Josie Huang
is a reporter and Weekend Edition host who lived in Altadena until her family was displaced by the Eaton Fire.
Published January 10, 2026 5:00 AM
Sarah and Joep Sporck stand at the end of the driveway of their former home in Altadena.
(
John and Colette Photography
)
Topline:
One year after the Eaton Fire, some Altadena families chose to start over halfway across the country — and the world.
Why now: Three households share how children, health concerns and grief shaped decisions to leave a community they once thought would be home forever.
The context: The families are part of a growing fire diaspora — Altadenans scattered across the country and the world, searching for versions of the natural beauty and close-knit and artistic community they enjoyed in the San Gabriels.
Read on... to hear their stories of sacrifice and acceptance.
Jennifer Cacicio didn’t set out to move across the country.
Like thousands of others who fled the L.A. fires a year ago this week, Cacicio and her family left their Altadena home thinking they would be gone a night, maybe two.
But in the year since the Eaton Fire erased their house and neighborhood overnight, home has become somewhere entirely new.
Cacicio, a television writer, and her husband and 8-year-old daughter now live nearly 3,000 miles from L.A. — in Cold Spring, a village in New York’s Hudson Valley they’d never visited until this year.
Starting over somewhere completely new, Cacicio said, felt easier than rebuilding their lives in high-cost L.A. with the foothills of Altadena casting a long shadow.
“What we had in Altadena was so wonderful that anywhere else but Altadena feels like you're settling for less,” Cacicio said.
Jennifer Cacicio poses for a photo with her husband Matt Shallenberger and their daughter, Bruna.
(
Matt Shallenberger
)
Cacicio is part of a growing fire diaspora — Altadenans scattered across the country and the world, searching for versions of the natural beauty and close-knit and artistic community they enjoyed in the San Gabriels.
Cacicio said she knows of three other Altadena families who’ve relocated to the Hudson Valley. Neighborhoods still edge up against the wilderness, but wooded slopes and river cliffs now define the landscape for them where canyons and ridgelines once did.
I also spoke with two other Altadena households who left post-fire, one for the Netherlands and the other for Asheville, North Carolina. Each family described decisions shaped by financial realities and the wrenching calculus of raising young children after a fire.
From Altadena to the Netherlands
The Sporcks left the Netherlands for L.A. over seven years ago, setting off on their American adventure.
Joep, a film composer, saw career opportunities in L.A, and his wife Sarah, was eager to try life in a new country.
Friends in Altadena introduced them to the San Gabriels, and eventually they found their own house in the west part of Altadena near the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Joep composed film scores and trailer music in a converted garage and Sarah commuted to her job as an education specialist at a school in Lincoln Heights. Three years ago, they welcomed their first child.
In the back yard, they planted fruit trees and raised chickens, and hiked along trails to favorite spots like Millard Falls.
“We loved it, and we never meant to leave,” Joep said.
This time last year, Sarah was pregnant with their second son and had just finished her first trimester when on Jan. 7 the couple saw flames shooting from the foothills.
The fire came within several blocks, but their house was ultimately spared.
In the month after the fire, Joep worked to remediate their home alongside professional crews, as Sarah looked after their toddler, whose daycare, Altadena Children’s Center, had burned down.
“With Sarah pregnant, it was really scary, even afterwards,” Joep said.
Added Sarah: “And with a toddler that wants to play outside.”
As they prepared for their second child, the fire forced questions: How long would it take for Altadena to recover and what would that look like?
“I'm sure there will be a new Altadena in a couple of years,” Joep said. “But it felt like it wasn't going to be the same ever again.”
Once-vague thoughts moved to the foreground. In the Netherlands, they would have more family support and a stronger social safety net, like lower-cost childcare.
And Joep had reached a point in his career that he could work remotely.
This past summer, after their baby was born, a listing landed in Joep’s inbox for a three-story brick villa in the southern part of the Netherlands where Joep is from — hilly just like Altadena. The couple made an offer for the house in Epen without seeing it in person.
