Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • The Board of Education wants your feedback
    A security guard sits at a desk under a wall that says "Los Angeles Unified School District."
    LAUSD board meetings are held at the district's headquarters in DTLA.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education’s website is getting a makeover. Parents, educators, students, and other members of the public can give feedback on what works and what doesn’t.

    Why it matters: The board’s website is “meant for the public to access anything and everything that the board does in the public eye,” says executive officer Michael McLean.
    Here are a few examples:

    • Agendas for upcoming meetings
    • Policies under consideration and previously passed 
    • Presentations to the board on topics including school safety, attendance, test scores, special education, and afterschool programs. 
    • Recordings of past meetings

    Why now: The board has had a “temporary” website for about a year. McLean says his office regularly fields requests from the public (often reporters) to find specific documents. “At this point, it's easier for us to search our internal files that hold all the public facing documents than it is for the public, and that's not fair,” McLean said.

    What's next: The online survey will be up at least through May 27 and possibly longer if there’s an influx of responses. There is no set date for the new website launch, but McLean said it could be within the next six months.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education’s website is getting a makeover.

    The board’s website is “meant for the public to access anything and everything that the board does in the public eye,” says the board’s executive officer Michael McLean.

    Parents, educators, students, and other members of the public can give feedback for the next several weeks on what works and what doesn’t.

    “They should fill out this survey and they will have an easier time at the end of the day using the website,” he said.

    Here’s a few examples of what lives on the board website:

    • Agendas for upcoming meetings
    • Instructions on how to give public comment
    • Policies under consideration and previously passed 
    • Presentations to the board on topics including school safety, attendance, test scores, special education, and afterschool programs 
    • Video recordings of past meetings

    Providing some of this information — for example, the agendas — is mandated by California law. The Brown Act requires elected officials conduct their business in a way that’s open and accessible to the public.

    What's it like to use the website?

    The board has had a “temporary” website for about a year. Most of what you want to find — and everything the district is legally required to provide — is there— somewhere— but it can take a lot of clicking to get to.

    I had McLean walk me through a search for the latest board information on the district’s ongoing effort to bring more green space to asphalt-covered school campuses.

    From the main site, I scrolled about halfway down the page to a link titled “2023-2024 Committee Meeting Schedule,” which leads to a PDF that shows the Greening/Climate Resilience Committee’s most recent meeting was Nov. 15, 2023.

    Then I went back to the calendar on the main page, clicked until I got to November, where I could find the materials from that convening. The slide deck from the meeting alone has a lot of great info — for example, there are 15 million square feet, or 350 acres, of paved schoolyard the district wants to update to green or natural space.

    I also looked under the “Board Resolutions” tab and found documents that mention greening dating to 1998, but not the most current materials.

    McLean says his office regularly fields and fulfills requests from the public (often reporters) to find specific documents.

    “At this point, it's easier for us to search our internal files that hold all the public facing documents than it is for the public, and that's not fair,” McLean said.

    What's next?

    The online survey will be up at least through May 27 and possibly longer if there’s an influx of responses. There is no set date for the new website launch, but McLean said it could be within the next six months.

    “I just want folks to be able to find what they're looking for in the broadest sense,” McLean says. “I want them to believe and understand that the information on which the Board of Education runs … is available to them and that there's no hiding the ball.”

    Contact your LAUSD school board member

    Find Your LAUSD Board Member

    LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students, and educators. Find your representative below.

    District 1 map, includes Mid City, parts of South LA
    Board Member George McKenna
    Email: george.mckenna@lausd.net
    Call: 213-241-6382

    District 2 map, includes Downtown, East LA
    Board Member Rocío Rivas
    Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
    Call: 213-241-6020

    District 3 map, includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood
    Board Member Scott Schmerelson
    Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-8333

    District 4 map, includes West Hollywood, some beach cities
    Board Member Nick Melvoin 
    Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
    Call: 213-241-6387

    District 5 map, includes parts of Northeast and Southwest LA
    Board President Jackie Goldberg
    Email: jackie.goldberg@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-5555

    District 6 map, includes East San Fernando Valley
    Board Member Kelly Gonez
    Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
    Call: 213-241-6388

    District 7 map, includes South LA, and parts of the South Bay
    Board Member Tanya Ortiz Franklin
    Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6385

  • Rain hits in time for Christmas week
    A person is holding a clear umbrella, decorated with colorful polka dots, over their head and face, resting on their shoulders. A packed freeway is out of focus in the background, with white headlights facing the camera.
    Rain is expected to return to Los Angeles next week.

