Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Who's paying for them? And how to do your homework
    Two glossy mailers are displayed next to each other on a dark background. One reads "Unconstitutional gerrymandering" in large letters and the other reads "Gerrymandering is Wrong - No Matter Who Does It."
    Political mailers for the Nov. 4 special election on redistricting.

    Topline:

    It’s been less than a week since the California Legislature triggered a special statewide election this November over redistricting, and already the political mail is flooding in. Wondering who’s funding these campaigns and what they’re all about? Here are a few tips on how to follow the trail.

    Look at your mailer: By law, all political ads are required to include information about who paid for them. Check for the “ad paid for by” section — often located toward the bottom in smaller print.

    Check the Secretary of State website: For state ballot measures, all the campaign finance information you want to dig through can be found on the California Secretary of State’s website. Go to “Propositions & Ballot Measures” and find Prop 50 listed there to see all the committees supporting or opposing the measure.

    Read on… for more tips on how to follow the money.

    It’s been less than a week since the California Legislature triggered a special statewide election this November over redistricting, and already the political mail is flooding in.

    The ballot measure headed to voters for a decision, Proposition 50, would allow California politicians to redraw congressional maps to benefit Democrats for elections in 2026, 2028 and 2030. It’s an effort to counter a similar move that President Donald Trump promoted successfully in Texas to benefit Republicans.

    This is a high-stakes moment — your yes or no vote will affect who represents our communities and which political party will drive the nationwide agenda.

    Millions of dollars are pouring in to sway your decision. As of Wednesday, more than $7 million had been raised by Gov. Gavin Newsom’s ballot measure committee to support the proposition, while opponents had raised more than $10 million to fight it. This fundraising will likely continue to ramp up all the way to November.

    Mailbox already stacked with campaign mailers? We’ll help you sort out who’s funding these campaigns and what information is available about them. Here’s how to follow the trail.

    Step one: Examine what the mailer says 

    As a first step, take a look at the mailers themselves. By law, every political ad is required to include information about who paid for it.

    My newsroom colleagues have already received several anti-redistricting campaign ads from a group called Protect Voters First, so let’s start there.

    At the bottom of the mailer, the text reads:

    Ad paid for by Protect Voters First, sponsored by Hold Politicians Accountable

    Ad Committee’s Top Funder

    Charles T. Munger, Jr.

    Seems straightforward enough: Charles T. Munger, Jr. is the main contributor to the group that paid for the ad in your mailbox. A quick Google search will tell you he’s a physicist and the son of the late billionaire Charles Munger, former vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway. The ad wants voters to vote “no” and describes the redistricting effort as a “threat to California’s landmark election reform.”

    But perhaps you’d like to know more. Who are these affiliated groups, Protect Voters First and Hold Politicians Accountable? How much money have they raised? What else have they supported in the past? And who else is funding them?

    Before we dig into those details, here’s a quick recap of the basics.

    A white glossy mailer on a wood background. The top of the mailer reads: "Vote NO in the Special Election."
    A mailer paid for by the Protect Voters First committee.
    (
    Rene Lynch/LAist
    )

    Step two: Understanding political committees

    • What’s a political committee? In an election, all political ad spending has to come from a committee. A political committee is any group of people (it can even be just one individual) who wants to raise or spend money to support or oppose a candidate or ballot measure.
    • How they work: Some committees stick around for a long time, putting money behind various measures year after year. One example is the Protect Prop. 13 committee — a project from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, an anti-tax group that has been around for decades. For the most part, committees are ephemeral: They come together for one specific purpose in an election, then disappear.
    • Who's behind it? All committees have to file a form that outlines their purpose, names of officers and some basic contact details. This information alone may not be enough to reveal the source. You can find a fair amount of information about who contributed money to a committee — and that's where you'll find the really juicy details.

    Step three: Where to find campaign spending information

    For state ballot measures, all the campaign finance information you want to dig through can be found on the California Secretary of State’s website. Its campaign finance database is called Cal-Access.

    You can look up any committee’s name from this website to find out what they’re all about — who’s listed on file as treasurer, previous names the committee has used, who’s contributed money to them and where they’ve spent that money. You can also look up any committee that is for or against any ballot measure.

