The Brief

In an election driven by concerns over rising consumer costs, voters in Los Angeles County did something remarkable — they chose to pay more for everyday goods.

At last count, more than 57% of L.A. voters supported Measure A. It will levy a sales tax of half a cent for every dollar spent in order to pay for ongoing local homeless services and new affordable housing efforts.

The tax is projected to raise about $1.1 billion dollars a year. Most of the funding will go toward the kinds of homeless services already funded by Measure H, an existing quarter-cent tax voters approved in 2017.

More than a third of Measure A funding (35.75% to be exact) will be funneled into a new entity called the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency, or LACAHSA (pronounced like the Spanish word for home, “la casa”).

LACAHSA board chair Rex Richardson, who is also the mayor of Long Beach, said Measure H was focused primarily on getting people off the street.

“The question now is, where do people go after they go into a shelter?” Richardson said. “This, finally, is a tool that answers that question.”

LACAHSA’s mandate will be to create new affordable homes, preserve L.A.’s existing lower-rent housing and prevent people from losing the housing they already have. LAist sat down with Richardson and LACAHSA’s interim CEO Ryan Johnson to talk about their plans for turning Measure A money into new affordable housing.

Another ingredient in L.A.’s alphabet soup?

LACAHSA is the new kid on the block, joining other agencies long tasked with addressing the region’s homelessness crisis. Funding for shelters and services is already coordinated by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA). Various county and city agencies also play a role in regulating and creating new affordable housing.

“There's a bunch of letter acronym agencies across the county already,” Richardson said. “We didn't want to be one of those. We wanted to be lean and mean and focused on production.”

The difference with LACAHSA, Richardson said, will be its ability to fund new development and homelessness prevention programs — such as rental assistance and free attorneys in eviction court — county-wide, rather than through one-off efforts happening in some cities but not others.

“Things like that really help, and have proven to help keep people in their homes,” Richardson said. “Now there's dedicated funding every year, county-wide, where there's no gaps.”

Coming from private sector to “unclog” the system

Johnson, LACAHSA’s interim CEO, has worked in both for-profit and nonprofit housing development. He was recently the CEO for Fulham Square Capital, an L.A.-based firm that invests in housing catering to moderate-income workers in the Southeast and Southwest.

“That background in the private sector is going to help us bring all of those things together — lower cost per unit, faster financing,” Johnson said. “Voters are saying to us, help us unclog this system.”

Johnson said LACHASA will aim to do that through a number of strategies.

It will provide gap financing to developers who rely on multiple funding sources. It will work on extending affordability covenants and signing new deals to preserve low rents in properties that are naturally affordable. It will also explore welfare tax exemptions for certain developments, and down payment assistance to put homeownership within reach for more families.

“You'll end up with this kind of multi-faceted strategy that reduces homelessness over time,” Johnson said. “Success, to me, is folks feeling like rents aren't going up exponentially overnight, there are cranes in the sky, and there are multiple solutions and opportunities for people.”

LACAHSA Interim CEO Ryan Johnson stands above a housing construction site in Downtown Long Beach.

(

David Wagner/LAist

)

How much new housing will be built? 

Johnson and Richardson could not specify how many new housing units LACAHSA will create. They said goals will be outlined in the months ahead, before the tax takes effect in April 2025.

“We are required to put forward a five-year funding plan that calls our shots,” Richardson said. “That is our number one priority.”

In the run-up to the election, The Angeleno Project — a civic group focused on equity issues — commissioned a study from outside consultants that concluded Measure A could help create 18,000 new affordable housing units over the next 10 years.

Jason Ward, co-director of the RAND Center on Housing and Homelessness, believes that outlook is optimistic.

“I'd be surprised if this money could produce 12,000 units over 10 years,” he said.

Ward sees Measure A largely continuing policies that have increased costs. For example, Measure A will subject projects to construction labor agreements similar to those that led to fewer units under the city of L.A.’s Measure HHH from 2016, according to Ward’s research.

“Texas builds three [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit] units for every one unit built in California,” Ward said. “Anything the agency can do to break out of that path can really only be to the good. The way we do it now really strikes me as the way to build the least housing at the highest cost.”

