Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Huntington Beach voters split the measures
    Voter Game Plan: Live Results is written in big bold blue letters, surrounded by gold starts. Text box is sitting on a sketchy collage background, depicting election result charts of different races in washy periwinkle colors. Some results are circled, and there are big "I Voted" stickers overlaid.

    Topline:

    The "Yes" votes have it for for Measure A and B, while voters said "No" to Measure C.

    What was the gist of the ballot measures? Measure A would allow the city of Huntington Beach to ask for voter ID at the polls; Measure B would restrict which flags can be flown from city flagpoles. Measure C would implement a two-year budget and change the way city council vacancies are filled.

    The backstory: The measures are one of the first big tests of residents' feelings about the city's sharp turn to the right under the leadership of an ultra-conservative city council majority, elected in 2022. 

    Huntington Beach voters have spoken: Yes, yes and no on Measures A, B and C.

    The Orange County Registrar of Voters released its latest count as of 5:43 p.m. March 22, and reported that all outstanding ballots had been processed. The measures have been framed as one of the first big tests of residents' feelings about the city's sharp turn to the right under the leadership of an ultra-conservative city council majority, elected in 2022. Here are the results on the three measures that have roiled this beach community:

    Screenshot of three boxes containing the results for three different election measures: A-Charter Amendement Measure No 1, has 53.4% of the vote, B-Charter Amendement Measure No. 2 has more than 57% of the vote and C-Charter Amendement Measure No. 3 has more than 53% of the vote.
    (
    Courtesy OC Registrar
    /
    OCVote.gov
    )

    There were no surprises as the leads were established shortly after election day, and the gap held steady. Opponents of Measures A and B conceded defeat a few days into the vote counting process.

    The election was March 5. You might be asking yourself, why does it take so long to make it all official?

    As a recent LAist story explained: Californians overwhelmingly vote by mail — more than 87% of votes cast in the 2022 general election were mail-in ballots. Those ballots can be postmarked up to and including Election Day. They're counted as long as the ballot arrives within seven days (for the primary, that was Tuesday, March 12).

    It's all part of the long and meticulous voting process in California: The Secretary of State is slated to certify the final primary results on April 12.

    Here is a closer look at the measures that went before Huntington Beach voters:

    Measure A

    Measure A would change Huntington Beach's charter (like a constitution for cities) to allow the city to require voters to show identification in municipal elections starting in 2026. It would also allow the city to monitor ballot drop boxes and add 20 new voting locations dispersed throughout the city.

    Supporters said the measure would restore voters' trust in the election process and ensure that only verified registered voters are casting ballots. 

    The proposal set off alarm bells among voting rights advocates and state leaders, who point to evidence that voter ID requirements disproportionately affect low-income people and non-white voters. They say the state and county already have robust measures in place to ensure voters are who they say they are.

    Bottom line: A court challenge is all but guaranteed.

    Measure B

    Measure B would add a section to Huntington Beach's charter to limit the city's display of flags on city property to government and military flags, along with the POW/MIA flag, and, around the Summer Olympic Games, the Olympic flag.

    Supporters say government flags best represent unity and equality, and that the measure will ensure no flags are flown that favor particular groups

    Opponents, however, say the real purpose of the measure is to make it nearly impossible to fly the Pride flag on city property. (The current city council rescinded an earlier council's decision to fly the rainbow Pride flag each spring.)

    Measure C

    By contrast to A and B, Measure C struggled out of the gate.

    The measure was an in-the-weeds initiative that would address the inner-workings of the city government. The measure would change the rules for filling city council vacancies, require the city to adopt a two-year, or biennial, budget, and change the rules for canceling city council meetings.

    For example, Measure C would allow the mayor or a majority of city council members to cancel a city council meeting. It also specifies that at least one city council meeting must be held each month. Currently, the city's charter requires the council to hold meetings twice a month.

    The measure would also require the city to adopt a two-year budget rather than an annual budget. According to an analysis of the proposal by city staff, half of the biggest cities in Orange County make their budgets on a two-year cycle.

    Supporters say adopting a two-year budget cycle would give city departments greater stability and allow for longer-term planning. They also say it would give city leaders more time to debate priorities in the budget and give residents more transparency into how the city is spending public dollars.

    How we got here

    The measures are considered one of the first big tests of residents' feelings about the city's sharp turn to the right under the leadership of an ultra-conservative city council majority, elected in 2022. The council's work has since been closely watched an analyzed. A headline earlier this week in the Washington Post put it this way: "How a laid-back beach town because California's MAGA stronghold."

    What's next

    The Secretary of State is slated to certify the final primary results on April 12.

