of construction.

    The Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing in Agoura Hills isn’t slated to open until fall 2026, but there’s already been a wild discovery near the forested overpass.

    National Park Service biologists recently captured and collared a female mountain lion, now named P-129, around the construction site of the forthcoming crossing.

    She is the third mountain lion to be captured through the crossing site, and the first since construction started.

    A drone footage aerial view of the Wildlife Crossing site in progress taken on December 6, 2025. Shrubbery and dirt pathways can be seen on the overpass; it is surrounded by the 101 Freeway.
    Anaerial view of the Wildlife Crossing site in progress taken on December 6, 2025.
    (
    Caltrans
    /
    Beth Pratt
    )

    “The mountain lion was captured and tracked and traveling right around the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing — right in sight of it,” said Beth Pratt, Regional Executive Director of the National Wildlife Federation, one of the organizations that's managing construction of the project.

    “To actually capture one right in sight of the crossing being built was pretty special,” she added.

    A Puma’s path

    P-129 was captured as part of the National Park Service’s Puma research project.

    Scientists with the service have been studying mountain lions in the Santa Monica Mountains and the surrounding region since 2002. It’s one of the longest continuous urban mountain lion studies.

    “The knowledge that the Park Service has gleaned from these decades of research [has] helped us understand how they travel and use the landscape in the Santa Monica Mountains,” Pratt told LAist.

    The soon-to-be-completed wildlife crossing that will go over the 101 freeway was set in motion because of research done by the Puma project.

    Although the crossing is intended for all wildlife, mountain lions are the ones most at risk from isolation caused by the freeway, said Pratt. The discovery of genetic degradation among mountain lions is what raised alarm bells that prompted the construction of the overpass.

    In 2020, birth defects began manifesting in tracking data. Kink tails, only one descended testis and the degradation of sperm quality all pointed to the next inevitable development: sterility.

    Indeed, Pratt said a major goal of the crossing is to bring "dates" — mating partners — for these mountain lions who are living in the Santa Monica Mountains.

    Coming next Fall

    Construction workers for the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing continue work on the project. Heavy duty construction equipment is pictured on the site. Two workers surround the machinery while two others watch them from above.
    Construction workers for the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing continue work on the project.
    (
    Caltrans
    /
    Beth Pratt
    )

    The crossing has been under construction since 2022 and is on track to open next fall. The main structure over the 101 has been completed, with a habitat of native plants growing on top.

    Right now, Pratt said a massive utility relocation of electricity, water and gas lines is underway.

    “We have to move those utility lines out of the way, and then the secondary structure over Agoura Road is being constructed as well,” she said.

    With the big unveiling in sight, the team is now taking bets on which animal will make its maiden passage next year.

    “It could be [P-129], or it could be the dominant male in the area," Pratt said. "Or it could be a new cat that we don’t even know.”

  • How to protect yourself

    Topline:

    In a recent AARP survey of nearly 2,000 U.S. adults, nearly 9 out of 10 reported being targeted by or falling for some type of scam during the holiday season in the past year.

    Why it matters: Common schemes included fake shipping notifications, stolen packages and fake charity and donation requests.

    Read on ... on how to spot these scams and to protect yourself.

    It's easy to lose our critical thinking skills around the holidays. In a frenzy of last-minute gift shopping and travel bookings, we can be more anxious, more distracted and more vulnerable.

    "There's a lot of hustle and bustle during the holiday season, so there's a lot more opportunities for scammers to steal from us," says Amy Nofziger, senior director of Fraud Victim Support at the AARP Fraud Watch Network, a fraud prevention service.

    In a recent AARP survey of nearly 2,000 U.S. adults, nearly 9 out of 10 reported being targeted by or falling for some type of scam during the holiday season in the past year. Common schemes included fake shipping notifications, stolen packages and fake charity and donation requests.

    Being aware of the tactics that scammers use this time of year can safeguard you from falling victim to fraud, Nofziger says. She shares four types of scams her team has seen this season.

    Fake retail ads on social media

    Scammers open stores on social media platforms for a limited period of time. They sell fake branded clothing or jewelry and use stolen logos or similar domain names to appear authentic. The store might disappear shortly after you've placed your order.

    How to protect yourself: "If you're using a vendor that you haven't normally used, take the name of the vendor, put it in a new search, type the words 'scam,' 'fraud' and 'complaint' after it, and use other shoppers' experiences with the company to guide your own," Nofziger says.

    She recommends always using a credit card to pay for online goods. "You have greater consumer protections," she says, meaning, in the event you fall for a scam, you can have an easier time getting your money back.

