The Brief

California State University is the nation’s largest public four-year system, with nearly half a million students. So it’s a big deal that starting this year, CSU will make OpenAI’s ChatGPT available to all those students and its faculty.

It’s also controversial.

The effort will cost the CSU nearly $17 million — even as the system faces a $2.3 billion budget gap. That gap persists despite a tuition increase and spending cuts that have meant fewer course offerings for students.

University officials say providing access to quality AI tools is an issue of equity. Across the system’s 23 campuses, some students were paying for their own ChatGPT subscriptions. CSU spokesperson Amy Bentley-Smith said the goal is for all students to have “the same access to the tools and learning opportunities that will prepare them for the future,” regardless of which campus they attend.

The creep of AI is undeniable. On college campuses, it has transformed how students and professors approach tests and assignments. Students have filed lawsuits for being accused of using AI and sued college professors for using the tools many of them use regularly. AI has also diminished the earning potential of recently lucrative majors, leaving colleges in the position of trying to keep up.

Those efforts point to why, in recent years, OpenAI has established business deals with universities across the country, including multiple public institutions.

At what cost? For the most part, the company and colleges involved have not made the price of these services publicly available.

Public records obtained by LAist for universities across the country show CSU’s massive scale appears to have helped it land a deal on ChatGPT subscriptions, and that CSU has invested far more aggressively in generative AI tools than other public universities, both in dollars spent and in the number of students served.

In an email earlier this year, CSU’s Bentley-Smith said the system leveraged economies of scale “to ensure that the CSU paid the lowest price possible.”

What is ChatGPT Edu? And how are students and faculty using it?

OpenAI is a leading generative artificial intelligence company valued at hundreds of billions of dollars, despite currently operating at a loss. On its website, the company touts business deals with at least a dozen public and private colleges worldwide, ranging from Arizona State University to Oxford.

University officials say they want students at each Cal State campus to have access to the same learning tools.

(

Julie Leopo

/

LAist

)

OpenAI provides these schools with a product called ChatGPT Edu, a chatbot specifically designed for college settings.

ChatGPT Edu is tailored to each campus. And with it, universities provide access to a mix of OpenAI products. This can include the company’s flagship model, ChatGPT‑5, along with other tools. ChatGPT Edu also enables students and faculty to make custom AI models. At Columbia University in New York City, for instance, faculty researchers built a prediction tool to help reduce overdose fatalities⁠. The model analyzes and synthesizes large datasets to inform interventions and, according to OpenAI, it enables the team to reduce “weeks of research work into seconds.”

ChatGPT Edu can also help with more run-of-the-mill work. Some of the tasks the company suggests include: personalized tutoring for students, helping researchers write grant applications and assisting faculty with grading.

A version of ChatGPT is available at no cost, but ChatGPT Edu allows for higher message limits than the free version. OpenAI also says student and faculty data are kept private and aren’t used to train its models.

(LAist requested an interview with Leah Belsky, OpenAI’s vice president of education, but a spokesperson said she was not available by the time of publication.)

Earlier this year, CSU launched a new AI initiative — a public-private partnership between the university system; the California governor’s office; and 10 tech giants, including Microsoft, NVIDIA and OpenAI.

The university system also put out a call for proposals, asking faculty to come up with strategies “that prepare students to thrive in a rapidly evolving digital world while promoting critical thinking, ethical AI use and integrating AI literacy into curricula.” In May, the CSU announced that it received more than 400 proposals from over 750 faculty members. Ultimately, 63 of those proposals were awarded $30,000 to $60,000 grants.

Leslie Kennedy, assistant vice chancellor of academic technology services, told LAist the $3 million in grants came from the division of academic and student affairs, which provides funding for special projects.

How CSU’s OpenAI contract compares to other public U.S. universities

The basic, free version of ChatGPT provides limited access to the chatbot’s core functions. For access to more advanced features, the average user can subscribe to ChatGPT Plus for $20 a month. (The highest level of access costs $200 a month.)

Public records show that, during the first six months of this year, CSU paid roughly $1.9 million dollars to make ChatGPT Edu available to 40,000 users. From July 2025 to June 2026, the university system will pay another $15 million to make the product available to 500,000 users. This, said spokesperson Bentley-Smith in an email, “represents a significant savings.”

It’s also clear CSU secured a far lower cost–per-student than other universities, in contracts reviewed by LAist:

Money flows the other direction, too. Redacted documents obtained from Texas A&M indicate that, in February 2025, OpenAI made a one-time gift of $50,000 to the Texas A&M Foundation, a nonprofit that operates independently from the university and manages private donations. The gift was earmarked for the development of generative AI literacy at the Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station.