    As of Wednesday, there are two committees that have filed to support the measure (including Newsom’s ballot measure committee) and two that have filed to oppose it. The committee from the ad is listed here on the “oppose” side: No on Prop 50 — Protect Voters First, Sponsored by Hold Politicians Accountable.

    What we found on the Protect Voters First committee

    Here’s what came up:

    • Who started the committee? Besides Munger, the names of the other officers listed (on a filing called Form 410) are Christopher E. Skinnell and James W. Carson — they’re attorneys based in San Rafael. The committee was formed in 2015.
    • Previous names used: This committee has been around for a while under slightly different names, all of which have included “Hold Politicians Accountable.” Previously, they were “Voters First, Not Special Interests - Sponsored by Hold Politicians Accountable,” they’ve also had “Yes on 54” in their name, and before that, they were just “Hold Politicians Accountable.” (Prop. 54 was a measure from 2016 that required state bills and legislative meetings to be posted publicly to provide transparency on lawmaking.)
    • How much money they’ve raised: Munger contributed a whopping $10 million on Aug. 21, the day the redistricting measure was approved in the California state Legislature, and followed that up with $90,000 more on Aug. 22. Before that, the committee had raised just $4,960.50 between January and the end of June.
    • Who contributed money to them: Almost every contribution made to this committee over the past 10 years came from Munger, except for one $5,000 contribution from the New Majority PAC in 2016.
    • What’s the takeaway? This committee is funded entirely by Munger. He’s not the only one spending money against the redistricting measure, but so far he’s got a $10 million head start.

    What we’re watching next

    You can use this process to check out any of the groups supporting or opposing Prop. 50. Remember, read the fine print on your mailer and look out for the “ad paid for by” section.

    Things are moving fast with this short election cycle, so the bigger campaign fundraising landscape is still emerging into view. But here are a few details we’re keeping our eyes on:

    • How much are other opponents spending? Other mailers pushing a “no” vote have been circulating, paid for by “Right Path California.” A visit to the organization’s website shows it’s headed by Jessica Millan Patterson, a former chair of the California Republican Party. Right Path California’s campaign finance forms haven’t yet been posted on the Secretary of State’s website, so it’s unclear how much they’ve raised or spent at this stage. (We reached out to Patterson and didn’t hear back by deadline.)
    • Who are the supporters? Meanwhile, Newsom’s ballot measure committee is springing into fundraising action to encourage a “yes” vote with a slew of new donations over the past few weeks. The largest so far come from the House Majority PAC ($3 million), the labor union affiliate SEIU California State Council ($1 million) and business person Bill Bloomfield ($1 million). Another committee supporting the measure, the Progressive Era Issues Committee, hasn’t yet reported any contributions this past month.

    We’re sure to be inundated with more campaign ads in the coming weeks — TV and internet spots, texts and robocalls — so if something catches your eye, let us know. You can reach me at blee@scpr.org.

  • Mama Jackie lays fourth egg of the season
    An adult bald eagle standing in a nest of twigs over two white eggs.
    Mama Jackie with her second egg of the second clutch of the season. Big Bear's bald eagles are getting another chance at raising chicks after the first two eggs were breached.

    Topline:

    Big Bear’s famous bald eagles, Jackie and Shadow, are getting another chance at parenthood after welcoming a fourth egg this season, about a month after the first two eggs were breached by ravens.

    Why now: Jackie welcomed the newest egg a little before 6 p.m. Friday, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley, the nonprofit that runs a popular YouTube livestream centered on the nest overlooking Big Bear Lake.

    Why it matters: Bald eagles generally lay one clutch, which refers to the group of eggs laid in each nesting attempt, per season. But a replacement clutch is possible if the eggs don’t make it through the early incubation process, as seen with Jackie and Shadow this year and in 2021.

    The backstory: The duo laid the first two eggs of the season in late January as thousands of eager fans watched online. But within a week, Friends of Big Bear Valley confirmed one of the eggs was cracked, and a raven breached both eggs in the nest later the same day.

    What's next: Jackie has laid up to three eggs in a clutch, including in each of the past two seasons, so it’s possible another egg could arrive in the coming days. In February 2021, Jackie laid two eggs in a replacement clutch.

    Friends of Big Bear Valley often reminds fans — nature is in charge, and only time will tell what the season brings.

    Chick watch: Once egg-laying is over, the chick countdown is on. Jackie and Shadow's usual egg incubation time is around 35 to 39 days, starting when the eagles begin to fully incubate their clutch, according to the nonprofit.

    Last season, the first egg hatched at around 40 days old, the second egg hatched around 38 days old and the third egg around 39 days old.

    Go deeper: Environmental groups launch $10M fundraiser to buy land near Big Bear’s famous bald eagle nest

  • Sponsored message
  • Notices to be sent to staff in mid-March
    Two teenagers with dark skin tone hold up white posterboard signs. One reads "Keep the arts in our hearts. Save Marcshall ACI."
    At this board meeting in November 2025, PUSD students protested cuts to their schools' funding.

    Topline:

    Facing a multi-million-dollar budget shortfall for the upcoming school year, Pasadena Unified School District board voted unanimously this week to finalize a plan to send layoff notices to more than 160 staff members as part of an effort to balance its budget that began last fall.

    About the board meeting: During the Thursday meeting, parents, teachers, union leaders and staff spoke against approving layoff notices, saying that they would harm the classroom experience and potentially lead to more families and teachers leaving the district.

    What the board says: Pasadena Unified board members said that the cuts were necessary, especially amid warnings from regulators that they could be out of compliance with regulators that have warned the district of its responsibility to balance its budget.

    What happens next: The reduction in force notices letting staff know that their positions may be cut will go out by halfway through March. The district will then have until the summer to finalize the list of staff being laid off.

    Facing a multi-million-dollar budget shortfall for the upcoming school year, Pasadena Unified's school board voted unanimously this week to finalize a plan to send layoff notices to more than 160 staff members as part of an effort to balance its budget that began last fall.

    The district has maintained that the job reductions are necessary because of a $30 million budget deficit, part of a financial crisis made worse by the Eaton Fire.

    Listen 27:10
    PUSD will vote on budget cuts. What programs are in jeopardy and will this help their overall deficit?

    California schools must notify employees about potential layoffs for the following school year by March 15. The number of current employees who will be out of a job next year is still unclear, in part, because people may be reassigned to vacant positions. In the past, PUSD has also rescinded some layoff notices before they took effect.

    Parents, teachers and union leaders at the Thursday meeting criticized the district for targeting teachers and school staff for layoffs instead of administrative positions.

    “ Teaching for PUSD means anxiety every March as it approaches, because we don't know if we're going to get to keep our job or not,” said Genevieve Miller, a PUSD teacher who said her children also graduated from the district. “ There's a different way forward.”

    Board members acknowledged the decision they made was difficult.

    “ I just want to be very clear that this is not the outcome that anybody prefers,” Board member Yarma Velázquez said. “Workforce reductions and the continuous, year after year position of being in this place where we have to reduce positions is draining and it is painful.

    “I am very aware of what the implications are for all of the people that work here at PUSD.”

    The board meeting

    At the meeting, which started at 4 p.m. and nearly lasted until midnight, parents highlighted the potential of families and teachers choosing to leave the district because of the layoffs.

    “ Right now, the [PUSD] community is in fight mode, as you can see from the turnout and other comments being made here tonight,” said parent Neil Tyler. “But if you approve these resolutions as proposed tonight, a large chunk of the community will quickly shift to flight mode and the death spiral of this district will begin.”

    Jonathan Gardner, president of United Teachers of Pasadena, told the board that the cuts meant the district would lose dozens of middle and high school teachers and child development staff.

    “ The best thing for kids and staff is always stability and making sure that we have full staff,” Gardner said. “The priorities should be working from the student experience out. Instead, what we see is millions and millions of dollars being spent on contracted services and millions and millions being spent on extra staffing at the central office.”

    Speakers also noted that Pasadena Unified had endured years of budget cuts, which affected teachers, librarians and office staff.