    Fake gift cards

    If you're looking to buy a gift card for someone, know that it is possible for scammers to get the gift card number and PIN before you buy it.

    "They actually remove stacks of gift cards off of the card carousels, log every gift card number and PIN into their system, then load those gift cards back onto the carousels," says Nofziger.

    If you add money onto one of these cards, scammers are notified and able to instantly withdraw it. "You could not even have left the store yet and that money could be drained," she says.

    How to protect yourself: Nofziger recommends buying gift cards that are close to the front of the store and might have had more eyes watching them. She also suggests purchasing electronic gift cards instead of physical cards that can be tampered with.

    Fake delivery texts

    It's more common to receive unexpected packages around the holidays, and scammers will use that to their advantage, says Nofziger.

    "They'll send out fake notifications saying that they're from a shipping company and that there's a problem with your account," like a missing piece of your address, she says. "But most of the time, if there's a problem with a package, you will hear directly from the vendor."

    How to protect yourself: If you receive an unexpected text message from a shipping company like UPS or FedEx asking for your personal information, Nofziger's advice is to reach out separately to the company's customer service line and confirm that a package is indeed coming your way. You can also verify your address directly through their website.

    Usually, "this is nothing but a phishing scam," she says, or an attempt to dupe you into sharing personal information.

    Travel deals too good to be true

    Travel prices can get expensive around the holidays, leading some to search online for better deals. But Nofziger says to be wary of suspiciously cheap fares and travel websites you haven't used before.

    Nofziger's team receives a lot of reports about car rental scams. "People think they're getting a great deal, but they have to prepay with a prepaid gift card," she says. "Then they get to their location and there's no car."

    How to protect yourself: She recommends sticking to vendors you have a preexisting relationship with and vetting any new travel website you might use.

    Ultimately, if you fall for any of these scams, know that it's common. "Be proactive and report it as quickly as possible," says Nofziger. You can report the incident to local law enforcement, the Federal Trade Commission and the AARP Fraud Watch Network.


    The digital story was edited by Malaka Gharib, with art direction by Beck Harlan. We'd love to hear from you. Leave us a voicemail at 202-216-9823, or email us at LifeKit@npr.org.

    Listen to Life Kit on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, and sign up for our newsletter. Follow us on Instagram: @nprlifekit.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Trio of top contenders lead race for open seat
    a trio of side-by-side photos, with a woman in a suit jacket standing at a microphone, a man in a blue button-up shirt, and a man in glasses, a brown suit jacket and blue tie
    San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan (left), Saikat Chakrabarti (center) and state Sen. Scott Wiener. For the first time in 38 years, San Francisco voters will have a spirited congressional race with three top candidates vying for Nancy Pelosi’s House seat.

    Topline:

    With Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi not running for reelection, San Francisco is about to experience its most spirited congressional race since 1987, when Pelosi beat 13 candidates to fill the seat left open by the death of Rep. Sala Burton.

    Who are the top contenders? So far, three very different candidates have emerged as the top contenders to represent Pelosi’s district. They are San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan, state Sen. Scott Wiener and software engineer Saikat Chakrabarti.

    Read on ... for more about each of the top candidates and what's at stake in this race.

    With Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi not running for reelection, San Francisco is about to experience its most spirited congressional race since 1987, when Pelosi beat 13 candidates to fill the seat left open by the death of Rep. Sala Burton.

    The 85-year-old Democrat leaves behind a historic record of accomplishment — from the power she achieved as a caucus leader and Speaker to delivering significant legislative victories, including passage of the Affordable Care Act, and her unparalleled ability to criticize President Donald Trump.

    “Nancy Pelosi was the most effective speaker of the modern era, a legendary political thinker and strategist,” said Brian Hanlon, co-founder and CEO of California YIMBY, a pro-housing group. “And San Francisco punches way above its weight in terms of both national and state politics. So, who is San Francisco going to put in this seat?”

    So far, three very different candidates have emerged as the top contenders to represent Pelosi’s district, which encompasses most of the city, except a southern slice that includes the Excelsior, Visitacion Valley and Oceanview neighborhoods.

    The leading candidates

    Connie Chan

    San Francisco supervisor, District 1

    The 47-year-old Democrat represents the northern section of San Francisco, including the Richmond District. Chan, who was born in Hong Kong and came to the U.S. as a teenager, is leaning into her biography as the basis of her candidacy.

    “As a first-generation immigrant, I have the lived experience, understanding the challenges that immigrant community faces, and most definitely during this time, when we see the Trump administration sending ICE agents to our streets and also in courtroom, firing our immigration court judges so that they can detain our immigrants illegally,” Chan told KQED. “That is, first and foremost, one of our top priorities.”

