Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,535 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Surprised? City Council Delays Vote on Pot Shops Ordinance

medical_marijuana_storefron.jpg
Photo by Katherine_hitt via Flickr

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

The Los Angeles City Council has once again opted to postpone a vote on a proposed action to curb the influx of medical marijuana clinics around town, reports the LA Weekly. In a meeting described as "raucous," the city's Planning Department showed "hurriedly created maps showing that only five of 137 pot shops envisioned under a City Council cap could remain at their current locations if the city adopts a buffer zone to keep them at least 500 feet from schools, youth centers, libraries, religious institutions and residential properties."The presentation brought about a strong reaction from those present, including "pro-medical marijuana advocates who booed many of the details presented by city planner Alan Bell." This map was apparently the first the Council had seen that actually indicated where permitted shops would be or not be if they adopted the "buffer zone" policy they have in mind.

The Weekly notes that the meeting also brought to light clearly "which council members were in favor of pot shops and which members were not," in reference to Bill Rosendahl's advocacy of the drug's medicinal value due to his own late lover's use of it, and Eric Garcetti's argument in favor of giving "special consideration" to the shops opened before the current moratorium was put in place. In contrast, Richard Alarcon was booed for his anti-pot shop comments, and Greig Smith "noted that pot shops have become crime magnets yet the City Council is being shown zoning maps instead of maps from the Los Angeles Police Department showing the crime hot spots."

The City Council is due to take the issue up again January 13th.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today