Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Cash-strapped cities ask private donors for help
    A group of armed, masked law enforcement officers in tactical gear patrols a street lined with palm trees and onlookers.
    People clash with U.S. Border Patrol after a traffic collision with one of their vehicles during an immigration raid in Bell on June 20, 2025.

    Topline:

    Local governments across Southern California are now asking private donors to fund cash assistance programs aimed at helping families affected by recent federal immigrant raids.

    The backstory: The raids have stripped many L.A. families of their primary breadwinner. Other immigrant workers who have not been detained are also losing income as workplaces shut down to avoid becoming the next target for masked, armed federal agents. The economic fallout has made paying rent even more challenging for undocumented L.A. tenants, two-thirds of whom were already paying rents considered unaffordable by federal government standards.

    What’s new: Local relief efforts have been complicated by municipal budget shortfalls. With the Trump administration spearheading the immigration raids, cash-strapped cities also cannot rely on the federal government to provide rent relief funds, as they did during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, they’re asking philanthropists to fund cash assistance programs aimed at helping families affected by the raids pay for rent and other expenses.

    Read on… To hear from tenant and immigrant advocates who argue cities should be digging deeper to help families afraid of leaving their homes.

    Recent immigration raids have stripped many Los Angeles families of their primary breadwinner. Other immigrant workers who have not been detained are also losing income as workplaces shut down to avoid becoming the next target for masked, armed federal agents.

    The economic fallout has made paying rent even more challenging for undocumented L.A. tenants, two-thirds of whom were already paying rents considered unaffordable by federal government standards.

    Now, local governments such as the city of L.A., Long Beach and L.A. County are asking philanthropists to fund cash assistance programs. The goal is to use private dollars to help families affected by the raids pay for rent and other expenses.

    So far the efforts have been relatively small in scale. Some immigrant and tenant rights groups say cities should be digging deeper to help families in need.

    “It’s a start, and something is better than nothing — and no, it does not go far enough,” said Estuardo Mazariegos, co-director of the L.A. Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, an economic justice advocacy group.

    Local relief efforts have been complicated by municipal budget shortfalls. With the Trump administration spearheading the immigration raids, cash-strapped cities cannot rely on the federal government to provide rent relief funds, as they did during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Elected leaders are also worried about privacy concerns for undocumented immigrants seeking aid. In addition, they have to consider potential blowback from Republicans in Washington, D.C. who oppose putting taxpayer funds toward housing support for unauthorized immigrants.

    Listen 0:44
    Cash-strapped LA cities ask private donors to help immigrants pay rent following ICE raids

    While local governments cobble together assistance funds, many tenants are left wondering how they’ll pay their August rent.

    Esmeralda, a Boyle Heights resident, told LAist the raids have caused her to lose work cleaning homes. She asked that only her first name be used in this story for fear of being targeted by immigration authorities.

    She said even before the raids began, more than half of her income went straight to rent. Now, she said, her income has plummeted.

    “My children are afraid of me leaving the house,” Esmeralda said, speaking in Spanish.

    Long Beach asks for donations

    On Friday, the day he announced the new Long Beach Neighbors Supporting Neighbors fund, Mayor Rex Richardson told LAist that he recognizes the urgent need for financial help.

    “Income goes down from two incomes to one in the household, rents are already high, and it may create an emergency,” Richardson said.

    The California Community Foundation, a local philanthropic organization, seeded the city’s fund with an initial contribution of $100,000. Long Beach, which is facing a general fund shortfall of $61.5 million over the next five years, is now asking for more donations to help eligible families pay for rent, groceries and other necessities.

    Richardson said he still hopes to find tax dollars to support families affected by the raids.

    Meeting the scale of the problem is “going to require significant funding, and that's where cities and counties can step up,” Richardson said. “This is a part of a broader strategy.”

    Some programs have yet to reveal funding levels

    This week, the L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted to establish a cash assistance fund within 30 days for households economically hurt by the raids. Details on how much funding will be available, and how much eligible households could receive, were not yet available.

    As in Long Beach, county leaders envision funding this program primarily through private donations. The county’s budget has been rocked by a $4 billion sex abuse settlement, the largest in U.S. history. Most county departments have had to cut spending by 3%.

    Supervisor Hilda Solis, who introduced the proposal, said in a written statement: “While the eligibility criteria, prioritization framework, and distribution mechanisms are still being finalized, the goal is clear: to deliver critical, compassionate support in a manner that protects confidentiality.”

    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said last Friday that the city is also working to set up a cash aid program in response to the raids. She said philanthropic organizations would fund the program, which could provide “a couple hundred dollars” to eligible families through prepaid debit cards.

    Bass said she has met with families who lost income after a worker was detained. She recalled meeting one mother who “now is concerned that she might face being evicted and being homeless” because a family member was locked up by federal immigration authorities.

    When asked if the city has plans to contribute taxpayer funds toward the relief effort, Bass said: “I wish we had general fund money for that.”

    Last month, Bass signed a budget that included hundreds of layoffs and other service cuts to close a nearly $1 billion dollar revenue shortfall.

    LAist reached out to ask the Mayor’s Office when the cash assistance program would launch, and how much funding would be available. We haven’t received a response.

    A push to re-prioritize ‘mansion tax’ money

    Tenant rights groups have said many immigrant families could soon fall short on rent, face eviction and potentially become unhoused if cities don’t do more to help. Some have called for a moratorium on evictions, a policy that so far has not been taken up by local elected leaders.

    The United to House L.A. coalition is now pushing for the city of L.A. to help immigrant families with funds from Measure ULA, often called the city’s “mansion tax” because it raises money from the sale of properties worth more than $5 million.

    Joe Donlin, the coalition’s director, wrote in a recent letter to the ULA Citizens Oversight Committee that this voter-approved source of tax revenue would be “an appropriate vehicle through which the City can support families deeply harmed by these actions.”

    Specifically, advocates want the city to prioritize households affected by immigration raids for a $14.6 million round of funding scheduled to launch this fall. The measure’s Income Support Program was originally designed to give direct financial assistance to low-income tenants who are elderly or disabled, and at risk of losing their housing.

    The program remains focused on seniors and renters with disabilities. But it has since been tweaked to prioritize households that lost income because of January’s wildfires.

    Mazariegos, with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, said ULA was created to address “urgent needs.”

    “We have the opportunity to extend it to the people that are directly impacted by this crisis, just like we extended it to people directly impacted by the fires,” he said.

    Later this month, the city’s ULA Citizens Oversight Committee plans to vote on whether to prioritize families affected by the raids. The proposal would need a vote of approval from the full City Council in August before households could apply, tentatively in September or October.

    Bucking the trend toward private donations, the city of Montebello has committed $100,000 in general funds toward a rent and utility relief program for immigrant families hurt by the raids.

    Montebello officials said those affected by federal enforcement actions should call the city at (323) 887-1363. The city will cut checks directly to landlords and utility companies, and all inquiries will be handled confidentially, they said.

  • Key city leaders call for shifting away from LAHSA
    Outreach workers, seen from the back, are walking down a street. A man and a woman on the left are wearing tops with the words LAHSA on them; the man on the right is wearing a neon green jacket. All three are wearing blue masks
    (Right) Garrett Lee, of Department of Mental Health's HOME Team, collaborates with LAHSA’s Homeless Engagement Team during outreach in the targeted COVID-19 testing efforts in the homeless community, April, 2020.

    Topline:

    In what could be a major change in oversight of L.A. homelessness spending, the City Council’s homelessness committee is recommending the city start shifting some programs away from the L.A. Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) over the course of the upcoming fiscal year. Which programs and who would oversee them remains to be seen.

    The context: The move comes a year after the county decided to pull its funding from the joint city-county agency in response to multiple audits that found LAHSA failed to properly track and manage billions of homelessness dollars. Officials are also warning homelessness services may have to be cut due to ongoing, years’ long delays on LAHSA’s part in reimbursing service providers for their work.