LAist asked other universities with OpenAI deals if they have plans to make ChatGPT available to everyone on campus; ASU, for example, enrolls nearly 200,000 students. At UMass Lowell, with more than 17,000 students, spokesperson David Joyner told LAist via email that “the university is evaluating generative AI options we may be able to offer broadly. However, we do not have current plans to license community-wide ChatGPT access." Other universities had not responded as of publication.

LAist is still waiting on public records for other public universities in the U.S. We will update this story as we obtain that information.

Friction between CSU leaders and educators

Despite CSU’s sizable discount, some educators have criticized the system’s gambit.

“For me, it's frightening,” said Kevin Wehr, a sociology professor at Sacramento State and chair of the California Faculty Association’s bargaining team. “I already have all sorts of problems with students engaging in plagiarism. This feels like it takes a shot of steroids and injects it in the arm of that particular beast.”

But Wehr said AI buy-in among faculty runs the gamut.

“I know faculty who are embracing [AI] with open arms. [They’re] building it into their curriculum, building it into their assignments, teaching students how to use these tools and how not to use these tools and what to be aware of and what the pitfalls and problems are,” he said. “And I want them to feel completely supported in their work.”

Wehr told LAist that faculty members' foremost concern is the technology's capacity to reshape the workforce. Faculty are also worried about harm to the environment, given the massive power needs to run AI, which include the increased use of fresh water to cool data centers.

Wehr also noted that chatbots sometimes generate inaccurate information, known as “hallucinations.” He also expressed concern over language learning models with built-in racial and gender biases.

Above all, Wehr expressed distaste for the expense at a time when the CSU is struggling financially. In his view, it speaks to misplaced priorities.

“We are cutting programs. We are merging campuses. We are laying off faculty. We are making it harder for students to graduate,” Wehr said. And instead of using that money to ameliorate those issues, he added, “we're giving it to the richest technology companies in the world."

Bentley-Smith, the CSU spokesperson, said the money for ChatGPT Edu “came from one-time funds from the Chancellor's Office, not from university budgets.”

The university’s vision for the future

LAist brought the faculty’s concerns to assistant vice chancellor Kennedy and the CSU’s chief information officer Ed Clark, who oversees IT strategy across CSU. Clark said the move was necessary from a system perspective.

“We were seeing certain universities that had more resources saying: ‘We're going to go sign a deal with X vendor or Y vendor,’” he said. “That was already happening in the CSU. For us at the system office, that's not OK, because then … you're a faculty member or a student at the wrong campus, you don't have access. So we wanted to make sure everybody had access.”

Clark added that the deal is important for individuals, too.

“Many people had already signed up for individual licenses for ChatGPT, whether they were faculty, staff, or students, but only the people that could afford that were doing that,” he said. “That was also leaving our community behind. So, we wanted to think about it system-wide in terms of access, equity, outcomes for all, and that is why we went system-wide.”

His words for critics? “Join us,” he said. “ Help us shape the future.”

Kennedy also responded to complaints from faculty who aren’t pleased with the pivot to AI.

“We still have a half a million students, even though we're being challenged with funding in general. And we still want to prepare them for the future,” she said. “That's why we moved ahead.”

The systemwide initiative was developed with recommendations from a CSU Generative AI committee. Members included CSU faculty senate appointees, a Cal State Student Association appointee and representatives from other CSU stakeholder groups. Three of about two dozen members were part of the faculty.

What happens when the deal expires?

Clark said the system has hired a firm to assess CSU’s return on its OpenAI investment. The success of the deal will be determined by taking a host of factors into account, including how ChatGPT is used in the classroom; student learning outcomes; administrative productivity; and environmental impact.

CSU’s contract with OpenAI is for 18 months total. It’s unclear how expensive a renewal would be, or how the system might use its leverage to negotiate with other companies.

“We knew things could change so rapidly that maybe something else would emerge and we said ‘maybe this is better now,” Clark said. “We did want to have that flexibility, but we are also very very happy with our partnership with OpenAI and the ChatGPT rollout at this moment.”

The Los Angeles City Council has officially delayed minimum wage increases for tourism workers. The council made the final vote Tuesday, pushing back a boost to $30 an hour for airport and hotel workers from 2028 to 2030.

The controversial move comes after L.A. faced major pressure from business interests, which had gathered enough signatures to put a measure on the November ballot to repeal the business tax. That effort could have financially ruined the city if it passed.

After the City Council voted to delay the wage from the November ballot, the leaders behind that ballot measure withdrew it.

It's a maneuver hotel workers have called a "shakedown." Originally celebrated as an "Olympic Wage," the $30 minimum was pegged to the arrival of the 2028 Games in Los Angeles. But a battle to upend it started as soon as the City Council passed it last year.

