Sponsor

Today is Giving Tuesday!

Give back to local trustworthy news; your gift's impact will go twice as far for LAist because it's matched dollar for dollar on this special day. 
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How one man completed 100 miles
    A group of people stand at a finish line with their arms around each other and up in the air. They are smiling.
    Cesar Quijano and his Amity support team at the finish line of the San Diego 100.

    Topline:

    In LAist’s latest episode of Imperfect Paradise, reporter Lucy Copp follows Cesar Quijano as he attempts another reentry back into society after serving time in prison. He wants this time to be different, so he finds a transitional home, develops a close relationship with a mentor, and discovers running. But not just any kind of running — ultrarunning.

    Why it matters: The episode follows Cesar Quijano as he trains to run a 100-mile race. He’s a former heroin addict who had been in and out of prison for most of his adult life. In January 2022, he decided this reentry would be his last. We follow him as he goes through a transitional housing program, develops a close relationship with a mentor and becomes obsessed with ultra running, which becomes a double edged sword: keeping him on track with addiction recovery and reentry, but also turning into an all-consuming obsession.

    Why now: California has been in a process of decarceration for decades now, ever since a 2006 mandate to reduce its prison population. More recently, Gov. Gavin Newsom closed three prisons and has plans to close another this year, and around 40,000 people are released from prison each year in the state — many of them to L.A. County. So the question of what makes re-entry successful is really urgent.

    I met Cesar Quijano in April of 2024 while he was training for the biggest race of his life — a 100-mile trek in the San Diego mountains.

    Quijano didn’t want to just complete the San Diego 100. He wanted to run it in under 24 hours — a goal that would mean running under 9 minute miles for 24 hours straight. For someone who couldn’t run a mile a few years ago, this would be a feat.

    “I never accomplished anything in my life,” he said. “I never started anything or wanted to start anything because I was afraid of failing.”

    A man stands on a train platform wearing a black sweatshirt with his hands in his pockets.
    Cesar Quijano

    Quijano is a recovering heroin addict who had been out of prison for two-and-a-half years. For him, the San Diego 100 wasn’t just about a physical triumph. It was about proving to himself that he could finish something for once in his life.

    In many ways, running was keeping Quijano afloat, giving him a sense of purpose and structure. It was also consuming his life.

     ”People say that it's an obsession, and I think it is,” Quijano said. “I think I overdo it sometimes, but it's keeping me sane. ”

    From prison to running his first mile

    For the past 15 years, Quijano has been in and out of various prisons across California. He grew up in San Diego and had little guidance as a kid. He dropped out of school, and by the time he was 12, Quijano had joined a gang. Soon, he was going to juvenile hall and less than two months after getting out of juvenile hall at 18 years old, he was involved in a robbery. He got two years. Not long after he got out, he got in trouble again and he was sentenced to four years. Two years later, he was back serving a six-year sentence.

    From Corcoran to Chino, Calipatria to Ironwood — every time Cesar got out of a state prison, he’d end up going back.

    On Jan. 1, 2022, he wanted this reentry to be his last.

    I reached out to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) — the agency that operates the state’s prison and parole systems. They said they provide a comprehensive reentry planning process, which connects formerly incarcerated people to various services outside of prison. Quijano learned about his reentry options, not from CDCR, but from a family member who had also been to prison.

    And he decided to go to Amity, a transitional home in Vista, 60 miles outside San Diego, with comprehensive reentry services.

    A picture of a stairs leading up to a big patio then a ranch style home.
    Amity's Vista campus about 60 miles east of San Diego, where Cesar lived when he got out of prison.
    (
    Cesar Quijano
    )

    At Amity, Quijano started attending self-help workshops for the first time in his life. He also grew close with the organization’s Associate Director of Residential Campus, Oswaldo “Ozzie” Terriquez, who introduced Quijano to running. At first, Quijano couldn’t finish a mile.

    “I think it took me like two weeks, three weeks just to be able to finish that mile,” Quijano said. “But then something clicked. Now, I had a goal.”

    California’s shifting focus towards reentry 

    Cesar Quijano is one of 35,000 to 40,000 people released from prison each year in California and going through the process of reentering society, a process known as “reentry.” Nearly 30% of this total population will parole to Los Angeles County, more than any other county in the state.

