The Brief

The evacuation shelter at the Pasadena Civic Center is expected to close soon — possibly next week — according to operators, leaving more than 200 remaining wildfire evacuees to wonder where they will go next.

The facility, operated by the American Red Cross, has housed hundreds of displaced residents since the Eaton Fire erupted Jan. 7, damaging or destroying more than 6,000 homes in Altadena and Pasadena. As of early this week, more than 270 residents were still sheltered there, Red Cross officials said.

L.A. County officials are saying the shelter will close Feb. 12, but the Red Cross and Pasadena officials say no official date has been set. They say they are working with the county to identify a location for a new shelter closer to Altadena.

"We want to make it clear that no one will be left behind or shut out,” Pasadena officials said in a statement Wednesday.

But people in the shelter aren’t so sure.

“If I don't find a place, I will go buy a tent and go up on my land and just set up camp, because sleeping on my land will be a little safer than sleeping in a park under a tree," said Alphonso Browne, who had lived in his Altadena home for 30 years before it burned.

Alphonso Browne lost his home in Altadena to the Eaton Fire and has been staying at the Pasadena Civic Center since.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Looking for a new shelter

Angel Sauceda, regional communications director for The Red Cross said Pasadena shelter residents will be moved into a new shelter once a location is identified. In the meantime, Sauceda said, Red Cross workers are meeting with evacuees to make sure each has a plan for next steps that is tailored to their needs.

That may include connecting some residents with short-term stays in hotels or Airbnbs, according to Pasadena officials.

But evacuees say the uncertainty is causing anxiety.

“They say Friday, and then I heard a guy say it's gonna be Sunday," said a woman who asked that her name not be used in this story. She said she’s been living at the shelter since Jan. 8.

"This is not hopscotch or playtime," she said. "This is real life.”

Kamaisha Peppars, who has been at the shelter since Jan. 12, said many evacuees need more time to figure out how to rebuild their lives from nothing.

“We’ve never been through this before,” she said. “We don't know what to do. We come to you guys for help, for resources. I know a lot of people would like to have it happen overnight, but it doesn't work that way.”

Once a new shelter is opened to replace the one in Pasadena, it will stay open as long as it is needed, according to shelter operators.

“The Red Cross will continue to have a congregate sheltering option until all the residents have a plan in place to get them to their next housing solution,” Sauceda said.

A shelter resident interacting with a Red Cross worker at the Pasadena Civic Center.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Why is it closing?

The Pasadena shelter opened Jan. 7, about 90 minutes after Cal Fire ordered evacuations in the city. At first, it was operated by the city, but the Red Cross took over a few days later. According to the Red Cross, representatives from the Civic Auditorium Complex asked the nonprofit to return the facility to the city for normal operations by early February.

The Red Cross signed a 30-day agreement with the city of Pasadena in January to operate the shelter, Finance Director Matthew Hawkesworth told councilmembers at a meeting Monday. Other events are scheduled to happen at the Convention Center later this month.

“Some business decisions will have to be made,” he said.

City and Civic Center representatives did not respond to LAist’s questions about those agreements, but the facility’s online calendar shows a full slate of events scheduled this month. They include a comedy show scheduled this Saturday in the auditorium and a youth leadership conference next week in the conference center. Next month, the Pasadena Civic Auditorium is scheduled to host live tapings of NBC’s "America’s Got Talent."

Los Angeles County, along with the Red Cross, is responsible for moving the remaining residents into another facility, according to Pasadena City Councilmember Tyron Hampton. He explained that most of the people still sheltering there are not residents of Pasadena, but of Altadena.

The Red Cross confirmed this week that two-thirds of the current shelter residents are from Altadena.

“We have the jurisdiction for our Pasadena residents,” Hampton said. “Unfortunately, we don't have the jurisdiction to do all we can for our county residents. And so the county is transitioning them to another facility.”

Officials with L.A. County's Coordinated Joint Information Center confirmed they are helping to find a new shelter site.

Residents say they’re having trouble finding new places to live at rates they can afford. Rent is already high for many in L.A. County residents, and some have reported instances of price gouging after the fires. Shortly after the fires began, tenant advocates began tracking hundreds of online listings for rental housing that raised asking rents far above the 10% post-disaster limit set by state law.

Many people displaced by the recent wildfires have encountered rent increases of 30% or more and a severe lack of available units.

"With so many of us displaced, it's hard to find a place, and the rent has gone from reasonable rent, like $1,000-$1,500, to like $2,500 and above," said Browne, who survives on Social Security retirement benefits.

William Lee, an Altadena resident who also relies on Social Security, said he hasn't gotten much help finding housing.

“There’s nothing from FEMA, nothing from the Red Cross, no emergency Section 8,” he said. “There is no subsidized housing for us. This is something that we need. I need some help.”

American Red Cross officials outside of the Pasadena Civic Center.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Shelter conditions

Some evacuees say conditions at the convention center have been bad and described high turnover in Red Cross staff and volunteers.

“Everybody comes in with their own different rules and their own different way of doing things,” Browne said. “There’s no one system, so everyone is confused.”

In recent days, shelter residents sleeping in separate rooms have been consolidated into a single room, a cause of concern for some evacuees.

“We were condensed into one room where animals, children, everyone was just condensed into this room," Lee said. “I’m a disabled dialysis patient. Twice a week I have to have a safe place where I can lay down and just be relaxing.”

Last month, there was an outbreak of stomach flu among evacuation center residents, according to Pasadena Public Health officials.

“A lot of people got sick,” said Browne. ” We were bringing in our own food because a lot of people in here cannot eat the food. The children were getting sick from the food.”

Several evacuees say their experience at the shelter has changed their view of the American Red Cross, though some acknowledge positive interactions with several staff and volunteers.

“I had a lot of respect for the Red Cross,” said Browne. “But now that I'm here, I have lost so much respect for them.”

Red Cross officials did not respond to LAist’s request for a response to evacuees' complaints about the shelter.

Aside from the Pasadena Civic Center, the Red Cross also continues to operate a wildfire evacuation shelter at Westwood Recreation Center. That shelter remains open and had 88 people living there as of Wednesday.

Red Cross officials did not say when that facility is scheduled to close.

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

“The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

“We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

(

J.W. Hendricks

/

The LA Local

)

In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

“They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

“These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

“I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

“It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

“Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

What can small businesses do? 

Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

“We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

What’s next 

After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

“It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

“And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

Topline:

Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.