Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How a Trump exemption could affect public health
    An arial photo of large white industrial buildings taking over a block.
    The Sterigenics facilities in Vernon, which have been exempted by President Donald Trump, are next to a residential area in Maywood.

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump has issued a proclamation that postpones compliance with a rule designed to tighten emissions of ethylene oxide at companies that use this gas to sterilize medical equipment. The decision grants two-year exemptions to several facilities, including two in Vernon, a city in southeast L.A. County.

    What is ethylene oxide? Ethylene oxide is a flammable, colorless gas used to sterilize a broad range of medical devices — everything from syringes to heart valves. The gas is also classified as a carcinogen.

    Why it matters: Public health experts say sustained exposure to ethylene oxide increases the risk of lymphoma, leukemia and stomach and breast cancer. Short-term inhalation of high amounts of ethylene oxide can cause headaches, fatigue, respiratory issues, nausea and other kinds of gastrointestinal distress.

    The backstory: Though Vernon is a largely industrial city, the exempted facilities are blocks away from Maywood, an adjoining city that’s predominantly Latino and working class. In 2024, Maywood residents sued the exempted facilities. Most of the plaintiffs have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The others have been diagnosed with leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, stomach cancer, or precancerous conditions. The lawsuit is ongoing.

    Go deeper: The government backs using this chemical. LA County residents say it's hurting their community

    President Donald Trump issued a proclamation this month that delays a rule meant to tighten ethylene oxide emissions at companies that use the gas to sterilize medical equipment.

    The decision grants two-year exemptions to several facilities, including two in Vernon, a city in southeast L.A. County. These facilities are currently embroiled in a lawsuit with local residents.

    The proclamation targets a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2024, which imposes new emissions-control requirements on commercial sterilization facilities.

    What is ethylene oxide? And what harm can it cause?

    Ethylene oxide is a flammable, colorless gas used to sterilize a broad range of medical devices — everything from syringes to heart valves. The gas is also classified as a carcinogen. According to the EPA and the National Cancer Institute, sustained exposure to ethylene oxide increases the risk of lymphoma, leukemia and stomach and breast cancer.

    In the short-term, inhaling high amounts of ethylene oxide can cause headaches, fatigue, respiratory issues, nausea and other kinds of gastrointestinal distress.

    Why was a rule put in place to limit it? And why undo it?

    The rule was the product of years of community advocacy across the United States. Advocates say it’s designed to reduce the risk of exposure to ethylene oxide for people who live, work and go to school near these facilities.

    According to the president, the exemptions are needed to ensure "that our Nation provides its sick and injured with the best outcomes possible.”

    But to advocates like Darya Minovi, senior analyst the Union of Concerned Scientists, Trump’s decision “flies in the face of public health.”

    Companies that use the gas to sterilize medical equipment can be found throughout the country. Minovi was the lead author on “Invisible Threat, Inequitable Impact," a 2023 report from the Union of Concerned Scientists that found more than 14 million people live within 5 miles of commercial sterilizers who emit ethylene oxide. And the people who live around these facilities are disproportionately people of color.

    In his proclamation, Trump said the technology to implement the ethylene oxide rule “does not exist in a commercially viable form.”

    The rule, he added, “will likely force existing sterilization facilities to close down, seriously disrupting the supply of medical equipment.”

    Minovi told LAist that the potential health effects of ethylene oxide have been known for decades. And last year, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of hydrogen peroxide for medical sterilization.

    Communities across the country advocated for this rule to protect their families and neighbors, she added.

    “It is immensely frustrating to spend years going through public participation processes — writing technical comments, writing research, gathering stories, testifying to EPA staff, joining community meetings that EPA held — just [to see the president] announce that, suddenly, [companies] can avoid compliance for another two years,” she said.

    What the exemptions could mean for Southeast L.A. residents

    In his list of exemptions, the president includes two facilities that belong to commercial sterilizer Sterigenics U.S. LLC.

