Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How a Trump exemption could affect public health
    An arial photo of large white industrial buildings taking over a block.
    The Sterigenics facilities in Vernon, which have been exempted by President Donald Trump, are next to a residential area in Maywood.

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump has issued a proclamation that postpones compliance with a rule designed to tighten emissions of ethylene oxide at companies that use this gas to sterilize medical equipment. The decision grants two-year exemptions to several facilities, including two in Vernon, a city in southeast L.A. County.

    What is ethylene oxide? Ethylene oxide is a flammable, colorless gas used to sterilize a broad range of medical devices — everything from syringes to heart valves. The gas is also classified as a carcinogen.

    Why it matters: Public health experts say sustained exposure to ethylene oxide increases the risk of lymphoma, leukemia and stomach and breast cancer. Short-term inhalation of high amounts of ethylene oxide can cause headaches, fatigue, respiratory issues, nausea and other kinds of gastrointestinal distress.

    The backstory: Though Vernon is a largely industrial city, the exempted facilities are blocks away from Maywood, an adjoining city that’s predominantly Latino and working class. In 2024, Maywood residents sued the exempted facilities. Most of the plaintiffs have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The others have been diagnosed with leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, stomach cancer, or precancerous conditions. The lawsuit is ongoing.

    Go deeper: The government backs using this chemical. LA County residents say it's hurting their community

    President Donald Trump issued a proclamation this month that delays a rule meant to tighten ethylene oxide emissions at companies that use the gas to sterilize medical equipment.

    The decision grants two-year exemptions to several facilities, including two in Vernon, a city in southeast L.A. County. These facilities are currently embroiled in a lawsuit with local residents.

    The proclamation targets a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2024, which imposes new emissions-control requirements on commercial sterilization facilities.

    What is ethylene oxide? And what harm can it cause?

    Ethylene oxide is a flammable, colorless gas used to sterilize a broad range of medical devices — everything from syringes to heart valves. The gas is also classified as a carcinogen. According to the EPA and the National Cancer Institute, sustained exposure to ethylene oxide increases the risk of lymphoma, leukemia and stomach and breast cancer.

    In the short-term, inhaling high amounts of ethylene oxide can cause headaches, fatigue, respiratory issues, nausea and other kinds of gastrointestinal distress.

    Why was a rule put in place to limit it? And why undo it?

    The rule was the product of years of community advocacy across the United States. Advocates say it’s designed to reduce the risk of exposure to ethylene oxide for people who live, work and go to school near these facilities.

    According to the president, the exemptions are needed to ensure "that our Nation provides its sick and injured with the best outcomes possible.”

    But to advocates like Darya Minovi, senior analyst the Union of Concerned Scientists, Trump’s decision “flies in the face of public health.”

    Companies that use the gas to sterilize medical equipment can be found throughout the country. Minovi was the lead author on “Invisible Threat, Inequitable Impact," a 2023 report from the Union of Concerned Scientists that found more than 14 million people live within 5 miles of commercial sterilizers who emit ethylene oxide. And the people who live around these facilities are disproportionately people of color.

    In his proclamation, Trump said the technology to implement the ethylene oxide rule “does not exist in a commercially viable form.”

    The rule, he added, “will likely force existing sterilization facilities to close down, seriously disrupting the supply of medical equipment.”

    Minovi told LAist that the potential health effects of ethylene oxide have been known for decades. And last year, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of hydrogen peroxide for medical sterilization.

    Communities across the country advocated for this rule to protect their families and neighbors, she added.

    “It is immensely frustrating to spend years going through public participation processes — writing technical comments, writing research, gathering stories, testifying to EPA staff, joining community meetings that EPA held — just [to see the president] announce that, suddenly, [companies] can avoid compliance for another two years,” she said.

    What the exemptions could mean for Southeast L.A. residents

    In his list of exemptions, the president includes two facilities that belong to commercial sterilizer Sterigenics U.S. LLC.

    These Sterigenics facilities are located in Vernon, a small, industrial city located 5 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles. The plaintiffs who’ve sued the company are current and former residents of Maywood, an adjoining city that’s predominantly Latino and working class. The plaintiffs also include long-term Maywood residents who’ve lost a parent or spouse.

    Court documents show that the plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future medical expenses, along with funeral costs, lost wages, and the fear and “mental anguish” of being sick or watching a family member die.

    Most of the plaintiffs have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The others — including a toddler and a man who fell ill while he was in high school — have been diagnosed with leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stomach cancer, or precancerous conditions. The Vernon Sterigenics facilities are blocks away from where the Maywood plaintiffs reside. There are also four elementary schools within a 1.5-mile radius.

