Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

EPA Bans Pesticide Blamed for Bird Deaths

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Listen 0:00
Listen

RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

The Environmental Protection Agency has decided to ban a pesticide that's been used for decades and that has killed millions of birds and other wildlife.

NPR's Elizabeth Shogren reports that bird enthusiasts are delighted with the news.

ELIZABETH SHOGREN reporting:

How delighted are they? Listen to Michael Fry of the American Bird Conservancy.

Mr. MICHAEL FRY (American Bird Conservancy): The environmental community is overjoyed, and would really like to thank EPA for getting rid of this worst possible pesticide for the environment and for wildlife.

SHOGREN: Fry is a bird toxicologist. He first learned about the danger of the pesticide called carbofuran in the mid-1980s, when he was teaching at the University of California at Davis. Carbofuran was killing flocks of ducks that were grazing in rice fields. Eagles and other birds of prey were dying too, because they ate the duck carcasses.

Sponsored message

Mr. FRY: Carbofuran is the pesticide that has killed more birds and other wildlife in legal uses than any other pesticide used in the United States.

SHOGREN: Ten years ago the EPA banned the granular form of the pesticide, but it continued to let farmers use the liquid form on corn, alfalfa, cotton and a whole range of crops. The Agency took another look at the pesticide over the last several years and decided it was too toxic in any form. An EPA analysis found that if a flock of mallards fed on an alfalfa field treated with the pesticide, 92% of the ducks would die. It's also very toxic for bumble bees, small mammals and lots of other wildlife. Again, Michael Fry.

Mr. FRY: They get it in their body, and it's a nerve toxin. It causes paralysis, they have convulsions and they die.

SHOGREN: Jim Jones, who heads the EPA's pesticide program, says carbofuran is risky for people, too, especially farm workers.

Mr. JIM JONES (EPA): We do have evidence of sweating palms, nausea, sort of the next level up from diarrhea, possibly vomiting.

SHOGREN: But FMC Corporation, which sells the chemicals under the name Furadan, is upset about the EPA's decision. Michael Morelli is a toxicologist who works for the company. He says the pesticide can be used safely.

Mr. MICHAEL MORELLI (FMC Corporation): We think that the EPA really has exaggerated the risks associated with this chemical and underestimated the benefits, and we're willing to defend it on those grounds.

Sponsored message

SHOGREN: That's exactly the point the company will make during an administrative hearing that has to take place before the ban can go into effect. The decision to ban carbofuran is part of a decade-long review of pesticides. The EPA has been examining them to see if they're safe for children. Pesticide chief Jim Jones says that the agency has banned several chemicals and put restrictions on dozens of others.

Mr. JONES: Over this ten-year period there have been 230 chemicals that now we can say with a great deal of certainty are safe. They're safe for the general public in the diet, they're safe for children, they're safe for the people that work with them and they're safe for the environment.

SHOGREN: But maybe not safe enough, say environmentalists and some scientists inside the agency. Although they were thrilled by the EPA's decision on carbofuran, they say the government didn't adequately consider the dangers posed by many of the other pesticides. And as a result, it's leaving the public and the environment at risk.

Elizabeth Shogren, NPR News, Washington. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right