    Tracking your ballot

    Use this tool at the Orange County Registrar of Voters to track the status of your ballot, and more.

    Further reading

    • LAist's Orange County Voter Game Plan Guide: Huntington Beach Ballot Measures
    • Huntington Beach election page — official ballot statement, impartial analysis, arguments for and against
    • Protect HB, a group opposed to the ballot measures
    • Huntington Beach’s New Conservative Council Bans Pride Flag On City Property (LAist)
    • The Pride Flag Is Gone. Library Books Are Under Review. It’s A New Era Of Backlash Politics In California (CalMatters/LAist)

    Ask us a question

    What questions do you have about this election?
    You ask, and we'll answer: Whether it's about how to interpret the results or track your ballot, we're here to help you understand the 2024 general election on Nov. 5.

  • Covina City Council to vote tonight
    Rows of Lithium Ion batteries in an energy storage container with red cables coming out of them.
    Battery storage hubs are used to stabilize the energy grid but have led to lithium battery fires.

    Topline:

    The Covina City Council is set to vote Tuesday night on whether to allow construction of a battery energy storage facility that’s faced backlash from community members.

    The details: The project is a 110-megawatt storage system that would include two structures that take up 3.4 acres in a mixed business and residential area in northeast Covina. The city’s planning commission voted unanimously against the project in June following resident feedback. Hundreds of community members attended the commission’s meetings in June, resulting in hours of public comment on the issue.

    Read on … for more on the proposed project.

    The Covina City Council is set to vote Tuesday night on whether to allow construction of a battery energy storage facility that’s faced backlash from community members.

    The project is a 110-megawatt storage system that would include two structures that take up 3.4 acres in a mixed business and residential area in northeast Covina.

    The city’s planning commission voted unanimously against the project in June following resident feedback. Hundreds of community members attended the commission’s meetings in June, resulting in hours of public comment on the issue.

    The backstory

    RWE Americas, a subsidiary of German energy company RWE, filed an initial study report with the city for the construction of a 110-megawatt battery energy storage system in Covina in January.

    These types of systems store electricity generated from other sources, such as wind farms and solar plants, in large batteries. The batteries can then be tapped by local electrical grids during power outages or times of high usage, such as heat waves.

    RWE Americas’ website says the project would enhance the reliability of the city’s electrical grid, create 150 jobs during its construction and generate over $17 million in property taxes.

    The public response

    The proposed project has received significant negative backlash from the community on social media.

    How to reach a reporter

    Curious about what your city government is up to? Anjanette Gile is writing about city councils across Southern California and welcomes your tips and ideas.

    • You can find information on how to reach LAist securely here.
    • If you're comfortable reaching out directly, Anjanette's email is agile@laist.com.

    Some residents allege a lack of transparency from the city regarding the project’s development while others cite concerns ranging from potential noise pollution to fires and smoke to insurance hikes.

    There has been similar backlash from communities against proposed battery energy storage systems in the City of Industry and San Juan Capistrano in recent years.

    Recent storage system fires include incidents in San Diego in 2024 and Monterey County in 2025. The San Diego fire had flareups for seven days following the initial incident. The Monterey County fire resulted in the evacuation of 1,200 local residents for 24 hours. The root causes of these fires remain under investigation by the EPA but have been attributed to an overheating process called thermal runaway associated with the lithium-ion batteries used in these facilities.

    Covina is one of eight storage projects in the United States proposed by RWE Americas.

    How to keep tabs on the Covina City Council

    The Covina City Council meets on scheduled Tuesdays. Meetings start at 7:30 p.m.

    Here’s how you can follow along:

  • Sponsored message
  • Alvarez pleads not guilty in body armor case
    A man sits handcuffed in the back seat of a car.
    Michael Angel Alvarez, 41, was arrested by the FBI on May 29, 2026, on allegations he was in possession of body armor after a violent felony conviction during a previous arrest by LAPD.

    Topline:

    A man who federal prosecutors say was an active gang leader while working as a city contractor pleaded not guilty Tuesday for possession of body armor after a previous murder conviction, which is illegal under federal and California law.

    The details: Prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California allege Michael Angel Alvarez, 41, was an 18th Street gang leader at the same time he worked as a peace ambassador for the nonprofit Healing Urban Barrios. The job focused on reducing tensions and potential violence among gangs in L.A.’s Council District 1.

    The backstory: Alvarez was previously convicted of a gang-related murder in 2002 and released from custody in 2024. A spokesperson for Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, who represents the district, previously told LAist they were never told of any new allegations against Alvarez prior to his arrest in May.