    In an email, a spokesperson previously told LAist that the company “empathizes with anyone battling cancer,” but that it’s “confident that it is not responsible for causing the illnesses.”

    “We will vigorously defend our essential and safe operations against these claims,” the spokesperson added.

    The residents’ ongoing lawsuit against Sterigenics doesn’t dispute the importance of maintaining a steady supply of sterilized medical equipment, but it argues that this work shouldn’t be done at their expense.

    Jay Parepally, a federal climate justice legal fellow at Communities for a Better Environment, a nonprofit that’s helped Southeast L.A. fight a host of pollution issues, echoed this point.

    The community is overburdened, he said. Among other issues, it continues to grapple with contamination from Exide, a now-shuttered battery recycler that spewed lead and arsenic into Bell, Boyle Heights, Commerce, East L.A. Huntington Park and Maywood for decades.

    Delaying regulation at a federal level could, in turn, preempt state and local regulation, which “further endangers our communities,” Parepally added. In his view, the health of Southeast L.A. residents “should not be further jeopardized," particularly at a time when it’s become “extremely vulnerable to arbitrary immigration detentions and civil rights violations."

    How will Sterigenics be regulated now?

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District is charged with monitoring the air and enforcing regulations in L.A., Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. In an email, a spokesperson said it cannot comment on Trump’s proclamation.

    When asked if the Sterigenics facilities in Vernon are currently in compliance with its rules, regulations and permit requirements, the agency said: “South Coast AQMD regulates [ethylene oxide] emissions from sterilization facilities under Rule 1405 and works to ensure compliance with our rules and permit requirements."

    In some aspects, the spokesperson added in a follow up email, the 2024 EPA rule is "more stringent" than what's currently in place at the state and local level.

    In recent years, Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have been hit with hundreds of lawsuits throughout the U.S. In 2023, for instance, Sterigenics and Sotera paid $408 million to settle 870 additional lawsuits in Illinois for exposure to elevated levels of ethylene oxide. In a statement, the companies denied liability or that emissions from its facilities posed any safety hazard to surrounding communities.

    In addition to commercial sterilizers in Vernon, Trump’s proclamation exempts seven other Sterigenics facilities. Most are in other states and Puerto Rico, but one is located in Ontario, a city in southwestern San Bernardino County.

    William Boyd, faculty co-director of UCLA’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change & the Environment, said no other president has made use of the authority Trump tapped into to issue his proclamation, which he expects environmental justice advocates to challenge.

    “What it'll come down to is the president's claim that the technology is unavailable and that this is in the national security interest, is that an accurate and valid claim, [and] does he have sufficient reasons to support that?” he said.

    “If you read EPA's rule on ethylene oxide, they say very clearly that the control technology and the limitations that they are including in this new rule [are] available and out there in the world,” he added. “Just because it might be more expensive, doesn't mean it's not available.”

    “As a general matter,” Boyd told LAist, the public “thinks this is sort of abstract. [But] there are real people living real lives in real places that are going to end up getting cancer because of what the president is doing.”

  • LAUSD school rebuilds underway
    A child with light skin tone and curly blonde hair walks across a playground with blue structures.
    Marquez Charter Elementary reopened to students with temporary classrooms and new playgrounds Sept. 30, 2025.

    Topline:

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior. The buildings are still in progress, but Los Angeles Unified's superintendent promised they’ll be complete in 2028.

    The backstory: The 2025 fire destroyed two Los Angeles Unified elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades— and damaged Palisades Charter High School, an independently run school on district property.

    Where are the students: 

    • Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus on Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April. 
    • Marquez Elementary students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus.  
    • Palisades Elementary students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. 

    What’s next: In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the three burned schools. District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.  The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior, though their classrooms are temporary.

    Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April.

    “ I am just overwhelmed with gratitude for the constant support that has been shown for our school and for our families, our teachers, all of our administrators and staff,” said Principal Pamela Magee at a press conference Tuesday with Los Angeles Unified leaders. Pali High is an independent charter high school located on district property.

    In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the high school, as well as two burned district elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades.

    Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said the three campuses’ new buildings will open in 2028— shaving two years off of the original 5-year timeline.

    “ These projects will come in on time or ahead of schedule,” Carvalho said. “These projects will come in at or below budget, and these projects will honor the resilience, the determination, the courage and yes, the suffering and the sacrifice of the community of the Palisades.”

