Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Why the “Builder’s Remedy” is coming to the city
    A sign on a tall lattice pole reads: Norwalk Town Square. Behind is a view of stores, streets and homes.
    A ban on new shelters and housing in Norwalk has state officials taking punitive action.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has fired back in an escalating conflict with Norwalk over the city’s ban on new homeless shelters — a ban local officials recently extended despite the Newsom administration’s warning that the policy was illegal.

    Why now: Local officials recently extended that ban despite the Newsom administration’s warnings that the policy was illegal.

    What’s new: Now, officials in Norwalk have lost their ability to stop developers from pursuing housing projects larger than what would normally be allowed under local zoning restrictions. This is happening because state officials have declared the city out of compliance with California housing law.

    Read on… to find out how the “Builder’s Remedy” could affect the city’s plans for new housing.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has fired back in an escalating conflict with Norwalk over the city’s ban on new homeless shelters — a ban local officials recently extended despite the Newsom administration’s warning that the policy was illegal.

    “It’s beyond cruel that Norwalk would ban the building of shelters while people are living on the city’s streets,” Newsom said in a statement on Thursday. “No more excuses — every city, including Norwalk, must do its part and follow state housing laws.”

    One Norwalk official countered the governor, calling the move “bully tactics.”

    As a result of the Newsom administration’s actions, Norwalk officials will no longer have a say in plans by developers to build large apartment projects in parts of the city where local zoning restrictions normally wouldn’t allow them.

    UC Davis law professor Chris Elmendorf said by trying to block homeless housing, Norwalk officials ironically ended up paving the way for other types of housing.

    “This is exactly the idea,” Elmendorf said. “You either comply with the law and accommodate shelters and other forms of housing in a way that you like. Or, if you're not willing to play ball, you’ll do your fair share in the way that the state deems reasonable.”

    The backstory

    The Norwalk City Council voted in August to stop issuing permits for shelters, interim housing and supportive apartments for unhoused people. That initial ban held that shelters and other forms of housing represented an “immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare,” and it was set to last for 45 days.

    California housing officials then told Norwalk that the ban violated state law because the city had made no findings to establish that such a moratorium was needed to protect the health of nearby residents.

    The City Council acknowledged that they had received the warning, but then went ahead and extended the policy another 10 months and 15 days. The ban also applies to liquor stores, laundromats, car washes, payday loan businesses and discount stores.

    Mayor Margarita Rios said in a written statement to LAist that the shelter ban is about protecting residents and promoting "responsible development." She went on to say, "We urgently need improved communication and collaboration from the state to address these issues; we must tackle this in a spirit of cooperation rather than under the threat of penalties."

    What’s new

    The state’s latest action means officials in Norwalk have lost their ability to stop developers from pursuing plans for buildings taller and denser than would normally be allowed under local zoning restrictions. This is happening because state officials have declared Norwalk out of compliance with California housing law, opening up the city to projects under the “Builder’s Remedy.”

    A newly signed law, AB 1893, even allows developers to use the Builder’s Remedy for streamlining mid-sized, market-rate apartment buildings in neighborhoods normally reserved for detached suburban houses. Close to 89% of Norwalk’s residential land is zoned for single-family homes, according to UC Berkeley researchers.

    “What I'm expecting to see in affluent communities is developers proposing 10-unit condo or apartment projects that would be market-rate on your standard single-family home lot," Elmendorf said.

    Norwalk City Councilmember Rick Ramirez called the state’s actions “bully tactics” and said local officials are in a better position to understand how to respond to homelessness. He also described a state-funded Project Homekey site — which turned a former Motel 6 in Norwalk into a 51-unit interim housing facility — as a “failed project.”

    “We're fully aware of the consequences, but the fact is, we have to have local control,” Ramirez told LAist. “Why is it always Norwalk that’s the dumping ground? Where are the other cities in their efforts to combat homelessness?”

    Why it matters

    The Builder’s Remedy has already led to an increase in large housing development proposals in Santa Monica and Beverly Hills. In order to get around local zoning limits, large-scale Builder’s Remedy projects must include a certain percentage of apartments affordable to low-income households.

    California remains in a significant housing crisis, and how to reach state-required targets has been a source of considerable tension and controversy in many places, including the city of L.A.

    Norwalk is facing a mandate of planning for at least 5,034 new homes by 2029. State officials say the city has so far only issued permits for 3.5% of that overall goal.

    RAND economist Jason Ward said it’s not yet clear that developers will flock to Norwalk in pursuit of large-scale projects. The city is less affluent than some of the wealthier areas where the Builder’s Remedy has been invoked, Ward said.

    “It's not in a sort of highly desirable coastal area,” he said. “However, I think that all over L.A., housing scarcity is so substantial that maybe [developers] are going to say, ‘Oh, now I can build dense housing in Norwalk, whereas before I couldn't.’ Given current circumstances in the region, maybe this is an attractive proposition.”

    Next Norwalk City Council meeting

    • Location: Norwalk City Hall, 12700 Norwalk Blvd.
    • Next regular meeting: 5 p.m, Oct. 15
    • Find the agenda ▶
  • Youth baseball program expanding
    A child with black hair and light skin poses for a photo with a mascot wearing a Dodgers uniform.
    Logan Cattaneo, 6, poses for a photo with the Dodgers mascot during Dodgers Dreamteam PlayerFest at Dodgers Stadium in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers Foundation says it's expanding Dodgers Dreamteam, its program for underserved youth. The foundation says the program will be able to serve 17,000 kids this year, 2,000 more than last year.

    Why it matters: Now in its 13th season, the program connects underserved youth with opportunities to play baseball and softball and provides participants with free uniforms and access to baseball equipment. It also offers training for coaches in positive youth development practices, as well as wraparound services for participant families like college workshops, career panels, literacy resources and scholarship opportunities.

    How to sign up: For more information and to sign up, click here.

  • Sponsored message
  • Low snowpack could signal early fire season
    Aerial view of a forest of trees covered in snow
    An aerial view of snow-capped trees after a winter snowstorm near Soda Springs on Feb. 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season. It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    What happened? Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    Why it matters: Experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains. State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs. “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

    It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

    On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

    “I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

    State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

    Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

    “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    “Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

    ‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

    In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

    “It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

    Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

    “That means we can get more work done,” he said.

    It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

    Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

    “In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

    ‘A haystack fire’

    Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

    Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

    “Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

    Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

    But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

    How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

    “This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • The airport will close in 2028 to become a park
    One white plane lands on the runway. Off to the right, another plan is parked.
    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park.

    Topline:

    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park that city officials say will improve quality of life and boost green space.

    What we know: The city is in the very early stages of planning how to transform the 192 acres into a park. The preliminary report shows some potential amenities of the park, such as gardens, biking trails, art galleries, a community center and much more.

    Background: After a long legal battle between the city and the Federal Aviation Administration, a settlement was reached that ruled that the city could close the more than 100-year-old airport. The park was controversial among residents because of air quality and noise concerns, and was the subject of many legal battles in recent decades.

    What’s next? The city wants to hear from residents. You’re encouraged to review the framework and fill out this survey. Feedback will be accepted until April 26.

  • Certain immigrants no longer eligible
    An adult reaches for a banana on a metal shelve as a child carries a toy rolling grocery basket with groceries inside it. On their left are shelves of canned food and other bags of food.
    Thousands of immigrants, including refugees and asylees, in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    Topline:

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    What’s new: The changes apply to certain immigrants who are here lawfully, including refugees and asylees. It also applies to people from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special visas for helping the U.S. military overseas.

    Why now: The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    What’s next: Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    The changes remove eligibility for certain noncitizens, including people with refugee status and victims of trafficking. It also applies to immigrants from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special immigrant visas for helping the U.S. government overseas.

     ”These are folks … many of whom have large families that we have a commitment to as a country because we welcomed them and invited them here to find a place of refuge,” said Cambria Tortorelli, president of the International Institute of Los Angeles, a refugee resettlement agency. “They’re authorized to work and they’ve been brought here by the U.S. government.”

    The federal spending bill, H.R. 1, made sweeping cuts to social safety net programs, including food assistance and Medicaid. In signing the bill, President Donald Trump said the changes were delivering on his campaign promises of “America first.”

    Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. The state estimates about 72,000 immigrants with lawful presence will be affected across California.

    CalFresh is the state’s version of the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Undocumented immigrants have not been eligible to receive CalFresh benefits.

    State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Who the changes apply to:

    • Asylees
    • Refugees
    • Parolees (unless they are Cuban and Haitian entrants)
    • Individuals with deportation or removal withheld
    • Conditional entrants
    • Victims of trafficking
    • Battered noncitizens
    • Iraqi or Afghan with special immigrant visas (SIV) who are not lawful permanent residents (LPR)
    • Certain Afghan Nationals granted parole between July 31, 2021, and Sept. 30, 2023
    • Certain Ukrainian Nationals granted parole between Feb. 24, 2022, and Sep. 30, 2024