Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Mother seeks info on son detained by ICE
    Two photos side by side. Left shows young man smiling, wearing a grey sweatshirt, holding a borwn cat. Right shows a uniformed Border Patrol officer with his arm around the neck of a man whose face is buried in his shoulder.
    Image of Adrian celebrating a birthday (left) provided by his sister, Alyssa Garcia. Screen grab of incident (right) that took place in the parking lot near the 8600 block of Washington Boulevard.

    Topline:

    Myra Martinez, the mother of a U.S. citizen taken into custody during a chaotic immigration enforcement interaction in a retail parking lot on Tuesday, is pleading for answers as her son remains unaccounted for nearly 24 hours later.

    Martinez detained: According to video seen on social media, Adrian Andrew Martinez, 20, was tackled and forcibly detained by several U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in a parking lot near the 8600 block of Washington Boulevard. According to eyewitnesses, Martinez may have attempted to intervene when agents began questioning his co-worker in the parking lot.

    ICE response: ICE has said they were not operating in Pico Rivera on June 17, according to a statement given to CALÓ News. According to Martinez, officials with ICE told her that they had no record of Adrian in their system.

    The mother of a U.S. citizen taken into custody during a chaotic immigration enforcement interaction in a retail parking lot on Tuesday is pleading for answers as her son remains unaccounted for nearly 24 hours later.

    Adrian Andrew Martinez, 20, was tackled and forcibly detained by several U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in a parking lot near the 8600 block of Washington Boulevard. According to his mother, Myra Martinez, Adrian Martinez had clocked in for his shift at Walmart around 5 a.m. and went on a break at approximately 8 a.m. when ICE agents were reportedly seen in the vicinity.

    According to eyewitnesses, Martinez may have attempted to intervene when agents began questioning his co-worker in the parking lot. There are several widely circulated videos being shared online of the interactions between Adrian Martinez and armed masked men, who were later identified as ICE agents.

    The footage, which quickly went viral on social media platforms, shows agents in tactical gear restraining Martinez as they wrestle him to the ground. A voice off camera can be heard saying, “these are legal citizens!”

    Martinez, who was born in Los Angeles and holds U.S. citizenship, has not been seen or heard from since the incident.

    “I just want to know where my son is,” said Myra Martinez, Adrian’s mother, in an exclusive interview with CALÓ News. A mother of five, Ms. Martinez said she learned of her son’s detention at the same moment much of the public did — when video of the incident began circulating online.

    “I was at work when one of my daughters sent me a message with the video, saying that they had taken Adrian,” she recalled. Witnessing the force used against her son, she said, was deeply painful. “It really hurt,” she added, noting that she left work immediately to locate him.

    Community members expressed alarm over the incident, noting that the detainment of U.S. citizens by ICE has become an increasingly frequent and troubling pattern. Advocates argue that such cases raise serious constitutional questions. According to Mr. Martinez’s mother, the only elected official who has reached out to the family so far is State Senator Bob Archuleta (D-30), who offered assistance in locating her son.

    Since Adrian was abducted, Myra Martinez said she has not received any information about his whereabouts. “Right now, I have no idea where my son is,” she said.

    According to Ms. Martinez, officials with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement told her that they had no record of Adrian in their system. “I already went looking for him,” she said. “I went to the place where they’re detaining everyone — ICE told me they don’t have him, that they don’t have no one by that name.” She also went to a federal detention facility, but was again told that no one by his name was being held there.

    On Tuesday evening, residents gathered in Pico Rivera to demand that the city sever any ties with ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The demonstration began at Pico Rivera City Hall and concluded with a march to the Walgreens near Washington Boulevard and Rosemead Boulevard, where Mr. Martinez was reportedly detained.

    “If anyone has any information, or anyone can help me to find my son… I just want to know if he’s okay,” said Mrs. Martinez.

    ICE states they were not operating in Pico Rivera on June 17, and would refer CALÓ News to CBP.

  • Agency fined over LA immigration sweeps case
    A group of armed, masked law enforcement officers in tactical gear patrols a street lined with palm trees and onlookers.
    People clash with U.S. Border Patrol after a traffic collision with one of their vehicles during an immigration raid in Bell on June 20, 2025.

    Topline:

    A federal judge today held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt for allegedly slow-rolling an order to create digital copies of communications from personal and government cell phones used by immigration agents during operations in the Los Angeles area last year.

    How we got here: U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in the Central District of California previously ordered the federal government in January to expedite imaging the personal cell phones of more than 800 agents involved in controversial immigration raids in Los Angeles in 2025.

    Read on... for more on the case.

    A federal judge on Tuesday held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt for allegedly slow-rolling an order to create digital copies of communications from personal and government cell phones used by immigration agents during operations in the Los Angeles area last year.

    U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in the Central District of California previously ordered the federal government in January to expedite imaging the personal cell phones of more than 800 agents involved in controversial immigration raids in Los Angeles in 2025.

    Judge Frimpong imposed a fine of $500 per day on the federal government until it complies with the order to turn over phones as part of discovery and reimburse plaintiffs’ attorneys for the legal costs of getting the records.

    Attorneys for DHS admitted in court in June that the agency had not provided the records. They told the judge they were processing the government devices at a rate of three phones every two weeks, which plaintiffs noted would take nearly four years to complete.

    Attorneys representing immigrants caught up in Operation At Large — the name given to the Trump administration’s Los Angeles immigration crackdown last year — argue the phones may contain evidence of a pattern of racial profiling by federal agents.

    Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in May that the Department of Homeland Security “simply proceeded to thwart” Frompong’s order “by dragging their feet on imaging government-issued cell phones and by openly defying the order as to personal phones.”

    Last month, ACLU attorneys asked Frimpong to issue another order that would prohibit agents from detaining people based on their race. They cited text messages and body camera footage in which agents used racial slurs, including “wet and “tonks,” to identify working-class Latinos to stop, according to court records.

    “Not only are federal agents violating the Constitution on the streets, the government is violating court orders by intentionally withholding critical evidence about its immigration enforcement operations.” said Mayra Joachin with the ACLU of Southern California.

    The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

  • Sponsored message
  • L.A. city councilmember calls for accountability
    The exterior of a restaurant painted baby blue with the lettering that reads "X'tiosu." Next to the store front on the street, to the right of frame a green bus passes by with a sign that reads "Boyle Heights."
    In recent years, Boyle Heights residents have endured a slew of health and quality of life issues that can be traced to industrial facilities operating near the area.

    Topline:

    L.A. City Councilmember Ysabel Jurado introduced seven motions Tuesday, all geared toward providing immediate and long-term relief for community members who’ve been hurt by the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights.

    What the package includes: Jurado is calling for a Mitigation Response Fund of up to $10 million to provide aid for impacted residents and small businesses that have lost revenue as the neighborhood continues dealing with foul odors, flies, rats and other vermin. Jurado also wants to see higher penalties for corporate negligence, and create a commission to advise L.A.’s city leadership on environmental justice policy.

    Why it matters: After the fire in mid-June, tons of food at the cold storage warehouse were left to rot. Now, more than a month later, community members are still dealing with odors and pests. This has disrupted local businesses, community spaces, and everyday quality of life.

    Read on... for more on what's being proposed.

    L.A. City Councilmember Ysabel Jurado introduced seven motions Tuesday, all geared toward providing immediate and long-term relief for community members who’ve been hurt by the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights.

    According to Jurado, the legislative package is centered around three priorities:

    • “Immediate relief and cleanup”
    • "Accountability, transparency and site safeguards”
    • “Long-term oversight and community power”

    Jurado is calling for a Mitigation Response Fund of up to $10 million to provide aid for affected residents and small businesses that have lost revenue as the neighborhood continues dealing with foul odors, flies, rats and other vermin. Jurado also wants to see higher penalties for corporate negligence, and create a commission to advise L.A.’s city leadership on environmental justice policy.