Workers who had counted on the increases aren't happy.

" I would expect my councilmember to stand up for working Angelenos, not help giant companies take money out of our pockets," Jordan Long, a bartender at LAX, said at a recent council meeting.

Stuart Waldman with the Valley Industry & Commerce Association told LAist that business groups decided to advance their ballot measure after unions wouldn't broker a deal with them directly.

"The business community has taken a page out of the union playbook to play hardball," he said.

Council members Eunisses Hernandez, Ysabel Jurado and Hugo Soto-Martinez voted against the motion to finalize the wage delay Tuesday.

The Trump administration has mass-deleted information about prosecutions tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, including cases of defendants who assaulted police officers. The removals mark the latest phase of President Donald Trump's effort to rewrite the history of the violent riot.

Justice Department news releases that detailed guilty pleas, jury verdicts and prison sentences abruptly disappeared from government websites last week.

On social media, the Justice Department defended the move, saying, "We are proud to reverse the DOJ's weaponization under the Biden administration. We will do everything in our power to make whole those who were persecuted for political purposes. This includes stripping DOJ's website of partisan propaganda."

A review by NPR found that the deleted material included information about some of the most serious assaults on law enforcement that occurred that day. NPR maintains the most complete database and visual archive of the Jan. 6 prosecutions.

The purged news releases covered cases including:

• Daniel Rodriguez, who pleaded guilty to driving an electroshock device into the neck of former Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department officer Michael Fanone, and who was sentenced to more than 12 years in prison. 
• Albuquerque Head, who pleaded guilty to assaulting police and grabbing Fanone by the neck and pulling him into the mob of rioters while yelling, "I got one!" Head was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. 
• Thomas Webster, who was convicted by a jury of assaulting law enforcement with a metal flagpole, tackling a police officer to the ground and trying to remove the officer's gas mask. Webster was sentenced to 10 years in prison. 
• Christopher Alberts, who was convicted by a jury of assaulting police with a wooden pallet and carrying a loaded handgun on Capitol grounds. Alberts was sentenced to seven years in prison.
• Peter Schwartz, who was convicted by a jury of assaulting police officers with pepper spray and throwing a metal chair at law enforcement. Schwartz was sentenced to 14 years in prison. 
  

The previously accessible news releases now lead to a "Page not found" message.

The mass deletion of government information about the riot, in which a mob of Trump supporters injured 140 police officers and threatened the lives of members of Congress and then-Vice President Mike Pence, follows a broader effort by the Trump administration to whitewash the attack.

Trump granted clemency to every Jan. 6 defendant, including full pardons for all the most violent rioters and the erasure of seditious conspiracy convictions for members of extremist groups. The Justice Department fired dozens of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and hired a former riot defendant who was seen on video urging the mob to "kill" police. The administration settled a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the estate of rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed while storming the Capitol, for nearly $5 million. On the fifth anniversary of the riot, the White House created a website that distorts that day's events, describing the rioters as "patriots" and blaming police for causing "chaos." And just last week, the administration announced a $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund," indicating that even rioters who assaulted police may be eligible for payouts.

When speaking about the attack, Trump consistently describes his supporters as victims rather than perpetrators of violence.

"I pardoned people that were assaulted themselves. They were assaulted by our government," Trump said last year. "They didn't assault. They were assaulted."

Police officers who were violently assaulted on Jan. 6 have described suffering lifelong physical and psychological injuries.

"I have been sentenced to a lifetime of medical issues that include physical pain and mental and emotional distress," former Capitol Police Sgt. Federico Ruiz said in a victim impact statement filed in a Jan. 6 case. "There is not a day that goes by that pain, discomfort, and/or a mental health issue do not flare up to remind me of that day."

Brendan Ballou, a former federal prosecutor who worked on Jan. 6 cases, told NPR in a recent interview that the administration's effort to flip the story of the riot is part of a broader effort to attack democratic institutions.

"It's clear there is an ongoing fight to rewrite the history of Jan. 6, because these people know if they can successfully get people to forget about Jan. 6 — or worse yet, condone it — then they will be able to convince people to accept any attack on democracy," said Ballou.

Ballou currently represents two police officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 and are suing to prevent payouts from the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

While the government continues to remove information on the attack, NPR's database and visual archive of the attack remains accessible. NPR's work has been used by prosecutors, defendants, academic researchers and the general public.

The searchable database covers all the nearly 1,600 criminal cases, including charges, convictions and sentencing outcomes. The archive also includes a timeline of the day's events and makes accessible hundreds of videos from police body cameras, Capitol surveillance footage and other sources. NPR is currently taking legal action to obtain additional video evidence held by the government, which has not been previously disclosed.
Copyright 2026 NPR