Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • US officials explore major shift for renters

    Topline:

    The Department of Housing and Urban Development is exploring the idea of giving struggling Americans cash aid instead of vouchers.

    Why it matters: The housing voucher program has been a lifeline for millions of people, but there are real problems. There aren't nearly enough federal housing vouchers for everyone who qualifies, and many people wait years for them. What happens next can be even more frustrating.

    What's next: Solomon Greene of HUD says these new tests will take years. And if HUD ever did want to make a large-scale shift — from paying landlords to paying tenants directly — it would need congressional authority. For now, he says housing vouchers will continue to help the millions of people who depend on them.

    Read more... about the potential plan to help millions with housing.

    The Department of Housing and Urban Development is exploring the idea of giving struggling Americans cash aid instead of vouchers. That might seem like an unlikely, bold new move for the federal housing agency — except it turns out that back in the 1970s, HUD was already testing the idea.

    Before the cash-aid results were even in, however, HUD launched its voucher program that now serves millions of people. A few years ago, a HUD employee came across the reports from its 1970s tests and wondered whether the idea was worth a new look.
    “It’s taken us 50 years to come back to it and really experiment with it once again,” says Solomon Greene, who helps develop policy at HUD.

    Why it matters

    The housing voucher program has been a lifeline for millions of people, but there are real problems. There aren't nearly enough federal housing vouchers for everyone who qualifies, and many people wait years for them. What happens next can be even more frustrating.

    When Elizabeth Alvandi finally got a voucher in 2022, she drove from North Carolina to Massachusetts to try and find an apartment near her aging dad. “I am sleeping in my car and doing the best I can to make the most of every moment that I'm there,” she recalled. But for three months she was rejected again and again, or told nothing was available.

    “There were a couple conversations that just ended,” she says, “when they asked what my income was and how I'd be paying for it.”

    No one said it was because of her housing voucher. In fact, discriminating like that is banned in some 20 states. And yet, Alvandi could not find a landlord to take it.

    Why vouchers come with problems

    “The underlying problem that we're facing is just because you get a voucher allocated to you does not mean you get to use it,” says Preston Prince, executive director of the Santa Clara County Housing Authority in Northern California.

    Vouchers allow recipients to pay 30% of their income on rent, with the government covering the rest. But according to one analysis, 40% of all voucher holders were unable to sign a lease after looking for six months. A 2018 study by the Urban Institute found even higher rejection rates in some cities.

    Landlords are put off by agency red tape and things like mandatory inspections to make sure a property is safe. That process can drag on for weeks or months, costing owners money as their rental properties sit empty and making vouchers an especially tough sell in a hot housing market.

    Prince has been among a growing number of housing officials and advocates pushing for a different way, even though it can feel risky to tinker with a program that still helps 5 million very low-income Americans.

    I've dedicated 35 years of my career to housing. Asking that question of, like, ‘Have we been doing it wrong?’ is a little scary.
    — Preston Prince of Santa Clara County Housing Authority

    “I've dedicated 35 years of my career to housing,” Prince says. “Asking that question of, like, ‘Have we been doing it wrong?’ is a little scary.”

    How we got here

    The idea of using cash instead of vouchers has gotten a boost from successful pandemic aid programs, as well as from dozens of basic income experiments around the country. Philadelphia is already testing this, giving cash directly to 300 renters. The federal government is now exploring that on a far bigger scale.

    This summer, HUD put out a formal request for more research on the impact of paying renters directly. The department has no new funding to do that itself, so it called on others to organize experiments, though HUD did offer a suggestion on how they could work.

    “There are some tricky things that agencies will have to go through when they do this,” says Brian McCabe of Georgetown University, who worked on this issue during a recent stint at HUD.

    He says a key goal of cash is getting people housed faster. So one big challenge will be how to carry out inspections without slowing down the lease process. One option could be a self-inspection.

    “We might have a checklist and say 'these are the things I'm looking for.' It may be that I move in with cash and then after I've moved in, the agency comes and does an inspection,” McCabe says. And maybe that inspection is done remotely over video.