    After the fire in mid-June, tons of food at the cold storage warehouse were left to rot. Now, more than a month later, community members are still dealing with odors and pests, which have disrupted local businesses, community spaces and everyday quality of life.

    Local activists and community members say the Lineage fire aftermath is part of a long legacy of environmental injustice in Boyle Heights. In recent decades, residents have also dealt with pungent smells from rendering plants in the neighboring city of Vernon. And up until 2015, Vernon was also home to Exide, a battery recycling facility that contaminated the soil of thousands of homes in surrounding communities with lead. The taxpayer-funded cleanup for that issue is still ongoing. Lineage also has several facilities in the city of Vernon.

    Jurado’s proposed commission “can serve as an interdisciplinary body to identify and start to protect our communities from historical harms that continue to function as standard practice today,” said mark! Lopez, a community organizer at East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice.

    Community members will have a chance to provide public comment on Jurado’s motions before they move to a full council vote.

    In a statement, Jurado said recovery "cannot mean removing debris and moving on.” In her view, it must also involve the “aggressive pursuit of every recoverable dollar from responsible parties” and "give communities that have carried Los Angeles' environmental burdens real power over what happens next."

    Lineage President and CEO Greg Lehmkuhl previously said in a statement that he cannot estimate how long the cleanup will take. “What we can tell you is this: there are people on site working on this recovery 24/7,” he added.

  • County to assist small businesses with costs
    A picture of the husk of the burned out Lineage Logisitics cold storage facility in Boyle Heights. Demolition equipment can be seen at the edges of the picture.
    Remediation work continues at Lineage Logistics, where residents and nearby businesses have had to deal odor complaints nearly one month after the fire.

    Topline:

    L.A. County will provide assistance grants to small businesses that suffered financial loss from the Lineage warehouse fire that burned for a week in June.

    About the funds: The grants from Supervisor Hilda Solis’ discretionary budget will be disbursed within 45 days — and then draw from countywide funds if needed. The county will also seek reimbursement for the grants from Lineage. The Department of Public Health and County Counsel will also evaluate new fees and penalties for businesses that pose environmental or health risks in L.A. County. Some fee increases could fund county assistance for future economic disasters.

    Keep reading... for who is eligible and what to have ready to qualify.

    L.A. County will provide assistance grants to small businesses that suffered financial loss from the Lineage warehouse fire that burned for a week in June in Boyle Heights. The fire's aftermath has many in the community seeking help to recover.

    Why it matters

    The county surveyed business owners in the area who said they are continuing to face a loss of customers and revenue amid persisting odor from food in the Boyle Heights warehouse that continues to rot in the summer heat. The fire started June 17 and burned until June 24. It initially generated significant air quality hazards and prompted evacuations.

    About the funds

    The grants from Supervisor Hilda Solis’ discretionary budget will be disbursed within 45 days — and then draw from countywide funds if needed. The county will also seek reimbursement for the grants from Lineage. The Department of Public Health and County Counsel will also evaluate new fees and penalties for businesses that pose environmental or health risks in L.A. County. Some fee increases could fund county assistance for future economic disasters.

    Who is eligible

    Small businesses within the affected area will be able to apply for the grants. The county is looking to prioritize initial funding for businesses that have not already received emergency financial support from other organizations.

    More details to come

    The Board of Supervisors and Department of Economic Opportunity will announce more about the amount of assistance and how to apply when those details are made final. Affected business owners and residents can find more information on the L.A. County Recovers website.

    What to have ready

    Existing documentation from L.A. County recommends you collect the following documentation of any damage.

    A chart lists the process to make claims including identifying impact, organizing documents and how to get help/
    (
    Courtesy L.A. Department of Economic Opportunity
    )
    A chart lists documents to gather to make claims including business licenses, records showing interruption in business, clean up costs and property damage.
    (
    Courtesy L.A. Department of Economic Opportunity
    )

  • LA voters will decide on Palisades exemption
    Several empty lots are shown in the Pacific Palisades, some have houses being built on them and some are completely barren. Some houses are more complete than others. Construction equipment can be seen at the top left corner along the street.
    LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 7: In an aerial view, empty lots line the streets of Pacific Palisades where homes destroyed by the Palisades Fire used to stand on March 7, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. Rebuilding from the devastating fire has been a slow process. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council voted 13-1 on Tuesday to put a measure on the November ballot that will ask voters whether homeowners affected by the Palisades Fire should be exempt from the city’s controversial “mansion tax.”