    About the costs and the design

    The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates some reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring, said Chief Facilities Executive Krisztina Tokes. She said the plan is to rebuild with future environmental risks in mind.

    “ From the earliest design stages, wildfire resiliency has been treated as a core requirement and not an add-on,” Tokes said. For example, using fire-resistant concrete blocks, installing enhanced air filtration systems and planting shade trees where they won’t hang over buildings.

    Environmental testing preceded students’ return to the fire-impacted campuses. Director of the Office of Environmental Health and Safety Carlos Torres said the district continues to monitor air quality through its network of sensors and is developing a plan for periodic testing.

    “We just can't just walk away,” Torres said.

    Enrollment is down at all three schools compared to before the fires, but district leaders say they are confident families will return to the rebuilt campuses.

    “I find it hard to believe that this community won't come back to its former glory,” said Board Member Nick Melvoin, who represents the Palisades. “We gave a lot of thought in an accelerated timeline to rebuilding for the next century.”

    Marquez Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? The campus is a “total loss.” More than three dozen classrooms, administration buildings, the school’s auditorium and playground burned down.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $202.6 million

    Where are the students? Students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus. There’s also two playgrounds, a garden, library and shaded lunch area. Enrollment has dropped 60% compared to before the fire from 310 to 127 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A group of elementary school aged students sit in a circle on gray carpet. A woman with light skin tone and long brown hair pulled back leans in to the center of the circle.
    Palisades Charter Elementary School teacher Ms. Davison talks with her students in their new classroom on the campus of Brentwood Elementary Science Magnet last year.
    (
    Brian van der Brug
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? About 70% of the campus was destroyed including 17 classrooms, the multipurpose room and play equipment.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $135 million

    Where are the students? Students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. Enrollment has dropped 25% compared to before the fire from 410 to 307 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A white building with PALI and four images of dolphins in blue. There are blue skies and hills in the background.
    Palisades Charter High School, pictured in December 2025, is scheduled to reopen to students Jan. 27, 2026.
    (
    Kayla Bartkowski
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter High School

    What’s the damage? About 30% of the campus was destroyed including 21 classrooms, storage facilities and the track and field.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $266 million

    Where are the students? Students started the school year in a renovated Sears building in downtown Santa Monica. Enrollment has dropped 14% compared to before the fire, from 2,900 to 2,500 students.

    What’s next? Classes will resume at the main campus Tues. Jan. 27 in a combination of surviving buildings and 30 new portable classrooms.

  • Sponsored message
  • Astrophysicist Ray Jayawardhana to lead university
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, speaking at a podium during an announcement ceremony at The Athenaeum in Pasadena. He is wearing a dark suit and patterned tie, standing in front of a large orange backdrop featuring the Caltech logo.
    Incoming Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana speaks during an announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Caltech has selected astrophysicist and Johns Hopkins University provost Ray Jayawardhana as its next president.

    Who he is: According to his introduction video, Jayawardhana goes by "Ray Jay."

    His academic work in astronomy explores how planets and stars form, evolve and differ from each other. He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    In addition to his time as provost at Johns Hopkins, where he oversees the university's 10 schools, Jayawardhana has also taught at Cornell University, the University of Toronto and the University of Michigan and also had a research fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley. He got his undergraduate degree at Yale and earned his Ph.D. at Harvard.

    Why now: In April, current Caltech President Thomas F. Rosenbaum announced he'd retire after the 2025-26 academic year. Rosenbaum has led the university for the past 12 years.

    What's next: Jayawardhana will step into his new role July 1.

  • Trump admin plans to halt billions to CA
    President Donald Trump speaks during a White House event to announce new tariffs April 2, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The backstory: The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The potential impact on California: The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    Read on ... for more on the fraud allegations and Gov. Gavin Newsom's response.

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The state’s Democrat governor, Tim Walz — who ran for vice president against Donald Trump’s ticket in 2024 — announced Monday he was dropping out of running for reelection. He pointed to fraud against the state, saying it’s a real issue while alleging Trump and his allies were “seeking to take advantage of the crisis.”

    On Monday, the New York Post reported that the administration was expanding the funding freeze to include California and three other Democrat-led states, in addition to Minnesota. Unnamed federal officials cited “concerns that the benefits were fraudulently funneled to non-citizens,” The Post reported.

    Early Tuesday, President Trump alleged that corruption in California is worse than Minnesota and announced an investigation.

    “California, under Governor Gavin Newscum, is more corrupt than Minnesota, if that’s possible??? The Fraud Investigation of California has begun. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” the president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

    He did not specify what alleged fraud was being examined in the Golden State.

    LAist has reached out to the White House to ask what the president’s fraud concerns are in California and to request an interview with the president.

    “For too long, Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” said an emailed statement from Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the federal childcare funds.

    “Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes. We will ensure these states are following the law and protecting hard-earned taxpayer money.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office disputed Trump’s claim on social media, arguing that since taking office, the governor has blocked $125 billion in fraud and arrested “criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers.”

    Criminal fraud cases in CA appear to be rare for this program

    Defrauding federally funded programs is a crime — and one LAist has investigated, leading to one of the largest such criminal cases in recent years against a California elected official, which surrounded meal funds.

    When it comes to the federal childcare funds that are being frozen, the dollar amount of fraud alleged in criminal cases appears to be a tiny fraction of the overall program’s spending in California.

    A search of thousands of news releases by all four federal prosecutor offices in California, going back more than a decade, found a total of one criminal case where the press releases referenced childcare benefits.

    That case, brought in 2023, alleged four men stole $3.7 million in federal childcare benefits through fraudulent requests to a San Diego organization that distributed the funds. All four pleaded guilty, with one defendant sentenced to 27 months in prison and others sentenced to other terms, according to authorities.

    It appears to be equivalent to one one-hundredth of 1% of all the childcare funding California has received over the past decade-plus covered by the prosecution press release search.

    Potential impact on California families

    The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    In the largest category of funding, California receives $3.7 billion per year. The program is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF.

     ”It's very clear that a freeze of those funds would be very damaging to the children, families, and providers of California,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives "at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

     ”It is a significant portion of our funds and will impact families and children and providers across the whole state,” she added. “It would be devastating, in no uncertain terms.”

    About 270,000 people are served by the TANF program in L.A. County — about 200,000 of whom are children, according to the county Department of Public Social Services.

    “Any pause in funding for their cash benefits – which average $1000/month - would be devastating to these families,” said DPSS chief of staff Nick Ippolito.

    Ippolito said the department has a robust fraud prevention and 170-person investigations team, and takes allegations “very seriously.”

    It remains to be seen whether the funding freeze will end up in court. The state, as well as major cities and counties in California, has sued to ask judges to halt funding freezes or new requirements placed by the Trump administration. L.A. city officials say they’ve had success with that, including shielding more than $600 million in federal grant funding to the city last year.

    A union representing California childcare workers said the funding freeze would harm low-income families.

    “These threats need to be called out for what they are: direct threats on working families of all backgrounds who rely on access to quality, affordable child care in their communities to go to work every day supporting, and growing our economy,” said Max Arias, chairperson for the Child Care Providers United, which says it represents more than 70,000 child care workers across the state who care for kids in their homes.

    “Funding freezes, even when intended to be temporary, will be devastating — resulting in families losing access to care and working parents facing the devastating choice of keeping their children safe or paying their bills.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    Federal officials planned to send letters to the affected states Monday about the planned funding pauses, the New York Post reported. As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, state officials said they haven’t gotten any official notification of the funding freeze plans.

    “The California Department of Social Services administers child care programs that help working families afford safe, reliable care for their children — so parents can go to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities,” said a statement from California Department of Social Services spokesperson Jason Montiel.

    “These funds are critical for working families across California. We take fraud seriously, and CDSS has received no information from the federal government indicating any freeze, pause, or suspension of federal child care funding.”

  • CA is investing in housing for fire survivors
    The charred remains of what used to be the interior of a home, with a stone fireplace sticking out from the rubble.
    A home destroyed in the Eaton Fire on Jan. 8.

    Topline:

    California is investing $107.3 million in affordable housing in L.A. County to help fire survivors and target the region’s housing crisis.

    What we know: In an announcement Tuesday, the state said the money will fund nine projects with 673 new affordable rental homes specifically for communities impacted by the January fires.

    Where will these projects go? The homes will not replace destroyed ones or be built on burn scar areas, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office. The idea is to build in cities like Claremont, Covina, Santa Monica and Pasadena to create multiple affordable housing communities across the county.

    Officials say: “We are rebuilding stronger, fairer communities in Los Angeles without displacing the people who call these neighborhoods home,” Newsom said in a statement. “More affordable homes across the county means survivors can stay near their schools, jobs and support systems, and all Angelenos are better able to afford housing in these vibrant communities.”

    Dig deeper into how Los Angeles is remembering the anniversary of the fires.