    Now in her second term on the Board of Supervisors, Chan, who once worked as an aide to former Supervisor Aaron Peskin, opposed Mayor Daniel Lurie’s Family Zoning Plan, which allows denser housing in neighborhoods like the Richmond, where single-family homes dominate. She also opposed a voter-approved ballot measure to close part of the Great Highway and create a public park, and supports sending the issue back to voters.

    Scott Wiener

    State senator 

    Now in his eighth year in Sacramento, Wiener has championed landmark legislation to facilitate — even mandate — more housing construction in California, a position that has won him both support and criticism.

    By any standard, Wiener, 55, is a prolific legislator. This year alone, 12 of his bills were passed and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom. In an evaluation of state lawmakers across the country, Wiener was ranked as the most effective member of the California State Senate by the nonpartisan Center for Effective Lawmaking, a project of the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University.

    Wiener, who is openly gay, said it is “definitely time” for the city’s LGBTQ+ community to elect one of its own to Congress. He would be the first openly gay representative from San Francisco in the House.

    Saikat Chakrabarti

    Software engineer and political activist

    Chakrabarti, 39, jumped into the race before Pelosi announced her retirement, saying it was time for a new generation of leaders for the Democratic Party. Wiener also entered the race before Pelosi made her plans public.

    After making millions of dollars as one of the first software engineers at the payment processing company Stripe, Chakrabarti worked on Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign and later became chief of staff to progressive icon Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

    “I think I’m the only one willing to challenge the Democratic party establishment,” Chakrabarti told KQED this week. “People know that the Democratic party needs a new direction, it needs new ideas and it needs solutions that are as big as the problems that we face. And that’s what I’m offering the voters.”

    What voters care about

    “Affordability” is the mantra for Democratic candidates across the country, and this race will be no different. Chan, who criticizes Wiener’s “Sacramento version of affordable housing” in her campaign announcement video, will emphasize affordability as it relates to housing, but also in health care and child care.

    Chakrabarti, who said he is more pro-housing than Chan, supports the controversial plan to build 800 units of housing above a Safeway in the Marina.

    As expected, all three candidates promise strong opposition to Trump’s policies, including ICE raids, mass deportations and federal budget cuts. Wiener, who authored a new law banning ICE agents from wearing face coverings and bills supporting trans students, is a frequent target of right-wing hatred. He wears it like a badge of honor, and even has a “Scott’s MAGA Fan Club” section on his campaign site highlighting attacks by Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and other conservatives.

    While housing is largely a local issue, defense spending is not — and U.S. funding for Israel could become a contentious topic. Wiener, who is Jewish, has been outspoken about antisemitism while trying to strike a balance between Israel’s right to exist and opposing its war in Gaza.

    Chakrabarti has made Palestinian rights a centerpiece of his campaign.

    “I’m opposed to military funding in Israel as long as the genocide continues,” he said.

    Chan has also said she would not support sending “weapons of war” to Israel, calling the situation in Gaza a human rights violation that she believes meets the legal definition of genocide.

    Money, endorsements — and Pelosi’s shadow

    The success or failure of a campaign depends on many factors, including name recognition, their record, voter enthusiasm, endorsements and resources.

    Chakrabarti is the least well-known of the candidates, but he has access to enormous personal wealth to self-fund his campaign. Since this is his first run for office, he mostly points to his work behind the scenes, including his role in helping promote the Green New Deal, which he said helped center climate change as the key environmental issue.

    “It’s going to take a movement of candidates and people to make this happen,” he said. “But I think that’s what’s possible right now, and that’s why I’m running.”

    Chan, who is running for the first time outside a relatively small district, could face fundraising challenges. But her relationships with local unions, such as Unite Here Local 2, which represents workers in the hospitality industry, could help with campaign cash and volunteers.

    Wiener has been raising money for a potential congressional run since 2023, reporting more than $1 million raised through September, according to federal campaign finance data. He said fundraising accelerated significantly after Pelosi announced her retirement.

    It’s not clear if Pelosi herself will put her thumb on the scale for one of her would-be successors. Among the candidates, she seems most aligned with Chan, who has appeared alongside her at recent public events.

    An endorsement from the San Francisco Democratic Party could provide a major boost. But that’s a significant hurdle, as it requires support from 60% of local delegates.

    Local party chair Nancy Tung, a leader of the party’s more moderate wing, thinks only one candidate could conceivably win an endorsement.

    “It’s within the realm of possibility that Scott Wiener would actually get the endorsement,” Tung told KQED this week. “I think he’s probably got the best chance.”

    In the June primary, voters will decide which two candidates will advance to the November general election in the race for this solid Democratic seat.