    Topline:

    An atmospheric river is expected to hit Southern California next week, bringing several inches of rain to the region — just in time for Christmas.

    Why it matters: The moderate to strong storm could dump 2 to 4 inches of rain on L.A., Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, while the mountains and foothills could see double that amount.

    Why now: The storm is expected to peak Tuesday evening into Christmas Eve, according to the National Weather Service, lingering into Thursday and Christmas Day.

    The details: Bryan Lewis, a meteorologist with the NWS Oxnard office, said forecasters also are expecting gusty winds across the region, along with a chance of thunderstorms.

    What's next: There’s also a growing potential for moderate to heavy showers continuing into next weekend, although Lewis said the details and timing could change as the storm approaches.

    Go deeper: Why your skis and snowboard might not get much of a workout this winter

  • Sponsored message
  • $37M grant will build fiber broadband
    A view from above of a pair of green hills at the bottom of the frame and the ocean in the horizon.
    More than 4,000 residents on Catalina Island don’t have reliable internet.

    Topline:

    A years-long effort to bring fast, reliable internet to Catalina Island cleared a major vote today after the California Public Utility Commission awarded $37 million to install subsea fiber internet infrastructure between Orange County and the island.

    Why it matters: Catalina Island is home to more than 4,000 residents, and it draws thousands of tourists each year, but the internet connection on the island is often slow and unreliable.

    Why is the internet connection so erratic? Residents don’t have access to fiber internet on the rural island and larger communications companies don’t serve the area because it’s too expensive.

    Read on … for more on what we know about the project so far.

    A years-long effort to bring fast, reliable internet to Catalina Island cleared a major vote today after the California Public Utility Commission awarded $37 million to install subsea fiber internet infrastructure between Orange County and the island.

    More than 4,000 residents on Catalina Island don’t have reliable internet. That’s because the rural island doesn’t have fiber broadband infrastructure, and large communication companies don’t serve the area because of high costs.

    “We currently operate off of a microwave tower, and it’s time that Avalon had nothing better than the rest of the mainland, but the same,” Avalon City Councilmember Lisa Lavelle said during public comment.

    Lance Ware, CEO of AVX Networks, the telecom company tasked with building Catalina Island’s broadband infrastructure, said this project is significant to the quality of life for island residents.

    “No one thought Catalina really was worthy,” Ware told LAist. “It really took a long time to convince the grant makers that this is a very much underserved community … not only digitally red lined, but forgotten about from an infrastructure perspective, and I mean that beyond communications.”

    The impact to the community is almost immeasurable, he added.

    “The access to that technology, workforce development, economic development and just the potential outcomes change massively for everybody involved,” Ware said. “Our ability to deliver world-class health care and public safety is huge.”

    What we know about the project

    The commission distributed more than $96 million in federal grant funds during Thursday’s meeting to five groups for high-speed broadband projects, including AVX Networks.

    The planned proposal includes building a fiber-optic network above and underground from Catalina Island to the Orange County coast.

    When it comes to internet connection, the entire island is unserved, according to the commission’s agenda report. That means it has zero access to broadband internet.

    According to records, the undersea cables will run under the San Pedro Channel from two points on the island to landings near Huntington Beach. Those cables will then connect to the Middle Mile Broadband Network in Stanton.

    The grant will cover 100% of the project costs, records show.

    What’s next?

    Grantees are required to follow a set of rules to receive funds, and that includes committing to providing internet service at affordable rates.

    Ware said AVX Networks will have a low-income plan at $40 a month at 100/100 Mbps — this is the download and upload speed of the service.

    “We chose to go symmetrical, which means the upload is the same as the download,” Ware added. “For people doing video streaming or telemedicine or FaceTime, even, or e-learning, it's really important to have symmetrical bandwidth.”

    AVX Networks also has committed to maintaining those rates for at least 10 years, the commission agenda reported.

    Next, the company needs to get permits for building out the project and surveying a route on the sea floor for the cables.

  • City spent $17m in 2 years without major audit
    A tile and glass building. Letters spelling out "Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd." are placed on the tile. There are palm trees in the background.
    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years without a major audit.

    Topline:

    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years, recently obtained records show, but the system hasn't been audited since 2018.

