Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • New details about Do’s other daughter
    An Asian man in a suit raises his right hand as his left is on a Bible. An Asian woman in a judicial robe is holding the Bible. Two young girls look on. They're in a formal chamber.
    Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do takes the oath of office from his wife, Judge Cheri Pham, as he stands with his daughters, Ilene Do, center, and Rhiannon Do, in 2015.

    Topline:

    One of the more striking aspects of the felony plea agreement signed by disgraced former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do was the involvement of his two adult daughters. But little has been reported about Do’s second daughter, Ilene Do, who like her sister, Rhiannon Do, received tens of thousands in taxpayers funds intended as bribes to their father, according to local and federal law enforcement officials and Andrew Do’s plea deal.

    What Andrew Do’s plea says about his other daughter: The plea deal refers to “Relative #1” and “Relative #2” and states that “DO Relative #1 and DO Relative #2 were defendant DO’s daughters.” The plea agreement details that four $25,000 checks went to Do’s other daughter, Relative #2, “in exchange for defendant [Andrew Do] agreeing to steer, steering, agreeing to vote for, and voting in favor of the County contracts …”

    So who is Ilene Do? Ilene Do is Andrew Do’s elder daughter, in her late 20s. She recently worked as a customer engagement coordinator at the Moulton Niguel Water District in south O.C., according to her LinkedIn page and public salary databases. A former friend and colleague of Ilene Do said she remembers Ilene being proud to be part of a prominent political family.

    Read on... for more about a political scandal that continues to unfold.

    One of the more striking aspects of the felony plea agreement signed by disgraced former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do was the involvement of his two adult daughters. Rhiannon Do, 23, made a deal with federal authorities to avoid prosecution for her role in a scheme to pilfer millions of taxpayer dollars meant to feed needy seniors. But little has been reported about Andrew Do’s other daughter, who also played a role in the fraud conspiracy, according to her father’s plea agreement.

    Andrew Do’s elder daughter, Ilene Do, is not mentioned by name in the federal documents accompanying his guilty plea to a felony bribery charge, which he entered in late October.

    At a news conference announcing the plea agreement, O.C. District Attorney Todd Spitzer said bribe payments had been made “to both of [Do’s] adult daughters.”

    What federal documents say about Do’s other daughter

    The plea agreement and accompanying documents signed by Andrew Do state that more than half a million dollars in taxpayer funds received by a nonprofit were funneled back to Do’s daughters. “DO Relative #1 and DO Relative #2 were defendant DO’s daughters,” federal prosecutors wrote.

    The documents state that in addition to the money funneled to Rhiannon Do, Andrew Do’s “other daughter” also received $100,000 in taxpayer money as part of the bribery scheme.

    It’s unclear whether authorities have taken or will take any action against the daughter identified as Relative #2 in the charging document and plea agreement. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office said Andrew Do would be responsible for paying back the $100,000 paid to Relative #2 as part of his restitution.

    Dave Wiechert, an O.C.-based criminal defense lawyer who is representing Rhiannon Do, told LAist he is also representing Ilene Do. But he declined to comment for this story. LAist tried to reach Ilene Do via email and separate work and personal cell phone numbers for comment but did not receive a response.

    So here’s what we know:

    The documents state that Andrew Do’s co-conspirators agreed to pay bribes to the former supervisor through financial payments and favors to his daughters, including a total of $100,000 in payments to Relative #2.

    The plea agreement details that four $25,000 checks went to Relative #2, “in exchange for defendant [Andrew Do] agreeing to steer, steering, agreeing to vote for, and voting in favor of the County contracts with VAS.” VAS stands for Viet America Society, the nonprofit at the center of a federal criminal case and an LAist investigation that uncovered public records showing Do directed more than $10 million in unaccounted for taxpayer funds to the group. The organization was founded by Peter Pham.

    This past summer, county officials sued VAS, Peter Pham, Rhiannon Do and other leaders of the nonprofit, accusing them of an “illegal and fraudulent scheme” to divert federal COVID dollars that then-Supervisor Do directed to the group.

    At least half of the taxpayer money given to Ilene Do was paid out in September and October 2022 in the form of deposits to her Citibank account, according to the federal documents.

    Three of the checks to Relative #2 came from an air conditioning company that “Co-Conspirator #1” used to “funnel” bribes to the Do family, and one came directly from Co-Conspirator #1, according to the documents. Peter Pham’s attorney wrote in an October court filing that Peter Pham is Co-Conspirator #1.

    Neither Peter Pham nor Ilene Do has been publicly charged in connection with the bribery scheme.

    Some background basics

    Ilene Do is the elder daughter of Andrew Do and Cheri Pham, the assistant presiding judge of Orange County Superior Court.

    Ilene Do is in her late 20s. According to her public LinkedIn profile and other sources, here’s what we know about her school and work history:

    Ilene Do earned her bachelor’s degree from Cal State Fullerton in 2018, according to her LinkedIn profile. Her profile also lists the Zeta Tau Alpha sorority and Accounting Society as activities during her time at the university.

    In 2021, she enrolled in an online master’s degree program in public administration offered by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She was enrolled for two years, but did not complete the program, according to a university spokesperson.

    Ilene Do once worked at a Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf in Santa Ana, according to her LinkedIn profile. She started when she was 17, according to a former colleague at the coffee shop, Hannah Walker.

    Walker said Ilene Do’s mother, Pham, was a regular at the coffee shop and had first inquired about a potential job for her daughter, who Walker said was getting ready to graduate from Beckman High School in Tustin. Ilene Do got the job, and worked there for nearly four years, according to her LinkedIn.

    Home life

    Walker said she became close to Ilene and would visit her and her family at their Tustin home. That location is noteworthy — Andrew Do was accused in multiple complaints to state and local authorities during his time in office of illegally living outside of District 1 where he was elected to represent residents on the O.C. Board of Supervisors.

    He and Cheri Pham’s North Tustin home is in supervisorial District 3. They also owned a home in Westminster, which is located in District 1. According to Zillow and other public real estate websites, they sold the Westminster home in late August, days after federal agents searched their North Tustin home and a nearby home owned by daughter Rhiannon Do. The residency complaints against Andrew Do never resulted in criminal charges.

    Walker described Ilene Do as “bubbly” and “sarcastic” with “a dry sense of humor.” She said Ilene Do was very proud of her sorority — “she talked about it all the time,” Walker said — and proud to be part of a prominent political family.

    She remembered, some years back, Ilene Do being excited about the chance to appear on a float with her father — then one of Orange County’s most powerful elected officials — at a Tet Festival in L.A. County. She also remembered Ilene Do saying she “very much wanted to intern for the FBI.”

    Recent work history

    Ilene Do worked at the federal Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General from 2018 to 2020 as an investigative analyst, a spokesperson for the office confirmed. Her LinkedIn profile states that she “investigated fraudulent activities within the healthcare industry” at her job there.

    Then, in 2021, Ilene Do began work as a customer engagement coordinator at Moulton Niguel Water District, according to the public employee salary database Transparent California and her LinkedIn profile. The Moulton Niguel Water District provides water and wastewater services to 170,000 customers in south O.C. Moulton Niguel has a little over 200 employees, according to a state Controller database.

    It's also the same district where her father’s former chief of staff sits on the board of directors.

    In 2023, Ilene Do earned $96,135 at the water district, according to the most recently available salary data from Transparent California. Compared to other jobs at the Moulton Niguel Water District, those wages are similar to those of an accountant or a senior electrical/instrumentation technician.

    Ilene Do is no longer employed at the water district, Joone Kim-Lopez, general manager and CEO of the water district, told LAist in an email this week.

    Andrew Do's former chief of staff Brian Probolsky has been an elected member of the water district’s board of directors since 2008. Probolsky was recently the focus of controversy swirling around the Orange County Power Authority (OCPA), the county’s green energy agency. LAist reporting found he was hired as the power authority’s CEO with no competitive process and no experience in the energy field. He was ousted from the job by the OCPA board in April 2023 after a series of damning audits citing lack of transparency in contracting, among other problems.

    Probolsky won re-election to the water board in November.

    Kim-Lopez, the water district CEO, had hoped to take over as CEO of Orange County when former CEO Frank Kim resigned last summer. Andrew Do was backing Kim-Lopez’s candidacy, according to a source who spoke to LAist on the condition that we not publish their name because the information was confidential.

    Kim-Lopez confirmed to LAist in an email that she had applied for the job and said she didn’t know the status of the hiring process. She did not respond to an emailed question from LAist about whether Andrew Do had backed her candidacy.

    Michelle Aguirre, the county’s former chief financial officer, is currently serving as the interim county CEO.

    Andrew Do is scheduled to be sentenced in March on his plea to conspiracy to commit bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. Authorities say they continue to investigate the misuse of taxpayer funds directed by the former supervisor.

    Nick Gerda contributed reporting to this story.

    Catch up on the investigation

    In November 2023, LAist began investigating how millions in public taxpayer dollars were spent. In total, LAist has uncovered public records showing more than $13 million in public money that was approved to a little-known nonprofit that records state was led on and off by Rhiannon Do. Most of that money was directed to the group by Supervisor Do outside of the public’s view and never appeared on public meeting agendas. He did not publicly disclose his family ties.

    Much of the known funding came from federal coronavirus relief money.


    Do you have questions or know of something we should look into?
    We are here to investigate abuse of power, misconduct and negligence in government, business, and any venue where the public is affected.

    How to watchdog your local government

    One of the best things you can do to hold officials accountable is pay attention.

    Your city council, board of supervisors, school board and more all hold public meetings that anybody can attend. These are times you can talk to your elected officials directly and hear about the policies they’re voting on that affect your community.

  • LA explores tax cut for Palisades rebuilds
    Fencing lines a sidewalk next to a home under construction. Signs on the fence bear the Horusicky name.
    Fencing lines a sidewalk next to a home under construction.

    Topline:

    As Los Angeles homeowners grapple with the expense of rebuilding after last year’s devastating fires, an L.A. City Council member is putting forward an idea that could lower some costs.

    Who’s behind it: Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, has introduced a motion to explore waiving part of the city’s portion of the local sales tax for fire victims who purchase rebuilding materials in the city.

    The details: The plan calls for returning the 1% of the local 9.75% sales tax that goes into the city’s general fund. The waiver could apply to lumber, appliances and other rebuilding goods purchased within the city.

    Read on … to learn whether economists think the proposed tax relief could make a difference.

    As Los Angeles homeowners grapple with the expense of rebuilding after last year’s devastating fires, an L.A. City Councilmember is putting forward an idea that could lower some costs.

    Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, has introduced a motion to explore waiving part of the city’s portion of the local sales tax for fire victims who purchase rebuilding materials in the city.

    The 1% of the local 9.75% sales tax that goes into the city’s general fund would be given back to consumers under the proposal. The waiver could apply to lumber, appliances and other rebuilding goods purchased within the city.

    The motion, introduced Friday by Park and seconded by Councilmember John Lee, says: “The City should do everything within its power to alleviate the financial burden for these residents and businesses in order to facilitate their return and stabilize the Pacific Palisades community.”

    Would it make much of a difference? 

    Economists told LAist the proposal could help many homeowners mitigate the high cost of rebuilding, but likely wouldn’t tip the scales for under-insured, under-resourced property owners.

    “It wouldn't hurt if it's very well designed and easy to use,” said Alexander Meeks, a director at the Santa Monica-based Milken Institute. “But I'm not sure if it's really going to tackle the scale of the financial challenge that survivors are facing.”

    Meeks noted that the tax waiver wouldn’t lower up-front costs such as environmental testing, architectural design and permitting. And it may not help homeowners sourcing raw materials from outside the city.

    Zhiyun Li, a UCLA Anderson School of Management economist, said the waiver could help some homeowners justify the additional cost of rebuilding more fire-safe structures.

    “Homeowners must typically pay out of pocket to upgrade to IBHS+ standards, which are more stringent,” Li said. “The tax waiver could encourage upgrading to IBHS+ standards or investing more in mitigation, thereby reducing future risk and improving the likelihood of maintaining insurance coverage.”

    What’s next for the proposal? 

    The proposed tax relief would not be available to properties that have been sold since the fires started in January 2025.

    The motion has been sent to the City Council’s budget and fire recovery committees. If approved by the full council, it would require the city administrative officer, the Office of Finance and the city attorney to report back to the council within 60 days on options for crafting a tax relief plan.

    The motion calls for the report to consider factors such as how to minimize the burden of administering the tax relief, what documentation homeowners would have to submit and what it would cost the city to oversee the program.

  • Sponsored message
  • Republicans in Congress say they have a deal

    Topline:

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a joint statement on Wednesday that the House will take up a measure passed by the Senate last week to fund most of DHS except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of September. Republicans would then attempt to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years using a party-line budget reconciliation bill that would not require support from Democrats.


    About the deal: The agreement comes nearly a week after House Republicans dismissed an identical plan, refusing to take up the Senate-passed measure and instead passing a 60-day short term funding bill for all of DHS that had little chance of overcoming Democratic opposition in the Senate. Democrats welcomed the agreement as in line with their pledge not to give ICE any more money without reforms after immigration enforcement agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. But the deal does not include any of the policy demands Democrats are pressing for, such as a ban on masks for immigration enforcement officers and requiring warrants issued by a judge, not just the agency, to enter homes.

