The Brief

The evacuation shelter at the Pasadena Civic Center is expected to close soon — possibly next week — according to operators, leaving more than 200 remaining wildfire evacuees to wonder where they will go next.

The facility, operated by the American Red Cross, has housed hundreds of displaced residents since the Eaton Fire erupted Jan. 7, damaging or destroying more than 6,000 homes in Altadena and Pasadena. As of early this week, more than 270 residents were still sheltered there, Red Cross officials said.

L.A. County officials are saying the shelter will close Feb. 12, but the Red Cross and Pasadena officials say no official date has been set. They say they are working with the county to identify a location for a new shelter closer to Altadena.

"We want to make it clear that no one will be left behind or shut out,” Pasadena officials said in a statement Wednesday.

But people in the shelter aren’t so sure.

“If I don't find a place, I will go buy a tent and go up on my land and just set up camp, because sleeping on my land will be a little safer than sleeping in a park under a tree," said Alphonso Browne, who had lived in his Altadena home for 30 years before it burned.

Alphonso Browne lost his home in Altadena to the Eaton Fire and has been staying at the Pasadena Civic Center since.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Looking for a new shelter

Angel Sauceda, regional communications director for The Red Cross said Pasadena shelter residents will be moved into a new shelter once a location is identified. In the meantime, Sauceda said, Red Cross workers are meeting with evacuees to make sure each has a plan for next steps that is tailored to their needs.

That may include connecting some residents with short-term stays in hotels or Airbnbs, according to Pasadena officials.

But evacuees say the uncertainty is causing anxiety.

“They say Friday, and then I heard a guy say it's gonna be Sunday," said a woman who asked that her name not be used in this story. She said she’s been living at the shelter since Jan. 8.

"This is not hopscotch or playtime," she said. "This is real life.”

Kamaisha Peppars, who has been at the shelter since Jan. 12, said many evacuees need more time to figure out how to rebuild their lives from nothing.

“We’ve never been through this before,” she said. “We don't know what to do. We come to you guys for help, for resources. I know a lot of people would like to have it happen overnight, but it doesn't work that way.”

Once a new shelter is opened to replace the one in Pasadena, it will stay open as long as it is needed, according to shelter operators.

“The Red Cross will continue to have a congregate sheltering option until all the residents have a plan in place to get them to their next housing solution,” Sauceda said.

A shelter resident interacting with a Red Cross worker at the Pasadena Civic Center.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Why is it closing?

The Pasadena shelter opened Jan. 7, about 90 minutes after Cal Fire ordered evacuations in the city. At first, it was operated by the city, but the Red Cross took over a few days later. According to the Red Cross, representatives from the Civic Auditorium Complex asked the nonprofit to return the facility to the city for normal operations by early February.

The Red Cross signed a 30-day agreement with the city of Pasadena in January to operate the shelter, Finance Director Matthew Hawkesworth told councilmembers at a meeting Monday. Other events are scheduled to happen at the Convention Center later this month.

“Some business decisions will have to be made,” he said.

City and Civic Center representatives did not respond to LAist’s questions about those agreements, but the facility’s online calendar shows a full slate of events scheduled this month. They include a comedy show scheduled this Saturday in the auditorium and a youth leadership conference next week in the conference center. Next month, the Pasadena Civic Auditorium is scheduled to host live tapings of NBC’s "America’s Got Talent."

Los Angeles County, along with the Red Cross, is responsible for moving the remaining residents into another facility, according to Pasadena City Councilmember Tyron Hampton. He explained that most of the people still sheltering there are not residents of Pasadena, but of Altadena.

The Red Cross confirmed this week that two-thirds of the current shelter residents are from Altadena.

“We have the jurisdiction for our Pasadena residents,” Hampton said. “Unfortunately, we don't have the jurisdiction to do all we can for our county residents. And so the county is transitioning them to another facility.”

Officials with L.A. County's Coordinated Joint Information Center confirmed they are helping to find a new shelter site.

Residents say they’re having trouble finding new places to live at rates they can afford. Rent is already high for many in L.A. County residents, and some have reported instances of price gouging after the fires. Shortly after the fires began, tenant advocates began tracking hundreds of online listings for rental housing that raised asking rents far above the 10% post-disaster limit set by state law.

Many people displaced by the recent wildfires have encountered rent increases of 30% or more and a severe lack of available units.

"With so many of us displaced, it's hard to find a place, and the rent has gone from reasonable rent, like $1,000-$1,500, to like $2,500 and above," said Browne, who survives on Social Security retirement benefits.

William Lee, an Altadena resident who also relies on Social Security, said he hasn't gotten much help finding housing.

“There’s nothing from FEMA, nothing from the Red Cross, no emergency Section 8,” he said. “There is no subsidized housing for us. This is something that we need. I need some help.”

American Red Cross officials outside of the Pasadena Civic Center.

(

Aaron Schrank

/

LAist

)

Shelter conditions

Some evacuees say conditions at the convention center have been bad and described high turnover in Red Cross staff and volunteers.

“Everybody comes in with their own different rules and their own different way of doing things,” Browne said. “There’s no one system, so everyone is confused.”

In recent days, shelter residents sleeping in separate rooms have been consolidated into a single room, a cause of concern for some evacuees.

“We were condensed into one room where animals, children, everyone was just condensed into this room," Lee said. “I’m a disabled dialysis patient. Twice a week I have to have a safe place where I can lay down and just be relaxing.”

