What to expect: A slightly, cooler weekend before another heatwave comes next week. Temperatures will drop a degree or two today.
Read on ... for more details.
It might not feel like it, but Southern California is in for a slight cooldown this weekend before the heat comes back.
The National Weather Service says temperatures today will drop a degree or two. At the beaches, the daily highs will range from 74 to 80 degrees. For the inland coast, expect max temperatures to reach 87 to 93 degrees. Inland areas of Orange County will see temperatures from 79 to 87 degrees.
Meanwhile, L.A. County valleys will stay below 100 degrees today with highs expected to reach 89 to 99 degrees. Over in the Inland Empire, we're going to see temperatures range from 91 to 100 degrees.
In Coachella Valley, temperatures will be about 3 degrees cooler with highs from 110 to 115 degrees. And in the Antelope Valley, expect highs from 99 to 108 degrees, and 93 to 98 degrees for the cooler hills.
Looking ahead to the weekend, daily highs for the valley communities are expected to max out in the lower to mid-90s. Coachella Valley will also see temperatures drop a few more degrees. Come Monday, temperatures will begin to warm up again.
You can find cooling centers via the following links:
Protect a pet from excessive heat
Protect a human from excessive heat
Check in frequently with family, friends and neighbors. Offer assistance or rides to those who are sick or have limited access to transportation. And give extra attention to people most at risk, including:
Topline:
California police and fire unions are backing bills that would create new retirement benefits or raise pay. Lawmakers approved them overwhelmingly.
More details: Three bills are moving forward that would either raise pay for state firefighters or boost retirement benefits for public safety personnel. Their supporters say the measures are meant to compensate people who risk their lives for others and who by the nature of their jobs are exposed to career-shortening hazards. The proposals are sailing through the Legislature with bipartisan support and overwhelming majorities of lawmakers voting for them.
Why it matters: The proposals carry significant price tags and could potentially drive up annual spending by hundreds of millions of dollars. They could also swell the state’s long-term liabilities by billions of dollars. That could make them a tough sell to Gov. Gavin Newsom given that the state anticipates deficits in the near future.
Read on... for more on the bills.
The Legislature wants to make putting on a California police or firefighter uniform more lucrative.
Three bills are moving forward that would either raise pay for state firefighters or boost retirement benefits for public safety personnel.
Their supporters say the measures are meant to compensate people who risk their lives for others and who by the nature of their jobs are exposed to career-shortening hazards. The proposals are sailing through the Legislature with bipartisan support and overwhelming majorities of lawmakers voting for them.
“Every day has a cost, and it's one that we pay with our lives,” Darrell Roberts, president of the union California Professional Firefighters said at a recent hearing where he spoke in favor of a bill that would let public safety employees retire at 55, two years earlier than currently allowed. “This job is physically and mentally demanding in the extreme and asking us to work until 57 is pushing us not just to our limit but beyond it.”
The proposals carry significant price tags and could potentially drive up annual spending by hundreds of millions of dollars. They could also swell the state’s long-term liabilities by billions of dollars. That could make them a tough sell to Gov. Gavin Newsom given that the state anticipates deficits in the near future.
The two retirement bills in particular are rekindling memories of California’s pension crisis in the Great Recession, when major funds lost tens of billions of dollars. At the time, taxpayer advocates drew attention to sweetened benefits that former Gov. Gray Davis signed into law just a few years before the crash, when the stock market was booming.
Marcia Fritz, an accountant and longtime Californmia pension watchdog, said the current push to expand public safety retirement benefits is similar to the law Davis signed. During Davis’ tenure, California’s pension funds were flush from a soaring stock market fueled by tech companies, and lawmakers believed the good run would continue.
Today, the two largest pension funds — CalPERS and CalSTRS — have not fully recovered from their recession losses. But they have been beating their earnings targets, thanks in part to a stock market again propelled by the tech sector.
To Fritz, the lawmakers advancing the bill are “drinking the Kool Aid that the markets are never going to go down,” she said. “We’re the ones paying for it with reduced services.”
California scaled back benefits for workers hired after 2012 when former Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law that compelled employees to work longer before earning a full pension and required them to kick in more money to fund their own pensions.
CalPERS has estimated that Brown’s pension reform saved government agencies $4 billion in its first 10 years and projected it would reduce their expenses by another $24 billion over the next decade.
To taxpayer advocates like Fritz, that’s a sign tthe law is working and should continue as is. To the public safety unions, that means the government agencies have capacity to increase benefits without fully unwinding Brown’s law.
The bills moving forward would:
The bill that would allow police and firefighters to retire earlier carries the biggest potential cost, requiring an additional $282 million in annual contributions to the California Public Employees’ Retirement system and increasing its long-term liabilities by $4.8 billion.
Its price tag would increase if cities, counties and other local government agencies agree to offer more generous pension formulas to police and firefighters, as the bill would allow. If that happens, CalPERS estimates it would cost an additional $353 million in annual contributions and further swell the fund’s long-term debt.
Those estimates do not account for the 20 county-run pension systems that are separate from CalPERS.
The potential costs are one reason California cities and counties oppose the measure. “We do definitely support strong retirement benefits, but those benefits must remain sustainable and fiscally responsible for our local agencies,” Johnnie Pina, a lobbyist for the League of California Cities, said at a recent Senate hearing.
It’s less clear what the other two measures will cost.
Supporters of the bill that would give CHP officers and Cal Fire firefighters access to an alternate retirement investment program during their last five years of service say it is intended to be cost neutral, although similar plans offered by cities and counties have driven up expenses. The bill requires CalPERS to assess the program every five years, which union representatives say would allow lawmakers to make adjustments if they see unintended drawbacks.
The measure that would nudge Newsom to raise pay for Cal Fire firefighters has an uncertain cost because it’s written in a way that would allow flexibility for the governor’s office.
It encourages the governor to bargain “in good faith” toward bringing Cal Fire compensation closer to what local governments pay, but does not mandate it. A 2023 state compensation survey found that local fire departments pay firefighters between 11% and 29% more than Cal Fire.
"Instead of being the lowest paid, we will inevitably be somewhere in the middle" if the bill becomes law, firefighter union lobbyist Terry McHale told lawmakers at a hearing earlier this year.
Last year, Newsom rejected a similar measure that was more explicit in demanding an increase in Cal Fire pay. Newsom wrote in a veto message that it would “create significant cost pressures for the state and circumvent the collective bargaining process.” Officials estimate it would have cost between $373 million and $609 million in its first year.
Cal Fire’s firefighter union essentially wants what only one other group of state workers has: Raises based on what other government agencies pay. CHP officers receive annual raises based on what several other large California police departments pay; every other state worker union has to negotiate compensation with the governor.
All three measures face a major obstacle later this month in the Senate Appropriations Committee, which has the power to sideline bills over cost concerns. If they clear that committee, the bills have a good chance of reaching Newsom’s desk.
At the most recent hearing, lawmakers said increasing incentives to recruit and retain first responders was so important that they’d cut other programs to make room for the additional spending. They commended emergency personnel who rushed to a chemical spill in Orange County in May not knowing if the danger would harm them.
“I still get goosebumps for these firefighters and their families that had to know that they're that they're they were putting their lives online to save that explosion from happening, which they actually end up doing,” Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican representing Huntington Beach, said at the hearing.
“You can't put a price tag on that,” he said.
The unions have also been a steady presence in the Capitol throughout Newsom’s tenure. Firefighter unions have contributed $6.2 million to lawmakers and legislative campaigns since 2019 and the law enforcement organization known as PORAC has spent $4.5 million over that time, according to CalMatters Digital Democracy database.
They’ve also been reliable allies to Newsom. California Professional Firefighters and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association were two of the largest donors in helping the governor defeat a 2021 recall campaign.
But the unions’ support for Newsom and other lawmakers doesn’t guarantee that he’ll sign the bills. Newsom was mayor of San Francisco during the Great Recession, and he backed a successful ballot measure that required city employees to put more of their own money toward their pensions.
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
Topline:
The 3 million people who pass through Orange County’s ARTIC train station annually are experiencing climate control by radiant cooling — a technology experts say could eventually replace the forced-air AC we’re used to.
Why it matters: Traditional AC systems consume vast amounts of electricity and often rely on greenhouse gases, helping fuel a vicious cycle: More warming drives more AC, which drives more warming. Radiant cooling offers a greener, more efficient approach that experts say is gaining popularity in homes across California.
Where you can feel it: The Anaheim train station, for one. It's also in use at a federal courthouse in downtown L.A. And experts hope it could be put to use during the 2028 Olympics in L.A.
Read on ... for more about how radiant cooling works and how much it might cost to install in a home.
The future of air conditioning could be in a train station in Anaheim.
The 3 million people who pass through Orange County’s ARTIC station annually are experiencing climate control by radiant cooling — a technology experts say could eventually replace the forced-air AC we’re used to.
AC has become one of the world’s most used defenses against extreme heat, but it’s simultaneously making that heat worse.
Traditional AC systems consume vast amounts of electricity and often rely on greenhouse gases, helping fuel a vicious cycle: More warming drives more AC, which drives more warming.
Radiant cooling offers a greener, more efficient approach that experts say is gaining popularity in homes across California.
A traditional air conditioning system works by circulating a refrigerant that rapidly changes between liquid and gas states, absorbing heat from indoor air and releasing it outside. These forced-air systems push cooled air through ducts in a building — resulting in that familiar blast of cool, dry wind from a vent in the ceiling. The process runs on electricity, and common refrigerants can be powerful greenhouse gases if they leak.
Heat pumps use a similar refrigerant cycle but can reverse direction, moving heat out of a building in summer and into it in winter.
In a radiant cooling system, however, air-to-water heat pumps transfer energy into a centralized water loop, often using less refrigerant. Radiant cooling systems circulate their chilled water through coils embedded behind panels that can be in floors, walls or ceilings. The water in these radiant systems is typically cooled to about 60 degrees Fahrenheit, while the chilled panels remain between 68 and 75 degrees.
A person standing nearby then radiates body heat toward the cooler panels, which act as a sponge for thermal energy. This creates a sensation of coolness even if the surrounding air remains warm.
“The idea is that basically you take advantage of thermal radiation to exchange heat between people and surfaces,” said Aaswath Raman, an engineering professor at UCLA.
Saul De Los Santos, a sales associate at Messana Hydronic Technologies, compared radiant cooling to the feeling of walking into a parking structure.
“As soon as you walk into that parking garage, even on a hot day, you start feeling much cooler,” De Los Santos said. “And that’s because those cold walls are extracting heat from your body, leaving you cooler.”
Water can carry 3,400 times more heat energy than air, making radiant cooling significantly more energy-efficient compared to traditional AC systems.
“You need a much smaller volume of water to distribute the same amount of energy through a space,” said Carlos Duarte, an assistant researcher at UC Berkeley’s Center for the Built Environment.
Only a handful of radiant cooling systems exist across Southern California, mostly in commercial and office spaces.
One is the United States Courthouse in downtown L.A.
Another is Anaheim’s relatively new train station. I went there to feel what it was like on Tuesday.
It was sunny and a hot 84 degrees outside. But inside the ARTIC station, the heat seemed to loosen its grip over my body at once, leaving me feeling deeply comfortable. It was subtle and all-consuming at the same time. Because unlike traditional AC, there was no sudden chill on my skin.
I walked to a nearby hotel to compare radiant cooling to traditional AC. I immediately felt cool air blowing over me, and there was an artificiality about the chill of the lobby that left me a little too cold.
Preliminary research suggests people experience higher levels of comfort with radiant cooling compared to conventional AC.
But Duarte said the U.S. lacks the infrastructure to implement radiant systems on a residential level.
“I think one of the biggest challenges is that many installers or contractors are not familiar with radiant systems, and there needs to be a lot of coordination among the trades,” he said.
A huge barrier for homeowners is cost. Purchasing and installing a radiant system on a home can cost around $20 per square foot. By comparison, a ducted HVAC installation costs $5 to $10 per square foot, while a mini-split system averages $3 to $10 per square foot.
For now, residential radiant systems remain a “relatively niche concept,” according to Raman.
When purchasing a new AC, Aaswath Raman of UCLA recommends looking at the Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER), which measures cooling efficiency.
ACs with higher SEER numbers are typically more expensive, but yield lower electric bills.
Window AC units can be great for renters, but Raman recommends installing mini-split units for longer term use, saying that they’re “definitely more efficient.”
But experts say radiant cooling is becoming more widespread across the state, and researchers are eyeing the 2028 Olympics as an opportunity to deploy these systems on a larger scale.
“We’ve certainly seen an increase in sales specifically for California, but also across the U.S.,” said De Los Santos, who works on residential applications of radiant cooling.
Beyond the home, radiant cooling is highly applicable in open-air spaces like the ARTIC station, where cooling vast quantities of air can be impractical.
In 2025, Raman and a team of researchers designed an outdoor radiant cooling system on the UCLA campus and at the San Fernando Swap Meet that made an area feel up to 10 degrees cooler.
“One thing we’re hoping is that as part of the Olympics, we can also have this as something that’s available for visitors,” Raman said.
“That will also showcase to the world the potential of this technology.”
Topline:
Nearly six months after volunteers counted the L.A. region's homeless population, the results still haven't been released — and the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority won't say when they will be. Instead, the agency says it's waiting on the federal housing department to validate its data, a review it once expected to be done by May 30.
Why it matters: The annual count shapes how hundreds of millions of federal dollars get spent in the county with the largest unhoused population in the country. It also drives policy and politics. The last two counts showed homelessness falling, a drop L.A. Mayor Karen Bass is running on for reelection.
Why now? LAHSA sent its data to HUD on April 30 and said the review would take about a month. Two months past that, neither agency will say whether it's finished. Meanwhile, HUD suspended LAHSA from federal grant activity in June over alleged mismanagement. LAHSA then sued, and a judge paused the suspension until an Aug. 6 hearing. HUD says nothing it has done stops L.A. from publishing its homeless count results.
The backstory: Last year, LAHSA broke precedent and rushed out preliminary numbers in March, weeks before county leaders voted to strip it of more than $300 million. A HUD review last year, though, found small errors in LAHSA's data. This year, interim CEO Gita O'Neill said the agency will wait for federal sign-off before releasing anything "to ensure total data integrity."
The Los Angeles region usually knows by the end of June whether homelessness went up or down.
Not this year, as L.A.’s lead homelessness agency is first waiting for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to validate the region’s annual homeless count data before releasing it publicly.
It’s unclear when the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority plans to publish the 2026 results.
Last week, LAHSA officials said it was possible the release wouldn’t happen at all this year because HUD suspended it from federal grant activity.
This week, after a federal judge intervened, a LAHSA spokesperson told LAist the agency expects to announce the release date for the 2026 homeless count numbers in the “near future.”
“Several factors can influence the announcement date, including the validation process with HUD,” LAHSA spokesperson Ahmad Chapman said.
LAHSA officials said they first submitted its homeless count data to HUD for quality analysis on April 30. HUD does not require these reviews to be completed before regions publish their data. But after last year’s HUD review found errors, LAHSA opted to wait “to ensure total data integrity,” said interim CEO Gita O’Neill
On June 11, while that review was taking place, HUD suspended LAHSA from federal grant activity, pending an investigation into alleged mismanagement.
LAHSA then filed a lawsuit challenging the suspension and a separate petition for relief. The agency mentioned in its June 29 lawsuit that it was still in the process of reviewing 2026 homeless count data with a technical assistance provider contracted by HUD.
“If the proposed HUD suspension takes effect, LAHSA likely will not be able to complete its 2026 PIT Count process,” LAHSA’s legal complaint states. “Should that occur, HUD would not have an accurate count for the Los Angeles area.”
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter issued a legal order pausing HUD’s effort to suspend LAHSA pending an Aug. 6 court date.
LAHSA officials said that ruling means the agency can continue drawing down funding from HUD, signing funding agreements with the housing agency, and participating in other federal activities.
HUD said no action it has taken in any way prevents LAHSA from publishing its own homeless count data, according to a spokesperson.
