Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Merck Pulls Arthritis Drug Vioxx from Market
Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. is pulling its arthritis drug Vioxx from the market after a study confirmed earlier concerns that it raises the risk of heart problems, including heart attacks and stroke. Vioxx is currently used by 2 million people worldwide and has been used by more than 84 million people around the world, according to Merck.
The drug was approved by the FDA in May 1999 for the relief of osteoarthritis and menstrual pain, and later for treatment of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. At that time, studies didn't show any significant risk of heart disease related to Vioxx. But data from a study started by Merck last year showed a doubling in the rate of cardiovascular problems, when compared with placebo. The problems appeared only after patients had been taking Vioxx for 18 months or more.
The FDA advises that patients who are currently taking Vioxx should contact physicians to discuss alternative treatments.
NPR Health Editor Joe Neel answers questions about today's withdrawal of Vioxx from the market.
Q: How dangerous is Vioxx?
A: The company that voluntarily withdrew Vioxx from the market, Merck, found that there was an elevated risk of heart problems for people taking a standard dose of Vioxx (25 mg per day). Technically, the risk of heart problems relative to people taking a placebo 1.9, which can be interpreted as a doubling of the risk. But a person's risk of a heart attack or stroke is relatively low. Double the risk is still means the chance of a cardiovascular event is still "small," according to the Food and Drug Administration.
Q: Why haven't we heard about this risk before?
A: There have been a few reports since 2000 suggesting that there may be heart problems associated with Vioxx. Merck and the Food and Drug Administration have been monitoring the situation. Today's surprise announcement comes from a study Merck was doing for a totally different reason. It was looking at 2,600 patients to see if Vioxx prevented such problems as colon polyps. The findings of an increased risk for heart problems were discovered by scientists monitoring safety in the study.
Q: What kinds of heart problems?
A: There was an increase in heart attacks and strokes for people taking 25 mg of Vioxx a day for 18 months or more. The study did NOT find problems in people who had taken Vioxx for a shorter period of time.
Q: What should I do if I'm taking Vioxx?
A: The Food and Drug Admininstration issued a Public Health Advisory to inform patients of Merck's action and to advise patients taking Vioxx to consult with a physician about alternative medications. (See the Web Resources on this page) These alternative medications might include drugs that are similar to Vioxx, like Celebrex or Bextra.
Q: Are Celebrex and Bextra safe?
A: Because Celebrex and Bextra are closely related to Vioxx, the FDA says it will now investigate whether these drugs cause the same problems as Vioxx. There's no evidence that that's the case right now. Other alternatives include older nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin. Some of these drugs have been associated with gastrointestinal, liver and kidney problems when used over the long term.
Q: Will the increased risk of heart problems go away when I stop taking Vioxx?
A: The FDA and Merck say that they don't know the answer to that. Merck will continue to follow patients in the study to see if there are any problems after they stop taking Vioxx.
Q: I remember my doctor saying that Vioxx was much better than the other drugs I was taking for arthritis and pain - better than high-dose aspirin or naproxen or ibuprofen.
A: Your doctor was acting on the best evidence at the time. Vioxx was the second member of a class of drugs called Cox-2 inhibitors. (The first was Celebrex; the other is Bextra.) These drugs were considered a major advance in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis because they did not cause stomach or intestinal problems like ulcers and bleeding. In fact, it appeared that the drugs might even protect people from digestive problems. That's why Merck was doing the study that led to today's withdrawal of Vioxx.
Q: How soon should I stop taking Vioxx?
A: Again, the FDA advises that you consult a physician. Merck is asking pharmacies to stop selling all dosages and formulations of Vioxx immediately, including the 12.5 mg and 50 mg doses.
Q: What if I have leftover medications? Vioxx isn't cheap.
A: You're right. One Web site I checked (drugstore.com) listed a 30-day supply of the 25-mg dose for $81.99.
Merck will reimburse patients for unused Vioxx. Patients seeking a refund should return any unused Vioxx tablets and oral suspension via regular U.S. mail to the following address:
ATTN: NNC Dept., Merck Order Fulfillment Center, 1645 Satellite Blvd., Duluth, GA 30097
Patients must include the following information when returning any unused Vioxx tablets and oral suspension:
1. Name, address and phone number
2. Unused product in its original pharmacy packaging
3. Pharmacy receipt corresponding to returned product
Merck says that patients will receive a full refund of the price paid as reflected on their pharmacy receipt, plus the cost of shipping via regular U.S. mail.
Q: Why didn't the FDA act faster?
The studies required by the FDA for approving a drug don't usually run as long as the study Merck was doing on colon polyps. So an effect of a drug that doesn't show up until 18 months after you've started taking it wouldn't have been noticed in the studies the FDA requires for approval.
Q: Why didn't Merck act faster?
Today's voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx from the market is an unusual move for a drug company. In many cases, companies wait for an order to recall a drug from the FDA, even after serious side effects are found. And a recall is not always the first response to reports of serious side effects. Though each case is different, the usual scenario is for the FDA and the manufacturer to agree on a warning label listing the risks. That's what happened when the first reports of heart problems were connected to Vioxx. In extreme cases, the FDA has tried to restrict sales of some prescription drugs to certain people. In this case, Merck acted voluntarily after seeing preliminary results of a large study it was doing. It notified the FDA, but there was no intervention by the government.
Copyright 2022 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.