Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Sheriff's Spokesman Can't Seem to Get It Straight: Is the Natalie Wood Case Open or Not?

natalie-wood-bw.jpg
Natalie Wood
()

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Lately, we haven't been hearing much about the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department investigation into Natalie Wood's drowning death off the coast of Catalina, which was reopened with great fanfare last November.That is until yesterday when someone from Access Hollywood asked the Sheriff's spokesman Steve Whitmore about whatever happened to that Natalie Wood case. AccessHollywood.com first reported that Whitmore said the investigation was "now in the LASD cold case file and not going anywhere." Later that same day Whitmore told Access Hollywood it actually is "open and they are working on it." The article does not explain why the department gave two totally contradictory statements in one day.

But it's worth noting that the department's motivation for reopening the case have been murky from the get-go. The sheriff's department has said that the case was reopened in part because of a media blitz by author Marti Rulli and Dennis Davern, the captain of the yacht Wood was on before she mysteriously drowned. Together the pair co-wrote "Goodbye Natalie, Goodbye Splendour," which was published two years ago. Around the 30th anniversary of Wood's death last November, "48 Hours" did a segment on Davern's statements produced in conjunction with Vanity Fair. At the time that the sheriff's department reopened the case it said that it still considered her death accidental, but offered few more details about the reasons it was opening the cold case.

Back in November when the case was reopened, the Los Angeles Times editorial writers put forth their own theory:

The mystery is why the Sheriff's Department is reopening the case at all. And maybe we can solve that one. Not only is the 30th anniversary of Wood's death approaching — along with magazine and TV coverage — but the new investigation comes at a time when Sheriff Lee Baca has reason to want to change the subject from himself. He faces a federal probe into allegations of brutality and misconduct by deputies in the county jails. Federal authorities have also launched a civil rights investigation into allegations of racial discrimination by sheriff's deputies in the Antelope Valley.
Support for LAist comes from

At the time, everyone seemed to have their own theory about why the case was reopened. We got quite a few bizarre e-mails (the Enquirer had its own theory, but it wouldn't publish it). The hubbub around the 30th anniversary of Wood's death has died down, but still the sheriff's department isn't putting out a totally straight answer.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist