With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA's plan to give renters free eviction attorneys as a ‘right’ moves forward

Los Angeles City Council members have voted to put the “right” back into the city’s proposal for a tenant’s “right to counsel” in eviction court, overriding an earlier draft that dropped the word.
In Wednesday’s meeting of the council’s housing committee, Councilmember Nithya Raman — who chairs the committee — introduced an amendment to alter some of the language drafted by the city attorney’s office. The earlier draft had called the effort a “City-Funded Counsel for Tenants Program” and conspicuously said it would not give renters the right to an attorney.
“I've offered some fairly minor amendments,” Raman said. “I want to call it the ‘Right to Counsel Program Ordinance.’ Other than that, to me this ordinance largely effectuates what this committee has been talking about, discussing in detail, for many, many months now.”
What’s happened so far
“Right to counsel” programs have been spreading across the country. More than a dozen cities have passed them with the goal of ensuring tenants can effectively defend themselves in court and stay housed, whenever possible.
Without a right to counsel, studies have shown the vast majority of tenants end up navigating eviction proceedings without a lawyer, while landlords almost always have legal representation.
L.A. took initial steps toward its own version when Raman and other city council members first introduced a right to counsel proposal back in February of 2023.
Elsewhere in Southern California, the L.A. County Board of Supervisors recently voted to launch a “Tenant Right to Counsel” program next year for low-income renters in unincorporated parts of the county.
The backstory to today’s vote
Advocates who favor guaranteeing free access to counsel — a long established right in criminal court — have said they were surprised to see the initial draft on Wednesday’s agenda. In it, the city attorney’s office seemed to go out of its way to clarify that L.A.’s proposal would not establish a “right to counsel.”
For supporters of publicly funded eviction defense, the changes requested by council members were welcome.
During the public comment portion of Wednesday’s meeting, Barbara Schulz with the Legal Aid Foundation of L.A. said the amendments “will make this a better ordinance.”
Landlord groups continue to argue that paying lawyers to fight for tenants is the wrong way to spend limited city funds.
David Kaishchyan with the Apartment Association of Greater L.A. said during public comment that the program’s source of funding — Measure ULA, also known as the city’s “mansion tax” — could instead be diverted to rent relief for tenants who are behind on payments.
“Rather than pursuing a program that will enrich private attorneys and delay evictions, it would be far better to exercise the discretion provided under ULA to use such funding to expand and expedite the permanent direct rental assistance program,” Kaishchyan said.
What’s next
L.A.’s housing department has estimated that a fully funded right to counsel could cost the city $68 million per year. That’s no small sum considering that revenue from Measure ULA has so far trickled in at a fraction of the initial projections of around $1 billion per year.
The changes approved by the housing committee on Wednesday will now go back to the city attorney’s office, which has 30 days to come up with new language for the proposal. It’s not yet clear when the plan will come up for a final vote in the full city council.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.