Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
With Looming Executive Order, Immigrant Advocates Say Trump Is Using Coronavirus To Restrict Immigration

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
President Donald Trump is expected to issue an executive order further halting immigration, citing a need to protect the jobs of American citizens.
But local immigrant advocates said they believe the administration is using the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse to further tighten already strict immigration rules.
Trump said during a White House coronavirus task force briefing Tuesday afternoon that the forthcoming order would temporarily affect people who are seeking legal residency, including employment-based green cards.
Los Angeles immigration attorney Alma Rosa Nieto said employers in L.A. are worried that the restrictions could prevent some of their workers from staying permanently in the United States.
"Employees that are maybe trying to get a green card, I think their hopes and dreams have been demolished," said Nieto, a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Trump said Tuesday that the forthcoming order would be in effect for 60 days but could be extended and that "any extension or modification will be evaluated by economic conditions at the time."
He also said the order would not affect those entering on a temporary basis.
DON'T MISS ANY L.A. CORONAVIRUS NEWS
Get our daily newsletters for the latest on COVID-19 and other top local headlines.
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
The New York Times reported that the administration does not plan to block guest workers, such as temporary farm and tech industry workers, as a concession to business groups that were upset after Trump tweeted late Monday that he would "temporarily suspend immigration."
U.S. citizens would still be allowed to sponsor their spouses and children, the Times reported, but other green card seekers would be blocked.
The Trump administration has long sought to curtail family-sponsored migration. A 2017 Trump-backed bill known as the RAISE Act sought to eliminate most categories of family-sponsored immigrant visas, with the exception of spouses and minor children.
It's unclear if U.S. citizens will be able to sponsor their adult children once an order is signed and takes effect, and this has naturalized citizens like 78-year-old Jose Amaya worried.
In December, Amaya filed a petition for his eldest son, 58, to come to the United States from Mexico. Amaya, who became a U.S. citizen last year, said he suffers from diabetes, needs eye surgery, and would like for his eldest son to be his caretaker.
"My fear is that really, I need the support of my son very much," Amaya said in Spanish. "Because I am getting older, I am a senior citizen, and my son is the one who can help me. This is my fear, that now we won't be able to do anything."
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the Trump administration has put in place numerous immigration restrictions, such as pausing refugee admissions, freezing some visa services and limiting travel across the U.S.-Mexico border.
"It's definitely become more difficult for individuals to unify with family members," said Farida Chehata, managing attorney for immigrant rights with the Orange County office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "We've been seeing policies that are very problematic for a while now, but what's happening with this pandemic is that this administration has been able to exploit this public health crisis to be able to really curtail the rights of immigrants."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.