Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. County Sheriff Opposes So-Called "Sanctuary State" Senate Bill
Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell (Photo via Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Facebook page)
()
In a letter acquired by the LA Times, LA County Sheriff Jim McDonnell has come out in opposition to Senate Bill 54, a bill introduced by Senate President pro Temp Kevin de León to prevent local and state policing agencies from using their resources to assist federal immigration enforcement. The so-called “sanctuary state” bill was introduced in December in response to President Trump’s escalating anti-immigration actions.
SB 54 states that “[i]mmigrants are valuable and essential members of the California community” and “[a] relationship of trust between California’s immigrant community and state and local agencies is central to the public safety of the people of California.” With this motivating philosophy, the bill would prevent local and state officials from inquiring into a person’s immigration status, giving federal immigration agencies information pertaining to an inmate’s immigration status, and making arrests based on civil immigration warrants, among other stipulations.
Sheriff McDonnell cites the pre-existing TRUST Act as reason not to enact SB 54, saying the act is sufficient in preventing “the unlawful over detention of those subjects of immigrations enforcement action.” SB 54 goes too far, in his opinion, because it would require federal officers to search for criminals within communities rather than making arrests outside correctional facilities. SB 54 allows for local and state agencies to collaborate with federal agencies only if the convicted person has a previous violent felony conviction, which Sheriff McDonnell believes is too lenient. In an interview with KABC, he claims it puts local and state officials in a “bad position on being able to communicate,” fearing it would “make our communities less safe.” This argument in opposition falls in line with similar arguments against the bill. At a recent press conference, Sen. Joel Anderson (R - San Diego) expressed concern by saying federal officials should look for violent criminals in prisons rather than in neighborhoods, according to the LA Times.
Sheriff McDonnell's opposition sits in contrast to widespread support for the bill from various organizations and individuals, including Mayor Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles County Supervisors Hilda Solis and Sheila Kuehl, and local and state activist groups. Mario Fuentes, of the community organization LA Voice, told LAist that he considers McDonnell’s opposition “part of an orchestrated campaign to spread fear and garner opposition,” claiming his statements are “nice lines to try and convince those who aren’t familiar with the issue.” Fuentes expressed his disappointment, saying “all [the communities] want is for the sheriff not to participate in the deportation machine.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The new ordinance applies to certain grocers operating in the city and has led to some self-checkout lanes to shutter. -
Children asked to waive right to see a judge in exchange for $2,500 -
There’s still a lot to be determined as the refinery, which supplies about one-fifth of Southern California's vehicle fuels, works to restore production and as data is collected. -
The FCC voted to end E-Rate discounts for library hotspot lending and school bus Wi-Fi. -
About half the Pacific Airshow’s 2025 lineup has been grounded because of the federal government shutdown. -
USC says it’s reviewing the letter also sent to eight other prestigious schools nationwide. California's governor vowed that any California universities that sign will lose state funding.
Best of LAist