Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Wants To Require Fingerprint Background Checks For Uber And Lyft Drivers
Ride on, ride on, ride on (Photo by Mike Coppola/Getty Images)
()
Drivers using ride-sharing apps in Los Angeles may soon have to undergo background checks with fingerprint scans—just as taxi drivers do.Mayor Eric Garcetti and two city council members have asked permission from the California Public Utilities Commission to start a pilot program requiring fingerprint-based checks for Uber and Lyft drivers, reports the L.A. Times. In a letter sent to the commission—which regulates the ride-sharing services—Garcetti, along with Councilman Paul Krekorian and council president Herb Wesson, proposed that ride-hailing drivers undergo fingerprinting checks against the state's Department of Justice screening system in order to work within city limits. The program would also include van, shuttle and limousine drivers.
Currently, Uber and Lyft require drivers to undergo background checks using social security numbers, but critics argue that those can be falsified and not reveal possible criminal histories of drivers. In the letter, Garcetti and the council members say that the "opaque" nature of the current practices "is a cause for concern for the riding public."
Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation requires taxi drivers to submit to Live Scan fingerprinting background checks, and certain charges or convictions will be flagged for review. The letter argues that this is "so that their provided identification can be cross-checked against law-enforcement databases for the purpose of determining a driver's criminal history and verifying driver identity."
The city officials also want Uber and Lyft to provide information about which applicants have been rejected and why, and to know if current drivers would be approved under a fingerprint-based system.
Support for LAist comes from
In an email to the Times, an Uber spokesman said that the companies background check "stacks up well against the alternatives," though he didn't directly address the letter. While a Lyft spokeswoman said drivers undergo "a comprehensive screening process," which includes a background check, as well as an "in-person session where their credentials are confirmed."
Last year, the Times revealed that four Uber drivers who were cited at LAX turned out to have criminal histories that would have prevented them from driving a city taxi.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars. -
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
Best of LAist