Elly Yu
reports on early childhood. From housing to health, she covers issues facing the youngest Angelenos and their families.
Published September 8, 2025 12:14 PM
The California Justice Department is suing the LA County Sheriff’s Department over conditions in its county jails.
(
Robert Garrova
/
LAist
)
Topline:
California Attorney General Rob Bonta is suing the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, calling conditions inside its jails a "humanitarian crisis.”
The backstory: In 2021, the Attorney General’s Office launched an investigation over the sheriff's department’s policing practices. As part of that probe, investigators examined conditions in county jails.
The context: It's not the first time L.A. County has been under scrutiny over jail conditions; the federal government has sued in the past, as well as the ACLU.
What’s new: Bonta said investigators found overcrowded and inhumane conditions in the nation’s largest jail system — including rat infestations, moldy food and broken plumbing. "We're talking about feces smeared on the walls and medical care denied to those in need," he said. "We're talking about a disrespect for the basic dignity of our fellow humans and a violation of their most fundamental constitutional rights."
Inmate deaths: There’s also been a significant rise in jail deaths. Over the last four years, there were 206 in-custody deaths and more than 40% were preventable, like homicides, suicides and overdoses, Bonta said. The lawsuit states that in 2025 alone, there have been 36 in-custody deaths, which amounts to about one a week.
Sheriff's response: Bonta said the county failed to implement reforms in its jails, and left the office “no choice” but to sue.
Sheriff Robert Luna said in a statement that his department has been "fully engaged and cooperative" with the state Department of Justice, and said the department has already made progress under other existing settlement agreements. "We are not waiting for mandates, we are proactively advancing reforms to build a safer, more accountable custody environment," he said.
David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published July 2, 2026 5:00 PM
Los Angeles City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto at a September 2024 news conference.
(
Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Long-term eviction defense funding for Los Angeles renters could soon begin to flow now that city officials have announced a break in an impasse dating back to May 2025.
The latest: L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto said Thursday she intends to sign a new $107 million contract with the Legal Aid Foundation of L.A. She said the contract — which was approved by the City Council and the mayor in April, but still awaits her approval — was “nearly finalized.”
What’s next: Feldstein Soto — who will not secure a second term after placing third in last month’s primary election — pledged to continue investigating the legal aid group. She has frequently criticized the nonprofit for what she sees as a lack of transparency, though L.A. Housing Department officials say the group has consistently provided accounting and caseload data to the city.
The response: Barbara Schultz, a Legal Aid Foundation attorney overseeing the city-funded Stay Housed L.A. program, said both parties have been negotiating final contract details for more than a week. She said the city attorney’s announcement was encouraging.
Long-term eviction defense funding for Los Angeles renters could soon begin to flow now that city officials have announced a break in an impasse dating back to May 2025.
L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto said Thursday she intends to sign a new $107 million contract with the Legal Aid Foundation of L.A. She said the contract — which was approved by the City Council and the mayor in April, but still awaits her approval — was “nearly finalized.”
“I am fully committed to supporting these crucial eviction defense services for our vulnerable neighbors in need,” Feldstein Soto said in a statement.
Feldstein Soto — who will not secure a second term after placing third in last month’s primary election — pledged to continue investigating the legal aid group. She has frequently criticized the nonprofit for what she sees as a lack of transparency, though L.A. Housing Department officials say the group has consistently provided accounting and caseload data to the city.
“Taxpayers deserve transparency and accountability and to know that their money is being used as intended,” Feldstein Soto said.
Barbara Schultz, a Legal Aid Foundation attorney overseeing the city-funded Stay Housed L.A. program, said both parties have been negotiating final contract details for more than a week. She said the city attorney’s announcement was encouraging.
“[Feldstein Soto] said she was going to approve the contract, so I'm very excited to hear that,” Schultz said. “Moving forward… we can continue to grow, fully implement the ‘Right to Counsel,’ and tenants in Los Angeles will be much better off as a result.”
In response to Feldstein Soto’s claims that more than $58 million in eviction defense grants remain “unaccounted for” in the foundation’s financial audits and IRS forms, Schultz said taxpayer dollars have not been misspent and that no findings have been made to that effect.
“[The Legal Aid Foundation] is a very large nonprofit law firm that has over 40 federal, state and local government contracts,” Schultz said. “We are very used to being audited. Any audit the city wants to do to satisfy itself is absolutely fine with us.”
Feldstein Soto denied a five-year contract to the legal aid group last year, arguing it should have gone through a competitive bidding process. After the city solicited applications and selected the group for new long-term funding, she later told city councilmembers in a confidential memo that they should consider withholding support for “a frequent litigant against the city.”
While she announced the contract should be ready for her signature by July 7, Feldstein Soto said her office would move forward with plans to assign forensic accountants to study how the legal aid group has spent more than $90 million in city funds since 2021.
Kevin Tidmarsh
is a producer for LAist, covering news and culture. He’s been an audio/web journalist for about a decade.
Published July 2, 2026 4:46 PM
Gita O’Neill, interim CEO of LAHSA, speaks ahead of the annual homeless count on Jan. 20, 2026.
(
Jordan Rynning
/
LAist
)
Topline:
A federal judge on Thursday indicated he wants to preserve federal funding for the embattled Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority as the agency sues the federal government for pulling access to these funds.
How we got here: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced last month it was freezing funding to LAHSA, citing mismanagement on the agency’s part. LAHSA then vowed to fight the funding freeze in court, filing its lawsuit Monday.
The timeline: U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ordered LAHSA and HUD to submit a proposed agreement by July 16 that would maintain status quo funding of LAHSA’s services. He also set an Aug. 6 hearing, during which Carter will decide whether to issue a court order that would block the federal funding freeze. Carter also indicated he would endeavor to issue a final ruling by Aug. 26, which is currently the deadline for LAHSA to apply for new grants.
What’s at stake: LAHSA CEO Gita O’Neill estimated the suspension put as much as $150 million in grants in limbo that the federal government has already awarded but hasn’t finalized. HUD also said the suspension barred LAHSA from submitting an application on behalf of the entire region for the next round of federal grants, totaling up to $241 million, according to LAHSA’s estimates.
LAHSA’s response: “We look forward to our day in court on Aug. 6, when we will have the opportunity to argue for a definitive ruling,” O’Neill said in a statement Thursday. The same statement also incorrectly described Carter’s court order as a preliminary injunction against HUD’s actions. Carter will decide whether to issue the preliminary injunction at the Aug. 6 hearing. A LAHSA spokesperson later corrected the statement after an inquiry from LAist.
Aaron Schrank and Nick Gerda contributed reporting.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
is an arts and general assignment reporter on LAist's Explore LA team.
Published July 2, 2026 4:23 PM
Belgica Cruz, left, helps her daughter Catherine Hernandez try on a replica Mexico soccer team jersey she bought in a Santa Ana indoor mall.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
/
LAist
)
Topline:
For many, wearing Mexico’s soccer team jersey represents the country’s World Cup aspirations. For some fans in the U.S., it’s about affirming their cultural roots in a time of struggle.
Why it matters: Support for Mexico’s national soccer team has increased among people with Mexican heritage abroad as the team has won in the latest round. People are attaching different meanings to wearing the team’s national symbols.
Why now: New fans are on the hunt for jerseys and are finding a shortage.
What's next: Mexico’s men’s soccer team hopes to advance to the next round of World Cup play on Sunday when it plays England at Mexico City Stadium.
At the Bristol Swap Mall in Santa Ana, people are flocking to buy their Mexico soccer team jerseys and paraphernalia.
“The color is green and that says Mexico right here,” said Catherine Hernandez, who’s entering third grade, as she pointed to the replica Mexico soccer jersey her mother had bought her at a nearby stall.
She asked her mother to get her one the day after Mexico’s win against Ecuador and is already thinking about how she’ll feel wearing it Sunday during Mexico’s knockout game against England in the Round of 16.
“Excited, very excited because I’m Mexican and I love this shirt,” she said.
Hernandez was born in the U.S. and her mother was born in Mexico. Both say their Mexico jerseys symbolize those similar but different prides in their Mexican backgrounds.
They're among fans rooting for Mexico’s men’s national soccer team to advance further than ever before into the World Cup tournament. A win against England would move the team to the Round of 8, the quarterfinals, for the third time. Along the way, this Mexico team has captured the imagination of many in the U.S. who have, or are close to, those of Mexican heritage.
