The Brief

More than half a year after January’s fires, utilities are slowly moving forward on their plans to put power lines underground.

Along the coast and in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, the details for the plans are lacking — and in the case of the Palisades, yet to be developed.

As survivors start filing the paperwork to rebuild their homes, they worry they’re putting the cart before the horse.

In Altadena, many fire survivors are asking — is the Southern California Edison work to bury power lines worth the cost? In Pacific Palisades, where rebuild permits are being approved more quickly, building contractors are wondering — what exactly is the L.A. Department of Water and Power’s plan?

In both areas, successfully putting power lines underground will require buy-in from neighbors on each block. If there’s one holdout, it can render an entire undergrounding project unfeasible. These individual homeowners could foot up to $10,000 of the bill, though those costs are still being worked out.

After a flurry of calls to put more power lines underground from community members, local officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom himself, the challenges of actually doing it — including whether people can or are willing to pay for it — are mounting.

Why put lines underground?

The causes of both the Eaton and Palisades fires remain under investigation. The leading theory for the Eaton Fire is that a de-energized transmission line (those big power lines up in the mountains) somehow re-energized and sparked the fire.

The electrical transmission towers above Eaton Canyon in Altadena, where the LA wildfire known as the Eaton Fire originally started.

(

Jules Hotz

/

CalMatters

)

Transmission lines are generally not buried underground because they’re often high above vegetation, are far apart from each other and are far less likely to spark fires. (Though when they do, it can be devastating — equipment on Pacific Gas & Electric transmission lines were found to be the cause of the deadly Camp Fire, which killed 85 people and razed the town of Paradise in Northern California).

In the Palisades, the leading theory is that a previous fire possibly reignited with the winds.

But in both areas, there’s evidence that downed distribution power lines — the lines that actually connect to our homes — sparked additional fires.

In Altadena, radio traffic shows how downed lines sparked new fires after Edison did not shut off power. In Pacific Palisades, a lawsuit representing more than 3,300 families alleges evidence of DWP downed power poles worsening the fires.

Snapped LADWP power poles and downed lines stand on a hill in the Palisades Fire burn scar. The image is from a lawsuit alleging high winds snapped the poles, leading to additional fires from the downed power lines.

(

Screenshot from Grigsby et al. lawsuit against LADWP

/

LAist

)

Putting distribution lines underground can almost completely reduce the risk of those lines sparking fires, as well as improve reliability. But it’s a lot more expensive than other fire-risk-reduction strategies, such as covered conductors or “fast trip” technology, which turns off the power automatically when a fault is detected on a line. Those strategies can reduce fire ignition risk by around 55% to 80%, respectively, and sometimes more, according to studies by utilities and academics.

An example of a covered conductor.

(

Courtesy Southern California Edison

)

Covered conductors like this one can reduce fire risk significantly, though not as much as burying power lines.

(

Courtesy Southern California Edison

)

But burying power lines also comes with advantages — the lines are insulated from the environment so they need less maintenance, and it can prevent the need to shut off power during dangerous fire weather (though it can extend outages when they happen since the lines are harder to reach).

Edison’s ratepayers largely have to foot the bill for these fire risk reduction strategies — from tree and vegetation management, to hardening infrastructure. It’s a big reason why electricity bills continue to rise — Edison estimates about 10% of our bills go toward wildfire mitigation.

What goes into the average SoCal Edison electric bill.

(

Courtesy Southern California Edison

)

How SoCal Edison is putting lines underground

In Altadena, about a mile of the trenching and equipment installation needed to put power lines underground has been completed so far along Sunny Oaks Circle and East Loma Alta Drive, just below the foothills. Many, though not all, of the houses in the area burned in the Eaton Fire. The utility was already planning to put these lines underground before the fire — now the work is being expedited.

Edison will need to secure about 30 easements from homeowners to successfully complete the remaining mile-and-a-half or so of this underground segment, said Shinjini Menon, Edison’s vice president of system planning and engineering.

A newly paved street hides buried power infrastructure at Sunny Oaks Circle and East Loma Drive in Altadena. The box to the right is the transformer. Newly built homes will connect to the cables running through it.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

Securing easements and rights of entry from full blocks of homeowners will be key to finishing all the underground projects, she said. Her team is managing the restoration work.

This part of Altadena is in a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, which experts say is the ideal place to put power lines underground. About 40 miles of underground lines are planned in Altadena's high-risk zones.

“ We are doing this because it makes sense for the communities and we really need their help collectively to get all the easements and permits that we need,” Menon said.

The rest of Edison’s line mileage in the area — about 45 miles — are not in designated high-risk zones. Still, the utility said it plans to bury about 23 miles of those lines "given the amount damage that has happened where there are multiple homes along roads that have to be rebuilt,” Menon said. They're assessing an additional 19 miles for undergrounding in lower fire-risk areas.

Shinjini Menon, SoCal Edison’s vice president of system planning and engineering.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

When it comes to burying power lines, Menon said Edison considers "not only the benefits from the risk reduction from fire, but the long term benefits of, 'Hey, we don't have to trim the trees as much once we are underground. We don't have to inspect as frequently.' There are other benefits that come with it. So looking at the lifecycle view of it and saying, 'Where does it make sense?'”

At the same time, Menon said, the utility is upgrading the system to hold more electricity to deal with higher future demand. She said now is the time to do it, when the cost will be less than normal given the scale of destruction.

Cost worries residents

Edison officials say they have done extensive outreach with officials and community members about their plan to bury power lines, but many residents feel they’re still left in the dark, especially when it comes to how much the work may cost them.

Julian Saucedo and his wife lost their home of 35 years in Altadena. He lived far below the foothills and is still beyond the bounds of newly designated fire-risk areas.

Still, Edison plans to bury the power lines that serve him and his neighbors as soon as the end of this year — and Saucedo’s not happy about it.

“It's been six months and little or nothing from [Edison] in terms of what they're doing in the undergrounding arena,” Saucedo said. “And we are beside ourselves.”

His biggest concern? The cost. In a letter to Newsom in mid-April, Edison Chief Executive Pedro Pizarro wrote it could cost individual homeowners $8,000 to $10,000 to connect to new underground lines, plus fees that may not be waived.

“Finding alternative ways to fund this significant out-of-pocket expense, including through government funds or philanthropic sources, could meaningfully assist customers in their rebuilding efforts,” Pizarro wrote.

Restored overhead power lines in Altadena.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

A spokesperson for Edison told LAist they’re working with L.A. County to secure funding from the state’s office of emergency management, as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to offset those costs.

But so far, no word on that additional money. And Saucedo and his neighbors are skeptical that support will ever come through.

Unlike required code upgrades, connecting to underground power lines is not covered by insurance. Saucedo worries the cost could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, the difference for some neighbors between deciding to rebuild or leave.

He called the undergrounding effort by Edison “a money grab,” especially in areas that are not designated high fire risk, even if they burned in the Eaton Fire.

“We're quite a group of neighbors — we are all rallying behind each other,” Saucedo said. “A number of individuals are strongly opposed to undergrounding.”

Saucedo and his neighbors are advocating for homeowners to reject Edison’s right of entry and easement sale requests.

Instead, they’re planning to push for other, cheaper fire suppression methods, such as covered conductors or fast-trip sensors.

“We're worried that everyone's just going to sign these ROEs [rights-of-entry] and then we're all footing the bill,” said Nicole Wirth, an Altadena resident who lost her home and is a captain with grassroots group Altagether.  She said they want more transparency about the costs from Edison. ”We don't have a ton of trust in Edison right now, and we don't have a ton of trust that the county is looking out for us.”

An aerial view of properties cleared of fire debris in Altadena.

(

Mario Tama

/

Getty Images

)

Amanda Riddle, lead attorney for the Eaton Fire lawsuit, said her clients could claim that cost as part of their damages.

“The costs shouldn't be on the ratepayers or homeowners at this point,” she said.

Edison has said they will pay homeowners a $500 stipend for the right of entry, plus whatever they’re owed for the sale of an easement.

“Our preference is to reach an agreement with the property owners,” said Edison spokesperson Gabriela Ornelas. “Delays into getting access to work on properties can slow down the collective effort to build back stronger. We are committed to working with the homeowners.”