    Why it matters: The absence of audits was a central issue former purchasing agent Kari Bouffard included in a tort claim in June alleging she was fired for raising concerns that the city’s top finance official, Debbie Moreno, was enabling fraud, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and lying to the City Council.

    About the purchases: LAist requested and reviewed credit card monthly billing statements for all city-issued credit cards for the past two years. The statements show city employees spent tens of thousands of public money at places like Target, Walmart and Amazon. as well as on “food, office and other operational supplies for city business purposes,” according to Lyster. The statements do not show details about specific purchases.

    Read on... for details about the purchases.

    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years, recently obtained records show, but the system hasn't been audited since 2018.

    Anaheim spokesperson Mike Lyster, who along with city leadership did not answer detailed questions about the purchases, confirmed the lack of audit.

    The absence of audits was a central issue former purchasing agent Kari Bouffard included in a tort claim in June alleging she was fired for raising concerns that the city’s top finance official, Debbie Moreno, was enabling fraud, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and lying to the City Council.

    In the legal claim, Bouffard says when she raised concerns over the lack of an audit with the city’s audit team, which then wanted to audit the credit card program, she alleges Moreno told her: “Do not let them in the door.”

    “I found her response unprofessional, dismissive, and deeply concerning, particularly given her role as Finance Director and her responsibility to support accountability and internal controls,” Bouffard wrote.

    In October, Lyster confirmed an external legal team is conducting “an independent outside review” of the allegations in the tort claim. But he did not answer questions about who the firm is or how much that contract has cost the city.

    LAist requested and reviewed credit card monthly billing statements for all city-issued credit cards for the past two years. The statements show city employees spent tens of thousands of public money at places like Target, Walmart and Amazon on “food, office and other operational supplies for city business purposes,” according to Lyster. The statements do not show details about specific purchases.

    The Amazon purchases totaled around $1.7 million of public money over the two years, according to the data. Anaheim provided a breakdown of the Amazon purchases that did not include details about what was bought at the online marketplace.

    Lyster said Anaheim monitors credit card purchases appropriately.

    He confirmed credit card purchases were last audited in 2018 by the city’s Internal Audit team.

    “There was no larger concern with any of the findings, and we reject any mischaracterization and misinformation about oversight of the city’s purchasing cards,” Lyster said in a statement.

    Lyster told LAist the city’s purchasing agent, who until recently was Bouffard, can “pursue audits at any time,” but one has not been done recently. In the tort claim, Bouffard said she raised concerns with Moreno over “lack of time and staffing within the Purchasing Division to adequately manage and audit the program.” Moreno’s solution, she said, was a temporary staffer — “an insufficient solution given the scope of responsibilities,” Bouffard wrote.

    Lyster also said the financial firm KPMG conducts an annual audit of a sample of credit card transactions. LAist asked Lyster for a copy of the KPMG sample audit, but he did not share it.

    Anaheim’s credit card spending amounts to about $800,000 a month.

    Anaheim's credit card purchases

    Amazon: $1,726,954.00
    Restaurant spend: $804,038.12
    Home Depot: $666,982.97
    Office Depot: $557,071.43
    Grainger: $344,650.22
    Hilton: $138,993.06
    Target: $136,050.68
    Sam’s Club: $119,924.50
    Walmart: $57,306.85
    Costco: $42,857.63
    In-N-Out: $21,020.98
    Walmart: $57,306.85

    Source: Monthly billing statements obtained via public records request

    The city of Irvine, also one of OC’s most populous cities, spends around $500,000 on credit cards every month, according to city spokesperson Kristina Perrigoue. Those purchases are audited monthly, Perrigoue said. Irvine’s purchasing staff randomly selects one department per month to audit and they audit a sample of purchases.

    “We take the five users with the highest number of transactions and audit all their transactions for the prior month,” Perrigoue said.

    Why it matters

    Earlier this year, Anaheim grappled with how to close a $60 million budget shortfall after spending more than they were generating in revenue. City leaders closed the deficit with proceeds from capital bonds and by pulling money previously set aside to repay debt. The City Council recently declined to put a gate tax at its entertainment venues, including Disneyland, to voters. Instead, the majority of the council decided to meet at a future date to discuss revenue generating ideas. At that meeting, Mayor Ashleigh Aitken called for “tightening our belts” to boost revenue.

    LAist review of the credit card purchases showed significant spending at vendors — some with which Anaheim has cooperative agreements with.

    Cooperative agreements allow agencies like the city of Anaheim to pre-negotiate pricing so they get the best deals.

