Sponsor

Today is Giving Tuesday!

Give back to local trustworthy news; your gift's impact will go twice as far for LAist because it's matched dollar for dollar on this special day. 
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Why Newsom didn't have that option in budget trims
    A patch for the California Dept. or Corrections and Rehabilitation Eureka is visible in a close up of a uniform
    Gov. Gavin Newsom has moved to close four California prisons and he's facing pressure to shut more because of the state deficit. Here, Francine Figueroa, a long-time seamstress, sows a patch with an emblem from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at Halby’s in Blythe on May 8, 2023.

    Topline:

    California’s rapidly falling inmate population could allow Gov. Gavin Newsom to close as many as five more prisons, analysts say.

    Why it matters: The move would save $1 billion a year at a moment when the governor is pulling from reserves to bring the state budget into the black.

    Why he isn't doing it: Newsom wants to take a more cautious approach to trimming prison beds. His new budget proposal calls on the corrections department to close 46 housing blocks inside 13 state prisons — saving about $80 million. The closure of prisons is opposed by the prison guard union and cities that are home to prisons that could be on the chopping block.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom faces a huge deficit this spring, and he has one especially big money-saving option that he’s not using.

    California’s rapidly falling inmate population could allow Newsom to close as many as five more prisons, analysts say, saving $1 billion a year at a moment when he’s pulling from reserves to bring the state budget into the black.

    Instead, Newsom wants to take a more cautious approach to trimming prison beds. His new budget proposal calls on the corrections department to close 46 housing blocks inside 13 state prisons.

    Prison yard closures save money and decrease the need for staffing, but not to the extent of a prison shutdown. Newsom’s proposal would save about $80 million.

    Saying his administration had been “scrutinizing” the prisons budget, Newsom said “We’re mindful of the direction we’re going as it relates to public safety.”

    California prison status

    At the inmate population’s peak in 2006, California locked up 165,000 people in state prisons. Today, after a decade of sentencing changes, federal court intervention and a surge of releases tied to COVID-19, California’s prisons house about 93,000 people.

    Because of that trend, Newsom has already moved to close four prisons over the course of his administration. He projects that those shutdowns will save the state $3.4 billion by 2027.

    He suggested on Friday that the forces fighting prison closures – labor unions representing prison employees, the communities dependent on prison jobs, legislation and litigation intended to slow or stop the closures – forced him to take smaller steps than shuttering entire facilities while he crafted his plan to close a projected $27.6 billion deficit.

    “Prison housing unit deactivations can happen much sooner than prison closures and provide us more flexibility,” Newsom said. “Legislative leaders have asked me, are we considering collectively reducing the larger footprint in the state? The answer is yes.

    “But we want to do it in a pragmatic and thoughtful way, we want to be mindful of labor concerns and community concerns, we want to be mindful of trends and we want to be mindful of the unknown, meaning there are proposals to roll back some of our criminal justice reforms that could have significant impact on the census and population.”

    California cities fight prison closures

    So far, Newsom closed the Deuel Vocational Institution in Tracy in 2021 and the California Correctional Center in Susanville in 2023. He ended a lease with a privately run prison called the California City Correctional Facility, and the corrections department is shutting down Chuckwalla Valley State Prison near the Arizona border.

    Newsom at Friday’s budget press conference said he would accelerate the proposed March 2025 closure of Chuckwalla prison in Blythe to November, although his office hasn’t yet provided details on how much money that would save the state.

    That news surprised leaders in Blythe, where city officials had attempted to save the prison as one of the community’s major employers.

    “This news is disheartening to say the least,” said Blythe interim city manager Mallory Crecelius. “Expediting the closure was not discussed with the city prior to it being included in the May (revised budget), and we learned about it with everyone else. Our hearts are heavy for the employees and inmates at (Chuckwalla Valley State Prison) whose lives will be directly impacted as this prison is shuttered.”

