With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA Wants To Charge Illegal Pot Shops For The Work It Takes To Shut Them Down
Marijuana plants are seen inside a green house, on October 10, 2010 (David Buimovitch/AFP/Getty Images).
()
Property owners that rent to illegal pot shops may soon feel the wrath of the city.
The Los Angeles City Council moved forward Wednesday with a proposal that would charge those businesses, as well as the owners they rent from, for any activity related to shutting the businesses down, including costs associated with LAPD enforcement, shutting off the retailers' utilities, and legal fees from the city attorney's involvement in such cases.
The motion, originally brought in April by Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez, passed unanimously.
Rodriguez said that she believes some property owners who rent to illegal cannabis businesses have been "skirting the law" and "trying to make fast money," and that some may even be in on the take.
Support for LAist comes from
"What we have found is that many are complicit in the business themselves," she said. "So we are going to shut them down, and we are gonna give them the bill."
Rodriguez also compared the effort to clearing brushes that may pose a fire danger.
"If the city has to go out at their cost to do brush clearance, the property owners get the bill," she said. "It's with the same approach that I am looking to make sure that taxpayers aren't going to be held liable for public safety hazards that are being created by property owners."
The proposal is now in the city attorney's hands, to draft an ordinance that would allow L.A. to begin recouping costs.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
Best of LAist