    Others said PUSD was failing to meet its requirement under California law to commit at least 55% of the district’s education expenses to teacher salaries.

    LAist reached out to the district for comment on this but has not yet received a response.

    Pasadena Unified board members said the cuts were necessary, especially after warnings from regulators that they could be out of compliance with requirements to balance the budget.

    “For the sake of the district's solvency, I feel like it would be irresponsible if I took an action that put this district in jeopardy,” board member Michelle Bailey said Thursday night. “I can't in good conscience take that kind of action.”

    About the budget issues

    Concerns over declining enrollment numbers, which are tied to funding, have been growing since the Eaton Fire.

    A report commissioned by a state agency recommended that the state increase its funding for the school system to help with fire recovery.

    Some observers said Pasadena Unified’s budget issues date back much longer than that.

    “Over the past 30 years, Pasadena Unified has faced a mounting fiscal calamity, one that you can no longer ignore or postpone,” Octavio Castelo, director of business advisory services for the Los Angeles County Office of Education, told Pasadena Unified’s board in November. “Despite your best efforts and intentions, the district has not been able to live within its means."

    Cutting staff will likely mean losing some school programs, including language and music.

    “ You have Mary Jackson [Elementary in Altadena] — it's a science magnet school, and they're cutting the science teacher,” Gardner, the teacher’s union president, told LAist. “That's the heart of the school.”

    PUSD's timeline for budget cuts

    Oct. 15, 22, 29 at 4:30- 6:30 p.m. 

    • The Superintendent's Budget Advisory Committee meets to review district programs and recommend cuts. More info.

    Nov. 13 

    Nov. 20 

    December 2025 

    • PUSD delivers a financial report called the “first interim” to the L.A. County Office of Education 
    • PUSD begins identifying specific positions to eliminate. 

    March 2026

    • PUSD issues layoff notices to impacted staff.

    June 2026 

    • PUSD board votes on the budget for the upcoming school year.

    July 2026 

    • Budget with up to $35 millions in cuts takes effect.

    What happens next

    The layoff notices are expected to be sent to affected staff members by mid-March.

    The district will have until summer to finalize the list.

    K-12 education reporter Mariana Dale contributed reporting.

  • FBI searched superintendent’s home and office
    A man looks off into the distance and wears a white shirt with a blue tie. He stands behind a microphone.
    LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho speaks during a press conference at LAUSD Headquarters in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board voted unanimously Friday to place Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation. The board appointed longtime administrator and current Chief of School Operations Andres Chait as interim superintendent.

    The backstory: The reason for the searches is unknown, although it has been the subject of widespread speculation. A DOJ spokesperson said the agency had a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told LAist media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.

    About the superintendent: Carvalho has been superintendent of LAUSD since 2022, and the board unanimously renewed his contract in 2025. Prior to coming to L.A., Carvalho had worked for the Miami-Dade County school district for decades, 30 years as a teacher and the last 14 years as the district's supervisor.

    A potential connection to AI: A spokesperson for the FBI in Miami confirmed Wednesday’s L.A. searches are linked to a search of a South Florida home the same day. That property, identified by local media outlets, belongs to a woman associated with the company LAUSD contracted with to create a short-lived AI tool.

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board voted unanimously Friday to place Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation.

    The FBI searched Carvalho’s home and district offices Wednesday. A DOJ spokesperson said the agency had a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told LAist media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.

    The board also appointed current Chief of School Operations Andres Chait as acting superintendent after the seven-hour closed meeting Thursday and Friday.

    “I know that this is a very challenging time,” said Board President Scott Schmerelson in a brief public statement after the decision was announced. “I want you to know that the board believes in you, supports you and knows that you will continue to do your very best to support the students and families of the district.”

    Schmerelson clarified in an email to LAist that he was referring to Chait. The seven-member board exited the meeting room without taking questions. Carvalho was not present and has not made a public statement since the searches Wednesday.

    The district posted a statement online later in which Schmerelson wrote that “today’s action is aimed at fulfilling our promise to students and families to provide an excellent public education without distraction.”