    A wave of criminal justice reforms and a national shift away from mass incarceration meant a refocusing of efforts toward supporting people in reentry. Since 2019, California Gov. Gavin Newsom approved the closure of three adult prison facilities. Another prison is set to close this year. He dismantled death row and is turning San Quentin, the state’s oldest prison, into a rehabilitation center based on Norway’s prison model. As the state plans for a continued reduction in the prison population, creating pathways to a successful reentry is crucial.

    When it comes to supporting people getting out of prison, there are several key factors to successful reentry.

    “ Housing and employment and trying to establish some source of income,” said Professor Elsa Chen, who teaches at Santa Clara University. “And then some of the other obstacles might seem a little bit more abstract.”

    Those abstract elements include social networks, civic participation, mental health, and finding a sense of structure and purpose.

    Quijano found a lot of those qualitative needs through Amity, his mentor Ozzie, and ultrarunning.

    “ Things that I was missing my whole life I gained by going to Amity.” Cesar said.

    As for running?

    “ It's a spiritual experience,” Cesar told me. “Having this battle within yourself about whether I should keep going or stop, I see it as a spiritual experience. That's what running does for me.”

    Race day: Running 100 miles 

    On June 7, 2024, Quijano and 255 other ultrarunners gathered under a “Start” banner at Lake Cuyamaca in the San Diego Mountains. Quijano started the race strong, but by mile 30 he was in what runners call the “pain cave.” By mile 40, he lay down on a rock by the side of the road, and for the first time in the race, contemplated throwing in the towel. But even if Quijanowas ready to give up, other ultrarunners wouldn’t let him. It might be an individual sport, but there is a community mindset. A group ran by Quijano, hoisted him up, and carried him back to the road.

    “For a long time…I was never willing to accept help," Quijano said. “But something deeper in me was like, you know what? I need help.”

    Twenty-nine hours, 16 minutes and 28 seconds after leaving the starting line, Quijano completed the San Diego 100.

    A man poses on a dirt trail in the mountains. He's wearing sunglasses and a hat.
    Cesar Quijano poses for a picture for Ozzie, his pacesetter.
    (
    Cesar Quijano
    )

    What made this reentry different 

    This January, Quijano celebrated his third year of being out of prison. By CDCR metrics, he’s had a successful reentry. But when I asked Quijano what made this reentry different, he told me it was Amity, and all the people he met there, especially Ozzie. This support system has stood by him throughout his reentry, encouraging him as he trained for the San Diego 100 and showing up to the finish line to cheer him on.

    As for direction and purpose? Cesar gets that from running.

    A group of people stand at a finish line with their arms around each other and up in the air. They are smiling.
    Cesar Quijano and his Amity support team at the finish line of the San Diego 100.
    (
    Lucy Copp
    )

    A few weeks after the race I asked Quijano what it felt like to cross the finish line.

    “I don't think happiness is the right word," he said. "I think it was something better than happiness because it was more meaningful to me. Just knowing that I've finally finished something that I started.”

    To learn more about Cesar Quijano’s reentry and ultrarunning journey, listen to this episode of Imperfect Paradise:

    Imperfect Paradise Main Tile
    Listen 48:29
    Struggling with addiction and reentry after multiple stints in prison, Cesar Quijano discovers ultrarunning, a hobby that turns into his addiction and salvation. Through Cesar’s story to complete  a 100-mile race, Imperfect Paradise host Antonia Cereijido and producer Lucy Copp explore urgent questions around what support people need to successfully transition out of prison and into society.
    How one man rebuilt his life, 100 miles at a time
    Struggling with addiction and reentry after multiple stints in prison, Cesar Quijano discovers ultrarunning, a hobby that turns into his addiction and salvation. Through Cesar’s story to complete  a 100-mile race, Imperfect Paradise host Antonia Cereijido and producer Lucy Copp explore urgent questions around what support people need to successfully transition out of prison and into society.

  • Highs in the upper 60s, low 70s
    Sunset at a marina with water in the foreground and small personal boats in the background.
    Another cool day with mostly sunny skies.

    Quick Facts

    • Today’s weather: Sunny
    • Beaches: 63 to 69 degrees
    • Mountains: low to mid 60s
    • Inland: 65 to 71 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: Beach hazards, No burn alert

    What to expect: Sunny and cool today with highs in the mid 60s to low 70s across SoCal.

    Read on...for more details and who is affected by a No Burn Alert, as well as why you should be careful near ocean waters.