    Another question is whether tenants would be able to spend their monthly cash aid on something other than rent. Advocates say trusting families with that kind of flexibility could help them better manage urgent, competing expenses, although it also opens up the possibility that more people may fall behind on rent. On the other hand, if the cash aid could only be spent on housing, how could that be enforced without re-creating too much red tape?

    The potential benefits of cash

    James Riccio, with the research group MDRC, has taken up HUD’s call to explore cash payments and will help design one pilot program. It needs more funding, but so far has signed up six housing agencies across the country, including the one headed by Preston Prince in Santa Clara County.

    Riccio says they will evaluate whether having money on hand helps more people find a place to live. “Will the whole process of leasing up happen more quickly? Which could save time and money for the housing authority and certainly for tenants as well,” he says.

    He also wonders if cash could make it easier for people to move to better neighborhoods.

    That was a core aim when then-President Richard Nixon called for letting people make their own decisions about where to live. In a special message to Congress in 1973, he said traditional public housing had left people isolated in “monstrous, depressing places — run down, overcrowded, crime-ridden, falling apart.” But half a century later, Riccio says it’s still the case that “voucher recipients tend to concentrate in a smaller number of higher poverty communities.”

    What's next

    Solomon Greene of HUD says these new tests will take years. And if HUD ever did want to make a large-scale shift — from paying landlords to paying tenants directly — it would need congressional authority. For now, he says housing vouchers will continue to help the millions of people who depend on them.

    “Your cost burden goes down. You are more likely to be able to stay in your unit longer,” he says. “There's a rich body of research showing that vouchers are the most effective way of preventing recidivism or returns to homelessness.”

    Could giving renters cash do all that? Greene says emphatically that at this point, “we don’t know.” And HUD won’t make any changes until there’s evidence they work.
    Copyright 2024 NPR

  • Israel and U.S. launch military strike

    Topline:

    Israel and the U.S. have launched what Israel describes as a preemptive military strike against Iran, amid weeks of escalating tensions and heightened U.S. military presence in the region.

    What we know: Iranian government media report rocket fire in parts of the capital, Tehran. State television has broadcast footage showing smoke rising after a blast in the city. The extent of the damage and potential casualties has not yet been confirmed. W

    Why now: In an official statement, Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz described the operation as a preemptive action aimed at neutralizing threats against Israel.

    Updated February 28, 2026 at 05:12 AM ET

    TEL AVIV — The U.S. and Israel have launched strikes against Iran with the goal of toppling the regime, President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Saturday.

    Iran retaliated by launching missiles at Israel and a U.S. naval base in Bahrain. An Iranian official said all Israeli and U.S. interests in the region were now considered legitimate targets.

    The joint U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran comes after weeks of escalating tensions and a major U.S. military buildup in the region, as the U.S. and Iran tried to negotiate a deal to limit Iran's nuclear program. Trump said those efforts had failed.

    "Bombs will be dropping everywhere," President Trump said, addressing Iranians in a video posted to his Truth Social account. "When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be, probably, your only chance for generations."

    The Israeli military said in a statement its fighter jets were striking "dozens of military targets" in Iran with "full synchronization and coordination" between the Israeli and U.S. militaries following months of joint planning.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the goal of the joint U.S.-Israeli attack is to "remove the existential threat posed by the terrorist regime in Iran."

    "Our joint action will create the conditions for the brave Iranian people to take their destiny into their own hands," Netanyahu said in a video.

    A person briefed on the operation told NPR it was expected to last a few days, with Israel's military focusing on targeting Iran's missile program.

    "We are going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground," Trump said.

    Israel has closed its airspace to all passenger flights, and civil defense protocols have been activated. Regional military forces remain on high alert.

    A 48-hour state of emergency has been declared nationwide. Air raid sirens have been sounding across Israel, with authorities warning civilians to enter bomb shelters.

    Trails of smoke streaked the sky above Tel Aviv as Israeli interception systems fired at incoming missiles. A hospital in central Israel began moving operations to an underground fortified compound.

    "Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a vicious group of very hard, terrible people. It's menacing activities directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas and our allies throughout the world," Trump said.

    Trump said the U.S. had "sought repeatedly to make a deal" but Iran "rejected every opportunity to renounce their nuclear ambitions."

    Trump told the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps to "lay down your arms… or you will face certain death."