    Anaheim’s credit card policy states that the credit card can only be used for the small dollar purchase of supplies or off-site services. Typically, for bigger purchases, cities turn to cooperative agreements.

    “The vast majority of city purchasing — most purchases more than $10,000 — is done by purchase order or contract,” Lyster told LAist.

    Credit cards, Lyster said, “provide an efficient, cost-effective way of making smaller purchases, rather than use of petty cash, direct payments, cash advances and check requests, which can be more cumbersome, administratively costly and bring their own risks of misuse.”

    “There are cases where a purchase order or contract would be unnecessary and excessive, adding time and cost and impacting timely service to our community,” he continued.

    LAist has shared our findings with Aitken, City Manager Jim Vanderpool and all council members. We have also reached out to Moreno for an interview. We will update this story if we hear back.

    Here are some of our key findings from Anaheim’s credit card purchases:

    • Over $800,000 spent on restaurants

    City employees spent more than $800,000 on restaurants in Southern California and elsewhere over two years including around $60,000 at K&A Restaurant and over $20,000 on In-N-Out. Some restaurants from the credit card statement include Aloha Steakhouse in Ventura County, Tacos 1986 in Pasadena and BaBaLoo Lounge in Palm Desert.

    Lyster told LAist the restaurant spends “are catering expenses for events or meals for special work operations.”

    He said the city also provides meals when they “bring together a large contingent of our own police officers and those of other agencies to work demonstrations, high-profile dignitary visits or other occasions,” especially for work in the evening or on weekends.

    Lyster added that the council meetings are also catered and the city hosts community events where they cater food for the public.

    How to reach the reporter

    • If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is @yusramf.25.
    • You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
    • For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page.
    • And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at yfarzan@laist.com

    • Around $650,000 spent on hotels

    LAist’s review of the credit card purchases showed thousands of dollars spent at hotels, including the Grand Hyatt in Nashville, Caesars Palace in Las Vegas and a pet hotel in Oxnard.

    “The vast majority of this spending is for employee development to ensure our people are continually learning and aware of best professional standards,” Lyster said about the hotel charges. “This is an investment in our workforce that brings better service to our community.”

    • Around $40,000 spent at Costco, close to $120,000 at Sam’s Club, around $120,000 at Target and around $57,000 on Walmart purchases in two years

    Lyster attributed this spend to “food and supplies.”

    The Community Services Department, he said, buys “food and crafts and other supplies” for the city’s Fun on Wheels program, the Mobile Library and family resource centers.

    He declined to answer questions on whether employees submit a request for the purchase of goods and services and how the city tracks if these purchases are used for public benefit. The requests, called requisitions, are typical first steps in the purchasing process detailing quantity, description and use, Bouffard told LAist. When she worked at the county, all purchases went through this “checks and balances process,” she said.

    • Over $600,000 spent at Home Depot, more than $550,000 at Office Depot and over $340,000 at Grainger

    Lyster didn’t confirm if the purchases at these vendors were made using a purchase order.

    He confirmed Anaheim has accounts with Grainger, Office Depot and others, but not if the city’s credit card purchases at the vendors are made through the dedicated account.

    LAist correspondent Jordan Rynning contributed to this report.

  • State votes to lower them, but not by much
    A work crew fixes a power line.
    A crew fixes a power line in Altadena. Worsening wildfires are driving up utility bills across the state.

    Topline:

    California regulators voted to lower how much profit the state’s big four investor-owned utilities can make — but only slightly.

    The proposal: The decision lowers the maximum allowed profits for the state’s four investor-owned utilities — Southern California Edison, So Cal Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric and Pacific Gas & Electric — by about 0.3%. That’s less than the 0.35% reduction originally proposed.

    The vote: In a 4-1 decision, the state’s five governor-appointed commissioners approved the proposal to lower the payout to shareholders from the state’s major utility companies. They argued the decision strikes a balance between the effort to lower energy bills with the need to keep the utilities financially stable, especially as they work to harden an aging power grid against worsening wildfire conditions. Commissioner Darcie L. Houck was the sole no vote.

    The response: Critics say the reduction should go further to meaningfully reduce energy bills, pointing out that the companies have reported record or near-record profits in recent years. The utility companies argued that lowering their returns on equity too far below national averages would hurt shareholder investment and their credit, driving up customer costs over time.

    Go deeper: Will California OK lower utility company profits? How a pending vote could affect your electric bill