    Because of the declining inmate headcount, California can close up to five more of its 33 prisons and eight yards within operating prisons while still complying with a federal court order that caps the system’s capacity, the Legislative Analyst’s Office found last year. The report estimated the potential savings at $1 billion.

    The costs of incarcerating prisoners, meanwhile, is more than ever, rising to $132,860 per inmate.

    Those numbers have prompted Democratic lawmakers over the past several years to press for more closures, particularly as they try to protect social services from budget cuts or to put money into inmate rehabilitation programs.

    “If the people you’re serving in the department continues to go down, why is the cost going up?” Democratic Assemblyman James Ramos of San Bernardino asked corrections department officials at an April budget hearing.

    Prison union sees safety risks in closures

    Amber-Rose Howard, executive director of Californians United for a Responsible Budget, which advocates for reducing the number of prisons and cutting the prison population, said Newsom’s proposal to close yards instead of whole prisons misses an opportunity for bigger savings.

    “The truth is, it doesn’t go far enough,” Howard said. “When only a single yard is closed, then that means that there’s still tens of millions of dollars being spent on operational costs (and) administrative staffing.”

    She noted that the state still has 15,000 empty prison beds.

    “These yard deactivation will save $80 million annually,” she said, “and that’s not even equal to the cost savings of one prison closing.”

    Newsom has previously said he wanted to maintain some capacity in the prisons to provide more space for rehabilitation efforts.

    The California Correctional Peace Officers Association, the union representing prison guards, has argued that shuttering prisons puts guards and inmates in danger. It’s a heavyweight in the Capitol, and it has supported Newsom. It contributed $1.75 million to help Newsom defeat a recall campaign in 2021, and it gave $1 million to back Newsom’s mental health ballot measure that voters approved in March.

    Writing in opposition to a bill that would limit the number of empty beds the prison system can maintain, the union said prisons are still holding more inmates than they were designed to.

    “Higher densities of inmates pose substantial risks to CCPOA’s membership, as well as other staff and inmates. The denser the population, the greater the risk of assaults and other acts of violence,” the union wrote.

  • Highs in the upper 60s, low 70s
    Sunset at a marina with water in the foreground and small personal boats in the background.
    Another cool day with mostly sunny skies.

    Quick Facts

    • Today’s weather: Sunny
    • Beaches: 63 to 69 degrees
    • Mountains: low to mid 60s
    • Inland: 65 to 71 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: Beach hazards, No burn alert

    What to expect: Sunny and cool today with highs in the mid 60s to low 70s across SoCal.

    Read on...for more details and who is affected by a No Burn Alert, as well as why you should be careful near ocean waters.

    Quick Facts

    • Today’s weather: Sunny
    • Beaches: 63 to 69 degrees
    • Mountains: low to mid 60s
    • Inland: 65 to 71 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: Beach hazards, No burn alert

    The crisp, cool weather continues Tuesday as the region prepares for another Santa Ana wind event on Wednesday.

    Highs along the coast on Tuesday will be from 63 to 69 degrees, and up to 72 degrees for the valleys.

    The Inland Empire will see daytime highs of up to 71 degrees.

    In the Antelope Valley, there will be some areas of frost in the early morning, with temperatures ranging from 56 to 62 degrees.

    Beach hazards

    You'll want to avoid swimming in the ocean because of strong rip currents and breaking waves from high surf. Minor flooding of beach parking lots is possible. These conditions will last until Friday morning for the Orange County coast, and until Saturday morning for L.A. County beaches.

    No burn alert in effect

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District has issued a no burn alert for most of SoCal until 11:59 p.m. because of high air pollution. That means you should avoid any burning of wood, including fireplaces or manufactured logs made from wax or paper. The alert applies to O.C. and L.A. County's non-desert areas, as well as Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

  • Sponsor
  • Should mom-and-pops be allowed an extra 1% hike?
    A view of Los Angeles City Hall from below, with a tall palm tree in the forefront and the light blue sky in the background.
    L.A. City Hall on Monday, April 21, 2025.

    Topline:

    After Los Angeles moved to significantly lower yearly increases in most of the city’s apartments, some City Council members now want to change the rules again. This time, they’re hoping to give small landlords the ability to raise rents more than their corporate counterparts.

    The details: On Tuesday, the council is scheduled to vote on a proposal that would let small landlords — those who own 10 units or fewer— raise rents by an additional 1% each year. The idea was put forward by Councilmembers John Lee and Monica Rodriguez.

    Why now: In a culmination of years of debate, the City Council voted last month to lower the maximum allowable rent increase in the city’s rent-controlled housing to 4% per year. That’s down from the previous maximum of 10%. Lee voted against the changes after expressing concern about how the lower increases would affect the bottom line of small rental property owners. Rodriguez supported the changes, but said more needs to be done to keep “mom and pop” landlords afloat.

    Read on… to learn what landlord and tenant advocates have to say about the proposal.

    After Los Angeles moved to significantly lower yearly increases in most of the city’s apartments, some City Council members now want to change the rules again. This time, they’re hoping to give small landlords the ability to raise rents more than their corporate counterparts.

    On Tuesday, the council is scheduled to vote on a proposal that would let small landlords — those who own 10 units or fewer — raise rents by an additional 1% each year. The idea was put forward by Councilmembers John Lee and Monica Rodriguez.

    “This modest adjustment recognizes the difference between a family that owns a few units and a large corporate operator,” Lee said in a statement to LAist. “Our goal is to keep small landlords in the system and prevent the loss of rent-controlled homes.”

    While the idea is gaining support from landlord groups, tenant advocates say the proposal would create a cumbersome and unfair, two-tier system in which some renters have to pay more than others.

    The changes coming for LA rent control 

    In a culmination of years of debate, the City Council voted last month to lower the maximum allowable rent increase in the city’s rent-controlled housing to 4% per year. That’s down from the previous maximum of 10%.

    Lee, whose district includes the northwest San Fernando Valley, voted against the changes after expressing concern about how the lower increases would affect the bottom line of small rental property owners. Rodriguez, whose district includes the northeast San Fernando Valley, supported the changes, but said more should be done to keep “mom-and-pop” landlords afloat.

    “The motion proposes a modest adjustment to help ensure these small landlords remain viable, rather than being pushed out and accelerating the further corporatization of housing in Los Angeles,” Rodriguez said in a statement to LAist.

    Landlord groups said the proposed 1% increase could help at the margins, but small landlords would still have to contend with insurance premiums and maintenance costs that have been rising faster than overall economic inflation.

    “Throwing a bone in the form of an additional 1% to smaller owners is necessary but will be insufficient to keep many owners in the housing business,” Daniel Yukelson, executive director of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, said in an email. “More and more, owners are being forced to look for the exit ramp in the city of Los Angeles.”

    Do small landlords really have it harder?

    But researchers paid to investigate the issue have not found evidence that small landlords face stronger headwinds than corporate owners. A city-commissioned report by the Economic Roundtable, an independent research nonprofit, found no significant differences between the financial health of small and large landlord operations in L.A.

    “The study found that, in general, small landlords are not suffering greater distress,” Anna Ortega, who is with the city’s Housing Department, said during a recent City Council meeting.

    Tenant advocates with the group Keep L.A. Housed opposed the 1% bump for small landlords, saying it would be unfair to charge some tenants more every year simply because they’re renting from a non-corporate owner. The coalition also said enforcing the rules would be difficult.

    “Allowing small landlords to self-certify creates the opportunity for abuse, as some will fraudulently claim the status and charge incorrect (and potentially illegal) rent increases to already rent-burdened tenants,” said Pablo Estupiñan, a Keep L.A. Housed member and an organizer with the nonprofit Strategic Actions for a Just Economy.

    The rules in LA and beyond

    The city’s rent control rules generally apply to rental units built before October 1978, though some newly built apartments are covered as well. About 70% of the city’s apartments are subject to the rent hike caps.

    Some other Southern California jurisdictions with rent control allow small landlords to increase rents more than larger owners.

    L.A. County allows small landlords in unincorporated areas to increase rents an extra 1%. The city of Inglewood allows owners of buildings with four apartments or fewer to increase rents by an extra 5% compared with owners of buildings with five or more units.

  • City Council to consider expanding support dollars
    A welcome sign for Santa Ana, with palm trees in the background
    The Santa Ana City Council could more than double its contribution to the city’s immigrant support fund.

    Topline:

    The Santa Ana City Council will consider tonight whether to more than double its contribution to the city’s immigrant support fund to help families who have been hurt by ICE enforcement. The vote would add an additional $150,000 to its Ayuda Sin Fronteras fund, which launched in July.

    Why it matters: Santa Ana is Orange County’s only sanctuary city. When federal agents began mass sweeps across Southern California, Santa Ana residents were hit hard. Many have chosen to stay indoors out of fear of ICE sweeps, avoiding workplaces, grocery stores and other public spaces.

    What is Ayuda Sin Fronteras? The money from this fund goes toward helping residents pay for rent and utilities. In July, when the fund was first launched, the city allocated $100,000 for housing assistance.

    Read on … for how Santa Ana residents affected by ICE sweeps can get help.

    Santa Ana’s Ayuda Sin Fronteras — a fund to support immigrant families affected by ICE sweeps — could more than double with an additional $150,000 influx of city dollars if approved by the City Council Tuesday night.

    The federal immigration sweeps have increased fear among immigrant families, prompting some to avoid workplaces and other public areas. The fund goes toward helping those families pay for up to one month’s worth of housing expenses, including past due rent and utility bills.

    The program was created in July following heavy immigration enforcement that rattled many communities in Southern California, including Orange County’s only sanctuary city — Santa Ana.

    When it launched, the city approved an initial $100,000 for housing assistance. In October, the City Council directed the city manager to seek additional funding for approval. Those funds were pulled from several city department employee vacancies, including the city attorney’s office, the Santa Ana Police Department and others.

    Ayuda Sin Fronteras has supported 232 residents as of Oct. 21, according to city officials.

    Mayor Valerie Amezcua said she will revisit the fund as much as possible to make sure the city is doing all it can to support community members affected by immigration enforcement.

    “We need to make sure that we take good care of our community because there is a need,” Amezcua told LAist. “There's a need for rental assistance, for food, for utilities. As the mayor and council, we're committed to helping out our community.”

    Who qualifies? 

    The funds are reserved for Santa Ana families with members who have been detained, deported or financially hurt by immigration enforcement. Families will need to provide proof of immigration enforcement activity or a signed third-party verification form.

    The program requires identification of all household members, but the city says it does not require proof of citizenship.

    Applicants need to be renters at or below moderate income. A family of five, for example, needs to make no more than $177,000 a year. The city’s income chart can be found here.

    How to apply

    If you are interested in getting financial assistance from the city, you need to get a referral from one of the city’s partners.

    You can get more information by reaching out to the Ayuda Sin Fronteras team by filling out a contact form.

    You can also send them an email or call at (714) 565-2655.

    Other help is available 

    In Orange County, Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento created the Orange County Liberty Fund in partnership with community organizations, bringing together $1.5 million to support immigrant families in navigating the legal system.

    In September, the Costa Mesa City Council launched a $200,000 immigrant legal defense fund to help those detained by ICE within the city.

    Outside Orange County, the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach, along with L.A. County, have asked for support from local philanthropists to donate to immigrant support funds.

  • LAHSA to reallocate money away from housing first
    A 2019 photo of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development building in Washington, D.C.

    Topline:

    The governing board for the L.A. Homeless Services Authority voted Monday to start the process of reallocating about $130 million in federal funding currently being spent on permanent housing to other projects meant to serve unhoused Angelenos.

    New HUD policy: The Los Angeles region is eligible for more than $260 million in federal funding under that program in the coming fiscal year, including $217 million for existing projects. But no more than 30% of those funds can go toward permanent housing projects, according to a notice issued last month by the U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development.

    Why it matters: It's a challenge for L.A. County because 90% of regional HUD funds currently cover people’s rent, according to LASHA officials. Under the new HUD policy, about 5,000 households in the county will lose their rental subsidies.

    Pushback: Last week, 21 states, including California sued HUD, claiming the new federal policies “essentially guarantee that tens of thousands of formerly homeless individuals and families will be evicted back into homelessness.”

    Los Angeles’ regional homelessness agency is working to find ways to keep thousands of people in their homes, while complying with new federal funding restrictions on permanent housing.

    The governing board for the L.A. Homeless Services Authority voted Monday to start the process of reallocating about $130 million in federal funding currently being spent on permanent housing to other projects meant to serve unhoused Angelenos.

    Because of new funding restrictions from the U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development, known as HUD, about 5,000 households in the county will lose their rental subsidies, according to several LAHSA officials who spoke at a commission meeting Monday.

    Those changes, along with state and county funding shortfalls for homeless services, threaten to drastically worsen the region’s homelessness crisis, they said.

    "The fact of the matter is there’s going to be a tremendous and terrible impact on people, on agencies, on landlords,” said Nathaniel VerGow, LAHSA’s chief program officer.

    Officials said they’re scrambling to maximize federal funding under the new guidelines while also advocating against the new HUD policy.

    “It is a cliff and it feels catastrophic, but I think it forces us as a region to figure out how to save ourselves,” LAHSA Commission Chair Amber Sheikh said.

    The funding challenge

    Most federal homelessness dollars flow into the L.A. region through the Continuum of Care program, managed by HUD.

    The Los Angeles region is eligible for more than $260 million in federal funding under that program in the coming fiscal year, including $217 million for existing projects.

    But no more than 30% of those funds can go toward permanent housing projects, according to a “notice of funding opportunity” HUD issued last month.

    That’s a challenge for L.A. County, because 90% of regional HUD funds currently cover people’s rent, according to LASHA officials.

    Instead, L.A. and other cities and counties must spend the bulk of their federal funds on other interventions, including transitional housing and street outreach.

    HUD officials have said the policy is meant to encourage self-sufficiency.

    At Monday’s meeting, Commissioner Justin Szlasa urged his colleagues to consider larger funding trends.

    “ There's actually a 23% increase in available funding from HUD, the federal government,” he said. “It just doesn't work with the way that we normally have done things here.”

    “We need to find, in this crisis, a way to be constructive about this,” Szlasa added.

    HUD policy changes

    HUD released its new notice of funding opportunity last month and rescinded a previous two-year funding agreement.

    Opponents have concerns with the federal housing department’s move away from “housing first” approaches. They also said HUD rolled out the changes without providing enough time to prepare service providers and clients for disruptions.

    Last week, 21 states, including California, sued HUD, claiming the new federal policies “essentially guarantee that tens of thousands of formerly homeless individuals and families will be evicted back into homelessness.”

    This week, a group of cities and homelessness organizations also sued over the changes. Plaintiffs include the city and county of San Francisco. The Continuum of Care for San Francisco was awarded $56 million in federal funding for Fiscal Year 2024.

    Approximately 91% of that funding supports permanent housing projects, according to the complaint.

    What’s next?

    The LAHSA Commission voted Monday to approve its request for applications for existing and new projects.

    Providers must submit applications to LAHSA over the next two weeks, and LAHSA has until Jan. 14 to craft and submit a new application to HUD.

    The agency is now talking with 130 contractors about the transition.

    LAHSA is also working with some permanent supportive housing providers to convert their programs to transitional housing instead, officials said.

    People who were in permanent housing projects aren’t eligible for transitional housing under HUD’s guidelines because they're not considered unhoused, VerGow said.

    The commission also reviewed a policy for ranking project applications and prioritizing them for federal funding. Officials said that policy has to be approved at a LAHSA Commission subcommittee on Dec. 10.

    Funds are expected to be awarded in May 2026.