    Iranian government media reported rocket fire in parts of the capital, Tehran. State television has broadcast footage showing smoke rising after a blast in the city. The extent of the damage and potential casualties has not yet been confirmed.

    The strike follows weeks of speculation about potential military action against Iran, particularly amid a significant U.S. military buildup in the Middle East.

    This is a developing story and will be updated.

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Mama Jackie lays fourth egg of the season
    An adult bald eagle standing in a nest of twigs over two white eggs.
    Mama Jackie with her second egg of the second clutch of the season. Big Bear's bald eagles are getting another chance at raising chicks after the first two eggs were breached.

    Topline:

    Big Bear’s famous bald eagles, Jackie and Shadow, are getting another chance at parenthood after welcoming a fourth egg this season, about a month after the first two eggs were breached by ravens.

    Why now: Jackie welcomed the newest egg a little before 6 p.m. Friday, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley, the nonprofit that runs a popular YouTube livestream centered on the nest overlooking Big Bear Lake.

    Why it matters: Bald eagles generally lay one clutch, which refers to the group of eggs laid in each nesting attempt, per season. But a replacement clutch is possible if the eggs don’t make it through the early incubation process, as seen with Jackie and Shadow this year and in 2021.

    The backstory: The duo laid the first two eggs of the season in late January as thousands of eager fans watched online. But within a week, Friends of Big Bear Valley confirmed one of the eggs was cracked, and a raven breached both eggs in the nest later the same day.

    What's next: Jackie has laid up to three eggs in a clutch, including in each of the past two seasons, so it’s possible another egg could arrive in the coming days. In February 2021, Jackie laid two eggs in a replacement clutch.

    Friends of Big Bear Valley often reminds fans — nature is in charge, and only time will tell what the season brings.

    Chick watch: Once egg-laying is over, the chick countdown is on. Jackie and Shadow's usual egg incubation time is around 35 to 39 days, starting when the eagles begin to fully incubate their clutch, according to the nonprofit.

    Last season, the first egg hatched at around 40 days old, the second egg hatched around 38 days old and the third egg around 39 days old.

    Go deeper: Environmental groups launch $10M fundraiser to buy land near Big Bear’s famous bald eagle nest

  • Notices to be sent to staff in mid-March
    Two teenagers with dark skin tone hold up white posterboard signs. One reads "Keep the arts in our hearts. Save Marcshall ACI."
    At this board meeting in November 2025, PUSD students protested cuts to their schools' funding.

    Topline:

    Facing a multi-million-dollar budget shortfall for the upcoming school year, Pasadena Unified School District board voted unanimously this week to finalize a plan to send layoff notices to more than 160 staff members as part of an effort to balance its budget that began last fall.

    About the board meeting: During the Thursday meeting, parents, teachers, union leaders and staff spoke against approving layoff notices, saying that they would harm the classroom experience and potentially lead to more families and teachers leaving the district.

    What the board says: Pasadena Unified board members said that the cuts were necessary, especially amid warnings from regulators that they could be out of compliance with regulators that have warned the district of its responsibility to balance its budget.

    What happens next: The reduction in force notices letting staff know that their positions may be cut will go out by halfway through March. The district will then have until the summer to finalize the list of staff being laid off.

    Facing a multi-million-dollar budget shortfall for the upcoming school year, Pasadena Unified's school board voted unanimously this week to finalize a plan to send layoff notices to more than 160 staff members as part of an effort to balance its budget that began last fall.

    The district has maintained that the job reductions are necessary because of a $30 million budget deficit, part of a financial crisis made worse by the Eaton Fire.

    Listen 27:10
    PUSD will vote on budget cuts. What programs are in jeopardy and will this help their overall deficit?

    California schools must notify employees about potential layoffs for the following school year by March 15. The number of current employees who will be out of a job next year is still unclear, in part, because people may be reassigned to vacant positions. In the past, PUSD has also rescinded some layoff notices before they took effect.

    Parents, teachers and union leaders at the Thursday meeting criticized the district for targeting teachers and school staff for layoffs instead of administrative positions.

    “ Teaching for PUSD means anxiety every March as it approaches, because we don't know if we're going to get to keep our job or not,” said Genevieve Miller, a PUSD teacher who said her children also graduated from the district. “ There's a different way forward.”

