Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Lawyers In LA Prepare For ‘Remain In Mexico’ Asylum Seekers As They Wait For Biden To End Trump-Era Program

Former President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” program is still in place despite June’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Biden administration may end it. As they wait for the legal process to sort itself out, groups in the Los Angeles area that provide immigrants with legal help are preparing to receive some of these asylum seekers.
The “Remain in Mexico” program has forced asylum seekers from various countries to wait across the border as their cases are adjudicated in U.S. immigration court. There are anywhere from several hundred to thousands of people in that situation, according to UC Davis immigration law professor Kevin Johnson.
The administration has yet to wind down the program, formally known as Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP. But if and when the asylum seekers under MPP are allowed to enter the U.S., legal service providers expect many will come to Southern California to wait as their cases are resolved.
“We definitely expect to have people … seeking to transfer their cases to the L.A. area, because we also have a higher concentration of service providers,” said Yolanda Martin, managing attorney for removal defense with the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles. “And so we are doing our best to get ready.”
Martin said her organization has beefed up staff and is trying to make room on attorneys’ calendars so they can take on MPP asylum seekers’ cases that are transferred to the L.A. area from border immigration courts. She said local families with relatives waiting in the program have reached out to her group.
“When it does happen, it’s going to be a lot of families, a lot of people that have been waiting,” she said.
But “when” remains a question.
In late June, the high court ruled against Texas and Missouri, which had alleged that the Biden administration acted illegally when it tried to end the program last year. In their 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court justices decided Biden had a legal right to end MPP and did not violate immigration law in doing so.
The justices sent the case back to the lower courts “for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.” Since then, the Biden administration has declined to end MPP, waiting for the lower courts to act.
In an emailed statement, the Department of Homeland Security said “we remain bound by the district court’s order to continue to implement MPP,” and that “DHS will continue reimplementing MPP in good faith, as is LEGALLY required until further action from the lower courts.”
This stance has infuriated immigrant advocates. Last month, more than 100 organizations sent a letter to the White House urging an end to the program. MPP has been criticized by immigrant advocates for exposing asylum seekers, many from Central America, South America, the Caribbean and elsewhere, to violent crime as they are forced to wait.
Johnson, the UC Davis professor, told LAist that if the Biden administration wanted to act more quickly to end MPP, it could.
“DHS has said that they're waiting for the lower courts to act, but the truth of the matter is, the Department of Homeland Security could file a motion seeking permission to dismantle or continue to dismantle MPP,” Johnson said.
He added that political timing could be one factor.
“One possibility is an abundance of caution,” Johnson said. “Another possibility is the political concern, in the year of midterm elections, with looking to be soft on border enforcement and immigration enforcement, generally. I think the Biden administration is acting very cautiously.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?