Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
'Safe Streets Bill' Heads to Committee Hearing
()
All over the Valley (and soon spreading into Hollywood, Westwood and beyond), speed limits are increasing and not because there is a need for better traffic flow. "Because of state law, when local government wants to use radar enforcement, they have to use up- to-date traffic surveys to justify the posted speed limit," Assemblyman Paul Krekorian, who this year introduced a bill to change the law to help protect cyclists and pedestrians, explained at a press conference this afternoon.
"Unfortunately," Krekorian continued, "these traffic surveys take into account the average speed that drivers are using on that street, which means that as speeders continue to increase the average speed limit, local government feels forced to increase the posted speed limit. Of course, as soon as that happens, the speeders go a little faster and it's an endless cycle of mayhem on our streets."
Wendy Greuel, the city's current chair of the Transportation committee is not thrilled with the law that was originally intended to protect people from police speed traps. "If 85% of the people were driving on Burbank Boulevard at 65 miles per hour, we would have to raise the rate to 65 miles per hour on that street if we wanted to enforce the law by radar," she vented. "So we only have two choices--to raise it or not enforce the law."
Support for LAist comes from
()
And that's exactly why Greuel and others are supporting Krekorian's bill, AB 766, or the "Safe Streets Bill." If passed, it would give local governments more flexibility by allowing them the chance to retain--but not lower--speed limits when a new speed survey is conducted by holding a public hearing and proving that higher speeds would not improve the flow of traffic.
22 years ago, Councilmember Richard Alarcon's son was killed in a car crash on Victory Blvd. The other car was going 97 miles per hour. "It irks me to think that with a driver driving 97 miles per hour, that their speed would be calculated into any kind of formula whatsoever, that's ludicrous, that's ridiculous," he said in frustration. "We in our history have become an auto oriented society in regards to our transportation systems," he noted. "We neglect the needs of pedestrians, we neglect the needs of cyclists and we need to get back to the day when everything is equal in terms of fairness, in terms of public safety."
AB 766 will be heard in the Assembly's Transportation Committee next Monday. Safe streets activist Stephen Box and his wife Enci are some of the people traveling up to testify in support of the bill. Box explains that streets are full of "high-performance vehicles with low-performance drivers" who are not skilled enough to handle the ever-increasing posted speed limits.
On the other side, the California Highway Patrol, the Teamsters and the Auto Club oppose this bill for various reasons.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars. -
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
Best of LAist