What will accountability look like? 

One of the key concerns voters raised about Measure A had to do with accountability for past spending. Measure H has pumped billions of dollars into homeless services, but the region’s homeless count rose 37% since voters approved that funding.

Johnson said LACAHSA will outline specific goals and be accountable for achieving them.

“We'll have a full strategic plan by June of next year,” he said. “That is going to be our North Star in making sure we're able to provide those solutions and hit those achievable targets.”

Measure A will also create a new Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor LACAHSA’s spending.

What barriers will stand in their way? 

Most of LACAHSA’s board members are elected leaders from local governments across L.A. County. City council members and mayors in various parts of Southern California have been known to fight new housing construction in their backyards.

For example, Norwalk is being sued by the state of California for banning homeless shelters and housing. One LACAHSA board member hails from Beverly Hills, a city currently sparring with Gov. Gavin Newsom over a “builder’s remedy” project that includes low-income apartments.

“The LACAHSA board is made up of the diverse opinions across L.A. County,” Richardson said, including “small communities who may be concerned about the impacts that growth might have on their communities. But also you have communities that have really been leaders.”

Under state law, cities across Southern California have already been given goals for new housing growth, including units affordable to low-income households. Failing to adequately plan for all that new housing can have negative consequences for those cities. Johnson said those state mandates are the stick, and LACAHSA hopes to be the carrot.

“Part of our goal is bringing the smaller cities along with these larger jurisdictions,” Johnson said.

What about DC? 

Measure A’s passage was overshadowed by a much bigger change in this election: the return of former president Donald Trump to the White House. Housing experts say his administration could slash support for new low-income housing across the country, including in L.A.

“I would be absolutely shocked if there was a more generous [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit] program coming down the pipeline,” said Ward with the RAND Center.

LACAHSA’s leaders said they would have preferred federal partners who aimed to expand affordable housing support, but they’re prepared to make the most of Measure A.

“We needed a dedicated long term source of revenue so we could chart our own destiny and not rely on who is in Washington,” Johnson said.

Past and ongoing audits of homelessness spending in California have shown that outcomes are not always tracked, and money in some cases appears to have been used fraudulently. LACAHSA leaders said they understand why some are skeptical about new efforts.

“What I would say to people who are on the skeptical side is: look at what this board is going to do over the next few months,” Johnson said. “We're going to shock you with what we're going to be able to accomplish.”

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to approve an $843 million homelessness spending plan that includes nearly $200 million in reductions to programs and services in the next budget year.

Among those programs is Pathway Home, which helps move people from encampments into temporary housing. The county reduced funding for that program by $92 million, which will shrink it from 20 project sites to seven, officials said.

Supervisors also approved $105 million in reductions to other programs, including large cuts to street outreach teams, homelessness prevention programs and other supportive services.

County officials said they had to reduce spending in order to cover the rising costs of operating shelter beds and the loss of tens of millions in temporary state and federal funding, including some COVID-19 relief dollars.

“With federal neglect and state cuts, we have to do more with less,” Supervisor Lindsey Horvath told LAist. “And we will.”

The county’s new Department of Homeless Services and Housing has been warning about the looming shortfall since July. County officials solicited input on how to fill an initial $303 million gap.

Since then, the department adjusted the county’s homelessness spending plan, after finding some one-time state grants and cost-saving measures.

The budget year starts July 1.

Some funding restored

Last month, local homeless service providers urged county officials to restore all of the more than $200 million in proposed reductions to programs and services. Some supervisors raised concerns about specific cuts.

Since then, new revenue projections show the county stands to bring in $21 million more through Measure A than originally anticipated.

Measure A is a sales tax ordinance, approved by L.A. County voters in 2024, that funds homeless services and affordable housing initiatives. It is expected to generate about $1 billion annually, but exact revenues fluctuate with consumer spending.

The county’s slightly rosier revenue projections allowed the homeless department to roll back a fraction of the proposed reductions.