    The board’s decision provided clarity about district leadership but did not shed light on the reason for the searches, which have been the subject of widespread speculation.

    “While we understand the need for information, we cannot discuss the specifics of this matter pending investigation,” read the district’s statement.

    Who is the acting superintendent?

    Chait has worked for the district for nearly three decades. The chief of school operations’ responsibilities are varied and include athletics, the district’s office of emergency management and staff investigations. Chait has presented to the board on everything from school safety to the cell phone ban and the district’s calendar.

    A man with medium-toned skin sits behind a desk with his hands held together. He's wearing a suit and tie and is surrounded by books and papers neatly stacked.
    Chief of School Operations Andres Chait has worked for LAUSD for nearly three decades.
    (
    Courtesy of Los Angeles Unified School District
    )

    “I am humbled by the board’s confidence in appointing me to serve as acting superintendent during this critical time," Chait said in the district’s statement. "Our focus remains clear: to ensure stability, continuity and strong leadership for our students, families and employees."

    What we know about AllHere, LAUSD’s AI tool

    A spokesperson for the FBI in Miami confirmed Wednesday’s L.A. searches are linked to a search of a South Florida home the same day. That property, identified by local media outlets, belongs to Debra Kerr, who was associated with the company LAUSD contracted to create a short-lived AI tool called AllHere.

    Federal authorities have not connected AllHere to this week’s investigation.

    Los Angeles Unified approved a $6.2 million contract with AllHere in June 2023 to develop a tool that would create an “individual acceleration plan,” using district data and featuring an artificial intelligence chatbot.

    LAUSD debuted “Ed” the following March as a "personal assistant" to students that would point them toward mental health resources and nudge students who were falling behind.

    Within three months of its debut, the company behind Ed, AllHere, furloughed the bulk of its staff; its CEO was later charged with fraud. The district defended the process it used to debut that chatbot, which cost $3 million.

    Parents and educators demanded transparency after the district shut down the chatbot.

    Many questions remain

    The federal investigation comes at a time when LAUSD is financially strained, cutting hundreds of jobs and facing pressure from the district’s largest labor unions to settle new contracts.

    SEIU Local 99, which represents school support staff and United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) have issued statements calling on the district to clearly communicate about the status of the superintendent and the investigation.

    "UTLA educators and our school communities have long raised concerns about LAUSD rapidly increasing spending on education tech and outside contractors, while investment in classrooms and educators has declined,” UTLA wrote in a statement provided to LAist.

    Carvalho has been superintendent of LAUSD since 2022, and the board unanimously renewed his contract in 2025. Prior to coming to L.A., Carvalho had worked for the Miami-Dade County school district for decades, 30 years as a teacher and the last 14 years as the district's supervisor.

    Carvalho's time at LAUSD has included a number of wins for the district, including gains in test scores and participation in AP classes.

  • Organization reaches agreement with DOD
    A man wearing a blue suit, red and white striped tie and grey shirt sits in a high back, black leather chair. Behind him are two flags, an American flag and a blue flag.

    Topline:

    After threatening to sever ties with Scouting America and kick the youth group off military bases worldwide, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Friday gave a six-month reprieve to the organization formerly known as the Boy Scouts of America.

    An ultimatum: Hegseth made the announcement in a video posted to X, framing it as an ultimatum to Scouting to conform to the Trump administration's anti-DEI agenda. He detailed his many criticisms of the group, saying Scouts had "lost their way" by changing the organization's name and "watering down" what he called "the focus on God as the ruler of the universe." He accused the Scouts of promoting "an insidious, radical, woke ideology that is anti-America and anti-American."

    The backstory: Today's announcement came after word of Hegseth's plans to shun Scouting sparked weeks of backlash. In a meeting with Scouting officials in January, Hegseth had demanded that the organization change its name back to Boy Scouts and remove some 200,000 young girls from its membership. A week after the Pentagon meeting, Scouting officials sent a letter to Hegseth outlining proposed concessions.

    After threatening to sever ties with Scouting America and kick the youth group off military bases worldwide, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Friday gave a six-month reprieve to the organization formerly known as the Boy Scouts of America.

