Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA Teachers Set To Strike Monday After Union Rejects New LAUSD Offer. No Weekend Talks Planned

Less than 60 hours before a possible strike, the union for L.A.'s teachers rejected the latest offer from the Los Angeles Unified School District, at the same time saying it had no plans to negotiate over the weekend.
Friday's development all but guarantees more than 30,000 LAUSD teachers, librarians, school nurses and counselors will walk off the job Monday for their first strike since 1989.
"If the district has a proposal that is demonstrably different between now and Monday, they can send that to us," United Teachers Los Angeles president Alex Caputo-Pearl told reporters.
But "short of a surprise like that ... ," he added, "get ready, because on Monday, we will be on strike for our students, for our schools, for our communities."
If a strike were to begin on Monday, Caputo-Pearl said it's doubtful the union would be available for talks the same day. He said officials would likely be too involved with strike activities on what would be the first day of picket lines.
Earlier Friday, LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner expressed exasperation with what he deemed UTLA's unwillingness to come forward with a meaningful counter-proposal.
"If they want a strike, they'll have a strike," Beutner said at a news conference. "We're doing everything we can to avoid it. We don't want it because we know the harm it will cause."

NEW OFFER, SAME RESULT
Here's what happened Friday.
School district administrators announced a new contract proposal for UTLA, offering to spend more money on a key sticking point in negotiations: class sizes.
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors also offered to pitch in to help settle the long-running dispute.
Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas said the county's governing board will soon consider a motion to forward "up to $10 million" in mental health funding for the school district.
According to Beutner, the funds would ensure every LAUSD elementary school has a nurse five days a week -- partially, but not fully, meeting a UTLA demand.
Ridley-Thomas said the proposed funding was intended to "close the gap so we can get on with the education agenda of L.A. Unified."
It wasn't enough for teachers union leaders, who were displeased by the way information was trickling out. The union's bargaining team found out about the district's new offer right as Beutner unveiled many of its details at a Friday afternoon press conference.
"What an atrocious set of values at the bargaining table," Caputo-Pearl said, "that you're going to come in and pass a proposal across the table while you're superintendent is presenting it to the media with his own spin."
Where things stand on key sticking points:
CLASS SIZE REDUCTION: $25 MILLION MORE
LAUSD officials proposed spending $130 million on targeted class size reductions in certain schools and grade levels, an increase from the $105 million it had previously offered.
JUST IN: @LASchools increases its class size offer to @UTLAnow, now spending $130M (up from $105M) and “no increase in any current class size.”#LAUSD will brief reporters on the offer in minutes. I’ll tweet updates. pic.twitter.com/0UXgxHsire
— Kyle Stokes (@kystokes) January 11, 2019
But the funding increase only covers one year -- which teachers union officials considered a major flaw.
THE CLASS SIZE 'SAFETY VALVE'
There was also no progress, both sides said, on a critical issue at stake: the district's broad discretion to raise class sizes.
LAUSD has offered to scrap a particular provision of the contract UTLA dislikes -- "Section 1.5" -- but has also said the language needs to be replaced. Reducing class sizes is expensive, so the district says it cannot entirely give up the flexibility to increase class sizes in the event of strain on the district's finances -- a safety valve, so to speak.
"It's not good enough for UTLA to say they don't like our proposal," Beutner said. "What's their proposal? We've agreed to get rid of 1.5. I think anyone would say we need something to make sure, we make sure we have some rules in place, whatever that might be."
UTLA leaders continue to fault LAUSD's negotiators for trying to lock in the current class sizes as a baseline. They want smaller class sizes than the district's current guidelines.
How much smaller would the union want to make class sizes? The union hasn't specified -- but they view making such a counter-offer to be pointless anyway.
Union officials point out that the district's discretion led directly to the status quo, which allows for as many as additional seven students per classroom in some schools and grade levels. That was put in place after LAUSD invoked its "Section 1.5" powers.
"Since they haven't been willing to move on 1.5," Caputo-Pearl said, "discussions of numbers don't mean anything because their numbers can just be jacked up and go through the roof because they have the unilateral authority to do so."
MORE ABOUT THE POSSIBLE STRIKE
- Why Is This Happening?
- Amid UTLA Negotiations, County Sounds Alarm About LAUSD's Budget
- LAUSD Parent Survival Guide
- LAUSD Parent Survival Guide (In Spanish)
NURSES: FIVE DAYS A WEEK IN ELEMENTARY
LAUSD had previously offered to double the number of days a nurse would be available at each district middle school.
That step addresses a much broader UTLA demand: that every school in the district be staffed with a full-time nurse.
Now, with the infusion of $10 million from L.A. County, Beutner said the district will be able to guarantee full-time nursing services at the elementary level.
Caputo-Pearl was skeptical how far this money would go toward meeting union demands.
"The number of additional nurses that they're talking about, around 150," Caputo-Pearl said, "would not provide full-time nurses at all schools ... We've got over 900 schools."
Supervisor Ridley-Thomas said Friday this funding would come from the county's Department of Mental Health. But the motion he authored with fellow Supervisor Hilda Solis also calls on two other county departments -- Public Health and Health Services -- to explore whether they could also pitch in.
And that funding would just be for one year.
The supervisors are set to consider the motion on Tuesday.

HOW MUCH STATE FUNDING IS LAUSD DUE?
The district was able to sweeten its offer after Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled a new state budget proposal Thursday, which included at least $3 billion in new funding for K-12 education statewide.
"Every nickel that we're receiving, we're putting in our classrooms," Beutner told reporters.
Beutner told reporters Friday that LAUSD's previous contract offer to the union assumed some increase in ongoing state funding for public schools, although they hadn't counted on getting quite as much as the governor ultimately proposed.
"We had assumed already getting to 1,000 [new] educators," he said. "We expected the state revision to be a positive one."
Caputo-Pearl union officials spoke with Newsom's budget staff and were told LAUSD stood to gain at least $140 million in state money "on top of what's already expected" -- meaning he believes the district ought to have more ongoing state funding to spend.
UPDATES:
10:15 p.m.: This article was updated throughout with additional details and quotes.
This article was originally published at 5:37 p.m.
Hey, thanks. You read the entire story. And we love you for that. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you, not advertisers. We don't have paywalls, but we do have payments (aka bills). So if you love independent, local journalism, join us. Let's make the world a better place, together. Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.