    Board members acknowledged the decision they made was difficult.

    “ I just want to be very clear that this is not the outcome that anybody prefers,” Board member Yarma Velázquez said. “Workforce reductions and the continuous, year after year position of being in this place where we have to reduce positions is draining and it is painful.

    “I am very aware of what the implications are for all of the people that work here at PUSD.”

    The board meeting

    At the meeting, which started at 4 p.m. and nearly lasted until midnight, parents highlighted the potential of families and teachers choosing to leave the district because of the layoffs.

    “ Right now, the [PUSD] community is in fight mode, as you can see from the turnout and other comments being made here tonight,” said parent Neil Tyler. “But if you approve these resolutions as proposed tonight, a large chunk of the community will quickly shift to flight mode and the death spiral of this district will begin.”

    Jonathan Gardner, president of United Teachers of Pasadena, told the board that the cuts meant the district would lose dozens of middle and high school teachers and child development staff.

    “ The best thing for kids and staff is always stability and making sure that we have full staff,” Gardner said. “The priorities should be working from the student experience out. Instead, what we see is millions and millions of dollars being spent on contracted services and millions and millions being spent on extra staffing at the central office.”

    Speakers also noted that Pasadena Unified had endured years of budget cuts, which affected teachers, librarians and office staff.

    Others said PUSD was failing to meet its requirement under California law to commit at least 55% of the district’s education expenses to teacher salaries.

    LAist reached out to the district for comment on this but has not yet received a response.

    Pasadena Unified board members said the cuts were necessary, especially after warnings from regulators that they could be out of compliance with requirements to balance the budget.

    “For the sake of the district's solvency, I feel like it would be irresponsible if I took an action that put this district in jeopardy,” board member Michelle Bailey said Thursday night. “I can't in good conscience take that kind of action.”

    About the budget issues

    Concerns over declining enrollment numbers, which are tied to funding, have been growing since the Eaton Fire.

    A report commissioned by a state agency recommended that the state increase its funding for the school system to help with fire recovery.

    Some observers said Pasadena Unified’s budget issues date back much longer than that.

    “Over the past 30 years, Pasadena Unified has faced a mounting fiscal calamity, one that you can no longer ignore or postpone,” Octavio Castelo, director of business advisory services for the Los Angeles County Office of Education, told Pasadena Unified’s board in November. “Despite your best efforts and intentions, the district has not been able to live within its means."

    Cutting staff will likely mean losing some school programs, including language and music.

    “ You have Mary Jackson [Elementary in Altadena] — it's a science magnet school, and they're cutting the science teacher,” Gardner, the teacher’s union president, told LAist. “That's the heart of the school.”

    PUSD's timeline for budget cuts

    Oct. 15, 22, 29 at 4:30- 6:30 p.m. 

    • The Superintendent's Budget Advisory Committee meets to review district programs and recommend cuts. More info.

    Nov. 13 

    Nov. 20 

    December 2025 

    • PUSD delivers a financial report called the “first interim” to the L.A. County Office of Education 
    • PUSD begins identifying specific positions to eliminate. 

    March 2026

    • PUSD issues layoff notices to impacted staff.

    June 2026 

    • PUSD board votes on the budget for the upcoming school year.

    July 2026 

    • Budget with up to $35 millions in cuts takes effect.

    What happens next

    The layoff notices are expected to be sent to affected staff members by mid-March.

    The district will have until summer to finalize the list.

    K-12 education reporter Mariana Dale contributed reporting.

  • FBI searched superintendent’s home and office
    A man looks off into the distance and wears a white shirt with a blue tie. He stands behind a microphone.
    LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho speaks during a press conference at LAUSD Headquarters in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board voted unanimously Friday to place Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation. The board appointed longtime administrator and current Chief of School Operations Andres Chait as interim superintendent.

    The backstory: The reason for the searches is unknown, although it has been the subject of widespread speculation. A DOJ spokesperson said the agency had a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told LAist media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.

    About the superintendent: Carvalho has been superintendent of LAUSD since 2022, and the board unanimously renewed his contract in 2025. Prior to coming to L.A., Carvalho had worked for the Miami-Dade County school district for decades, 30 years as a teacher and the last 14 years as the district's supervisor.

