Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LAUSD Keeps Blaming Student For Having Sex With Teacher
L.A. Unified School District is still arguing that a 14-year-old girl was somewhat responsible for having a sexual relationship with her 28-year-old teacher. After firing a lawyer for comparing deciding to have sex with your older teacher to crossing the street, LAUSD is still trying to argue that an underage girl was somewhat to blame for the months-long sexual relationship her teacher carried on with her, the L.A. Times reports. Their reasons include that she lied to her parents in order to rendezvous with him, and elements of her past sexual history.
Elkis Hermida, 28, was a math teacher at Thomas Edison Middle School in Southeast L.A. In December of 2010, he began an inappropriate relationship with a 14-year-old female student that lasted for over six months. He was sentenced to three years in prison for lewd acts against a minor in July of 2011. In 2013, a jury threw out the girl's claims that the district was negligent and therefore responsible for her emotional damage, which led to an appeal.
The girl's lawyer, Holly Boyer, is arguing that putting blame on the girl completely dismisses the fact that Hermida "groomed" the girl to be abused. "Grooming" is a word that gets used a lot in cases of abuse, and for good reason. Many abusers have a history of prepping their victims, first by gaining their trust then slowly introducing elements of sex or violence.
Boyer said that Hermida first approached the girl via social media when she was only 13. Soon, he began talking with her about sex, framing the conversation as "secrets." He then kissed her in his classroom, then moved the sexual relationship to area motels.
"People in positions of authority use their position to build relationships of trust and slowly introduce sex to get the child to acquiesce. To then point to the child and say 'you let it happen' is really crazy," Boyer said.
Boyer also faults Judge Lawrence Cho for allowing LAUSD to bring up the girl's past sexual history, though the district claims that the jury didn't consider any of that and that their decision was based on the idea that the district wasn't negligent because they didn't know about Hermida's actions. Boyer counters that bringing up the girl's sexual history influenced the case.
In the previous civil suit proceedings, LAUSD lawyers argued that the girl, although 14, consented to the sex. They argued that the family was suing because they wanted money, not because the girl was suffering from emotional distress. One LAUSD lawyer, W. Keith Wyatt, told KPCC that, "Making a decision as to whether or not to cross the street when traffic is coming, that takes a level of maturity and that's a much more dangerous decision than to decide, 'Hey, I want to have sex with my teacher.'" LAUSD fired him after making those statements.
While 18 is always the age of consent in a criminal case in California, a civil case is different. There are two state appellate court rulings where a lawyer was able to argue that a minor gave consent: a 2001 case where a 38-year-old father had a relationship with his own 16-year-old daughter, and a 2009 case where a 24-year-old supervisor of a Starbucks had a relationship with an employee who was 16.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.