But HUD’s suspension put the troubled agency’s responsibilities and funding in limbo, and experts said it’s possible the suspension could delay the release of L.A.’s homeless count.
“Given the unprecedented nature of the HUD suspension and LAHSA's subsequent lawsuit, I imagine the staff capacity over there is somewhat limited to make it all happen,” said Alex Visotzky, senior California policy fellow with the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
HUD mandates the homeless counts across the country to help determine priorities for hundreds of millions in federal funds to address homelessness.
L.A.’s annual count has become increasingly consequential and controversial in L.A. County, which is home to the largest unhoused population in the U.S., estimated at more than 72,000 in 2025.
Last year’s count found homelessness had dropped for two years in a row, and was down 4% in L.A. County and 3.4% in the city of L.A. from the year before.
Those declines are a major talking point in L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ reelection campaign. The region’s homelessness system has since experienced major shifts in funding, making this year’s results even more anticipated.
From 2016 to 2020, LAHSA published its annual unhoused point-in-time count results in May or early June. The count was canceled in 2021. In 2022, they were released Sept. 8. Then back to June release dates in 2023 and 2024.
Last year, in an unprecedented move, LAHSA released early preliminary results in March 2025. It was a month after the count wrapped and just before L.A. County leaders voted to divert more than $300 million from the agency into its own new homelessness department.
LAHSA released official results in July. Then, in October, LAHSA put out “finalized” 2025 homeless count results with revisions based on a data review by HUD.
This year’s L.A.-area homeless count happened in January. And unlike last year, no preliminary raw data or official results have been released.
Orange County, San Diego and San Francisco each publicly released 2026 results in May. Pasadena released its homeless count findings in June. Long Beach and Glendale still haven’t.
“These types of delays are incredibly common in reporting out homeless count data,” Visotzky said. “In fact, many communities across California have not yet reported out their 2026 Point-in-Time Count data.”
In April, a LAHSA spokesperson told LAist this year’s final release would arrive in “late spring or early summer,” but cautioned “there are some aspects of the post-counting process that affect when the results are released that are beyond LAHSA's control.”
At an April 24 LAHSA Commission meeting, O’Neill said the agency planned to submit its homeless count data to HUD on April 30 for review and validation. She clarified that, unlike last year, LAHSA would wait until the HUD review and validation processes are complete before releasing any data.
“ After HUD's validation process is complete, we look forward to releasing the results, hopefully this summer,” O’Neill said.
At the meeting, O’Neill told LAHSA commissioners that HUD’s review process usually takes about a month, with data coming back by May 30, but explained that the exact timing was unknown and outside of LAHSA’s control.
Two months later, both LAHSA and HUD decline to say whether the federal review had been completed.
After HUD completes its review, LAHSA officials said they will require additional time to prepare the data for release.
“Since 2022, the count has been released in June, July, and September,” LAHSA’s Chapman told LAist. “There is no deadline for announcing the results of the homeless count, so it cannot be late.”
Topline:
Inglewood Unified is one step closer to independence more than a decade after the state took over the school district amid a financial crisis.
Why now: A July state report found the district has improved its financial and facilities management enough to operate independently. If Inglewood maintains this progress, the district could regain local control in 2027 with some guardrails.
The backstory: In 2012, the Inglewood Unified Board of Trustees requested a multimillion-dollar loan from the state to balance its budget. The district ultimately borrowed $29 million and entered receivership as a condition of the loan. Inglewood’s board lost the power to make decisions and an administrator was appointed, first by the state, and later by the L.A. County Office of Education.
Why it matters: During the receivership, the locally elected board has been able to advise, but not have a final say on decisions on everything from the budget to school closures. “It created anxiety about who and what is being served with these decisions,” said Board Member Ernesto Castillo. “ Now moving forward, the district and the community knows that the board is going to make decisions on behalf of their voters, on behalf of their students or their families, and I think that's going to help regain trust.”
What's next: California’s Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) will return to conduct another evaluation of the district next year. If Inglewood maintains or improves its scores, the county can return power to the board. However, an assigned trustee will have the power to reverse board decisions until the district pays off the initial state loan and passes an external audit.
