Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

LAUSD Again Fires Lawyer Who Blamed Teen For Having Sex With Teacher

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Never mind, everyone. The attorney who argued on behalf of L.A. Unified School District that a 14-year-old girl was somewhat to blame for having sex with a teacher twice her age will ultimately not be getting his gig with the district back. W. Keith Wyatt was canned by LAUSD in November of last year after making comments to KPCC about a 14-year-old girl's ability to consent to sex with her adult male teacher. His firm, Ivy, McNeill & Wyatt, was re-hiredlast month for five upcoming cases. However, in the face of backlash, LAUSD has fired Wyatt once again, the L.A. Times reports. While Wyatt will not be involved in any future LAUSD cases, it's not clear if LAUSD will continue to use other attorneys from the same firm. The district has worked with the firm for 28 years.

The case involved former LAUSD teacher Elkis Hermida, who was sentenced to three years in prison in 2011 for carrying on a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old female student, identified in court documents as "M.S." Hermida was 28 years old at the time. Though 18 is always the age of consent in a criminal case, it's not so in a civil case. LAUSD attorneys repeatedly argued against a civil suit filed by the girl’s family in 2013, saying that the girl consented to the sex and therefore was partly to blame.

"Making a decision as to whether or not to cross the street when traffic is coming, that takes a level of maturity and that's a much more dangerous decision than to decide, 'Hey, I want to have sex with my teacher,'" Wyatt told KPCC last November.

LAUSD lawyers also tried to bring up the girl's sexual history outside of Hermida, and tried to use the fact that she knew what the slang term "quickie" meant as evidence that she was not "a naïve person," according to The Atlantic. Wyatt also argued something more reasonable in court—that the district had no way of knowing about Hermida's behavior and therefore, was not liable.

Support for LAist comes from

A jury ultimately decided in LAUSD's favor. However, a court of appeal decided last month that there would be a new trial because the judge should not have allowed the jury to assign any blame to the student, and because of the admission of her sexual history in court.

The girl's lawyer, Holly Boyer, argued that Hermida had groomed the girl for abuse, first reaching out to her via social media when she was 13, then steering the conversations to sex. He eventually kissed her in his classroom before moving their encounters to nearby motels.

"People in positions of authority use their position to build relationships of trust and slowly introduce sex to get the child to acquiesce. To then point to the child and say 'you let it happen' is really crazy," Boyer said.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist