Last Member Drive of 2025!

Your year-end tax-deductible gift powers our local newsroom. Help raise $1 million in essential funding for LAist by December 31.
$881,541 of $1,000,000 goal
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

YouTube Finds Another Pandora's Box to Rip Open

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

As if YouTube wasn't a legal nightmare already, what with profiting off copywritten material, to profiting off of kids beating each other up, to profiting from underage girls dancing around their bedrooms in their underwear to hip hop songs... now YouTube wants to create a million more headaches to themselves by offering to pay those who upload popular videos.

On the surface it's a) nice b) smart c) competitive, but what happens if the subject of the video sues Google/YouTube because the video was originally theres, but stolen? What happens if the real director of the film appears and sues Google/YouTube and the person who originally claimed to be the director of the video?

What happens if the director of international movies like the one above sees that this clip has gotten over 2 million views, and he wants his cut?

Why fix what's not broken?

One reason LAist gives LonelyGirl15 zero props is because it was fake. It was outted because it was a bad fake, and the only reason that anyone gave a crap was because it starred a somewhat attractive young lady. If YouTube goes through with paying people for uploading videos, we will get an unending amount of LonelyGirl15 wannabes, not to mention worse fakes, and just plain dumber videos whose only intention was to get visits, thus money.

YouTube is perfectly fine the way it is. It's handily beaten all comers without a good search engine, despite its mostly dull content, and in spite of its decision not to include adult content.

We realize Google has billions burning a hole in their pockets. We just don't think this is a good place to invest all of that new money. How about irrigating Africa or something.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right