Meanwhile, finding an accessible way to identify if their individual properties will be in areas with newly buried power lines has been a challenge for homeowners. Members of Altagether have been piecing details together using Edison’s public list of current undergrounding projects, then searching the names of the circuits in Altadena via this map.

In an FAQ Edison released in June, the utility said it is “developing a public ArcGIS map to show planned undergrounding areas.”

Putting the cart before the horse?

Beyond questions about costs, in Pacific Palisades, builders and residents are wondering why the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is taking so long to develop a specific plan.

“ This plan should be done,” said Reza Akef, who was raised in the Palisades and now builds homes there via his company Metro Capital Builders.

Unlike in Altadena, the goal in the Palisades is to bury 100% of the lines in the neighborhood, which exists entirely in a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

Before the fires, about 48% of the lines in the Palisades were already underground, said Yamen Nanne,  an assistant program management director with LADWP.

Nanne said the city-owned utility is putting together more specific plans that will be released at a town hall Aug. 27.

Part of the delay has been coordinating with telecommunications companies, who jointly own poles with LADWP but will have to foot the bill themselves to go underground with the utility.

“ Initially, we did get some concerns from the telecommunication companies about the costs associated with that,” said David Hanson, senior assistant general manager for LADWP’s power system at a July 2 town hall. “But we have had further meetings with the telecom companies and we're making some accommodations for them. So I feel confident that we're moving forward with both electrical and telecommunication underground.”

Power poles in Pacific Palisades. LADWP has largely restored its overhead system already.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

Burying lines will not be required in the Palisades — it will only happen if each neighborhood block agrees to it together.

“There's no mechanism for us to come in and essentially force folks to go underground,” Hanson said. “We want to provide the option, and if they don't want to take the option, it's fine with us. We'll harden your overhead system with another wildfire mitigation technique.”

Like Edison, DWP is also upgrading how much power the system can handle in the process. They’re doing that by expanding their station on Sunset Boulevard, where power lines are being put underground.

This will be the new “backbone” of the neighborhood’s upgraded electric system, a spokesperson for the utility said, and will allow the utility to abandon a plan for another distribution center near Marquez Elementary School, which had long faced resistance from the community.

The increased voltage LADWP is building into this system is another reason for delays.

LADWP is burying power line on Sunset Boulevard in Pacific Palisades.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

“Since this is a new voltage not currently used anywhere else in LADWP service territory, special attention and consideration is being taken to ensure the system will be reliable for the homeowners and safe for our crews and inspectors constructing and operating the system,” said Mia Rose Wong, a spokesperson for the utility.

Hanson said that even without the specific plans yet in public hands, as long as homeowners who are rebuilding install an electrical panel that supports both underground and overhead electric service, they’ll be able to be hooked up to the underground system when LADWP gets to them.

Restored overhead power lines in Pacific Palisades.

(

Erin Stone

/

LAist

)

Contractors are skeptical.

“That is so far from the truth  of what it takes to underground power in Los Angeles,” Akef said.

He pointed out that when connecting to underground power, homeowners need to hire an electrical engineer who can provide more detailed plans to the city on their power needs beyond that electrical panel upgrade, such as how many amps are needed and the size and number of the conduit lines. Inspections from LADWP are required every step of the way, Akef said.

He worries that for those already rebuilding, it could cost them later if they get too far ahead of LADWP.

 ”Imagine those people who are building right now,  for example, like if you finish your hardscape or your driveway,  you would have to tear that all down,” Akef said. “You’d have to trench down three feet for this conduit and take it to the property line.”

Justin Skaggs, a utility consultant who specializes in overhead to underground conversion for power lines, said the “logistical puzzle” of burying lines in a timely manner in concert with homes being rebuilt requires more coordination with contractors and homeowners than is currently happening.

“Everyone's going to be on different timelines, so it's very difficult for anyone to be able to really logistically plan,” Skaggs said. “ It's going to be very challenging to coordinate. That's probably one of the biggest hurdles other than the funding.”

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

“The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

“We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

(

J.W. Hendricks

/

The LA Local

)

In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

“They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

“These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

“I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

“It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

“Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

What can small businesses do? 

Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

“There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

“We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

What’s next 

After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

“It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

“And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

Topline:

Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.