Proudly wearing the green jersey
The market vendor at the stall said only one adult-size 2026 jersey remained. So many had been sold they'd had to place an order for more.
A replica of Mexico's 2026 FIFA World Cup soccer jersey.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
/
LAist
)
Many Mexico fans have been wearing their jerseys on the days leading up to the team's World Cup matches.
“On Monday, I looked around to see a sea of green, white and red, and it nearly brought me to tears in line at Costco,” said Alex Alcantar, who lives in Norwalk.
On Monday, I looked around to see a sea of green, white and red, and it nearly brought me to tears in line at Costco.
— Alex Alcantar, Mexico soccer fan who lives in Norwalk
He was born and raised in the U.S. and he says his Mexico soccer jersey symbolizes that experience.
“Why I wear my Mexico jersey is because I want to visibly represent this community when our contributions to society are so heavily discounted,” he said.
The team’s growing prominence has also coaxed some others in Mexican communities in the U.S. to feel more confident in their identity.
“I've never used [a Mexico jersey] before,” said Xochi Flores, who was born in Oxnard and whose great-grandparents were Mexican.
“I didn't feel like I could go around representing Mexico when I'm a Chicana, third generation, not the best Spanish speaker,” she said.
Xochi Flores (left), with her husband Cesar Castro, has become more comfortable wearing the soccer jersey recently.
(
Courtesy Xochi Flores
)
In the past year, she said she’s felt closer to her Mexican roots as she’s seen reports of farmworkers and other people of Mexican descent arrested by ICE agents.
I didn't feel like I could go around representing Mexico when I'm a Chicana, third generation, not the best Spanish speaker.
— Xochi Flores, on why she didn't wear a Mexico jersey before
So to her, wearing her Mexico soccer jersey means leaving behind insecurities she used to have about not being “Mexican enough,” as well as “not being American enough.”
“I want my kids to see me embracing all of the parts of me. … They don't have those insecurities, and that makes me happy,” Flores said.
Wearing the jersey when you're Mexican-ish
The stalls are attracting all types of customers. “I'm just looking for a Mexican soccer jersey,” said Son Lam, who lives in nearby Orange and identifies as Vietnamese.
Lam says he’s become devoted to soccer since the World Cup started June 11. Buying and wearing a Mexican soccer team jersey means showing off his newfound sports fandom already embraced by his extended family
“My wife is Mexican and to me, [wearing the Mexico jersey] means I can fit in with the family more," he said as he laughed.
However they identify, all these shoppers will likely be wearing their jerseys as they watch Mexico compete against England on Sunday, July 5. Joining millions of fans rooting for their team to advance to the next round, and keeping dreams of a 2026 FIFA World Cup championship alive.
Jill Replogle
covers public corruption, debates over our voting system, culture war battles — and more.
Published July 2, 2026 4:02 PM
Santa Ana welcome sign
(
albertc111/Getty Images
/
iStockphoto
)
Topline:
Santa Ana voters could be asked in November to maintain the city’s 1.5% sales tax, which was set to decrease in 2029 and eventually expire.
The backstory: Voters approved the citywide sales tax in 2018 on the condition that it sunset in 20 years. Now, the Santa Ana City Council will vote Tuesday on whether to ask voters in November to make the tax permanent.
Read on ... to find out what other OC cities are considering similar tax hikes.
Santa Ana voters could be asked in November to maintain the city’s 1.5% sales tax, which was set to decrease in 2029 and eventually expire.
Voters approved the citywide sales tax in 2018 on the condition that it sunset in 20 years. Now, the Santa Ana City Council will vote Tuesday on whether to ask voters in November to make the tax permanent.
The big picture
Only about one-third of cities in Orange County have a local sales tax on top of the county-imposed sales tax of 7.75%. Sales taxes in most of Los Angeles County are much higher — L.A.’s countywide sales tax is 9.75% and the highest total sales taxes for cities in L.A. County are in Lancaster and Palmdale, at 11.25% each, according to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
Other potential tax hikes in OC
Voters in Orange will be considering a sales tax hike on their November ballot, after failing to get voters’ approval in 2024. San Clemente voters will also consider a local sales tax in November to pay for more sand to shore up local beaches.