The Brief

Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson in Moana. Antonio Banderas in Puss in Boots. Ellen DeGeneres in Finding Nemo. Chris Pratt in The Lego Movie, The Super Mario Bros. Movie, Garfield, and… a couple others.

All these big-name actors and comedians have lent their voices and talents to lead roles in animated features. And they’re just a handful of the many, many examples.

So when did this phenomenon start happening?

As the story often goes, the practice of casting celebrity-level actors rather than trained voice actors in animated films can be traced back to Robin Williams’ casting in the 1992 Disney hit Aladdin.  

The idea is that the popularity of the character led other producers and directors to want big-name actors in their films too — in an effort to draw in more adult viewers. The consequence, so the argument goes, is that the practice led to a decrease in opportunities for trained voice actors (similar to actors and celebrities replacing models on magazine covers.)

But according to Eric Goldberg, the supervising animator for the Genie and co-director of Pocahontas, and veteran animation casting director Mary Hidalgo (The Lego Movie, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse): that’s not exactly how it happened. (The two recently spoke with The Academy Museum Podcast host Jacqueline Stewart, for an episode focused on casting in animation.)

The history of casting celebrities in animation

Goldberg says that while many people do point to Williams’ casting in Aladdin as a turning point, “being an animation geek, I know of many other cases where they did cast famous people.”

Ed Wynn and Lucille Ball in a photo from May 18, 1953. The caption reads, "'Best young comedienne we have,' said Wynn after she made TV debut in his show."

(

Los Angeles Herald Examiner Photo Collection / Digital Collections of the Los Angeles Public Library

)

A few examples:

“Cliff Edwards, the voice of Jiminy Cricket [in Pinocchio] was already a well-known recording star, known as Ukulele Ike. And everybody knew Ukulele Ike back in 1940. In the 1950s, they cast Ed Wynn and Jerry Colonna as the Mad Hatter and the March Hare, respectively [in Alice in Wonderland], and they were both vaudeville and radio comedians. Very, very well known,” says Goldberg.

“So it certainly has had its history,” Goldberg says. “But I think in this particular case, because the humor was so linked to Robin's rhythms and Robin's style of delivery, I think that made it a turning point for an awful lot of people.”

How Robin Williams’ Genie did change things 

According to Goldberg, what was new in Williams’ portrayal of the Genie was his style of humor.

“Disney humor was not exactly ‘gut-buster’ humor. It could be a little bit tame,” Goldberg says.

“And truth be told, Disney films went more for the characterization than the gut-busting laugh, let's put it that way. Hopefully with a character like the Genie, we got both. And with this humor, there had never been that kind of humor in a Disney film before. So we all kind of felt a little subversive, you know, sticking this stuff in a Disney movie and just wondering if we're going to be be allowed to keep it in.”

Robin Williams recording the voice for his character in the 1996 sequel "Aladdin and the King of Thieves."

(

Courtesy of the Everett Collection

)

For casting director Mary Hidalgo — who didn’t work on Aladdin, but cast other Disney films like Tarzan and Finding Nemo — Williams’ casting had a wide-ranging impact in another way.

“I think that triggered something,” Hidalgo says. “That kind of set the bar — his comedy and his presence — he really, totally ‘plussed’ that character and that role. And I think from that moment there was a lot of high demand for that kind of actor. Somebody that will come in and read your words, but also really plus it, you know? That's why we go a lot of times for comedians.”

A push for “names”

But Goldberg and Hidalgo both say that there’s no denying that there has been — and still is — pressure from studios and producers to cast big big-name actors in animated films, particularly when it comes to lead roles.

Hidalgo recalls recommending actor/comedian Will Ferrell for the character of Sully in the 2001 film Monsters, Inc.

“He was so great, but they didn't know who he was. They knew like, ‘Oh, that guy on Saturday Night Live.’ But that's part of the whole job is trying to sell them on this thing that they don't know about, you know? And then they do always go kind of for the bigger star.”

The role ultimately went to actor John Goodman, who Hidalgo calls “the most perfect voice in animation.” And Ferrell was cast in The Lego Movie, which Hidalgo worked on, years later.

The drawbacks of celebrity

There are some times, Goldberg says, when casting a celebrity in a role can take something away from the magic of an animated character.

“You always want the characters to be their own characters,” Goldberg says. “You don't just want them to be a paper-thin carbon copy of who the voice actor is, for example."

In that sense, Goldberg says, casting lesser-known actors can help, because "you aren't necessarily referencing the persona of a previously known actor."

Listen

How do I find The Academy Museum Podcast?

It's now available from LAist Studios. Check it out wherever you get your podcasts!

Topline:

The case: In September, the city settled a lawsuit brought forward by two brothers in their 70s who said they suffered serious injuries after an LAPD officer crashed into their car. Days before the $18 million settlement was reached, lawyers for the brothers said Feldstein Soto called an expert witness testifying for the plaintiffs and “attempted to ingratiate herself with him and asked him to make a contribution to her political campaign,” according to a sworn declaration to the court by the plaintiffs’ attorney, Robert Glassman.

The response: Feldstein Soto did not respond to an interview request. Her spokesperson said the settlement “had nothing to do” with the expert witness. Her campaign manager told LAist the city attorney had been making a routine fundraising call and did not know the person had a role in the case, nor that there were pending requests for her office to pay him fees.

What Jurado says: In a statement to LAist, Jurado said she wants to “make sure that the city’s legal leadership is guided by integrity and accountability, especially when their choices affect public trust, civic rights and the city’s limited resources."

What’s next: The motion needs to go through a few committees before reaching the full City Council. If it passes, the motion calls for the city attorney to “report to council in closed session within 45 days regarding the ethics breach violation and give updates to the City Council."

Every year in Santa Ana, Luis Cantabrana turns the front of his home into an elaborate altar in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe that draws hundreds of visitors.

Along the front of the house, the multi-colored altar is filled with lights, flowers and a stained-glass tapestry behind a sculpture of the Lady of Guadalupe. Cantabrana’s roof also is lit up with the green, white and red lights that spell out “Virgen de Guadalupe” and a cross.

Visitors are welcomed with music and the smell of roses as they celebrate the saint, but this year’s gathering comes after a dark year for immigrant communities.

Luis Cantabrana stands in front of the stunning altar he built in front of his home in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe. Every year, his display draws hundreds of visitors.

(

Destiny Torres

/

LAist

)

Why do they celebrate? 

In 1513, the Virgin Mary appeared before St. Juan Diego between Dec. 9 and Dec. 12, asking him to build a church in her honor. Her image — a brown-skinned woman wearing a green veil with her hands together in prayer and an angel at her feet — miraculously appeared on his cloak.

To celebrate in Santa Ana, worshippers gathered late-night Wednesday and in the very early hours Dec. 12 to pray the rosary, sing hymns and celebrate the saint.

Cantabrana has hosted worshippers at his home for 27 years — 17 in Santa Ana.

The altar started out small, he said, and over the years, he added a fabric background, more lights and flowers (lots and lots of flowers).

“It started with me making a promise to la Virgen de Guadalupe that while I had life and a home to build an altar, that I would do it,” Cantabrana said. “Everything you see in photos and videos is pretty, but when you come and see it live, it's more than pretty. It's beautiful.”

The Santa Ana home's elaborate altar in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe draws hundreds of visitors each year.

(

Destiny Torres

/

LAist

)

Gathering in a time of turmoil 

Many also look to the Lady of Guadalupe for protection, especially at a time when federal enforcement has rattled immigrant communities.

“People don’t want to go to work, they don’t want to take their kids to school, but the love we have for our Virgen de Guadalupe,” Cantabrana said. “We see that la Virgen de Guadalupe has a lot of power, and so we know immigration [enforcement] won’t come here.”

Margarita Lopez of Garden Grove has been visiting the altar for three years with her husband. She’s been celebrating the Virgencita since she was a young girl. Honoring the saint is as important now as ever, she said.

“We ask, and she performs miracles,” Lopez said.

Claudia Tapia, a lifelong Santa Ana resident, said the Virgin Mary represents strength.

“Right now, with everything going on, a lot of our families [have] turned and prayed to the Virgen for strength during these times,” Tapia said. “She's a very strong symbol of Mexican culture, of unity, of faith and of resilience.”

See it for yourself

The shrine will stay up into the new year on the corner of Broadway and Camile Street.

California’s unemployment agency kept paying cellphone bills for 4 1/2 years without checking whether its workers actually were using the devices.

That’s how it racked up $4.6 million in fees for mobile devices its workers were not using, according to a new state audit detailing wasteful spending at several government agencies.

The Employment Development Department’s excessive cellphone bills date to the COVID-19 pandemic, when it shifted call center employees to remote work and faced pressure to release benefits to millions of suddenly unemployed Californians.

It acquired 7,224 cellphones and wireless hotspots by December 2020. State auditors analyzed 54 months of invoices since then and found half the devices were unused for at least two years, 25% were unused for three years and 99 of them were never used at all.

The investigation, which auditors opened after receiving a tip, identified 6,285 devices that were unused for at least four consecutive months, and said the department spent $4.6 million on monthly service fees for them.

From the beginning, the department had about 2,000 more cellphones than call center employees, according to the audit. The gap widened over time after the pandemic ended and the department’s staffing returned to its normal headcount.

As of April, the audit said the department had 1,787 unemployment call center employees, but was paying monthly service fees for 5,097 mobile devices.

“Although obtaining the mobile devices during COVID-19 may have been a good idea to serve the public, continuing to pay the monthly service fees for so many unused devices, especially post-COVID-19, was wasteful,” the audit said.

Department officials told auditors they were unaware of the spending, but auditors pointed to regular invoices from Verizon that showed which phones were not being used.

“We would have expected EDD management to have reconsidered the need to pay the monthly service fees for so many devices that had no voice, message, or data usage,” the audit said.

The unemployment department began acting on the auditors’ findings in April, when it canceled service plans for 2,825 devices. It has since implemented a policy to terminate service plans for devices that go unused for 90 days.

The California state auditor highlighted the mobile devices in its regular report on “improper activities by state agencies and employees.” The audit also showed that the California Air Resources Board overpaid an employee who was on extended leave as he prepared to retire by $171,000.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.