    Hegseth made the announcement in a video posted to X, framing it as an ultimatum to Scouting to conform to the Trump administration's anti-DEI agenda. He detailed his many criticisms of the group, saying Scouts had "lost their way" by changing the organization's name and "watering down" what he called "the focus on God as the ruler of the universe."

    He accused the Scouts of promoting "an insidious, radical, woke ideology that is anti-America and anti-American."

    Hegseth also made clear he thinks the organization should go back to being exclusively male. " Ideally, I believe the Boy Scouts should go back to being the Boy Scouts as originally founded, a group that develops boys into men," he said. "Maybe someday."

    The Pentagon's promise to reevaluate its relationship with Scouting in six months was nonetheless a retreat of sorts for Hegseth. Today's announcement came after word of Hegseth's plans to shun Scouting sparked weeks of backlash, including from some Republicans. Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska has said of Hegseth's plans: "I've heard a lot of dumb stuff, but this is up there."

    In a meeting with Scouting officials in January, Hegseth had demanded that the organization change its name back to Boy Scouts and remove some 200,000 young girls from its membership.

    " I knew in the meeting that my board, my organization, was not gonna make those changes," Scouting America CEO Roger Krone said in an interview with NPR.

    Krone explained that the organization considers including girls to be a service to families.

    " When I was a youth, we left parts of the family in the parking lot on Friday night when we went camping," Krone said. "Long before I came back to Scouting, our board made several decisions, by a vote of our national council, that we were gonna serve the entire family."

    A week after the Pentagon meeting, Scouting officials sent a letter to Hegseth outlining proposed concessions. While they wouldn't change the name or kick out girls, they would drop a Citizenship in Society merit badge that promoted diversity and had been instituted after the killing of George Floyd. They would also add a Military Service merit badge, waive membership fees for military families and offer a public rededication "of duty to God, duty to country, and service."

    Even after the concessions, which Scouting officials said they planned to implement regardless, a spokesman told NPR the group expected an announcement from the Pentagon severing ties was imminent. But after NPR reported on the rift, Krone said Scouting's members and alumni started lobbying against breaking the century-old partnership.

    Hegseth has for years criticized Scouting for allegedly caving to progressive politics. He repeated the claim Friday. "Scouting became an organization that no longer supported and celebrated boys," Hegseth said. "They even welcomed the destructive myth of gender fluidity and transgenderism to infiltrate their membership."

    The Secretary also highlighted another concession. "Scouting America will modify its policy to make clear that membership will be based solely on biological sex at birth and not gender identity," he said. "That means that the application, any application, will have only two sex designations, male and female, and the application must match the applicant's birth certificate."

    Krone noted that the Scouting application already has only two sex designations. " Tomorrow it will be the same application that we had yesterday," he said. "We ask for that information so we can operate our units in a way that ensures that our kids are safe and are safeguarded."

    In the wake of sexual abuse allegations that resulted in a $2.46 billion victim compensation fund, Krone says Scouting has implemented stringent policies. Along with other practices, he said they ask for gender information " so that we know from a tenting standpoint and from a bathroom standpoint how to run our programs."

    Severing ties with Scouts would have meant banning scouts from meeting on military bases, withdrawing military medical and logistical assistance to the quadrennial Scout Jamboree and eliminating the program that allows Eagle Scouts to enlist at advanced rank and pay.

    As reported by NPR, the Pentagon had gone so far as to coordinate with the heads of the different branches on what a separation might mean. The Pentagon circulated a draft notification internally meant for the congressional Armed Services Committees, justifying the withdrawal of military support for the Jamboree. The memo, reviewed by NPR, claimed that providing medical and logistical help to the campout, scheduled for July, would threaten national security.

    With this six-month trial period, base access for Scout troops will continue and Jamboree assistance is moving forward for now, including recruitment coordination. As Hegseth pointed out on X, many boy Scouts have become high-ranking military officers, or have served the country in other ways.

    "Six Boy Scouts have been elected president of the United States," Hegseth said. "Eleven of the 12 Men to walk on the Moon [were] boy Scouts."

    Copyright 2026 NPR