    The recommendations: On Wednesday, the council’s Housing and Homelessness Committee voted to recommend multiple changes to city homelessness spending, including a recommendation to shift management of some city programs away from LAHSA during the next fiscal year that starts July 1. Another recommendation advanced by the committee is to pursue negotiations to give the city “a clear majority” in the governance and decision-making control at LAHSA.

    What’s next: The recommendations now go to the full City Council for a decision.

    In what could be a major change in oversight of L.A. homelessness spending, the City Council’s homelessness committee is recommending the city start shifting some programs away from the L.A. Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) over the course of the upcoming fiscal year. Which programs and who would oversee them remains to be seen.

    The move comes a year after L.A. County decided to pull its funding from the joint city-county agency in response to multiple audits that found LAHSA failed to properly track and manage billions of homelessness dollars. Officials are also warning homelessness services may have to be cut due to ongoing, years’ long delays on LAHSA’s part in reimbursing service providers for their work. The committee’s chair, Councilmember Nithya Raman, describes LAHSA as “plagued with scandal” in her mayoral platform.

    On Wednesday, the council’s Housing and Homelessness Committee voted to recommend multiple changes to city homelessness spending, including a recommendation by Raman to shift management of some city programs away from LAHSA during the next fiscal year that starts July 1.

    Another recommendation advanced by the committee, which was proposed by Councilmember Tim McOsker, is to pursue negotiations to give the city “a clear majority” in the governance and decision-making control at LAHSA — including over federal funding meant for 84 other cities in L.A. County. Currently, LAHSA’s governing commission is split 50-50 between city and county appointees. Starting next year, the city will be by far the largest funder of LAHSA.

    [Click here to read the recommendations a majority of the committee voted to make.]

    The recommendations call for city officials to send the council a report by July 1 analyzing which city programs make sense to shift away from LAHSA and instead be managed by the county, the city or another entity. If approved by the council, $450,000 would be budgeted to hire consultants to advise the city about the funding shift, and city officials would be directed to update the council every 30 days about the transition.

    The recommendations now go to the full City Council for a decision.

    Mayor Karen Bass has expressed concern that moving too quickly to shift funds from LAHSA could harm services for unhoused people. That concern was echoed at Wednesday’s committee meeting by Gita O’Neill, who is serving as LAHSA CEO during a year-long leave from being an attorney at the city attorney’s office.

    “ I would just ask this committee to take their time to look at the issues. Sometimes when things are rushed and hurried, unfortunately our unhoused folks fall through the cracks,” O’Neill said. “Seeing it go really quickly, sometimes things can get lost, sometimes contracts can get lost.”

    Councilmember Heather Hutt, who is on the council’s homelessness committee, said Wednesday she does not support shifting spending yet to the county or in-house.

    “It's too premature, too early and too rushed,” Hutt said. “Given the actions of the county and the federal government, we need to make sure our system is stabilized over the next two years before we think about what a longer transition looks like.”

    She voted against Raman’s recommendations to start shifting funding over the next fiscal year, and voted for McOsker’s recommendations to try to beef up city control of LAHSA.

    The full City Council is expected to decide on the recommendations at a future meeting. Regardless of what the city does, all of the county’s funding of services through LAHSA will be pulled as of July 1 and moved to full county control.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

  • Sponsored message
  • What happens to his seat and the race for CA gov
    Rep. Eric Swalwell, a man with light skin tone, wearing a blue zip-up sweater, speaks as he gestures with his hands. Out of focus in the background are two people, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, and a wall of posters.
    Rep. Eric Swalwell speaks to reporters after a campaign event on Proposition 50 in San Francisco.
    Topline:
    East Bay Rep. Eric Swalwell resigned from Congress on Tuesday, days after sexual assault and misconduct allegations against the Democratic front-runner upended California’s wide-open governor’s race. Swalwell dropped out of the race on Sunday and resigned from Congress on Tuesday. Here’s what happened and what it means for the June 2 statewide primary and the future of Swalwell’s congressional seat.


    The allegations: Swalwell, 45, is accused of sexually assaulting two women and harassing others. On Friday, he was accused of raping a former staff member twice, when she was too intoxicated to consent, and of harassing three other women, including by sending nude photos and making unwanted physical advances. The latest allegation was made by another woman, Lonna Drewes, who told reporters at a press conference on Tuesday that Swalwell drugged and raped her in 2018 in a West Hollywood hotel.

    What's next: Gov. Gavin Newsom quickly set Aug. 18 as the date for a special election to fill Swalwell’s seat. Whoever wins will fill the seat for the remaining months of Swalwell’s term, which ends in January. Swalwell’s departure stands to further shake up what has long been an unsettled race — and California’s first wide-open campaign for governor in two decades. Prior to Swalwell dropping out, he, Porter and Steyer were the top-polling Democrats. It seems likely that Porter and Steyer could now attract some of his supporters.

    East Bay Rep. Eric Swalwell resigned from Congress on Tuesday, days after sexual assault and misconduct allegations against the Democratic front-runner upended California’s wide-open governor’s race.

    Swalwell dropped out of the race Sunday and resigned from Congress on Tuesday. His exit comes as a new accuser came forward Tuesday, alleging that Swalwell drugged and raped her in 2018. Gov. Gavin Newsom quickly set Aug. 18 as the date for a special election to fill Swalwell’s seat.

    Here’s what happened and what it means for the June 2 statewide primary and the future of Swalwell’s congressional seat.

    Why did Swalwell resign from Congress and drop out of the governor’s race?

    Swalwell, 45, is accused of sexually assaulting two women and harassing others.

    On Friday, he was accused of raping a former staff member twice, when she was too intoxicated to consent, and of harassing three other women, including by sending nude photos and making unwanted physical advances.

    Those allegations were detailed in a San Francisco Chronicle investigation and a subsequent report by CNN. The latest allegation was made by another woman, Lonna Drewes, who told reporters at a press conference Tuesday that Swalwell drugged and raped her in 2018 in a West Hollywood hotel.

    Two women sit at a table with a row of microphones on top of it. Behind them is a blown up photo of a man and woman standing side by side. On the right, one of the women wearing a rust colored blazer puts her hand on the shoulder of the other woman, sitting to her right, wearing a white blazer and black top underneath.
    Attorney Lisa Bloom (right) comforts Lonna Drewes during a press conference in which Drewes accused U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell of sexual assault Tuesday in Beverly Hills.
    (
    Justin Sullivan
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Swalwell has denied the allegations since they broke April 10, and his lawyers sent the women accusing him cease-and-desist letters demanding they retract their claims. In a video message Swalwell posted late Friday, he seemed to acknowledge he’d been unfaithful to his wife.

    On Tuesday, after the second allegation of rape, Swalwell issued a statement through an attorney, which the lawyer posted on social media. It said that Swalwell “categorically and unequivocally denies each and every allegation of sexual misconduct and assault” and calls them a “calculated and transparent political hit job." His lawyer, Sara Azari, also went on News Nation on Tuesday night and said that “regret is not rape.”

    The most serious allegations involve a woman who worked for Swalwell’s presidential campaign and in his congressional office, a job she began at age 21. She told the Chronicle that Swalwell, who is 17 years older than she, began pursuing her within weeks of joining his office in 2019, sending her explicit pictures on Snapchat and asking for nude photos in return.

    She alleged that in September 2019, she went out drinking with a group, including Swalwell, in Pleasanton and woke up the next day naked in his hotel room, feeling the effects of vaginal intercourse.

    The woman also described a similar alleged assault in 2024 in New York City after a night of drinking, recalling portions of the night, including being in Swalwell’s hotel room, pushing him off of her and telling him no. She said she woke up alone in his hotel room with vaginal bleeding and bruising.

    Swalwell is also facing possible criminal investigations in both New York and California. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office said Saturday that it is looking into the alleged 2024 assault, and the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office said over the weekend that prosecutors there are “evaluating whether any alleged criminal conduct occurred within Alameda County.” And on Tuesday, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said it is investigating Drewe’s allegations.

    What happens to Eric Swalwell’s seat now?

    Swalwell represented California’s 14th Congressional District, which includes the East Bay cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore and Hayward. He submitted his resignation Tuesday. The seat is now vacant.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom quickly called a special election this summer to replace him. Whoever wins will fill the seat for the remaining months of Swalwell’s term, which ends in January. In the meantime, the district has no voting representation in Congress, only the staff who have remained to assist constituents.

    Meanwhile, the election cycle for the next term, beginning in January, continues on its regular schedule, with the June 2 primary and a potential runoff in the November general election.

    Swalwell is not on the ballot for his congressional seat because he was running for governor. However, his name will still appear on the June ballot for governor, since it’s legally too late to remove it.

    When is the special election for Swalwell’s seat and who might run?

    Newsom has scheduled a special election to fill the remainder of Swalwell’s term. First, a special primary election will be held June 16. If a candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, they would win outright and immediately take his seat in Congress.

    A man in a suit jacket and no tie holds a mic. He wears a wedding band on his left hand.
    A frontrunner for California governor, U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell suspended his campaign Sunday after a series of women accused him of sexual assault and harassment.
    (
    Ronaldo Bolaños
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    If no candidate clears that threshold, the top two finishers will advance to a runoff election Aug. 18. Whoever wins will serve only the remainder of Swalwell’s term until January.

    That means that if no candidate receives more than 50% of the vote in both the statewide primary and the special primary, voters in Swalwell’s East Bay district could potentially cast four separate ballots for their congressional representative this year.

    Nine candidates already were running to succeed Swalwell in the 14th District in the June 2 primary for the full term set to begin in January. State Sen. Aisha Wahab is the only one with statewide elected experience. Former Dublin Mayor Melissa Hernandez, who serves as president of the BART Board of Directors, also is running.

    Those candidates also may run in the special primary election.

    Who is running for governor of California now?

    The top-polling candidates in the crowded field include two Republicans: businessman Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco. Two Democrats other than Swalwell also have been enjoying double-digit support in most polls: former Orange County Rep. Katie Porter and billionaire Democratic activist Tom Steyer.

    Other Democratic candidates include Xavier Becerra, who previously served as U.S. Health and Human Services secretary and California attorney general; San José Mayor Matt Mahan; former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa; California Superintendent for Public Instruction Tony Thurmond; and former state Controller Betty Yee.

    Swalwell’s departure stands to further shake up what has long been an unsettled race — and California’s first wide-open campaign for governor in two decades.

    How does Swalwell dropping out affect the California governor’s race?

    Prior to Swalwell dropping out, he, Porter and Steyer were the top-polling Democrats. It seems likely that Porter and Steyer could now attract some of his supporters.

    California has a “top-two” primary system, meaning the two candidates who receive the most votes in June, regardless of party, will move on to a November runoff. That means two Republicans or two Democrats could face each other in a runoff election.

    There’s been concern among Democrats that because no Democratic candidate has consolidated support, Hilton and Bianco could make it into the runoff, shutting out Democrats and resulting in a Republican governor. That seems less likely now, especially since Hilton recently received President Donald Trump’s endorsement, which is likely to play well among Republican voters. The state GOP failed to endorse either candidate at their convention this weekend, though Bianco did get more votes than Hilton from party insiders.

    If Hilton surges ahead of Bianco, the race could come down to a contest between Porter and Steyer for a second spot in the runoff.

    When is the primary for California governor, and for whom will I be able to vote?

    Election Day is June 2. The last day to register to vote is May 18.

    Counties will begin sending out mail-in ballots May 4, and in-person early voting starts May 23.

    To register to vote, contact your county elections office. The official state information guide is available here.

  • Sleek, light-filled galleries break tradition
    A building made of concrete and glass. Grass and palm trees are in front of the building.
    LACMA's new David Geffen galleries open to the general public on May 4.

    Topline:

    LACMA is previewing new $720-million galleries designed to break the mold of the traditional art museum. Instead of white walls, there's exposed concrete, and instead of little, if any natural light, there's floor to ceiling windows.

    Why it matters: LACMA is the largest museum in the western U.S., organizes groundbreaking art exhibits, and welcomes many L.A.-area school children through their education programs.

    Why now: LACMA’s new galleries have been 20 years in the making and took six years to build.

