Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Problem with Confidential LAPD Files Out in the Open Addressed

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.

lapdstorage.jpeg


Unsecured files next to a parking garage staircase | Photo by the Los Angeles Police Protective League

Remember last October when the LAPD's union busted the department for storing confidential files in common spaces like hallways and parking garages with no security (see photos here)? Documents with social security numbers, serial numbers, search warrants, arrestee booking information and more was there for the taking. Even some boxes were marked “Evidence” and “Analyzed Evidence."

Word spread through the media and the police commission quickly asked for a report "documenting the circumstances that lead to the problem along with the Office of Operations' corrective and preventive measures that were put into place," wrote Chief Charlie Beck in a memo to the commission with that report attached (.pdf), which was finalized in December.

Unsecured files were found in three stations--Northeast, Southwest and Wilshire--with most records scheduled to be destroyed. However, files at Northeast were supposed to be, and eventually were, sent to a secured storage facility.

Reasons for the screw-up was mainly space capacity--when new records came in, they ousted older records, which should have been picked up for storage or destruction. "Had the Areas adhered to the yearly records retention schedule and shipped older documents for destruction the number of records retained by the Areas would not have exceeded their storage capacity," explained the report. "However, it is important to note that Area Records Department-wide are operating with a number of vacant positions that undoubtedly contributed to this problem."

The solution? Area Records Coordinators and the office in charge of records retention will work closely to make sure the job is done right from now on.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right