With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The LAPD Has Drones Now But Won't Use Them Until After Reviews, Public Hearing

The Los Angeles Police Department announced Friday that they got two free drones from their Seattle counterparts. LAPD got the Draganflyer X6 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles from the Seattle Police Department free because Seattle PD had paid for the drones with government money, City News Service reported. Seattle’s mayor and police chief decided not to use the drones after public outcry about possible intrusions into privacy, The Seattle Times reported.
LAPD says the drones aren’t going to be used just yet. There’s going to be a review both internally and by the Board of Police Commissioners as well as public hearings before anything happens. LAPD said they’d only be used in certain situations:
“The review would only consider narrow and prescribed uses to prevent imminent bodily harm, for example, a hostage situation or barricaded armed suspect.”
According to LAPD Commander Andrew Smith, “we saw this as an opportunity to possibly incorporate them in very narrow, high-risk kinds of things our SWAT guys do from time to time.”
The ACLU of California said in a statement that the LAPD were right to be transparent about receiving the drones and urged implementing policies to make sure privacy is protected. ACLU staff attorney Peter Bibring told KPCC: “The threat from drones is particularly severe when coupled with other technologies like facial recognition, the use of infrared night vision cameras, or even listening devices.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.