Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Some St. Louis Rams Season Ticket Holders Will Get To Keep Their Seat Rights In Los Angeles
The Rams may have won against Seattle on Sunday, but they weren't so lucky Wednesday, when a federal judge ruled against them, and in favor of the St. Louisians who had purchased personal seat licenses while the team was still in Missouri. U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr. ruled that some of those PSLs (there were two different contracts) are still valid despite the move, meaning that their holders retain the right to purchase season tickets here in L.A. The Rams will have to refund deposits for the others, although the amount has not yet been specified, according to Fox 2 St. Louis.
The Rams returned to Los Angeles this year after 21 seasons in the Gateway City. Approximately 46,000 fans had PSLs at the time of the switch, and multiple PSL-related lawsuits were filed after the Rams announced their move. Those three lawsuits were later consolidated into a single case.
PSLs, as they are known, guarantee fans the right to purchase season tickets for a particular seat in a stadium. It's a one-time fee, and then tickets still have to be purchased on top of it every year.
The lawsuits argued that the PSLs were supposed to have allowed their holders to be able to purchase tickets through the 2024 season, and that the move to L.A. rendered them valueless nine years early, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
The St. Louis Rams first started selling PSLs in 1995, the year they moved to St. Louis from L.A. Those PSLs would "entitle the purchaser to buy one season ticket per year in the designated section of the stadium (now known as the Edward Jones Dome at America’s Center) through the 2024 season," according to the lawsuit. Though prices varied depending on where in the stadium the seats were located, the average was $2,085—meaning that after selling 46,000 initial PSLs, the Rams may have made as much as $96 million, again, according to the lawsuit.
According to another Post-Dispatch article, there were two separate types of PSLs sold, some through Rams ticketing agent, FANS Inc., and others sold directly by the Rams. Although the contracts for each differ slightly, they both stipulate that the Rams must “use its best efforts” to provide seats for PSL holders if they move to a different venue. This is why there are two different classes of PSLs, and where things get a little more complicated, as the Post-Dispatch explains:
The judge ruled that people who bought PSLs from FANS cannot buy season tickets because the FANS contract clearly states that a Rams relocation would terminate the contract, thus rendering the “best efforts” language moot. However, the Rams must “use its best efforts” to provide season tickets for people who bought PSLs directly from the team, because that particular contract never states the PSL agreement is terminated by relocation.
According to the L.A. Times, at least two other lawsuits on the topic are still pending.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.