With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Newsom administration tells Beverly Hills its efforts to block a high-rise violate state housing law

California housing officials are sending a message to the city of Beverly Hills: approve plans for a high-rise apartment building, or we’ll see you in court.
On Thursday, the state’s Department of Housing and Community Development sent a letter to the affluent city saying their failure to process an application for a 165-unit building just off Wilshire Boulevard “is in violation of state housing law.”
“The City Council should reverse its decision and direct city staff to process the project without further delay,” the department’s letter goes on to say.
Gov. Gavin Newsom said he expects local governments to do their part to address the state’s housing shortage. In a statement, Newsom said of Beverly Hills: “Their attempt to block this housing project violates the law. Now is a time to build more housing, not cave to the demands of NIMBYs.”
In response, Beverly Hills officials said they have not yet denied the project and their actions so far have been “procedural in nature.”
“Beverly Hills has until September 20, 2024 to submit a response to HCD’s letter and intends to provide HCD with detailed reasoning in support of its actions, which were taken in good faith,” city officials said in a statement.
The details of the project
The project in question is located at 125 Linden Drive. If approved, it would be one of the city’s tallest residential buildings at 200 feet. Twenty percent of the apartments would be reserved for low-income renters. The building would also include a hotel.
Developer Leo Pustilnikov first submitted the plans in October 2022 under a provision known as the “Builder’s Remedy.” This law applies to cities that fail to adequately plan for state-mandated housing goals.
What’s the ‘Builder’s Remedy’?
When cities blow deadlines to plan for new housing, the Builder’s Remedy gets activated. It allows developers to submit plans for housing that normally would not be allowed under local zoning restrictions. Under the law, cities without a state-approved housing plan cannot reject these projects, as long as they include some affordable units.
Beverly Hills was out of compliance with state housing law when Pustilnikov first submitted the Linden proposal. State officials have told cities they must process Builder’s Remedy projects like this one based on the situation on the ground when developers first applied — not based on later compliance. Beverly Hills received state approval for its housing plans this May.
How the developer’s team is responding
Dave Rand, the land use attorney for the Linden project, said the state’s letter to Beverly Hills shows cities will face consequences if they flout the law.
“You have actors at the highest level of state government forcefully intervening to push housing forward and to prevent cities from taking tactics like this,” Rand said. “The state cannot afford to turn down affordable housing in a place like Beverly Hills, where it's incredibly difficult to build.”
This isn’t the first time state officials have cracked down on cities resistant to new housing. The Newsom administration sued Huntington Beach in 2019 over failures to plan for state housing goals, and in 2022 the state told Pasadena that the city’s plans to block new housing in “landmark districts” were illegal.
What the city has done so far
The city’s most recent action on the Linden project came on June 27, when the Beverly Hills City Council voted to deny an appeal from the developer challenging the city’s conclusion that the project application was “incomplete.” The state’s housing department sent a letter the day before the council meeting taking the side of the developer.
Any litigation that could stem from this showdown would not commence until after Sept. 20, the deadline the state gave Beverly Hills to respond to Thursday’s letter.
Under state law, the city has to plan for 3,104 units of new housing by 2029. More than half of those units must be affordable to low-income households.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.
-
The bill would increase penalties for metal recyclers who possess or purchase metal used in public infrastructure.