    What’s next: A trial date has been set for Aug. 18. Alvarez currently is in federal custody after the court found “by clear and convincing evidence that [he] presents a serious danger to the community,” court records show. Prosecutors wrote in court documents that Alvarez also “knows that he is under investigation for crimes that carry great sentencing exposure,” indicating other charges could be coming.

    Topline:

    A man federal prosecutors say was an active gang leader while working as a city contractor pleaded not guilty Tuesday for possession of body armor after a previous murder conviction, which is illegal under federal and California law.

    The details: Prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California allege Michael Angel Alvarez, 41, was an 18th Street gang leader at the same time he worked as a peace ambassador for the nonprofit Healing Urban Barrios. The job focused on reducing tensions and potential violence among gangs in L.A.’s Council District 1.

    The backstory: Alvarez was previously convicted of a gang-related murder in 2002 and released from custody in 2024. A spokesperson for Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, who represents the district, previously told LAist they were never told of any new allegations against Alvarez prior to his arrest in May.

    What the lawyers say: Prosecutors claim in court documents that Alvarez already admitted to law enforcement officers that he was in a leadership position within the gang and had body armor despite his previous murder conviction.

    Alvarez’s lawyers have argued in court documents that he did have contact with the 18th Street gang after his release from prison but only because of his employment as a gang violence-reduction worker with Healing Urban Barrios.

    Lawyers for Alvarez and the federal government told LAist they would not give further comment on the case Tuesday.

    What’s next: A trial date has been set for Aug. 18. Alvarez currently is in federal custody after the court found “by clear and convincing evidence that [he] presents a serious danger to the community,” court records show. Prosecutors wrote in court documents that Alvarez also “knows that he is under investigation for crimes that carry great sentencing exposure,” indicating other charges could be coming.

  • This LA fan will root for the US again next time
    Two light-skinned men are standing shoulder-to-shoulder wearing multi-colored scarves. They stand in front of a stadium entrance.
    Jeff van Hoy and his son outside SoFi Stadium in Inglewood during U.S.A.'s opening match against Paraguay.

    Topline:

    L.A. resident Jeff van Hoy is setting aside his jerseys and hanging up his scarves after Team USA's brutal 4-1 loss to Belgium last night. He traveled from L.A. to Houston to Monterrey and L.A. again for the 2026 World Cup. Here's what he has to say about the team's tournament run.

    What this superfan has to say: "It feels like Halloween is over," said the diehard American soccer fan, who's been rooting for the national team since it last played on home soil in 1994. "That holiday that you so look forward to celebrating, it's all come and gone. … You have to say goodbye to that aspect of joy for a while."

    The journey: The U.S. men beat Paraguay in the opening match at SoFi Stadium, making it all look so easy to a local audience more groomed for American football or baseball at Dodger Stadium. They came out of the group stage on top, even after a last-minute loss to Turkey also here in Los Angeles.

    Then, they beat Bosnia and Herzegovina. But all that momentum came to naught. The team looked ragged in the Round of 16, bamboozled by a more experienced European team.

    Read on ... for why the this L.A. fan wasn't surprised by the loss.

    L.A. resident Jeff van Hoy is setting aside his jerseys and hanging up his scarves after Team USA's brutal 4-1 loss to Belgium last night.

    "It feels like Halloween is over," said the diehard American soccer fan, who's been rooting for the national team since it last played on home soil in 1994. "That holiday that you so look forward to celebrating, it's all come and gone. … You have to say goodbye to that aspect of joy for a while."

    Van Hoy's team — that eternal underdog, American men's soccer — had a good run. It beat Paraguay in the opening match at SoFi Stadium, making it all look so easy to a local audience more groomed for American football or baseball at Dodger Stadium. The U.S. men came out of the group stage on top, even after a last-minute loss to Turkey, also here in Los Angeles.

    Then, they beat Bosnia and Herzegovina. But all that momentum came to naught. The team looked ragged in the Round of 16, bamboozled by a more experienced European team. The moment was further soured after FIFA allowed U.S. striker Folarin Balogun to play despite a red card in the previous match, following an intervention by President Donald Trump.

    Watching from Los Angeles, van Hoy was saddened by the loss. But surprised? No way.

    "I'm so used to dealing with disappointment," he said in a phone call Tuesday morning. "I try to make sure that I allow myself the joy of hope and excitement when the team is doing well, but I'm always ready for the wheels to come off."

    Such is the life of an American soccer fan. With low hopes of seeing the U.S. reach the final, for van Hoy, the World Cup is about his bottomless love of the game — and the buffet of experiences and celebrations that come with the tournament.

