Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

L.A. Times' 'Quakebot' Erroneously Reports Massive Earthquake From 1925

Earthquake_Fault.jpg
(Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

At about 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, there came news from the L.A. Times about a massive earthquake. The report said that a 6.8 temblor had just struck the Santa Barbara area. To give you a sense of scope, the 1994 Northridge Quake was of a magnitude 6.7— this one was bigger.

The event spelled great danger, but...no one felt anything. Outside, the birds kept chirping, and motorists sat idly in gridlock traffic. Everything was as usual. What happened? It turned out that "Quakebot," the Times' automated earthquake reporter (it actually gets its own byline), had relayed a bit of false information from the U.S. Geological Survey. That 6.8 quake had actually happened in 1925.

Wait, what?

Let's backtrack. Quakebot is actually an algorithm that was designed by a journalist and programmer for the L.A. Times, according to Slate. Whenever the USGS sends out a report of a quake that's above a certain size, Quakebot takes that data and plugs it into a pre-written template, and voila, we have an article about an earthquake.

Except something went wrong this time around. The Times retracted the story about the 6.8 quake almost as soon as it'd gone up. "The quake appears to have been from 1925," said the Times.

The problem seems to have started when the USGS sent out a false alert:

Sponsored message

And here's the report itself:

The Times later explained what had happened: it turns out that a Caltech staffer, while trying to correct the location of the 1925 quake, had accidentally sent out an alert for that quake in the process. Those with a keen eye (or those who bothered to read the report) would have seen that the quake was described as happening in 2025, which would have aroused suspicions immediately. After the report was sent out, Quakebot did its job and relayed it back to us feeble humans. So that's how it all went down.

Anyway, there's no massive earthquake! We'll all having an OK day, though it may be a rough one for a certain non-sentient reporter.

LAist reached out to the USGS, but no one was immediately available for comment.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right