“It’s not a windfall and it doesn’t solve every challenge, but it does give us the ability to restore important programs that were on the chopping block,” Supervisor Janice Hahn said.

The board voted to use much of that $21 million to restore funding for two dozen full-time outreach workers and about 100 shelter beds that were previously on the chopping block.

The plan approved Tuesday also calls for $5 million in Measure A revenue to partially restore funding for interim housing in Long Beach, Pasadena and Glendale. It restored more than $1 million to operate family solution centers — hubs to connect unhoused families with services — and about $500,000 for a program that helps military veterans access government benefits.

Supervisor Holly Mitchell said she wishes Pathway Home funding could be maintained. She said it’s been crucial for helping people living in RV encampments in her district, which spans from Koreatown to much of the South Bay.

"These restorations don't expand encampment resolution operations,” Mitchell said Tuesday. “The services with the greatest impact in the Second District remain reduced, and the current plan does not replace what was cut."

County homelessness officials told supervisors the 100 shelter beds they saved will be prioritized for people living in encampments and will help make up for cuts to Pathway Home.

"The reduction to Pathway Home is not a reduced commitment to encampment resolution,” L.A. County Department of Homeless Services and Housing director Sarah Mahin said Tuesday. “It’s a recognition that it was built on one-time funding and we need to expand strategies to include more cost-effective resolution solutions."

New oversight push

The supervisors also voted 5-0 Tuesday to approve a new motion focused on accountability in homeless service contracting. The motion by Horvath and Kathryn Barger directs the homelessness department to work with the county auditor-controller to create strict oversight procedures for contracts, including random site visits, performance monitoring and provisions for termination.

They said the goal is to prevent the mismanagement that has plagued the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, and the fraud that has resulted in recent arrests. Last month, federal authorities arrested Alex Soofer, director of a nonprofit called Abundant Blessings, on suspicion of embezzling tens of millions in dollars meant to serve unhoused Angelenos. Soofer pleaded not guilty to the charges this week.

"Public dollars intended to address homelessness have gone unaccounted for under LAHSA," Horvath said. “That is unacceptable and it ends now with the county.”

Last year, the board voted to divert more than $300 million in county homelessness dollars away from LAHSA and administer the funds itself with a new homelessness department.

“As the department launches, every contract, every dollar, and every outcome must withstand scrutiny,” Horvath told LAist in a statement. “We don’t have resources to waste or time to lose in addressing the homelessness crisis.”

Barger described instances of fraud within the homeless services sector as “moral failures” that cannot be tolerated.

“They represent theft from the most vulnerable people in our community,” she said.

She also argued that ethical service providers “should not have their reputations destroyed by the criminal actions of a few bad actors.”

Barger told fellow supervisors at Tuesday’s meeting it’s their responsibility to monitor how county homelessness dollars are being spent — and to defund programs that aren’t generating results.

“Setting the budget is the easy part,” Barger said. “We have to see results. And if we don’t, we have to have a debate at this board: is that the best use of these resources?”

The department must report back to the board in 60 days with their full plan for monitoring contractors and preventing fraud and misuse of public funds.

Auditor-Controller Oscar Valdez told supervisors his office would submit a plan to county homelessness officials Tuesday.

A crew of four moon-bound astronauts will remain on the ground for at least a month after NASA delayed the launch of the Artemis II mission. During critical pre-launch testing Monday, mission managers uncovered a number of issues that prevented the completion of the test.

NASA is now planning a March launch date for the four astronauts — three from the U.S. and one from Canada — on a ten-day mission to circle the moon and return to Earth, traveling farther than any humans have ventured into deep space.

Issues leading to that delay began about an hour into Monday's test, known as the wet dress rehearsal. As the team began fueling the rocket at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, sensors picked up a hydrogen leak. Super-chilled hydrogen is used as the fuel for the massive Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.

Hydrogen is an efficient propellant for rockets — but its molecules are so tiny and light they can escape even the tightest of seals. Launch director Charlie Blackwell-Thompson said they had troubleshooted the initial leak, but when they began to pressurize the tank, another leak surfaced.

"And so as we began that pressurization, we did see that the leak within the cavity came up pretty quick," said Blackwell-Thompson.

