Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Beverly Hills Hotel Wars: Beverly Hilton Doesn't Want A New Hotel Across The Street

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

So this is what a street fight is like in Beverly Hills.

One one side of the ring, you have the historic Beverly Hilton on 9876 Wilshire Boulevard. On the other end, there's the Dalian Wanda Group from China, which is fighting to erect a new hotel right across the street from the Beverly Hilton.

The Hilton is not having any of it, reports Variety. On Tuesday night, several representatives from the Hilton hotel testified at a Beverly Hills Planning Commission meeting where Wanda's proposed hotel was being discussed. Ted Kahan, the president of Oasis West Realty, the corporate parent of the Beverly Hilton, said that a new hotel would be "an undeniable danger to the future of the Beverly Hilton."

Wanda had purchased the property in 2014. Currently, the area has been approved for a 235-unit condominium, but Wanda wants to get permission to build instead a complex—called One Beverly Hills—with 193-unit condos and 134-room luxury hotels.

With the battle lines drawn, both sides have hired top-dog lawyers. The Hilton has secured the aid of George Mihlsten of Latham & Watkins. And Wanda has gotten Dale Goldsmith of Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac on their side. Mihlsten had helped get the Staples Center (a $350 million project) built. And Goldsmith worked on USC's 5 million square-foot master plan for its University Park Campus. So yeah, you know it's a big case when these guys are called in.

The lawyers had also showed up at Tuesday's meeting to duke it out. Mihlsten said that the Wanda project would clog up traffic and "be a transportation disaster for the Hilton and the community." Score one for the Mihlsten!

Goldsmith countered by saying that Hilton's concerns of overcrowding is hypocritical, as they are gearing to add a 26-story condominium tower. Oof! Goldsmith is back in the lead!

Sponsored message

Wanda, one of China's largest real estate developers, has momentum on their side. They have $139 billion in assets, and have been branching into other ventures such as sports and entertainment, reports Variety. Aside from purchasing Legendary Entertainment earlier this year, they also have a 20% stake in Atlético Madrid, one of the globe's most respected soccer clubs, and a majority share in AMC theaters.

The Hilton, on the other end, has history. The hotel was opened in 1955 and as noted by The Hollywood Reporter, has seen its share of history-defining moments. It was where Nixon gave a sad-sap press conference after he'd lost the California gubernatorial race ("You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore."). It was where undercover cops busted Heidi Fleiss' prostitution ring. And, sadly, it was where Whitney Houston had passed away in her hotel room. The hotel has also been the home to the Golden Globes since 1961.

The Planning Commission will hold another hearing on the project on Sept. 19. This battle looks like it'll be a doozy, with a mega hotel company throwing punches at an overseas real estate titan. We imagine it'll turn out like this:

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today