    Not his first World Cup

    A soccer player himself, van Hoy first attended the World Cup when the U.S. hosted the tournament in 1994. He joined his dad at the opening U.S. match against Switzerland in Detroit, which ended in a 1-1 tie. The U.S. went on to defeat top contender Colombia at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, before getting beat in the knockout stage of the tournament.

    Van Hoy was enamored. Since then, he's attended four more World Cups, from Germany to South Africa to Brazil and now back in the U.S. again. Along the way, he couch surfed in Kaiserslautern, Germany, where he watched the U.S. tie Italy 1-1 in 2006. He saw a sports journalist wrestle to get his backpack back from a baboon in South Africa in 2010 on his way to the Cape of Good Hope. He was in the crush of fans at a massive fan party on Copacabana Beach in Brazil in 2014.

    This World Cup, his first in more than a decade, he went to four matches. Two he attended in Inglewood, just a short trip from his home in Mid City. But seeking that storybook feeling that marked his last few tournaments, van Hoy and his son also took to the road to support their other favorite team, the Netherlands. They drove 22 hours each way to Houston to dance with a sea of Dutch fans clad in orange and watch the Netherlands play Sweden. Then they drove to Tijuana and caught a flight to Monterrey, where they saw the team take on Morocco and lose.

    Why he has hope for a future championship

    At home, he also enjoyed seeing Los Angeles outside of the stadium, where Angelenos got to experience some soccer madness at city watch parties and fan events, whether they were fans of the sport or not.

    Now that the U.S. is out, van Hoy is already looking forward to the next World Cup in 2030. Will the U.S. stand a chance then?

    "I thought this was a little too early for us to win the World Cup," he said. "But in five or 10 years, I think we should have a team that's good enough to compete."

    In the meantime, he'll be cheering for LAFC here in Los Angeles. There's always the next soccer match.

  • Cash assistance for LAUSD Boyle Heights families
    A woman with a white tank top on, long brown hair in a pony tail and medium skin tone looks down a smoky street with her hand on the shoulder of  a boy with short brown hair and a dark-colored shirt on.
    An estimated 13,000 families with children in Los Angeles Unified schools live near the site of the Boyle Heights warehouse fire.

    Topline:

    Boyle Heights families of school age children affected by the warehouse fire have until Wednesday afternoon to apply for $250 cash assistance payments.

    Why it matters: An estimated 13,000 Los Angeles Unified families live near the site of the Boyle Heights warehouse fire. Sadie Jefferson, executive director of the LAUSD Education Foundation, said families are reporting asthma flare-ups, missed work and a lack of access to their homes. The nonprofit is independent of the school district and frequently supports LAUSD students and programs. “ There's tremendous stress and anxiety about how to pay for rent, food [and] childcare,” Jefferson said.

    How it works: Families can apply in-person from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 8, at:

    The application requires families to provide a student’s ID. The money comes from the Foundation’s “compassion fund,” a mixture of donations from individuals and the California Community Foundation. Families can also connect with district counselors and other resources at those same schools.

    The backstory: The fire started on June 17 at a refrigerated warehouse owned by a company called Lineage and burned for eight days. The blaze filled the air with acrid smoke and there’s been reports of foul smells, pests and concerns about water quality as the clean-up continues.

    Boyle Heights families of school age children impacted by the warehouse fire have until Wednesday afternoon to apply for $250 cash assistance payments.

    The money comes from the LAUSD Education Foundation’s “compassion fund,” a mixture of donations from individuals and the California Community Foundation.

    “ There's tremendous stress and anxiety about how to pay for rent, food [and] childcare,” said Sadie Jefferson, the executive director of the independent nonprofit that frequently supports LAUSD students and programs.

    Jefferson said families are reporting asthma flare-ups, missed work and a lack of access to their homes.

    An estimated 13,000 Los Angeles Unified families live within two miles of the Boyle Heights warehouse fire. The fire started on June 17 at a refrigerated warehouse owned by a company called Lineage and burned for eight days. The blaze filled the air with acrid smoke and there’s been reports of foul smells, pests and concerns about water-quality as the clean-up continues.

    How it works

    Families can apply in-person on Wednesday July 8 from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at:

    The application requires families to provide a student’s ID.

    Families can also connect with district counselors and other resources at those same schools.

    Jefferson said the foundation will support more families if more donations to the compassion fund come in.

    Need more help?

    LAUSD families can call the district’s family hotline at (213) 443-1300.

    The foundation started the compassion fund in 2025 to support families in the wake of widespread immigration enforcement actions throughout Southern California.

    Jefferson said the Foundation has distributed nearly $900,000 in cash gift-cards from the fund and that most families make less than $20,000 a year.

     ”We wanted to make sure that people had the dignity of choice on how to use the funding in a way that made sense for their families,” Jefferson said.