Last month, there was an outbreak of stomach flu among evacuation center residents, according to Pasadena Public Health officials.

“A lot of people got sick,” said Browne. ” We were bringing in our own food because a lot of people in here cannot eat the food. The children were getting sick from the food.”

Several evacuees say their experience at the shelter has changed their view of the American Red Cross, though some acknowledge positive interactions with several staff and volunteers.

“I had a lot of respect for the Red Cross,” said Browne. “But now that I'm here, I have lost so much respect for them.”

Red Cross officials did not respond to LAist’s request for a response to evacuees' complaints about the shelter.

Aside from the Pasadena Civic Center, the Red Cross also continues to operate a wildfire evacuation shelter at Westwood Recreation Center. That shelter remains open and had 88 people living there as of Wednesday.

Red Cross officials did not say when that facility is scheduled to close.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has rejected a proposal that would have let tenants across the county fall behind by about three months' worth of rent and still have local protections from eviction.

Supporters said the rules would have helped immigrants stay housed after losing income because of federal immigration raids.

Only one of the county’s five supervisors supported the expanded eviction protections. With none of the other four willing to second the motion in Tuesday’s meeting, the proposal died before it ever came to a vote.

The proposal failed after an hour of impassioned public comment from both renters and landlords. Onlookers chanted “cowards” as the board cleared the room for closed session.

Would the rules have been challenged in court?

Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, who put forward the proposal, said earlier in the meeting that expanding eviction protections would have been an appropriate way to help the county’s nearly one million undocumented immigrants.

Anticipating potential lawsuits to strike down the proposed ordinance, Horvath said, “I understand there is legal risk. There is in everything we do. Just like the risk undocumented Angelenos take by going outside their homes every day.”

Landlords spoke forcefully against the proposed rules. They said limiting evictions would saddle property owners with the cost of supporting targeted immigrant households.

“This proposed ordinance is legalized theft and will cause financial devastation to small housing providers,” said Julie Markarian with the Apartment Owners Association of California.

Horvath’s proposal would have built on an existing protection for renters in unincorporated parts of L.A. County, such as East L.A., Altadena and City Terrace. Under the current rules, renters can fall behind by up to one month’s worth of “fair market rent” (an amount determined by the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department) and still be legally protected from eviction.

Protections won’t go countywide

Last week, county leaders voted to explore increasing that threshold to two months. But Horvath wanted to go further by increasing the limit to three months and making it apply countywide, not just in unincorporated areas.

Tenant advocates said family breadwinners have been detained during federal immigration raids, and other immigrants are afraid to go to their workplaces, causing families to scramble to keep up with the region’s high rents.

“Immigrant tenants are experiencing a profound financial crisis,” said Rose Lenehan, an organizer with the L.A. Tenants Union. “This protection is the bare minimum that we need to keep people housed and keep people from having to choose whether to stay in this county with their families and with their communities or self deport or face homelessness.”

A report published this week by the L.A. Economic Development Corporation found that 82% of surveyed small business owners said they’d been negatively affected by federal immigration actions. About a quarter of those surveyed said they had temporarily closed their businesses because of community concerns.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday placed on the June ballot a proposed temporary half-cent sales tax increase to fund the county’s struggling health care system, which has been hit hard by federal funding cuts.

If passed by voters, the increase would bring the county’s tax rate to 10.25%. It is projected to raise one billion dollars annually over five years.

The tax would expire in five years.

The background

County health officials said Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” will cut $2.4 billion from county health programs over three years, threatening closure of some of the county’s 24 clinics and an array of public health programs.

Supervisor Holly Mitchell, who co-authored the proposal, said the county faced a “federally imposed crisis” that in the absence of state action, could only be addressed by raising taxes on county residents.

“This motion gives the voters a choice, given the stark realities that our county is facing,” Mitchell said.

The vote was 4-1, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger the lone dissenter. Barger is the board’s sole Republican. She worried shoppers would go to Orange County, where the sales tax is 7.75%. She also said the state should take the lead on addressing federal funding cuts to county health care systems.

Public reaction

More than 700 people showed up Tuesday to speak out on the proposal. Health care providers pleaded with the board to place the measure on the ballot, saying federal funding cuts to Medi-Cal had hit them hard.

“This is a crisis,” said Louise McCarthy, president and CEO of the Community Clinic Association of L.A. County. “Medi-Cal accounts for over half of clinic funding. So these changes will lead to clinic closures, longer wait times, overcrowded E.R.’s and higher costs for the county.” 

Others opposed any plan that would increase the sales tax.

“Our city is opposed to the adding of this regressive tax to overtaxed residents and making it even more difficult for cities, especially small cities, to pay for the increasing cost of basic resident services,” said Rolling Hills Mayor Bea Dieringer. “The county needs to tighten its belt further.”

Details on the proposed plan

Under the plan, up to 47% of revenue generated will be used by the Department of Health Services to fund nonprofit health care providers to furnish no-cost or reduced-cost care to low-income residents who do not have health insurance. 

Twenty-two percent would provide financial support to the county’s Department of Health Services to safeguard its public hospital and clinic services. Ten percent would be allocated to the Department of Public Health to support core public health functions and the awarding of grants to support health equity.

The rest would be sprinkled across the health care system, including to support nonprofit safety net hospitals and for school-based health needs and programs.

A last-minute amendment by Supervisor Lindsey Horvath set aside 5% of funding for Planned Parenthood.

The spending would be monitored by a nine-member committee but ultimately would be up to the discretion of the Board of Supervisors.