The Sporcks have moved back to the Netherlands, to the village of Epen in the southern part of the country.
(
Gerlach Delissen
)
“We made some lists like pros and cons of staying or leaving, and it was just we couldn't deny it anymore,” Joep said.
They put their house on the market — and after some price cuts — sold it to another Altadena family that had lost their home in the fire.
In November, the Sporcks moved to their Epen home, where they are still unpacking — and grieving.
“I’m really sad to be leaving America and Los Angeles,” Joep said. “It feels a little bit like giving up this dream.”
But he said the ties to the area are strong. Their children are dual-citizens. Joep will return to L.A. regularly for work.
“Part of us is now like American, Altadenan forever, I guess,” Joep said.
It's something, he said, that will always set them apart from their friends and family in the Netherlands.
From Eaton Canyon to the Blue Ridge Mountains
Altadena wasn’t their first stop in Southern California. There was Sherman Oaks and Highland Park.
But for Carson Dougherty and Chris Gower, their Altadena cottage rental within walking distance of Eaton Canyon was the first place that felt like home in L.A.
Pushing their daughters in strollers to Altadena Beverage and Market and Prime Pizza, they would stop to speak with neighbors along the way.
“I would walk around and just be like, ‘Oh my God, I can’t believe we live here,'" Carson said. “I've just never loved a place more or felt more welcome.”
Carson, a spiritual coach, had moved from New York to L.A. about nine years ago when she was an actor, accompanied by Chris who works in tech sales.
Carson is originally from northern Virginia, while Chris grew up in Surrey, England. The call of family always beckoned, but the allure of life in Altadena kept it at bay.
Carson Dougherty and her family moved to Asheville, North Carolina.
(
Courtesy Carson Dougherty
)
They had months earlier re-upped their lease for another two years, when the Eaton Fire happened.
The next day, they returned to find their rental standing — but coated in soot.
With no clear remediation plan being offered by the landlord and worried about their children’s health, the couple broke their lease and forfeited their full deposit.
As they planned their next move, Carson and Chris began rethinking what it meant to raise a family in California — from pre-school to housing.
“Life here is very hard,” Carson said. “We're obsessed with it, but it's not easy.”
Carson flew with the girls out to Virginia, and stayed with her parents. When Chris rejoined them, they discussed where they could live.
Using A.I., they researched cities within 500 miles of Carson’s parents that met their criteria for schools and property taxes. Starting with more than 50 places, Carson winnowed down the list by watching online walking tours of cities and asking for advice on social media.
Asheville, North Carolina — where she had once attended a wedding — kept coming up.
“But we were like, ‘We're not going to move to a place that just had a hurricane,” Carson said, recalling the devastation of Hurricane Helene in 2024.
After taking road trips to Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey and feeling nothing was clicking, the couple traveled to Asheville. They were drawn to the Blue Ridge Mountains that ring the city and the artistic community that reminded them of Altadena’s.
“I was like, ‘OK, this is it,’” Carson said. “I don't know. It was just a feeling.”
Two months into living in their current spot in Asheville, they’re still adjusting.
“I can see this was the right move for us,” Carson said. “But it doesn't feel like home yet.”
“It still feels like a consolation prize,” Chris said. “Whereas Altadena was the one that we were like ‘Holy crap, we found it.'"
Giving her daughter home
In Cold Spring, New York, Jennifer Cacicio is also going through a range of emotions.
“I love Altadena so much, and there's so much grief in letting go of it,” she said.
She mourns her street of identical mid-century homes designed by the architect Gregory Ain. When neighborhood kids visited each other, they knew the exact layout of each others’ homes.
Jennifer estimates of the 28 houses in the neighborhood, about three-quarters are gone.
After struggling with the cost of renting or buying in L.A., she and her husband — a landscape photographer — began thinking about moving East, where she’s from.
During their daughter’s spring break, the family flew out for an expedition.
“We tried to frame it with my daughter, like, ‘You know what this terrible thing happened, and we're going to try to turn it into a family adventure and live closer to cousins and explore a new part of the world,'" Jennifer said.
Jennifer Cacicio's 8-year-old daughter surveys her new environs in Cold Spring, N.Y.
They looked at towns within an hour or so of New York City, located in the suburbs of New York and Connecticut. In New York’s Hudson Valley, they visited an open house for a school that their daughter instantly took a shine to.
“We were like, ‘Great, let's just build it around that — like one thing felt right,’” Cacicio said.
Another sign came when Jennifer, who was the showrunner for this year’s Paramount+ drama Happy Face, got an offer to work on a show based in New York.
“It kind of felt like the universe confirming the decision in a way,” Jennifer said.
In September, they moved into their new home in Cold Spring. Cacicio puts aside her sadness when she thinks about her daughter.
After an event as traumatic as a fire, she wants her childhood to feel stable again. Altadena will recover over the next decade, Cacicio said, but later than she would hope for her daughter.
Being in a new place has brought unknowns, but also a sense of excitement.
"That was kind of what it came down to," Cacicio said. "It didn't feel like settling. It just felt different."
Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published April 29, 2026 5:00 AM
The jail complex in downtown Los Angeles
(
Robert Garrova
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Proposition 36 is getting mixed reviews nearly 18 months after it was passed. Supporters say it has been effective in punishing repeat offenders, particularly for drug crimes and petty theft. Critics say it targets people who commit "crimes of poverty" and it has failed to provide adequate treatment for those who need it.
The backstory: Prop. 36, which passed in November 2024, promised California voters a new era of “mass treatment” for people struggling with addiction and a crackdown on repeat petty thieves amid a spike in retail theft.
Hot debate: The debate around the measure, called “The Homelessness, Drug Addiction and Theft Reduction Act,” was fueled in part by a series of videotaped smash-and-grab robberies splashed across local TV news and images of unhoused residents shooting up drugs in the streets.
The numbers: In 2025, California prosecutors filed more than 19,000 Prop. 36 felony drug cases and more than 15,500 felony theft cases, according to a study by the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice released in March.
Jail population: In Los Angeles County alone, there are about 1,150 individuals in jail because of Prop. 36 — about a 9% increase in the jail population, according to county Public Defender Ricardo Garcia.
Proposition 36, which passed in November 2024, promised California voters a new era of “mass treatment” for people struggling with addiction and a crackdown on repeat petty thieves amid a spike in retail theft.
The debate around the measure, called “The Homelessness, Drug Addiction and Theft Reduction Act,” was fueled in part by a series of videotaped smash-and-grab robberies splashed across local TV news and images of unhoused residents shooting up drugs in the streets.
Voters signaled they wanted a crackdown and they approved Prop. 36 with nearly 70% casting ballots in favor of it.
A little more than a year later, the measure is getting mixed reviews.
Supporters say it's been effective in holding repeat offenders accountable. Critics say it's been a return to mass incarceration without the promised treatment for people with substance abuse.
How Prop. 36 works
Prop. 36 stiffened penalties for repeat theft and drug offenders.
Here’s how the measure works: If you have been convicted of two misdemeanor thefts of $950 or less, prosecutors have the option of charging your third petty theft as a felony, which carries up to a three-year prison term.
Before Prop. 36, petty theft was a misdemeanor, regardless of how many times you did it.
Make It Make Sense
This is part of a weeklong series from our elections newsletter, Make It Make Sense, in which we check in on the people and measures that were elected in 2024. Sign up for the newsletter here.
When it comes to drug offenses under Prop 36, if you have been convicted of two possessions of a small amount of hard drugs (fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine), prosecutors have the option of charging your third possession as a felony. But you don’t have to go to prison if you agree to go into drug treatment.
In 2025, California prosecutors filed more than 19,000 Prop. 36 felony drug cases and more than 15,500 felony theft cases, according to a study by the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice released in March. Most people were released on bail pending the outcome of their case.
Nearly 900 Californians have been sent to state prison under Prop. 36, since it went into effect in December 2024. County jail populations have grown by nearly 3,000 since the measure passed, driven by a surge in felony bookings of people who have not yet been sentenced.
In Los Angeles County alone, there are about 1,150 individuals in jail because of Prop. 36 — about a 9% increase in the jail population, according to county Public Defender Ricardo Garcia. The surge in defendants is adding caseloads to his already overworked attorneys, he said.
The same is happening across the state.
“This is really compounding the workload crisis,” said Kate Chatfield, executive director of the California Public Defenders Association.
The data represents a reversal of yearslong declines in incarceration, and they are occurring amid all-time lows in California’s crime rate.
“It really is a return to mass incarceration,” Chatfield argued.
Black people overrepresented
Black people are dramatically overrepresented in Prop. 36 charges, according to the study. In Contra Costa County, for example, Black residents account for more than half of all Proposition 36 theft charges, despite making up less than one-tenth of the population.
Prosecutors say the law has been effective.
“It’s been a valuable tool to go after chronic and repeat thieves,” Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said.
Hochman said his office brought more than 3,300 Prop. 36 felony cases against people charged with their third petty theft in 2025.
He said his office brought over 1,900 felony cases against people charged with their third possession of hard drugs.
He said he couldn’t immediately provide numbers on how many of the drug defendants opted for rehabilitation over prison.
Statewide, fewer than 1 in 5 people arrested on Prop. 36 drug charges have been ordered to treatment, and fewer than 1 in 100 have completed a program, according to the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice study.
Lack of treatment beds
One reason for the low treatment numbers is a scarcity of treatment beds throughout the state.
“There just isn’t enough treatment to meet the need,” said the center’s Maureen Washburn. “People aren’t getting connected to treatment. They aren’t succeeding in treatment programs once they’re in them.”
Treatment, a major promise of Prop. 36, has been an “abject failure,” she said.
Hochman agreed treatment is lacking.
“We do not have anywhere close to enough drug treatment and mental illness beds in a county of 10 million people,” he said.
The district attorney argued the state needs to provide more funding for treatment beds.
“Sacramento has not funded at any meaningful level,” he said.
In a March letter to the chair of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, the co-author of Prop. 36 — Senator Tom Umberg (D-Santa Ana) — said at least $400 million dollars in new funding is needed for treatment facilities.
“I think spending taxpayer dollars on drug treatment — both in the short term and in the long term — is a smart way to address public safety issues,” Umberg told LAist.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has requested in his budget $100 million dollars for treatment over three years.
But Chatfield said people facing Prop. 36 charges shouldn't be locked up in the first place. Drug offenses should be handled as a public health issue, she argued.
“Even the low level misdemeanors for theft are economic crimes,” she said. “These are crimes of poverty.”
Unequal application of Prop. 36
In addition to a paucity of treatment beds, the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice study found charging rates vary dramatically by county. Orange County alone accounted for nearly 20% of Prop. 36 drug charges and 40% of theft convictions in 2025 despite representing just 8% of the state’s population.
“This inconsistency across counties exacerbates California’s longstanding problem of providing differing ”justice by geography,” the report stated.
Empirical evidence of the effect of Prop. 36 on the crime rate is lacking. But Umberg said he believes it has reduced retail theft.
“I have been told by a huge number of folks in law enforcement and also in the business community — particularly in the retail community — that it has had an effect on retail theft,” Umberg said.
Hochman said it's too early to tell if people are being deterred by Proposition 36.
“We’re waiting on statistics that we’ll probably get sometime this year to see if the deterrent aspect is also working — that we actually have fewer people going ahead and committing these crimes,” Hochman said.
But crime was on the way down before Proposition 36 passed. Violent crime fell 6% and property crime dropped 8.4% in California in 2024 — the year Prop. 36 passed.
Chatfield of the California Public Defenders Association maintains voters were “sold a bill of goods” on the measure.
“They were told this was about homelessness. They were told this was about treatment. And it absolutely was not," she said. "It was about increasing incarceration.”
Elly Yu
reports on early childhood. From housing to health, she covers issues facing the youngest Angelenos and their families.
Published April 29, 2026 5:00 AM
The study found that higher device use to calm or distract a child was linked to more behavior problems and higher maternal stress.
(
Kathleen Finlay
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
Using a device to calm a small child? A new study out of UC Irvine finds that’s linked to more behavioral problems.
What’s new: The study, published in Developmental Psychology, found higher device use was linked to more behavior issues among toddlers, like biting or hitting or kicking — as well as higher parental stress.
The backstory: The study followed more than 200 families in Orange County and Washington, D.C., over time, from when a child was 9 months old to 2.5 years old.
Why it matters: Stephanie Reich, a professor of education, said devices can be replacing an important opportunity to learn how to self-regulate. “If they don’t have that skill, they then might act out more, have more behavior problems, which makes parenting more stressful — which probably makes it more likely they get devices again,” she said.
Using a tablet or TV to calm a fussy child might work in the short-term, but a new study out of UC Irvine finds it could backfire later.
The study, published in Developmental Psychology, found that higher device use was linked to more behavior issues among toddlers, like biting or hitting or kicking — as well as more parental stress.
The study followed more than 200 families in Orange County and Washington, D.C., over time, from when a child was 9 months old to 2-and-a-half years old.
“Emotion regulation skills — like their own ability to calm and distract themselves — [they] might be being displaced by devices instead,” said Stephanie Reich, professor of education at UC Irvine. “And if [kids] don't have that skill, they might act out more, have more behavior problems.”
More behavioral problems in turn can make parenting more stressful, which means it’ll make it more likely that kids get devices again, creating a cycle parents can get stuck in, Reich said.
The study also found that mothers experienced more stress later when using devices to distract their children, but that wasn’t the experience for fathers. While higher device use was linked to more behavior problems, fathers did not feel the level of stress as much as mothers.
When mothers were stressed, they were more likely to use devices, Reich said. She couldn’t definitively explain why there was a difference between parents, but said that in general, parenting work falls more to mothers.
“They just might be more overwhelmed, or taking on more than fathers when it comes to day-to-day parenting,” she said.
The study notes the type of parent-child interactions that might be replaced by devices, including picking them up, holding and rocking them, and talking to them calmly and reminding them to breathe.
“All of these types of interactions, from physical touch to language use to breathing tips for calming, offer the developing child opportunities to cultivate their self-regulatory skills,” the authors wrote.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Julia Barajas
is following the impact of President Trump's immigration policies on Southern California communities.
Published April 28, 2026 5:20 PM
Immigration advocates say conditions at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center are inhumane.
(
Patrick T. Fallon
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
A federal judge is weighing whether to grant a temporary court order to give immediate relief to immigrants detained at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center.
The backstory: Immigrants rights groups and a private firm filed a lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security in January. They allege that the approximately 2,000 people currently held at the Adelanto complex are subject to inhumane treatment.
Why it matters: On top of squalid conditions, the lawsuit alleges that detainees at Adelanto are fed cold, unsanitary food and expected to drink dirty water. They also say detainees must often wait several months to see a doctor and that solitary confinement is used to retaliate against those who speak out against these conditions and to isolate detainees who are experiencing mental health crises. Since last September, at least four people have died while detained in this facility.
What the feds say: The federal government has asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit. Pushkal Mishra, representing ICE and DHS, said “between the government and the alleged injury are the independent, discretionary, uncertain and speculative day-to-day activities of a third party.” He argued that The GEO Group, a private prison operator that runs the Adelanto facility, is the "proper defendant" in the case.
What's next: Judge Sunshine Sykessaid she’ll need more time to decide. In addition to the preliminary injunction, she is also navigating the federal government’s motion to dismiss the case and a motion by the plaintiffs to make this a class action lawsuit, meaning the court’s outcome would apply to all Adelanto detainees.
A federal judge said she’ll need more time to decide whether to grant a temporary court order to give immigrants detained at Adelanto ICE Processing Center immediate relief.
Immigrants rights groups and a private firm filed a lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security in January. They allege that the approximately 2,000 people currently held at the Adelanto complex are subject to inhumane treatment.
On top of squalid conditions, plaintiffs say detainees are fed cold, unsanitary food and expected to drink dirty water. They also allege detainees must often wait several months to see a doctor, if they ever do.
“The conditions in which these non-citizens are being held in the Adelanto detention facility, as alleged in the petition, are certainly concerning,” said Judge Sunshine Sykes at a hearing Tuesday for the Central District of California. “I think that each of us would never want to be in that position.”
Still, Sykes said she was tentatively inclined to “deny the motion [for a preliminary injunction] without prejudice or to allow plaintiffs to withdraw the motion and refile it,” which would give the immigrants rights groups a chance to address her concerns. She then gave the attorneys the opportunity to respond and, potentially, convince her otherwise.
What’s happening at Adelanto?
Adelanto is about 90 miles away from downtown Los Angeles. According to the lawsuit, the detention center does not accommodate detainees with special needs. Detainees with mobility issues, for instance, are assigned top bunks. And in a sworn declaration, one detainee described being put in handcuffs and ankle chains when she is taken to court appointments, even though she uses a cane.
Plaintiffs also say solitary confinement is used to retaliate against detainees who speak out against these conditions and to isolate those who are experiencing mental health crises. An LAist analysis of the most recent ICE data found that as of January, Adelanto is among the top 10 facilities that put immigrant detainees in solitary confinement across the country.
The detention center is run by The GEO Group Inc., one of the largest private prison operators in the United States.
The federal government has declined LAist's request for interviews and comments, and The GEO Group has not responded to those requests.
The arguments for and against an injunction
In the hearing, Judge Sykes raised concerns that The GEO Group and the Adelanto warden are not named in the lawsuit. She also questioned how the court could enforce an order for immediate relief and wondered if there might be a more “efficient” way for the plaintiffs to proceed.
The federal government has asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit altogether. Pushkal Mishra, representing ICE and DHS, said “between the government and the alleged injury are the independent, discretionary, uncertain and speculative day-to-day activities of a third party.” The GEO Group and its employees, he argued, “are the proper defendants in the case, not [the] government.”
The advocates' lawsuit underscores that companies like The GEO Group are subject to inspection by the federal government. Recently, ICE gave the Adelanto ICE Processing Center a “good” rating. Since September 2025, at least four people have died in detention at Adelanto, the most recent March 25.
At the hearing, Vanessa Young Viniegra, a fellow at Public Counsel, refuted the federal government’s argument that ICE and DHS should not be named defendants in the case.
“The Supreme Court has been clear that the government has a constitutional duty to care for the people in its custody and the people that it chooses to detain,” she said, “regardless of whether it employs a private company.”
Judge Sykes interjected: “I don't think I'm saying that the government is not a proper defendant. I'm saying that The GEO Group [and] the warden of Adelanto may need to be joined or brought in as defendants as well.”
Young Viniegra noted that the motion for the emergency court order provides the government “some leeway” in terms of how it obligates Adelanto to provide adequate care for detainees.
“We're not asking the court to order, you know, a specific number of staff,” she said. “It's up to the government to comply with its constitutional obligations and exactly how it does that and its relationship with GEO is for it to decide.”
What's next?
Sykessaid she’ll need more time to make a decision. In addition to the preliminary injunction, she is also navigating the federal government’s motion to dismiss the case and a motion by the plaintiffs to make this a class action lawsuit, meaning the court’s outcome would apply to all Adelanto detainees.
David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published April 28, 2026 4:09 PM
The developer behind the newly renovated Jardinette Apartments wanted to return the Hollywood building to architect Richard Neutra's original vision.
(
David Wagner
/
LAist
)
Topline:
When it was first built nearly 100 years ago, the Jardinette Apartments building in Hollywood made international headlines for its radical design. At the time, Los Angeles had never seen such an iconoclastic vision of what apartment living could look like. But by the end of the century, the Jardinette had become derelict, its historic significance hidden behind years of neglect. Now, this pioneering piece of L.A. architecture is coming back to life.
What’s new: Developer Cameron Hassid bought the nationally registered building in 2020 after previous owners tried but failed to restore it. With Hassid’s renovation now nearing completion, the Jardinette’s original conception is once again coming into clear view.
The backstory: The Jardinette was designed by Austrian-American architect Richard Neutra. With his flat roofs, expansive windows, deep overhangs and blending of the indoors and outdoors, Neutra would go on to define the language of mid-century California modernism. But the Jardinette, built in 1928, was Neutra’s first major commission in L.A., coming just a few years after he arrived in the United States to work with Frank Lloyd Wright and fellow Austrian émigré Rudolph Schindler.
Read on … to learn why the building’s restoration matters to L.A.’s architectural history.
When it was first built nearly 100 years ago, the Jardinette Apartments building in Hollywood made international headlines for its radical design. At the time, Los Angeles had never seen anything quite like architect Richard Neutra’s iconoclastic vision of what apartment living could look like.
But by the end of the century, the Jardinette had become dilapidated, its historic significance hidden behind years of neglect.
Now, this pioneering piece of L.A. architecture is coming back to life.
Developer Cameron Hassid bought the nationally registered building in 2020 after previous owners tried but failed to restore it. With the renovation now nearing completion, the Jardinette’s original concept once again is coming into clear view.
“It was a big, heavy lift,” Hassid said, describing the project as the most complicated in his career. “There are so many apartment buildings in L.A. But none of them will have the story or any of the significance that this does.”
First steps for a now-famous architect
In the 1920s, Neutra was a young Austrian architect who had recently moved to the United States to work with Frank Lloyd Wright and fellow Austrian émigré Rudolph Schindler.
Historians cite the style he would go on to develop — with its flat roofs, expansive windows, deep overhangs and blending of the indoors and outdoors — as defining the language of mid-century California modernism.
Richard Neutra's family lived in the VDL Research House II, located in Silver Lake and designed by Neutra with his son, Dion.
(
Michael Locke via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
)
But the Jardinette, built in 1928, was Neutra’s first major commission in L.A., coming just a few years after his arrival in the United States.
Architecture historians say Neutra’s goal was to strip down the Jardinette’s design, maximizing light and fresh air in the building’s 43 modestly sized apartments, all in keeping with the burgeoning International Style.
Long ribbon windows are the most striking feature in an otherwise unadorned facade. Windows join at corners and stretch across nearly entire walls, connecting living rooms and kitchens. Panes in the walls of interior closets bring “borrowed light” into shadowy interiors.
Neutra outfitted many of the apartments with balconies that cantilever off reinforced concrete. The balconies were ideal for outdoor plants — hence the name Jardinette, or Little Garden.
The restoration of the Jardinette Apartments is nearly complete.
(
David Wagner
/
LAist
)
Barbara Lamprecht, an architectural historian who consulted on the preservation of the Jardinette, said Neutra’s approach would have seemed utterly alien amid the 1920s development boom in L.A.
“All these other revival styles were happening: Tudor Revival, Spanish Colonial Revival,” said Lamprecht, the author of Neutra: Complete Works from the publisher Taschen. “This was not a milieu that encouraged, fostered or remotely understood the tenets of early modernism.”
Once-lauded edifice falls on hard times
The Jardinette helped secure Neutra’s fame far beyond the confines of Southern California. His work on the Jardinette was included in a landmark 1932 architecture exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York.
But by the 1990s, the Jardinette had all but lost its visionary purity. It was painted pink and green. The previously uniform steel windows were mismatched, using cheap materials. The walls were graffitied.
By the late 20th century, the Jardinette had fallen into disrepair.
“It's just what happens when buildings get neglected,” he said. “It's important to look back on these ideas and not lose them and try to maintain them and not cover them up. Now, hopefully for another 100 years, more generations of people can experience the design the way it was originally intended.”
Working with the limits of a century-old building
The team behind the Jardinette’s renewal said the building was not easy to renovate. It was originally built without a cooling system. Its electrical system couldn’t meet modern energy needs. It didn’t have stand-up showers.
Installing those modern amenities while preserving Neutra’s original design proved challenging at times, said Anant Topiwala with June Street Architecture.
The team preserved whatever original materials they could, Topiwala said, but they needed to order custom tiles, windows and other parts in order to match historic photographs and documents.
A historic photograph shows the Jardinette in its original state.
(
Courtesy Cameron Hassid
)
“We were like archeologists, in a way,” he said. “There was a lot of peeling back. What do we think the paint color was? What do we think that wood detail was?
“Neutra didn't like angles. We needed to make sure, for example, the casing around the doors didn't meet at a mitered corner. There's just so many interesting things.”
Pulling permits for a protected landmark
The Jardinette has multiple historic designations. It’s in the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. And it’s protected as a Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument. Those classifications limit what kinds of changes are allowed in a renovation. Getting all the necessary permits was a job in itself, one handled by Michael Norberg with Cali Planners.
“Everything you can think of that could come up did come up on this building,” Norberg said. “But I think the bones have been reinforced. The historic aspect has been retained. The entire nature and history and spirit of this building is still here.
“And I love the fact that the city was willing to work with us on maintaining that,” he said.
How the past informs future plans
Hassid said the renovation should be completed by this summer. He added that he’s not yet sure what the building’s future will be, but he won’t sell it to a typical real estate investor. He recently put it on the market with Neema Ahadian of Marcus & Millichap.
“We've sold some really beautiful buildings, but nothing that has the history that you can find here,” Ahadian said. The buyer will need to be someone who understands the value of preserving a piece of architectural history, he said.
“This building's been through a few ownerships that have not necessarily had the same vision,” Ahadian said.
Two windows join at a right angle and a door opens to a balcony in one corner of a Jardinette apartment.
(
David Wagner
/
LAist
)
When he first took on the project, Hassid said, colleagues told him he was nuts. But he said ultimately the effort was worth it to preserve an L.A. architectural gem.
“I hope we made Richard Neutra proud, bringing his building back to life,” he said.
What does real luxury look like?
Neutra built the Jardinette at a time when movie studios were growing. The Paramount studio lot is just a few blocks away.
Barbara Lamprecht, an architectural historian with expertise in Neutra's work, consulted on the preservation of the Jardinette.
(
David Wagner
/
LAist
)
Lamprecht, the Neutra historian, said she’s looking forward to seeing how people occupy the apartments. She said Neutra designed the Jardinette to bring a new kind of luxury to occupants who might have included up-and-coming actors or below-the-line production workers.
“The luxuries in life are access to sunlight, to views,” Lamprecht said. “This was the raison d'être for this entire building: to provide graceful, expansive lives to people who weren’t in single-family dwellings in the Hollywood Hills.”
Whoever the next tenants will be, Lamprecht said, “I feel like, for the first time, this building is not invisible any longer.”