Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Landlords Want Renters To Pay Their Own Water Bills

faucet.jpg
Tenants would collectively pay the building's water bill (Photo by Jari Hindstroem via Shutterstock)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.


Using the reasoning that we'd all be a little more conscientious with our water usage if we had to pay for it, some landlords are lobbying to get tenants to foot their own water bill. The Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles is pushing for renters to have to pay their own water bills, KPCC reports. As it stands, about 60 percent of L.A. renters have their water bill included in their rent. The Apartment Association is seeking to trade footing the water bill for a slight break in rent. Their reasoning, according to the group's Executive Vice President, Jim Clarke, is that "we want to find some way for [renters] to be incentivized to conserve water."

Tenants who live in rent-controlled buildings currently don't have to worry about landlords changing the terms of their leases. Under Los Angeles' current ordinance, a landlord could only push the water bill onto the tenant if it were an entirely new renter.

Earl Vaughn, a landlord with six properties, told KPCC that his tenants haven't been using any less water, despite the drought. He's worried that he'll get penalized for something he has no control over, and said he has no desire to go around being the "water police" among his tenants. In one 7-unit Echo Park building, he says his annual water bill comes out to $5,000—more than the property tax.

If the Association's proposal were come to fruition, affected tenants could start seeing water bills in six months. Tenants would collectively pay the bill, with a third party figuring out much each renter owed based on unit size or other variables.

Larry Gross, who works with the tenant advocacy group Coalition for Economic Survival, told KPCC he thinks individual meters that calculated a tenant's actual water use would be better than having renters pay collectively, and that he thinks renters need more education on water conservation.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right