    Quick Facts

    • Today’s weather: Sunny
    • Beaches: 63 to 69 degrees
    • Mountains: low to mid 60s
    • Inland: 65 to 71 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: Beach hazards, No burn alert

    The crisp, cool weather continues Tuesday as the region prepares for another Santa Ana wind event on Wednesday.

    Highs along the coast on Tuesday will be from 63 to 69 degrees, and up to 72 degrees for the valleys.

    The Inland Empire will see daytime highs of up to 71 degrees.

    In the Antelope Valley, there will be some areas of frost in the early morning, with temperatures ranging from 56 to 62 degrees.

    Beach hazards

    You'll want to avoid swimming in the ocean because of strong rip currents and breaking waves from high surf. Minor flooding of beach parking lots is possible. These conditions will last until Friday morning for the Orange County coast, and until Saturday morning for L.A. County beaches.

    No burn alert in effect

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District has issued a no burn alert for most of SoCal until 11:59 p.m. because of high air pollution. That means you should avoid any burning of wood, including fireplaces or manufactured logs made from wax or paper. The alert applies to O.C. and L.A. County's non-desert areas, as well as Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

  • Sponsor
  • City Council to consider expanding support dollars
    A welcome sign for Santa Ana, with palm trees in the background
    The Santa Ana City Council could more than double its contribution to the city’s immigrant support fund.

    Topline:

    The Santa Ana City Council will consider tonight whether to more than double its contribution to the city’s immigrant support fund to help families who have been hurt by ICE enforcement. The vote would add an additional $150,000 to its Ayuda Sin Fronteras fund, which launched in July.

    Why it matters: Santa Ana is Orange County’s only sanctuary city. When federal agents began mass sweeps across Southern California, Santa Ana residents were hit hard. Many have chosen to stay indoors out of fear of ICE sweeps, avoiding workplaces, grocery stores and other public spaces.

    What is Ayuda Sin Fronteras? The money from this fund goes toward helping residents pay for rent and utilities. In July, when the fund was first launched, the city allocated $100,000 for housing assistance.

    Read on … for how Santa Ana residents affected by ICE sweeps can get help.

    Santa Ana’s Ayuda Sin Fronteras — a fund to support immigrant families affected by ICE sweeps — could more than double with an additional $150,000 influx of city dollars if approved by the City Council Tuesday night.

    The federal immigration sweeps have increased fear among immigrant families, prompting some to avoid workplaces and other public areas. The fund goes toward helping those families pay for up to one month’s worth of housing expenses, including past due rent and utility bills.

    The program was created in July following heavy immigration enforcement that rattled many communities in Southern California, including Orange County’s only sanctuary city — Santa Ana.

    When it launched, the city approved an initial $100,000 for housing assistance. In October, the City Council directed the city manager to seek additional funding for approval. Those funds were pulled from several city department employee vacancies, including the city attorney’s office, the Santa Ana Police Department and others.

    Ayuda Sin Fronteras has supported 232 residents as of Oct. 21, according to city officials.

    Mayor Valerie Amezcua said she will revisit the fund as much as possible to make sure the city is doing all it can to support community members affected by immigration enforcement.

    “We need to make sure that we take good care of our community because there is a need,” Amezcua told LAist. “There's a need for rental assistance, for food, for utilities. As the mayor and council, we're committed to helping out our community.”

    Who qualifies? 

    The funds are reserved for Santa Ana families with members who have been detained, deported or financially hurt by immigration enforcement. Families will need to provide proof of immigration enforcement activity or a signed third-party verification form.

    The program requires identification of all household members, but the city says it does not require proof of citizenship.

    Applicants need to be renters at or below moderate income. A family of five, for example, needs to make no more than $177,000 a year. The city’s income chart can be found here.

    How to apply

    If you are interested in getting financial assistance from the city, you need to get a referral from one of the city’s partners.

    You can get more information by reaching out to the Ayuda Sin Fronteras team by filling out a contact form.

    You can also send them an email or call at (714) 565-2655.

    Other help is available 

    In Orange County, Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento created the Orange County Liberty Fund in partnership with community organizations, bringing together $1.5 million to support immigrant families in navigating the legal system.

    In September, the Costa Mesa City Council launched a $200,000 immigrant legal defense fund to help those detained by ICE within the city.

    Outside Orange County, the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach, along with L.A. County, have asked for support from local philanthropists to donate to immigrant support funds.

  • Should mom-and-pops be allowed an extra 1% hike?
    A view of Los Angeles City Hall from below, with a tall palm tree in the forefront and the light blue sky in the background.
    L.A. City Hall on Monday, April 21, 2025.

    Topline:

    After Los Angeles moved to significantly lower yearly increases in most of the city’s apartments, some City Council members now want to change the rules again. This time, they’re hoping to give small landlords the ability to raise rents more than their corporate counterparts.

    The details: On Tuesday, the council is scheduled to vote on a proposal that would let small landlords — those who own 10 units or fewer— raise rents by an additional 1% each year. The idea was put forward by Councilmembers John Lee and Monica Rodriguez.

    Why now: In a culmination of years of debate, the City Council voted last month to lower the maximum allowable rent increase in the city’s rent-controlled housing to 4% per year. That’s down from the previous maximum of 10%. Lee voted against the changes after expressing concern about how the lower increases would affect the bottom line of small rental property owners. Rodriguez supported the changes, but said more needs to be done to keep “mom and pop” landlords afloat.

    Read on… to learn what landlord and tenant advocates have to say about the proposal.

    After Los Angeles moved to significantly lower yearly increases in most of the city’s apartments, some City Council members now want to change the rules again. This time, they’re hoping to give small landlords the ability to raise rents more than their corporate counterparts.

    On Tuesday, the council is scheduled to vote on a proposal that would let small landlords — those who own 10 units or fewer — raise rents by an additional 1% each year. The idea was put forward by Councilmembers John Lee and Monica Rodriguez.

    “This modest adjustment recognizes the difference between a family that owns a few units and a large corporate operator,” Lee said in a statement to LAist. “Our goal is to keep small landlords in the system and prevent the loss of rent-controlled homes.”

    While the idea is gaining support from landlord groups, tenant advocates say the proposal would create a cumbersome and unfair, two-tier system in which some renters have to pay more than others.

    The changes coming for LA rent control 

    In a culmination of years of debate, the City Council voted last month to lower the maximum allowable rent increase in the city’s rent-controlled housing to 4% per year. That’s down from the previous maximum of 10%.

    Lee, whose district includes the northwest San Fernando Valley, voted against the changes after expressing concern about how the lower increases would affect the bottom line of small rental property owners. Rodriguez, whose district includes the northeast San Fernando Valley, supported the changes, but said more should be done to keep “mom-and-pop” landlords afloat.

    “The motion proposes a modest adjustment to help ensure these small landlords remain viable, rather than being pushed out and accelerating the further corporatization of housing in Los Angeles,” Rodriguez said in a statement to LAist.

    Landlord groups said the proposed 1% increase could help at the margins, but small landlords would still have to contend with insurance premiums and maintenance costs that have been rising faster than overall economic inflation.

    “Throwing a bone in the form of an additional 1% to smaller owners is necessary but will be insufficient to keep many owners in the housing business,” Daniel Yukelson, executive director of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, said in an email. “More and more, owners are being forced to look for the exit ramp in the city of Los Angeles.”

    Do small landlords really have it harder?

    But researchers paid to investigate the issue have not found evidence that small landlords face stronger headwinds than corporate owners. A city-commissioned report by the Economic Roundtable, an independent research nonprofit, found no significant differences between the financial health of small and large landlord operations in L.A.

    “The study found that, in general, small landlords are not suffering greater distress,” Anna Ortega, who is with the city’s Housing Department, said during a recent City Council meeting.

    Tenant advocates with the group Keep L.A. Housed opposed the 1% bump for small landlords, saying it would be unfair to charge some tenants more every year simply because they’re renting from a non-corporate owner. The coalition also said enforcing the rules would be difficult.

    “Allowing small landlords to self-certify creates the opportunity for abuse, as some will fraudulently claim the status and charge incorrect (and potentially illegal) rent increases to already rent-burdened tenants,” said Pablo Estupiñan, a Keep L.A. Housed member and an organizer with the nonprofit Strategic Actions for a Just Economy.

    The rules in LA and beyond

    The city’s rent control rules generally apply to rental units built before October 1978, though some newly built apartments are covered as well. About 70% of the city’s apartments are subject to the rent hike caps.

    Some other Southern California jurisdictions with rent control allow small landlords to increase rents more than larger owners.

    L.A. County allows small landlords in unincorporated areas to increase rents an extra 1%. The city of Inglewood allows owners of buildings with four apartments or fewer to increase rents by an extra 5% compared with owners of buildings with five or more units.

  • LAHSA to reallocate money away from housing first
    A 2019 photo of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development building in Washington, D.C.

