Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Zoo expansion plan violated CEQA, lawsuit alleges.
    A little girl dances in front of a woman holding a mic at the Los Angeles Zoo while a crowd watches.
    Zoo Friday Nights returned to the Los Angeles Zoo on July 7.

    Topline:

    A group of organizations have filed a lawsuit against L.A. alleging the city council violated state environmental regulations when it certified an environmental impact report and approved an expansion plan.

    Why it matters: The lawsuit alleges that the plan “will destroy 16 acres of Griffith Park’s native California chaparral habitat in order to develop the California Planning Area.” And it states that while some efforts have been made for improved animal habitat and conservancy, the plan is mostly centered on increasing the L.A. Zoo’s use as an entertainment and events venue.

    Why now: Opponents say the proposed plan will change the area's habit and view. While the zoo has proposed an alternative to their plan, they have not shared how the alternative plans would impact the environment.

    What's next: The lawsuit is asking a judge to rescind the plan's approvals.

    A group of organizations have filed a lawsuit against L.A. alleging the city council violated state environmental regulations when it certified an environmental impact report and approved an expansion plan.

    The lawsuit, filed by the Friends of Griffith Park, a body of environmentalists and preservationists, and the Griffith J. Griffith Charitable Trust, alleges that the L.A. City Council violated the California Environmental Quality Act and that the plan “will destroy 16 acres of Griffith Park’s native California chaparral habitat in order to develop the California Planning Area.”

    It also states that while some efforts have been made for improved animal habitat and conservancy, the plan is mostly centered on increasing the L.A. Zoo’s use as an entertainment and events venue.

    The EIR, according to the lawsuit, also fails to mention how the development will address the environmental effects of excavating a canyon, removing existing vegetation, and does not contain key documentation requested by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    Friends of Griffith Park have asked the court to rescind approvals to the zoo's vision plan.

    Marian Dodge, a former president of Friends of Griffith Park, said the area proposed for “Condor Canyon” within the California Planning Area — a section of the zoo where visitors can learn about the California condor and the conservation efforts — is on a ridgeline covered with chaparral.

    “It's an important ridgeline because it's the very eastern end of the Santa Monica Mountains. A lot of people don't realize that the Santa Monica Mountains go all the way to Griffith Park and it's extremely visible,” she said. “That would be a huge impact, digging that trench through the middle of this ridge to get from one part of the mountain around to the backside of the mountain. The second thing that they want to build in that area is a California visitor center that would be placed on the top of that ridge line.”

    The 18,000-square-foot proposed building, she said, would change the view and the habitat.

    “It would be visible from all the people living in Atwater Village or in Eagle Rock. It would have events there at night, so they'd be bringing a lot more people,” she said. “So, that's why we filed the lawsuit. We want them to step back.”

    The city’s EIR states that they would explore a tunnel instead of a canyon to avoid blasting during construction.

    “This feature (Condor Canyon area) would improve not only the visitor experience, but also visitor safety and operational excellence,” the EIR states.

    But the environmental impact of a tunnel has not been outlined in the EIR.

    “We don't know what impact that (tunnel) might have on the habitat,” Dodge said. “The zoo also offered to reduce the size of the California Visitor Center and place it lower on the hill, but again, we have no details whatsoever on that. It was something that was just mentioned, it was not in the EIR.”

    The EIR does state that the zoo is committed to “making the California visitor center smaller in scale and less obtrusive on the hillside and ridgeline and not in the style of a Yosemite lodge.”

    However, no details are given about what that would entail.

    On the zoo’s website, the current iteration of the vision plan — named Alternative 1.5: The California Focused Conservation Alternative — is deemed as an “environmentally superior update to the plan.”

    In this new iteration, spaces dedicated to animals will increase by 162%, and 95% of trees will be protected with zero expansion into Griffith Park.