    The backstory: LACMA’s David Geffen galleries are open to members only from April 19 to May 3, then to the general public after that.

    Go deeper: This new LACMA Van Gogh is making LA a destination for Van Gogh paintings.

    After about two decades of planning, six years of construction and a cost of $720 million, L.A. County Museum of Art officials gave a preview of the new David Geffen museum galleries on Wednesday.

    “This museum is very experimental,” said Michael Govan, LACMA’s CEO. “It's very new, it's very fresh. It's a new way to think about our history and being more accessible at the same time that I think it's more meditative."

    Gone is LACMA’s 1965 iconic, boxy gallery building, replaced by an exposed concrete and glass structure distinguished by a soft, curved profile.

    “You can stand in the building and know where you are, not in a box… you are here in the city, you can look around the perimeter and know exactly where you are,” said Diana Magaloni, LACMA’s senior deputy director overseeing conservation, curatorial and exhibitions.

    People stand in a large room with grey concrete walls. Art hangs on the walls, and there is a general sense of light from the floor to ceiling windows.
    LACMA's new David Geffen galleries have floor to ceiling windows and are more open than traditional museum art galleries.
    (
    Kristina Simonsen
    /
    Museum Associates/LACMA
    )

    The feeling of knowing where you are is due largely to the acres of open space and plazas next to the building and ground level, as well as the floor to ceiling windows in the galleries’ second level that allow you to see L.A.’s mountains and urban skylines.

    LACMA officials say the design by renowned minimalist Swiss architect Peter Zumthor will better serve the public’s interaction with its massive art collection that spans 6,000 years and cultures from around the globe. The collection includes Southeast Asian sculptures, paintings by Diego Rivera, as well as contemporary art by Southern California artists.

    Two male presenting people smile. One has his arm around the other.
    LACMA CEO Michael Govan, left, with Peter Zumthor, the architect who designed LACMA's new David Geffen galleries.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “One of the nice things about this building is there are many new works of art and then there are old friends,” said Stephanie Barron, head of modern art at LACMA, as she stood next to a 12-foot-tall by 18-foot-wide piece by Henri Matisse.

    The 2,000-pound work features multicolored leaves made of ceramic. It’s well known to LACMA’s visitors because it hung for years near the old gallery’s entrance. Now, the work faces northwest toward the Hollywood Hills and the Pacific Ocean.

    An art gallery with large windows.
    LACMA opens its new David Geffen galleries to members on April 19 and to the general public on May 4.
    (
    Courtesy LACMA
    )

    Success, Govan said, will be measured by visitors’ reactions to seeing art in this new setting, as well as what the setting does to people visiting by themselves or with groups of people.

    “The way this building works, the way you can wander through galleries, the way the light works, the way it brings collections and thinking together, the way we’re collaborating” centers human interactions, Govan said. “It’s a launch pad, not an end point.”

    LACMA’s David Geffen galleries are open to members from Sunday April 19 to Sunday May 3, then to the general public after that.

  • Suggest names for Big Bear third graders' vote
    Two tiny gray fuzzy bald eagle chicks are trying to sit up straight in the bottom of a nest of sticks. The head of an adult eagle is leaning down into the nest to feed the chicks from it's orange beak.
    Jackie and Shadow's eaglets, Chick 1 and Chick 2, in Big Bear's famous bald eagle nest.

    Topline:

    The naming contest for Jackie and Shadow's new eagle chicks is officially open!

    The backstory: Big Bear third graders will make the final call on the chicks' names. But they'll use a computer-generated list of finalists from the naming contest to vote on the winners.

    The rules: You'll have to make a small donation to Friends of Big Bear Valley, the nonprofit that runs the popular livestream of Jackie and Shadow's nest. One entry is $5. Three entries will cost $10. And 10 entries will set you back $25. Names also have to be gender neutral because it's not known yet whether the chicks are male or female. And this probably goes without saying, but any inappropriate, explicit or derogatory names will automatically be disqualified.

    How to enter: You can find more information on the contest here. Friends of Big Bear Valley is accepting suggestions until 11:59 p.m. Sunday, April 26.