    A potential connection to AI: A spokesperson for the FBI in Miami confirmed Wednesday’s L.A. searches are linked to a search of a South Florida home the same day. That property, identified by local media outlets, belongs to a woman associated with the company LAUSD contracted with to create a short-lived AI tool.

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board voted unanimously Friday to place Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation.

    The FBI searched Carvalho’s home and district offices Wednesday. A DOJ spokesperson said the agency had a court-authorized warrant but declined to provide additional details. The FBI told LAist media partner CBS LA that the underlying affidavit remained under court-ordered seal.

    The board also appointed current Chief of School Operations Andres Chait as acting superintendent after the seven-hour closed meeting Thursday and Friday.

    “I know that this is a very challenging time,” said Board President Scott Schmerelson in a brief public statement after the decision was announced. “I want you to know that the board believes in you, supports you and knows that you will continue to do your very best to support the students and families of the district.”

    Schmerelson clarified in an email to LAist that he was referring to Chait. The seven-member board exited the meeting room without taking questions. Carvalho was not present and has not made a public statement since the searches Wednesday.

    The district posted a statement online later in which Schmerelson wrote that “today’s action is aimed at fulfilling our promise to students and families to provide an excellent public education without distraction.”

    The board’s decision provided clarity about district leadership but did not shed light on the reason for the searches, which have been the subject of widespread speculation.

    “While we understand the need for information, we cannot discuss the specifics of this matter pending investigation,” read the district’s statement.

    Who is the acting superintendent?

    Chait has worked for the district for nearly three decades. The chief of school operations’ responsibilities are varied and include athletics, the district’s office of emergency management and staff investigations. Chait has presented to the board on everything from school safety to the cell phone ban and the district’s calendar.

    A man with medium-toned skin sits behind a desk with his hands held together. He's wearing a suit and tie and is surrounded by books and papers neatly stacked.
    Chief of School Operations Andres Chait has worked for LAUSD for nearly three decades.
    (
    Courtesy of Los Angeles Unified School District
    )

    “I am humbled by the board’s confidence in appointing me to serve as acting superintendent during this critical time," Chait said in the district’s statement. "Our focus remains clear: to ensure stability, continuity and strong leadership for our students, families and employees."

    What we know about AllHere, LAUSD’s AI tool

    A spokesperson for the FBI in Miami confirmed Wednesday’s L.A. searches are linked to a search of a South Florida home the same day. That property, identified by local media outlets, belongs to Debra Kerr, who was associated with the company LAUSD contracted to create a short-lived AI tool called AllHere.

    Federal authorities have not connected AllHere to this week’s investigation.

    Los Angeles Unified approved a $6.2 million contract with AllHere in June 2023 to develop a tool that would create an “individual acceleration plan,” using district data and featuring an artificial intelligence chatbot.

    LAUSD debuted “Ed” the following March as a "personal assistant" to students that would point them toward mental health resources and nudge students who were falling behind.

    Within three months of its debut, the company behind Ed, AllHere, furloughed the bulk of its staff; its CEO was later charged with fraud. The district defended the process it used to debut that chatbot, which cost $3 million.

    Parents and educators demanded transparency after the district shut down the chatbot.

    Many questions remain

    The federal investigation comes at a time when LAUSD is financially strained, cutting hundreds of jobs and facing pressure from the district’s largest labor unions to settle new contracts.

    SEIU Local 99, which represents school support staff and United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) have issued statements calling on the district to clearly communicate about the status of the superintendent and the investigation.

    "UTLA educators and our school communities have long raised concerns about LAUSD rapidly increasing spending on education tech and outside contractors, while investment in classrooms and educators has declined,” UTLA wrote in a statement provided to LAist.

    Carvalho has been superintendent of LAUSD since 2022, and the board unanimously renewed his contract in 2025. Prior to coming to L.A., Carvalho had worked for the Miami-Dade County school district for decades, 30 years as a teacher and the last 14 years as the district's supervisor.

    Carvalho's time at LAUSD has included a number of wins for the district, including gains in test scores and participation in AP classes.