    A representative Los Angeles Zoo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

  • Youth baseball program expanding
    A child with black hair and light skin poses for a photo with a mascot wearing a Dodgers uniform.
    Logan Cattaneo, 6, poses for a photo with the Dodgers mascot during Dodgers Dreamteam PlayerFest at Dodgers Stadium in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers Foundation says it's expanding Dodgers Dreamteam, its program for underserved youth. The foundation says the program will be able to serve 17,000 kids this year, 2,000 more than last year.

    Why it matters: Now in its 13th season, the program connects underserved youth with opportunities to play baseball and softball and provides participants with free uniforms and access to baseball equipment. It also offers training for coaches in positive youth development practices, as well as wraparound services for participant families like college workshops, career panels, literacy resources and scholarship opportunities.

    How to sign up: For more information and to sign up, click here.

  • Sponsored message
  • Low snowpack could signal early fire season
    Aerial view of a forest of trees covered in snow
    An aerial view of snow-capped trees after a winter snowstorm near Soda Springs on Feb. 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season. It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    What happened? Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    Why it matters: Experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains. State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs. “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

    It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

    On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

    “I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

    State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

    Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

    “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    “Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

    ‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

    In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

    “It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

    Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

    “That means we can get more work done,” he said.

    It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

    Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

    “In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

    ‘A haystack fire’

    Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

    Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

    “Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

    Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

    But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

    How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

    “This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • The airport will close in 2028 to become a park
    One white plane lands on the runway. Off to the right, another plan is parked.
    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park.

    Topline:

    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park that city officials say will improve quality of life and boost green space.

    What we know: The city is in the very early stages of planning how to transform the 192 acres into a park. The preliminary report shows some potential amenities of the park, such as gardens, biking trails, art galleries, a community center and much more.

    Background: After a long legal battle between the city and the Federal Aviation Administration, a settlement was reached that ruled that the city could close the more than 100-year-old airport. The park was controversial among residents because of air quality and noise concerns, and was the subject of many legal battles in recent decades.

    What’s next? The city wants to hear from residents. You’re encouraged to review the framework and fill out this survey. Feedback will be accepted until April 26.

  • Certain immigrants no longer eligible
    An adult reaches for a banana on a metal shelve as a child carries a toy rolling grocery basket with groceries inside it. On their left are shelves of canned food and other bags of food.
    Thousands of immigrants, including refugees and asylees, in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    Topline:

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    What’s new: The changes apply to certain immigrants who are here lawfully, including refugees and asylees. It also applies to people from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special visas for helping the U.S. military overseas.

    Why now: The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    What’s next: Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    The changes remove eligibility for certain noncitizens, including people with refugee status and victims of trafficking. It also applies to immigrants from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special immigrant visas for helping the U.S. government overseas.

     ”These are folks … many of whom have large families that we have a commitment to as a country because we welcomed them and invited them here to find a place of refuge,” said Cambria Tortorelli, president of the International Institute of Los Angeles, a refugee resettlement agency. “They’re authorized to work and they’ve been brought here by the U.S. government.”

    The federal spending bill, H.R. 1, made sweeping cuts to social safety net programs, including food assistance and Medicaid. In signing the bill, President Donald Trump said the changes were delivering on his campaign promises of “America first.”

    Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. The state estimates about 72,000 immigrants with lawful presence will be affected across California.

    CalFresh is the state’s version of the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Undocumented immigrants have not been eligible to receive CalFresh benefits.

    State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Who the changes apply to:

    • Asylees
    • Refugees
    • Parolees (unless they are Cuban and Haitian entrants)
    • Individuals with deportation or removal withheld
    • Conditional entrants
    • Victims of trafficking
    • Battered noncitizens
    • Iraqi or Afghan with special immigrant visas (SIV) who are not lawful permanent residents (LPR)
    • Certain Afghan Nationals granted parole between July 31, 2021, and Sept. 30, 2023
    • Certain Ukrainian Nationals granted parole between Feb. 24, 2022, and Sep. 30, 2024