Read on ... to learn more about how this could change the district.
Inglewood Unified is one step closer to independence more than a decade after the state took over the school district amid a financial crisis.
A July report found the district has improved its financial and facilities management enough to operate independently. If Inglewood maintains this progress, the district could regain local control in 2027 with some guardrails.
“They've met the standards that really demonstrate we have strong systems in place, sound financial management, that the district is operating effectively so that students can learn and thrive and do well,” Debra Duardo, Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools, told LAist.
The county, which has authority over the 6,000-student school district, announced the news that the district had met 153 standards at a press conference Thursday at City Honors International Preparatory High.
James Morris, who has served as the county-appointed administrator for the district since 2023, said one example of a change the district has made is setting up a system to monitor utility bills.
“This is an achievement that was built by people, not just spreadsheets,” Morris said. “Our teachers, our classified staff, our labor partners, community partners, have all been working hard for 14 years.”
In 2012, the Inglewood Unified Board of Trustees requested a multimillion-dollar loan from the state to balance its budget.
A state report said the district’s financial insolvency had been created by overstatement of attendance (which is the basis for state funding), understatement of salary costs, deficit spending and declining enrollment among other factors.
The district ultimately borrowed $29 million and became one of only 10 school districts in the state to enter receivership since 1990 as a condition of an emergency loan. Inglewood’s board lost the power to make decisions and an administrator was appointed, first by the state, and later by the L.A. County Office of Education.
Ernesto Castillo was a senior at City Honors when the district was placed under receivership.
“It was a really scary time, and it felt that I was leaving a sinking ship when I graduated,” Castillo, who’s now a member of the district’s board, said. “To see it still kind of flounder for years under state control was really disappointing and disheartening, especially as it affected my cousins, it affected the residents of my community.”
John Hughes has been an educator in the district for nearly three decades and is the president of the Inglewood Teachers Association.
“ When you have an outside entity's scrutiny, I think it creates a feeling among educators of a lack of autonomy,” Hughes said. “But also a lack of a voice to be heard with the real needs that they're experiencing day to day.”
Marcie Brown, vice president of the Inglewood Council of PTAs, said the receivership created a negative perception of the district that obscured the rich experience that her grandchildren had in the district.
“ We heard all the buzzwords, underdeveloped, underprivileged. I'm like, ‘We never accepted any of those words at all,’” Brown said. “Our children got to … live large regardless.”
Castillo, the board member, said it was challenging for the board not to have the final say on the decisions such as closing five schools in 2025.
“It created anxiety about who and what is being served with these decisions,” Castillo said. “ Now moving forward, the district and the community knows that the board is gonna make decisions on behalf of their voters, on behalf of their students or their families, and I think that's gonna help regain trust.”
Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT), the California agency that supports public schools' financial and business practices, has evaluated Inglewood Unified across five areas since 2013:
The first step for the district to exit receivership is to meet 153 standards that touch on everything from budget development to data collection.
Michael Fine, FCMAT’s CEO, said most districts exit this phase within six years.
“ Inglewood's a bit unique in that it has been in phase one since inception,” Fine said.
Join a parent teacher group (PTA) at your child’s school
Watch or attend a board meeting
We also have more tips in our guide to school family engagement.
The district cycled through several external administrators appointed by the state before a change in the law transferred oversight to the county in 2018.
“ Leadership turnover is really detrimental to a district,” Duardo, the County Superintendent, said. “You have to have leaders that are gonna stick around and know the community and know the staff and be able to do the work.”
The district met the FCMAT standards for community relations and governance in 2023 and personnel and student achievement in 2025.
The district met the standards in the last two areas— financial and facilities management— in the most recent report released this month.
FCMAT will return to conduct another evaluation of the district next year. If Inglewood maintains or improves its scores, the county can return power to the board.
However, an assigned trustee will have the power to reverse board decisions until the district pays off the initial state loan and passes an external audit.
FCMAT’s most recent evaluation also outlines remaining challenges, including continued deficit spending and declining enrollment.
“ If in receivership, with all this extra assistance and focus, they're not balancing their budget, then what happens when those extra protections disappear?” Fine asked.
