Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The LAPD Has Drones Now But Won't Use Them Until After Reviews, Public Hearing
A Draganflyer X6 remote-controlled miniature helicopter (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The Los Angeles Police Department announced Friday that they got two free drones from their Seattle counterparts. LAPD got the Draganflyer X6 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles from the Seattle Police Department free because Seattle PD had paid for the drones with government money, City News Service reported. Seattle’s mayor and police chief decided not to use the drones after public outcry about possible intrusions into privacy, The Seattle Times reported.
LAPD says the drones aren’t going to be used just yet. There’s going to be a review both internally and by the Board of Police Commissioners as well as public hearings before anything happens. LAPD said they’d only be used in certain situations:
“The review would only consider narrow and prescribed uses to prevent imminent bodily harm, for example, a hostage situation or barricaded armed suspect.”
According to LAPD Commander Andrew Smith, “we saw this as an opportunity to possibly incorporate them in very narrow, high-risk kinds of things our SWAT guys do from time to time.”
The ACLU of California said in a statement that the LAPD were right to be transparent about receiving the drones and urged implementing policies to make sure privacy is protected. ACLU staff attorney Peter Bibring told KPCC: “The threat from drones is particularly severe when coupled with other technologies like facial recognition, the use of infrared night vision cameras, or even listening devices.”
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
