Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

LA, SaMo Two of the Most Expensive Cities for Businesses

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

'Tis the season for Top Ten lists, but this one--the 14th annual Kosmont-Rose Institute Cost of Doing Business Survey released by the Rose Institute of State & Local Government at Claremont McKenna College--gives our fair city more of dubious honor. Once again, Los Angeles ranks among the "10 most expensive places in the country to do business," reports the Daily News.

The survey takes a comparative look at over 400 cities in the nation, "based on the array of taxes and fees each imposes. They include sales, utility, income, property, and business taxes." However, the released information does not give a numerical ranking, but rather a top and bottom ten. According to Yahoo! "The ten most expensive cities in 2008 (in alphabetical order) are: Akron, OH; Chicago, IL; Clarksburg, WV; Jersey City, NJ; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; Newark, NJ; Philadelphia, PA; San Francisco, CA; and Santa Monica, CA."

Why so pricey here? It has a lot to do with our tax and fee structure, history of business relations, and the realtor's mantra: location, location, location. This year's survey revealed that cities located on the coast or the Great Lakes were more expensive than those inland. The survey also "noted that the highest-cost cities, such as Santa Monica and Oakland, cluster around the aging urban cores, while newer bedroom communities in the outer suburbs charge developers for their growth and pass on the savings to businesses to stimulate their economies."

Unfortunately for Los Angeles and Santa Monica, the "most expensive" tag isn't likely to dissipate soon, in fact, it's expected to get worse.

Photo by jenn_jenn via Flickr

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today