(L/R) NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya, NASA Associate Administrator Lori Glaze, launch director Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, and manager of NASA's Space Launch System Program, John Honeycutt, hold a news conference on the Artemis II mission at Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla., on Tuesday.

(

Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

Hydrogen leaks plagued testing of NASA's Artemis I mission in 2022. Blackwell-Thompson said lessons learned from that uncrewed flight were utilized for Artemis II, but there's more investigation is needed.

The wet dress rehearsal uncovered other issues — including a problem with the Orion capsule, which will carry the crew to the moon. While no one was on board Monday, teams practiced preparing the spacecraft for its passengers. A valve that pressurizes the vehicle required additional attention and took more time to close the hatch than anticipated.

Teams also uncovered issues with cameras due to cold weather and audio dropouts across communication channels. "As always, safety remains our top priority, for our astronauts, our workforce, our systems and the public," said NASA administrator Jared Isaacman in a post on X, and that NASA will only launch when the agency is ready.

Work now begins to fix the issues. NASA will require another wet dress rehearsal before giving the "GO" to put astronauts on board. "All in all, a very successful day for us on many fronts," said Blackwell-Thompson. "Then, on many others, we got some work we've got to go do."

The earliest launch window for another attempt is March 6. NASA has additional launch opportunities on March 7, 8, 9 and 11.

The crew of NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen were released from quarantine and will remain in Houston, Texas. They'll re-enter quarantine about 14 days ahead of the next launch attempt and make the trip to the Kennedy Space Center six days before liftoff.

Artemis II is testing key systems of the Orion spacecraft, like its maneuverability and life support systems, ahead of the planned Artemis III mission that will take humans to the lunar surface. The Artemis II will mark the first time humans have returned to the moon since the final Apollo lunar mission in 1972.
Copyright 2026 NPR

A trial got underway Tuesday in a case alleging that Huntington Beach illegally dilutes the power of Latino voters with its at-large election system.

Cities across Orange County and elsewhere in California have faced similar challenges over the past decade. Most have settled out of court by adopting by-district elections, where voters only vote on a city council representative from their area, rather than requiring candidates to run citywide. A notable exception is Santa Monica — the city has been fighting a challenge to its at-large election system in court for nearly 10 years.

Now, Huntington Beach is following suit.

The case was brought by the nonprofit group Southwest Voter Registration Education Project and Victor Valladares, a Huntington Beach resident and Democratic Party activist. It’s being heard by Orange County Superior Court Judge Craig L. Griffin.

The argument against at-large city elections

The plaintiffs allege Latino voters can’t elect a candidate of their choice under the current system, in violation of the California Voting Rights Act. This alleged dilution of Latino voting power, they say, leads to poor representation and negative consequences for the city’s majority-Latino Oak View neighborhood.

“Their needs get ignored,” Kevin Shenkman, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, said during his opening statement Tuesday. “It is a natural result of the at-large election system.”

Latinos make up about 20% of the population in Huntington Beach. Under a draft map of electoral districts drawn up by demographer David Ely, a witness for the plaintiffs, the district that includes the Oak View neighborhood would be 40% Latino. Plaintiffs argued this would give residents more power to elect a city councilmember who represents their interests.

The city’s defense of at-large elections

In their opening argument, lawyers representing Huntington Beach argued that Latinos in Huntington Beach are spread across the city and politically diverse.

The city’s lawyers also argued that recent elections of Latino city council members, including MMA star Tito Ortiz in 2020 and Gracey Van Der Mark in 2022, prove the city’s current at-large election system doesn’t impede Latino residents’ ability to participate in the local political process.

“The system works, it’s not broken, and the evidence will show that at trial,” said Anthony Taylor, one of the attorneys representing Huntington Beach.

The trial is expected to last into next week.

Go deeper

• Why were AI-equipped police cameras installed in this majority Latino Huntington Beach neighborhood?
• Huntington Beach's controversial voter ID law is illegal
• Voting by district gives Latino candidates a boost in Orange County
• District elections mean big governing changes for many California cities