    What's next: Congress is on a two-week recess, but the Senate and House could move to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP as early as Thursday using a procedure known as unanimous consent that allows the chambers to circumvent formal voting as long as no member objects. Even during a recess when most members are not in Washington, this could be unpredictable, especially in the House, where many hard-line conservatives oppose a deal that does not fully fund DHS. If a member does object, that could require waiting for another vote when all members are back from recess.

    Senate and House Republican leadership have resurrected a stalled plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security after a record 47-day funding lapse.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a joint statement on Wednesday that the House will take up a measure passed by the Senate last week to fund most of DHS except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of September.

    Republicans would then attempt to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years using a party-line budget reconciliation bill that would not require support from Democrats.

    "In following this two-track approach, the Republican Congress will fully reopen the Department, make sure all federal workers are paid, and specifically fund immigration enforcement and border security for the next three years so that those law-enforcement activities can continue uninhibited," Thune and Johnson wrote.

    The agreement comes nearly a week after House Republicans dismissed an identical plan, refusing to take up the Senate-passed measure and instead passing a 60-day short term funding bill for all of DHS that had little chance of overcoming Democratic opposition in the Senate.

    Johnson called the agreement a "joke" and President Donald Trump declined to publicly endorse the deal. Trump had previously resisted any package that did not include his push to overhaul federal elections known as the Save America Act.

    "I think any deal they make, I'm pretty much not happy with it," Trump told reporters last week.

    Democrats welcomed the agreement as in line with their pledge not to give ICE any more money without reforms after immigration enforcement agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. But the deal does not include any of the policy demands Democrats are pressing for, such as a ban on masks for immigration enforcement officers and requiring warrants issued by a judge, not just the agency, to enter homes.

    "For days, Republican divisions derailed a bipartisan agreement, making American families pay the price for their dysfunction," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote in a statement Wednesday. "Throughout this fight, Senate Democrats never wavered."

    Trump seemed to bless the revived plan earlier Wednesday, writing on social media that he wants a party-line bill to fund immigration enforcement on his desk by June 1.

    "We are going to work as fast, and as focused, as possible to replenish funding for our Border and ICE Agents, and the Radical Left Democrats won't be able to stop us," Trump wrote.

    Despite the shutdown, ICE has been minimally impacted because Republican lawmakers approved $75 billion for ICE through another party-line budget reconciliation bill last year.

    Congress is on a two-week recess, but the Senate and House could move to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP as early as Thursday using a procedure known as unanimous consent that allows the chambers to circumvent formal voting as long as no member objects.

    Even during a recess when most members are not in Washington, this could be unpredictable, especially in the House, where many hard-line conservatives oppose a deal that does not fully fund DHS.

    "Let's make this simple: caving to Democrats and not paying CBP and ICE is agreeing to defund Law Enforcement and leaving our borders wide open again," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, wrote on X. "If that's the vote, I'm a NO."

    If a member does object, that could require waiting for another vote when all members are back from recess.

    Claudia Grisales contributed reporting.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Youth baseball program expanding
    A child with black hair and light skin poses for a photo with a mascot wearing a Dodgers uniform.
    Logan Cattaneo, 6, poses for a photo with the Dodgers mascot during Dodgers Dreamteam PlayerFest at Dodgers Stadium in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers Foundation says it's expanding Dodgers Dreamteam, its program for underserved youth. The foundation says the program will be able to serve 17,000 kids this year, 2,000 more than last year.

    Why it matters: Now in its 13th season, the program connects underserved youth with opportunities to play baseball and softball and provides participants with free uniforms and access to baseball equipment. It also offers training for coaches in positive youth development practices, as well as wraparound services for participant families like college workshops, career panels, literacy resources and scholarship opportunities.

    How to sign up: For more information and to sign up, click here.

  • Low snowpack could signal early fire season
    Aerial view of a forest of trees covered in snow
    An aerial view of snow-capped trees after a winter snowstorm near Soda Springs on Feb. 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season. It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    What happened? Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    Why it matters: Experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains. State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs. “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

    It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

    On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

    “I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

    State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

    Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

    “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    “Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

    ‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

    In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

    “It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

    Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

    “That means we can get more work done,” he said.

    It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

    Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

    “In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

    ‘A haystack fire’

    Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

    Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

    “Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

    Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

    But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

    How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

    “This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.