Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Controversy to Increase Speed Limits in the Valley Continues
Three streets are under consideration for speed limit increases | View Speed Limit Increases in The Valley in a larger map
The proposal to increase speed limits on two Valley streets was stalled by the City Council's Transportation committee this afternoon after concerns were brought up by the public and politicians alike. "I've got serious concerns with moving this forward," stated Councilman Paul Koretz, whose district includes the two streets in question, Riverside Drive and Chandler Boulevard, which could be raised to 40 and 45 miles per hour, respectively.
Councilman Paul Koretz, whose district also includes the streets at different points felt the same. "In a broader sense, this is a challenge to all of us on council because of state law that limits the ability of police to use radar," he said, referencing a state law that requires cities seeking the legal use of radar enforcement to survey street speeds and set the limit at the 85th percentile.
Support for LAist comes from
For radar enforced roads, speed surveys must be done every seven years (there is a one-time three-year extension). Once the time limit expires for a street, police officers cannot use radar and it is a policy of the LAPD to not use other dangerous techniques such as matching speed to catch drivers. As for Riverside and Chandler, it is no longer legal for police to use radar until the new speed limits are set.
LAPD officer Troy Williams opined that there is a misconception in the public dialogue with the issue. The speeds are already raised because that's what people are already doing.
Traffic Engineer Brian Gallagher added that one study concluded that drivers are going to drive the limit they're comfortable with, regardless of posted limits. The study also found that if you set the posted limit not at what people are comfortable with, it increases accidents.
However, activist Stephen Box believes this approach is outdated. "We're pursuing a 50-year-old paradigm. It's an old paradigm with one tool in the tool box," he told the committee during public comment. "We've debated the science and the opinion. We simply ask you to embrace a philsophy of safety. Let's accept the fact that this is a flawed process."
Box, along with Dorothy Le of the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition said there is another option, which city staff never brought up: traffic calming. "Santa Monica has been able to slow some streets down using similar policies,' noted Le of techniques like road diets, bulb outs and traffic circles.
The proposals for the two streets were continued to committee's next meeting on February 10th. A request to increase and decrease portions of Beverly Glen Boulevard in Sherman Oaks to formalize the speed limit to 30 miles per hour was approved.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist