With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
How veterans are reacting to Marine deployment in LA: ‘The impact is so negative’

Some 700 active-duty Marines have been deployed to Los Angeles amid widespread protests against the recent immigration sweeps.
The move comes even as L.A. Mayor Karen Bass says the troops are not needed, LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell raises concerns around coordination, and state Attorney General Rob Bonta seeks to block the deployment of Marines and federalized National Guard troops in L.A.
Some federal officials have defended the deployment. During a press conference Wednesday, Bill Essayli, United States Attorney for the Central District of California, said President Trump had “no choice but to call in the National Guard.”
“Our agents and our law enforcements were overwhelmed and we are grateful for the help of the National Guard that we’ve received,” Essayli said.
Still, California officials have asked a federal court for a temporary restraining order to block the deployments. A judge is slated to hear arguments today.
Concerns over the use of troops
Local veterans of both the Marine Corps and Army said that the deployment of active-duty troops to L.A. raises concerns for them.
“In my professional opinion, this is not a situation that warrants calling in active-duty Marines,” Gary Barthel, a retired lieutenant colonel who served 20 years with the U.S. Marine Corps, told LAist. Barthel is also managing partner of the Military Law Center in San Diego.
“Constitutionally, as a nation, we do not want to use active duty troops, deploy them against American citizens and others residing in our country. Because the impact is so negative. It makes it appear that the United States of America is a battleground,” Barthel said.
He added that he was also concerned the deployment would politicize the military toward the Trump Administration's goals.
“For me it appears that this is somewhat of a power grab by the administration in testing the waters as to how far they can go,” Barthel said.
In his experience, Barthel said most veterans he hears from don’t think the deployment is a worthwhile endeavor.
'It's an overreach'
Eric Goepel of Bellflower, a veteran of the U.S. Army who did two deployments in Iraq, said the deployment represents a militarization of what should be domestic or federal law enforcement functions.
“It’s an overreach most certainly,” he told LAist.
A member of the veteran group Common Defense, Goepel said he plans to attend a local “No Kings” rally in Long Beach. On Saturday, the same day as the Trump Administration’s military parade in celebration of the Army’s 250th anniversary — and Trump’s birthday—- organizers around the country are planning to protest what they see as presidential overreach and corruption.
The military celebration in Washington, D.C. is estimated to cost $45 million. Defense officials have said the deployment of Marines and National Guard in Los Angeles could see a price tag of around $134 million.
Goepel said he doesn’t believe that’s money well-spent. He points to studies which have shown that in 2020, nearly a quarter of active duty military experienced food insecurity at some point during the previous year.
“A lot of those folks basically can’t provide proper nutrition to their family, meanwhile they’re watching the federal government spend hundreds of millions of dollars ... on the things that are, at best, tangential to the actual mission of the military,” Goepel said.
Listen
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
-
This is the one time you can do this legally!
-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
-
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week.
-
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency.
-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.