    These Sterigenics facilities are located in Vernon, a small, industrial city located 5 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles. The plaintiffs who’ve sued the company are current and former residents of Maywood, an adjoining city that’s predominantly Latino and working class. The plaintiffs also include long-term Maywood residents who’ve lost a parent or spouse.

    Court documents show that the plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future medical expenses, along with funeral costs, lost wages, and the fear and “mental anguish” of being sick or watching a family member die.

    Most of the plaintiffs have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The others — including a toddler and a man who fell ill while he was in high school — have been diagnosed with leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stomach cancer, or precancerous conditions. The Vernon Sterigenics facilities are blocks away from where the Maywood plaintiffs reside. There are also four elementary schools within a 1.5-mile radius.

    In an email, a spokesperson previously told LAist that the company “empathizes with anyone battling cancer,” but that it’s “confident that it is not responsible for causing the illnesses.”

    “We will vigorously defend our essential and safe operations against these claims,” the spokesperson added.

    The residents’ ongoing lawsuit against Sterigenics doesn’t dispute the importance of maintaining a steady supply of sterilized medical equipment, but it argues that this work shouldn’t be done at their expense.

    Jay Parepally, a federal climate justice legal fellow at Communities for a Better Environment, a nonprofit that’s helped Southeast L.A. fight a host of pollution issues, echoed this point.

    The community is overburdened, he said. Among other issues, it continues to grapple with contamination from Exide, a now-shuttered battery recycler that spewed lead and arsenic into Bell, Boyle Heights, Commerce, East L.A. Huntington Park and Maywood for decades.

    Delaying regulation at a federal level could, in turn, preempt state and local regulation, which “further endangers our communities,” Parepally added. In his view, the health of Southeast L.A. residents “should not be further jeopardized," particularly at a time when it’s become “extremely vulnerable to arbitrary immigration detentions and civil rights violations."

    How will Sterigenics be regulated now?

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District is charged with monitoring the air and enforcing regulations in L.A., Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. In an email, a spokesperson said it cannot comment on Trump’s proclamation.

    When asked if the Sterigenics facilities in Vernon are currently in compliance with its rules, regulations and permit requirements, the agency said: “South Coast AQMD regulates [ethylene oxide] emissions from sterilization facilities under Rule 1405 and works to ensure compliance with our rules and permit requirements."

    In some aspects, the spokesperson added in a follow up email, the 2024 EPA rule is "more stringent" than what's currently in place at the state and local level.

    In recent years, Sterigenics and its parent company, Sotera Health, have been hit with hundreds of lawsuits throughout the U.S. In 2023, for instance, Sterigenics and Sotera paid $408 million to settle 870 additional lawsuits in Illinois for exposure to elevated levels of ethylene oxide. In a statement, the companies denied liability or that emissions from its facilities posed any safety hazard to surrounding communities.

    In addition to commercial sterilizers in Vernon, Trump’s proclamation exempts seven other Sterigenics facilities. Most are in other states and Puerto Rico, but one is located in Ontario, a city in southwestern San Bernardino County.

    William Boyd, faculty co-director of UCLA’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change & the Environment, said no other president has made use of the authority Trump tapped into to issue his proclamation, which he expects environmental justice advocates to challenge.

    “What it'll come down to is the president's claim that the technology is unavailable and that this is in the national security interest, is that an accurate and valid claim, [and] does he have sufficient reasons to support that?” he said.

    “If you read EPA's rule on ethylene oxide, they say very clearly that the control technology and the limitations that they are including in this new rule [are] available and out there in the world,” he added. “Just because it might be more expensive, doesn't mean it's not available.”

    “As a general matter,” Boyd told LAist, the public “thinks this is sort of abstract. [But] there are real people living real lives in real places that are going to end up getting cancer because of what the president is doing.”

  • Dodgers fans grapple with loyalty ahead of it
    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers shirt, speaks into a microphone standing behind a podium next to others holding up signs that read "No repeat to White House. Legalization for all" and "Stand with you Dodger community." They all stand in front of a blue sign that reads "Welcome to Dodger Stadium."
    Jorge "Coqui" H. Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on Wednesady to demand the Dodgers not visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

    Topline:

    Less than 24 hours before season opener, longtime Dodgers fans demand the team divest from immigration detention centers and decline the White House visit.

    More details: More than 30 people joined Richard Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. “We are demanding that the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together we have the power to make a change.”

    The backstory: The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    Read on ... for more on how some fans are feeling leading up to Opening Day.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

    “The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

    Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

    More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

    “We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

    Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

    Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers t-shirt, speaks into a microphone behind a podium.
    Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

    “They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

    Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

    The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

    In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

    When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

    “These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

    According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

    “I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

    The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

    Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

    “It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Warmer weather has caused more biting flies
    A zoomed in shot of a fuzzy black fly with some white spots.
    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley.

    Topline:

    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley, according to officials.

    What are black flies? Black flies are tiny, pesky insects that often get mistaken for mosquitoes. The biting flies breed near foothill communities like Altadena, Azusa, San Dimas and Glendora. They also thrive near flowing water.

    What you need to know: Black flies fly in large numbers and long distances. When they bite both humans and pets, they aim around the eyes and the neck. While the bites can be painful, they don’t transmit diseases in L.A. County.

    A population spike: Anais Medina Diaz, director of communications at the SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District, told LAist that at this time last year, surveillance traps had single-digit counts of adult black flies, but this year those traps are collecting counts above 500.

    So, why is the population growing? Diaz said the surge is unusual for this time of year.

    “We are experiencing them now because of the warmer temperatures we've been having,” Diaz said. “And of course, all the water that's going down through the river, we have a high flow of water that is not typical for this time of year.”

    What officials are doing: Officials say teams are identifying and treating public sources where black flies can thrive, but that many of these sites are influenced by natural or infrastructure conditions outside their control.

    How to protect yourself: Black flies can be hard to avoid outside in dense vegetation, but you can reduce the chance of a bite by:

    • Wearing loose-fitted clothing that covers the entire body. 
    • Wearing a hat with netting on top. 
    • Spraying on repellent, but check the label. For a repellent to be effective, it needs to have at least 15% DEET, the only active ingredient that works against black flies.
    • Turning off any water features like fountains for at least 24 hours, especially in foothill communities.

    See an uptick in black flies in your area? Here's how to report it

    SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District
    Submit a tip here
    You can also send a tip to district@sgvmosquito.org
    (626) 814-9466

    Greater Los Angeles Vector Control District
    Submit a service request here
    You can also send a service request to info@GLAmosquito.org
    (562) 944-9656

    Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control
    Submit a report here
    You can also send a report to ocvcd@ocvector.org
    (714) 971-2421 or (949) 654-2421

  • Rent hike to blame
    A black and brown dog lays down on a brown sofa on the foreground. In the background, a man wearing a plaid shirt sits.
    Jeremy Kaplan and Florence at READ Books in Eagle Rock.
    Topline:
    Local favorite mom and pop shop READ Books in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say they’re just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    The backstory: Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and their shop dog Florence.

    What happened? The building where Kaplan and his wife Debbie rent was recently sold and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    What's next? While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Read on... for what small businesses can do.

    A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

    Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

    “Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

    But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

    California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

    Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What can small businesses do? 

    Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

    Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

    “There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

    She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

    “We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

    Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

    What’s next 

    After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

    While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

    Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

    By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

    When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

    “It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

    “And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

  • Ballots to be sent out
    A person sits in the carriage of a crane and places solar panels atop a post. The crane is white, and the number 400 is printed on the carriage in red.
    A field team member of the Bureau of Street Lighting installs a solar-powered light in Filipinotown.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote on Tuesday to send ballots to more than half a million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which has essentially been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote on Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired.The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote Tuesday to send ballots to more than a half-million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which essentially has been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.