    Topline:

    The governing board for the L.A. Homeless Services Authority voted Monday to start the process of reallocating about $130 million in federal funding currently being spent on permanent housing to other projects meant to serve unhoused Angelenos.

    New HUD policy: The Los Angeles region is eligible for more than $260 million in federal funding under that program in the coming fiscal year, including $217 million for existing projects. But no more than 30% of those funds can go toward permanent housing projects, according to a notice issued last month by the U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development.

    Why it matters: It's a challenge for L.A. County because 90% of regional HUD funds currently cover people’s rent, according to LASHA officials. Under the new HUD policy, about 5,000 households in the county will lose their rental subsidies.

    Pushback: Last week, 21 states, including California sued HUD, claiming the new federal policies “essentially guarantee that tens of thousands of formerly homeless individuals and families will be evicted back into homelessness.”

    Los Angeles’ regional homelessness agency is working to find ways to keep thousands of people in their homes, while complying with new federal funding restrictions on permanent housing.

    The governing board for the L.A. Homeless Services Authority voted Monday to start the process of reallocating about $130 million in federal funding currently being spent on permanent housing to other projects meant to serve unhoused Angelenos.

    Because of new funding restrictions from the U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development, known as HUD, about 5,000 households in the county will lose their rental subsidies, according to several LAHSA officials who spoke at a commission meeting Monday.

    Those changes, along with state and county funding shortfalls for homeless services, threaten to drastically worsen the region’s homelessness crisis, they said.

    "The fact of the matter is there’s going to be a tremendous and terrible impact on people, on agencies, on landlords,” said Nathaniel VerGow, LAHSA’s chief program officer.

    Officials said they’re scrambling to maximize federal funding under the new guidelines while also advocating against the new HUD policy.

    “It is a cliff and it feels catastrophic, but I think it forces us as a region to figure out how to save ourselves,” LAHSA Commission Chair Amber Sheikh said.

    The funding challenge

    Most federal homelessness dollars flow into the L.A. region through the Continuum of Care program, managed by HUD.

    The Los Angeles region is eligible for more than $260 million in federal funding under that program in the coming fiscal year, including $217 million for existing projects.

    But no more than 30% of those funds can go toward permanent housing projects, according to a “notice of funding opportunity” HUD issued last month.

    That’s a challenge for L.A. County, because 90% of regional HUD funds currently cover people’s rent, according to LASHA officials.

    Instead, L.A. and other cities and counties must spend the bulk of their federal funds on other interventions, including transitional housing and street outreach.

    HUD officials have said the policy is meant to encourage self-sufficiency.

    At Monday’s meeting, Commissioner Justin Szlasa urged his colleagues to consider larger funding trends.

    “ There's actually a 23% increase in available funding from HUD, the federal government,” he said. “It just doesn't work with the way that we normally have done things here.”

    “We need to find, in this crisis, a way to be constructive about this,” Szlasa added.

    HUD policy changes

    HUD released its new notice of funding opportunity last month and rescinded a previous two-year funding agreement.

    Opponents have concerns with the federal housing department’s move away from “housing first” approaches. They also said HUD rolled out the changes without providing enough time to prepare service providers and clients for disruptions.

    Last week, 21 states, including California, sued HUD, claiming the new federal policies “essentially guarantee that tens of thousands of formerly homeless individuals and families will be evicted back into homelessness.”

    This week, a group of cities and homelessness organizations also sued over the changes. Plaintiffs include the city and county of San Francisco. The Continuum of Care for San Francisco was awarded $56 million in federal funding for Fiscal Year 2024.

    Approximately 91% of that funding supports permanent housing projects, according to the complaint.

    What’s next?

    The LAHSA Commission voted Monday to approve its request for applications for existing and new projects.

    Providers must submit applications to LAHSA over the next two weeks, and LAHSA has until Jan. 14 to craft and submit a new application to HUD.

    The agency is now talking with 130 contractors about the transition.

    LAHSA is also working with some permanent supportive housing providers to convert their programs to transitional housing instead, officials said.

    People who were in permanent housing projects aren’t eligible for transitional housing under HUD’s guidelines because they're not considered unhoused, VerGow said.

    The commission also reviewed a policy for ranking project applications and prioritizing them for federal funding. Officials said that policy has to be approved at a LAHSA Commission subcommittee on Dec. 10.

    Funds are expected to be awarded in May 2026.