Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LADWP Accidentally Overcharged Its Customers By At Least $67.5 Million
Water and power at the DWP building. (Photo by RV Sun via LAist Pool of Photos on Flickr)
()
On Friday evening, a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge issued preliminary approval to a proposed class-action settlement for customers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) who were overcharged at least $67.5 million following the introduction of a new billing system in September of 2013, reports the L.A. Daily News.
The class-action lawsuit alleges that a faulty billing system designed by PricewaterhouseCoopers was responsible for consistently over-billing the utility agency's customers. If fully approved, the lawsuit will pave the way for LADWP customers to receive a full refund of the amount they were overcharged, and will require LADWP to restructure its flawed billing system.
"LADWP exists for the people of our city—nothing is more important than giving customers the highest quality water, electric and customer service... With the judge's ruling today, we've finally taken an important step forward in making our customers whole... Next year, customers will receive refunds for every penny they were overcharged, and that process will be carried out with rigorous oversight from both the court and our independent monitor," said Mayor Eric Garcetti in a statement to the Daily News.
After LADWP installed the PricewaterhouseCoopers designed billing system, customers almost immediately began finding bogus fees and overcharges on their utility bills. Four separate individuals filed class-action lawsuits against LADWP, all of which were eventually merged into one single case, according to KPCC.
Support for LAist comes from
Though the suit was (and continues to be) an uphill battle for those attempting to get the utility agency to agree to a settlement and repayment, the Friday ruling establishes, more or less, that repayment will happen at some point in the near future. According to a website set up by attorneys representing LADWP customers, a hearing has been set for mid-December to discuss customer notification.
Once that hearing happens, customers should be able to expect notification of how much they'll receive back from LADWP in a written letter mailed, if everything works out, within 90 days. Customers should expect a refund by Summer of 2017, according to the L.A. Daily News.
It's also possible that the $67.5 million value will increase in the coming weeks as well, as more information about the agency's failed billing system is analyzed. LADWP and the City of Los Angeles, meanwhile, are also suing PwC over the failed system in hopes the accounting firm will compensate the agency for its losses.
Remember, the PwC people were the DWP contractors caught (allegedly) spending taxpayer money on prostitutes and parties in Las Vegas.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake. -
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
Best of LAist