The Brief

After a bruising week that saw the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority lose a large chunk of its funding, the agency’s head announced Friday she will be stepping down.

Va Lecia Adams Kellum, who joined as the agency’s chief executive two years ago from L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ administration, had been fighting to preserve funding from L.A. County.

But earlier this week, county leaders voted to strip the agency’s funding in favor of channeling resources through a new county department they said would provide more oversight and accountability.

The county is currently the agency's largest funder, providing nearly $350 million a year. LAHSA’s next largest funder is the city of L.A., and city officials are also exploring an exit from funding the agency.

In recent months, multiple audits have found serious accounting and oversight issues at the agency. The most recent audit, released in March in connection with a lawsuit brought against the city and county of L.A., prompted U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter to describe officials’ failure to track billions of dollars in spending as “a slow train wreck.”

Why now?

In a resignation letter submitted Friday, and first reported by the L.A. Times, Adams Kellum wrote that she was proud of her efforts to make the agency more effective. She noted that unsheltered homelessness in the region decreased last year in the count her agency oversaw, and was expected to decrease again this year based on partial results released earlier than usual.

Still, Adams Kellum said, now was the right time to step down.

“Ensuring a seamless handover is a top priority, and I am committed to a 120-day transition period, or longer if needed,” she wrote.

Adams Kellum joined LAHSA as CEO in January 2023. Prior to stepping into local government, she was the CEO of St. Joseph Center, a homeless services provider based in Venice.

The exit comes after LAist revealed in February that as LAHSA’s CEO, Adams Kellum signed a taxpayer deal to pay $2.1 million to a nonprofit that employs her husband in a senior leadership role. Adams Kellum had previously told LAist she followed rules barring her from any matters that involve the group. Public documents LAist reviewed showed otherwise.

Officials' positions on LAHSA

The L.A. City Council is also considering a proposal to pull the city’s funding from the agency. Currently, the city contributes about $306 million to the agency’s annual budget.

Bass and some City Council members have said the agency’s performance has been improving and that now is not the right time to withdraw funding.

Bass issued a statement Friday thanking Adams Kellum and calling her an "agent of change."

"Dr. Adams Kellum has saved thousands of lives in Los Angeles. ... She tackled the challenges of the homelessness system — silos, services, accountability, cost — and despite knowing that LAHSA was broken, she answered the call of service to serve as CEO because she knows that above all else, we must work to save lives," the mayor said.

Councilmember Nithya Raman, chair of the council's housing and homelessness committee, said the city was "finally making headway against our most intractable crisis."

"I deeply hope that this momentum won't be lost, because it would be the most vulnerable people — those on our streets — who would suffer,” Raman said in a written statement.

Other elected leaders have said that under Adams Kellum’s watch, the agency has not been able to say what local taxpayers are getting in exchange for their money. Councilmember Monica Rodriguez, one of City Hall’s most outspoken critics of the agency, has said she feels the current funding model “has zero transparency, zero consequences for failure to perform.”

L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, one of the leaders of the move to pull the county's funding from LAHSA, said Friday that change is what's needed.

"LAHSA has seen multiple leadership transitions during challenging times," Horvath said in a statement. She added: "To truly move forward, we must replace this broken system with the accountability measures that set future leaders up for success."

What's next

Recent turmoil leaves the agency’s role uncertain.

Elected leaders agree that even if most of its funding is pulled, the agency will still perform certain key functions, like overseeing the region’s annual homeless count and coordinating shared data on homeless services.

But without being entrusted with hundreds of millions of dollars each year for service providers, shelters and outreach efforts, the agency would have a much diminished role in confronting the region’s homelessness crisis. Hundreds of LAHSA employees will likely have to leave the agency.

Read the resignation letter

How we're reporting on this

Reporters Nick Gerda and David Wagner are working on this developing story. In all cases, we strive to bring you the most accurate information in real time and will update this story as new information becomes available.

More LAHSA reporting from LAist

• LA County to strip hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars from homelessness agency
• Judge blasts LA homeless spending as a ‘train wreck’ and threatens to seize control
• LA County supervisors to vote on pulling over $300 million out of homeless services agency
• LA's top homelessness official signed $2.1 million contract with husband's employer

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

“The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

“We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

(

J.W. Hendricks

/

The LA Local

)

In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

“They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

“These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

“I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

“It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

“Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

What can small businesses do? 

Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

“We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

What’s next 

After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

“It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

“And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

Topline:

Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.