    The details: If passed, the exemption would apply to the sale of homes damaged or destroyed by the fire. The exemption would last until early 2030, five years from the date of the fire. This could potentially reduce the tax’s revenue by up to 6% — or $32 million each year — according to a May 2026 report from the L.A. Housing Department.

    The background: The “mansion tax,” officially called Measure ULA, is a tiered tax on real estate selling for $5.4 million or more in L.A. The tax, which was passed by voters in 2022, funds programs such as rental assistance, eviction defense and affordable housing construction in the city.

    Where council members stand: In Tuesday’s meeting, Councilmember Eunisses  Hernandez cast the lone vote against placing the measure on the November ballot. She has previously argued the ballot language should have done more to make owners of multiple properties ineligible for the tax break. Thirteen council members supported the move. Councilmember Curren Price was not present for the vote.

    Read on… for more on what the new ballot measure could mean for Palisades Fire survivors.

    The Los Angeles City Council voted 13-1 on Tuesday to put a measure on the November ballot that will ask voters whether homes affected by the Palisades Fire should be exempt from the city’s controversial “mansion tax.”

    If passed, the exemption would apply to the sale of homes damaged or destroyed by the fire. The exemption would last until early 2030, five years from the date of the fire.

    This could potentially reduce the tax’s revenue up to 6% — or $32 million each year — according to a May 2026 report from the L.A. Housing Department.

    How the ‘mansion tax’ works 

    The “mansion tax,” officially called Measure ULA, is a tiered tax on real estate selling for $5.4 million or more. The tax, which was passed by voters in 2022, funds programs such as rental assistance, eviction defense and affordable housing construction in the city.

    The measure has fierce defenders, as well as staunch critics. A statewide ballot measure sought to kill the tax before it was pulled by supporters earlier this year in exchange for a legislative deal in Sacramento.

    State and local lawmakers have considered reducing the tax or exempting newly constructed apartment buildings. Their ideas have been guided by economic studies that found the tax was slowing down housing development in the city. So far, none of those reforms have mustered enough support to pass.

    Where council members stand

    Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, whose district includes Highland Park, Chinatown and Westlake, previously spoke against the measure’s scope at a City Council meeting on July 1.

    “Any exemption should only be for homeowners whose primary residence was destroyed, and people who genuinely need help rebuilding, not LLCs, investors or people with a portfolio of properties,” Hernandez said. “We had the opportunity to write those protections into this ordinance, and we didn’t.”

    Hernandez criticized her colleagues for shooting down the post-fire eviction protections she proposed after tenants living in her district lost work as gardeners and nannies in the Pacific Palisades.

    “When wealthy property owners need relief, we’re willing to bend over backwards,” she said. “But when working class people and tenants need protection, suddenly our hands are tied and the political will is not there.”

    Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, voiced support for the measure at the same meeting.

    “Putting this tax on these folks who are trying to recover and reckoning with the fact that some of them just aren’t coming home, is just unspeakably cruel,” Park said. “It’s an exemption that applies in very narrow circumstances to original owners and first transactions for five years, only for residential properties. This is the least we can do as this community continues to recover.”

    In Tuesday’s meeting, Hernandez cast the lone vote against placing the measure on the November ballot. Thirteen council members supported the move. Councilmember Curren Price was not present for the vote.

    What happens next 

    L.A. voters will have the final say on whether Palisades homeowners will be exempt from the tax. The proposal needs a simple majority of support from voters in the upcoming November general election to pass.

    How to keep tabs on the L.A. City Council

    The L.A. City Council tends to meet Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Meetings typically start at 10 a.m.

    Here’s how you can follow along: